misc.legal

Lucky225@2600.com (Lucky225) wrote in message news:<ee6fd48a.0402171827.71824425@posting.google.com>... > I was wondering if federal law or state law(in my case, California) > defines the term 'year' in any of it's codes. The reason I'm asking > is be

I know how much some of you hate hypotheticals, but please bare with me. This question is very important to me. I appreciate any input you can give. It is hard to find lawyers with an expertise in this area Facts: 1. Sam wants to start an online

"Christopher" <christo2004@comcast.net> wrote in message news:a7fd77c3.0402171719.2621937b@posting.google.com... > To whom it may concern, > > I am currently emailing this letter to various law firms in hopes of > retaining a practiced attorney. If

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:15:42 -0600, Steve Kraus <screen@SPAMBLOCKfilmteknik.com> wrote: >What would happen if OJ said, yeah, I did it? Probably nothing. Double jeopardy would bar any prosecution for the murders or anything related to the murder

"Mr. Krab" <mrkrab-remov@remov.comcast.net> wrote in message news:adednaiGCZLgfa_d4p2dnA@comcast.com... > If a person in the course of making harassing phone calls has threatened > to call HRS on the family receiving such calls, would it make sense f

"Lucky225" <Lucky225@2600.com> wrote in message news:ee6fd48a.0402171827.71824425@posting.google.com... > I was wondering if federal law or state law(in my case, California) > defines the term 'year' in any of it's codes. The reason I'm asking > is

On 17 Feb 2004 13:20:34 -0800, rpayne@mybluelight.com (Rich) wrote: >Laurie S. <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<k1ht201erljq434rmlsc1mvr7ohifrcul5@4ax.com>... >> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:06:10 GMT, Steve_sullivan >> <steve_sullivan@nospa

"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message news:c0u1mp02sgk@enews3.newsguy.com... > Joyce wrote: > > > Richard > > > Where do you get these idea's in that > > cruddy head of yours,? > > Joyce, quit playing around with informant and forge

"Joyce" <JoyceInGates@webtv.net> wrote in message news:23253-40323D80-457@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net... > Richard > > Where do you get these idea's in that > cruddy head of yours,? > > I grew up in Broolyn, NY, and live in a > mixed neighborho

> You mean other than the fact that he obliquely admitted as much ...? You know, if you don't want to look even dumber than you do you might try not using words incorrectly.

"I P Seldom" <BashfulBladder@urinal.org> wrote in message news:T2qYb.343148$na.503318@attbi_s04... > Tevion wrote: > > > "I P Seldom" <BashfulBladder@urinal.org> wrote in message > > news:UOpYb.342997$na.504060@attbi_s04... > > > >>fungus_nuts@ma

> I was wondering if federal law or state law(in my case, California) > defines the term 'year' in any of it's codes. The reason I'm asking > is because according to California Business and Professions code 25658 > no one can sell or furnish alcohol t

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:59:34 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > drink their own piss with you? http://www.tvwavs.com/wavs/Army_of_Darkness/-/jackspit.zip

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:59:34 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > >Ken burned you Poxie, go set yer toenails on fire you freak.

"Vitruvian" <vitruvian@globalfrequency.org> wrote in message news:700af493.0402171035.63723b3@posting.google.com... > > > > but yet if a lawyer tell a judge, thate reason you puch the offender in the > > > > nose, was beacuse you have an underlying

"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:40329674.5708F879@sprintmail.com... > JaBrIoL wrote: > > > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<40317D98.DE6E78CC@sprintmail.com>... > > > jabrio

veritas wrote: > I would refer you to the only official publication for United States ATC > controllers. It is called the FAAH 7110.65 and has been in use for more > than 30 years in it's current format. > > -- And you will find that it will have

HEY- CIA,FBI, NSA- "learn" a MORE with their "experiments " by using an infinite variety of subjects(victims) including victimizing real schizophrenics. "Martin F. Abernathy" <abemarf@aol.com> wrote in message news:f0f9ae7d.0402091542.2696300b@post

Although I'm not a lawyer,one would think that he could be charged with one or more crimes...other than what one(s) he was placed on trial for,assuming that the statute of limitations on that/those crime(s) hasn't expired. My hunch is that manslaugh

Hi I work for a consulting company (A). We signed an agreement with a bodyshop (B) to place our consultant at a large corporation (D). The bodyshop was also not a direct vendor to the large corporation. They again signed up with another bodyshop (C

Adjudicator <Adjudicator.Pro@God.Bless.America.Death.To.Al.Queda.Scum!> wrote in message news:29Z9QARC38034.1645949074@Gilgamesh-Frog.org: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Now we all knew that SLAP! Dumbass Jerk Min is a far right moron

In article <c0uh5o$6u4$2@stan.redhat.com>, Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >tjab wrote: >> In article <c0r863$1pc$3@stan.redhat.com>, >> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>>tjab wrote: >>> >>>>Bryant doesn't seem especia

Alan Minyard wrote: > On 14 Feb 2004 06:38:56 GMT, b2431@aol.com (B2431) wrote: > >>> From: "=> Vox Populi ©" vox@popu.li Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> >> >> >>> Pay attention, he's got no logbook entries for the time in question, >>> he wasn't flyin

