Re: Conditional Insurance rating?

Re: Conditional Insurance rating?

ManualInsert@DB.com	2/25/2004 1:35:58 PM




"A. Cain"	2/25/2004 2:35:58 PM
"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message news:c1iq5302bas@enews2.newsguy.com... Peter wrote: Why should that matter? 20 in one year in a large company that promotes safety in every way is unacceptable. Unacceptable to who, Bullis? If you look at the percentages alone, you'd see shcneider's was a tad higher than the conditional company. If truckinsp's theory is correct, needing only 1 of 6 factors, then schneider should be "conditional" as well. Whay aren't they? $$$$$$$$ Schneider has better attorneys who are paid to screw the DOT anyway they can. It's always a conspiracy with you, isn't it Bullis? Always has to be something to do with those lawyers and their nasty habits of doing their jobs. A small company who can only afford a third rate attorney isn't gonna get the favortism companies like schneider do. Take a look at my former company's record: Funny how you don't mention which "former company" that is. Power units: 45 ..... drivers: 36 Type ........Fatal ....Injury .... Tow .... Total Crashes ........0 ........1 ...........3 ......... 4 How many of those 4 were you responsible for, Bullis? All of them? Inspection Type........... Vehicle...... Driver.... Hazmat .......Inspections ................70.......... 118........... 0 ...Out of Service ................15 ...........7 .............0 ...Out of Service % .........21.4% .....5.9% ........0% .....Nat'l Average %(2002) 22.90% ...7.21%.... 5.72% Zero fatal crashes. That sir, is the name of the game. Driver's placed OOS - 7! While at the same time, schneider had 40 fatal crashes and 987 drivers placed OOS. Except for unforseen events such as heart attacks, not one trucking company should be involved in a fatal crash. Yes, those omnipotent drivers should be able to see accidents coming, right? That sir, is totally unacceptable practices for promoting safety in the industry. Even one is not acceptable. Path: text02!newsfeeds-atl1!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.usenetserver.com!border1.nntp ..sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed3.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynew s.com!easynews.com!easynews!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.c om!enews2 From: "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking Subject: Re: Conditional Insurance rating? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:41:18 -0600 Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Lines: 55 Message-ID: <c1iq5302bas@enews2.newsguy.com> References: <jJQ_b.7302$OE4.6041@fe1.columbus.rr.com> <403BE6CA.C3A86860@sympatico.ca> <c1gsaj050n@enews4.newsguy.com> <ow2%b.142$Xy3.539@tor-nn1.netcom.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-343.newsdawg.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 FL-Build: Fidolook 2002 (SL) 6.0.2600.78 - 24/10/2002 21:18:29 X-No-Archive: yes Xref: usenetserver.com misc.transport.trucking:270498 X-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:12:06 EST (text02)



Robert Buchanan	2/26/2004 12:52:01 AM
SEE A. Cain at alt.usenet.kooks on 25 Feb 2004! Reserve your tickets now! From: "A. Cain" <noemail@there.invalid> Newsgroups: misc.transport.trucking,alt.usenet.kooks,misc.transport.road,alt.law-en forcement,misc.legal,alt.dimwit.richard-bullis "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message news:c1iq5302bas@enews2.newsguy.com... Unacceptable to who, Bullis? Ask the people who have fired his dumb ass. If you look at the percentages alone, you'd see shcneider's was a tad higher It's always a conspiracy with you, isn't it Bullis? Always has to be something to do with those lawyers and their nasty habits of doing their jobs. Especially when a company he bears a grudge towards is involved. A small company who can only afford a third rate attorney isn't gonna get the favortism companies like schneider do. Take a look at my former company's record: I'd sooner take a look at Bullis' record. Funny how you don't mention which "former company" that is. Don't mind that; it's likely fabricated, anyway. Power units: 45 ..... drivers: 36 Type ........Fatal ....Injury .... Tow .... Total Crashes ........0 ........1 ...........3 ......... 4 How many of those 4 were you responsible for, Bullis? All of them? company Yes, those omnipotent drivers should be able to see accidents coming, right? Bullis expects nobody to make mistakes, regardless of the thousands of glaring, dangerous errors he's made in his life. God, what a dickhead. -- Robert Buchanan http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/ Scott A. Gilbert FAQ http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/SAG-FAQ.html Quotations From Scott A. Gilbert http://home.ripway.com/2004-1/55797/SAG-quotes.html



"A. Cain"	2/25/2004 9:00:30 PM
"Robert Buchanan" <?????????@?????????.???> wrote in message news:403d4331$0$4212$ad3619e8@news.netcarrier.net... SEE A. Cain at alt.usenet.kooks on 25 Feb 2004! Reserve your tickets now! Ask the people who have fired his dumb ass. If you look at the percentages alone, you'd see shcneider's was a tad Especially when a company he bears a grudge towards is involved. A small company who can only afford a third rate attorney isn't gonna get the favortism companies like schneider do. Take a look at my former company's record: I'd sooner take a look at Bullis' record. It's probably about as long as Emmett Gulley's rap sheet. Don't mind that; it's likely fabricated, anyway. Power units: 45 ..... drivers: 36 Type ........Fatal ....Injury .... Tow .... Total Crashes ........0 ........1 ...........3 ......... 4 Bullis expects nobody to make mistakes, regardless of the thousands of glaring, dangerous errors he's made in his life. God, what a dickhead. But as long as no children are hurt, everything is fine!

Report this post for offensive content