2431 wrote: >> From: "=> Vox Populi ©" vox@popu.li Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> > > >> Pay attention, he's got no logbook entries for the time in question, >> he wasn't flying then as he was grounded for either failing, or >> refusing >> to take his

jls wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:40323584.406405D@worldnet.att.net... > > Well, the guy Cam is entitled to fair trial even if he's in a family with a > beer-sotted scoundrel. Anyway, what's his bon

Chas wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote > >>"[W]aht-trash"? Sorry, no. When he lived in Denver, he lived in an area on >>the south side known as "Cherry Hills". If you know ANYTHING about the south >>side of Denver, you

In article <140220041627569756%timcmay@removethis.got.net>, Tim May <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote: >I park outside, as my 2-car garage is way too valuable to waste just to >keep some rain off my car. What's rain?

rztalizer wrote: >>> keep em comin', Vox - yer a riot. >> >> You forgot the rest, you sycophantic fascist bootlicker: > > Whose boots do I supposedly lick, you illiterate little noisy pup? > *Sycophantic* doesn't seem to appear in any dictionary tha

Ken Smith wrote: > Uncle Samuel wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:55:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >> >>> Ted is petty, malicious, vindictive, a compulsive liar, and a >>> flaming hypocrite -- >> >> Sounds like you're describing > >

If a person in the course of making harassing phone calls has threatened to call HRS on the family receiving such calls, would it make sense for the threatened family to preemtively call HRS and let them know of this threat? Reporting of general ba

In article <995be351.0401201338.6b49dc8c@posting.google.com>, mill1223@yahoo.com wrote: > Am I morally obligated to do this? > In real life? > According to d&d alignment system? > Is this the appropriate way to deal with problem players?

Ken Smith wrote: > Chas wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> It's kind of like not liking Islam because some of the followers want to >>> blow you up to bring about their caliphate. In fact, it's a lot like >>> that. :P >> Except that you'd be hard

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 18:28:47 GMT, "Acharya" <acharya@hawaii.rr.com> in misc.legal, wrote the following: >You mean the BBC that recently admitted that they hyped up reports against >the Blair adminsitration and in which the their CEO resigned? Lik

Ken Smith wrote: > Teddi, get a @$#*in' grip!!!!! You are totally out of control, Dude! Ken, don't you have work to do? It is tax time already after all, isn't it? -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

No. NOT DOA!! The liberals will keep this garbage alive and in our faces for a long, long time! "Adjudicator" <Adjudicator.Pro@God.Bless.America.Death.To.Al.Queda.Scum!> wrote in message news:29Z9QARC38034.1645949074@Gilgamesh-Frog.org... > --

Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote: >> >> Arthur L. Rubin wrote: >>> "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote: >>>> >>>> Arthur L. Rubin wrote: >>>>> => Vox Populi © wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You want a cite that "due process" is a foundation of >>>>>> t

It depends on the state and the reason for certified mail. For example, if someone in MD refuses a court summons sent by certified mail, it is evidence of avoiding service of process, which allows the use of "mailing and posting" instead. -- Bre

"Jibba Jabba" <dontemailme@dontemailme.com> wrote in message news:<-MKdnWUn4KbFA6_dRVn-hA@adelphia.com>... > If someone were to reject a piece of registered mail or mail that needs to > be signed off, does that mean the recipient was never notified in t

In article <c0ss03$1adh76$1@ID-164291.news.uni-berlin.de>, The Todal <the_todalnospam@msn.com> writes > >"Alexander Baron" <A_Baron@ABaron.Demon.Co.UK> wrote in message >news:10503184.0402170244.59f33f1c@posting.google.com... >> Does anyone have an

In article <c0r863$1pc$3@stan.redhat.com>, Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >tjab wrote: >> >> Bryant doesn't seem especially traumatized to me. > >Well hell -- neither does Party Girl. Would that make Bryant Party Boy?

You nor David Kay are not god and your truth is not absolute. Better to err on the side of caution when it comes to fascist terrorist dictators and WMD. "John" <babydriver3@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c0ss96$o8t$1@sparta.btinternet.com... >

You mean the BBC that recently admitted that they hyped up reports against the Blair adminsitration and in which the their CEO resigned? "roy" <roy***@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:pan.2004.02.17.10.48.30.585594@yahoo.co.uk... > On Tue, 17 Fe

I was wondering if federal law or state law(in my case, California) defines the term 'year' in any of it's codes. The reason I'm asking is because according to California Business and Professions code 25658 no one can sell or furnish alcohol to a pers

On 17 Feb 2004 14:57:43 -0800, cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote: >> I never said that. I said that I can't tell who was driving from the >> picture with any degree of certainty. > >If the judge were presented with a picture of t

On 17 Feb 2004 10:19:10 -0800, waidoan@hotmail.com (Wai Doan Hsu) wrote: >> >>> But in this case, I >> >>> can't tell who was driving from the picture with any degree of >> >>> certainty. It is my car, though. >> >> >> So either your car was stol