|
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nba&id=1744159 DENVER -- Chiding prosecutors for being too secretive, the judge in the Kobe Bryant sexual assault case said Wednesday the public should be able to see at least the titles of all documents filed. State District Judge Terry Ruckriegle said state law specifically requires public access to a register showing the general nature of documents filed in a criminal case. A redacted register, with some words blacked out, will be posted on the state court Web site where other Bryant-related documents are available. Ruckriegle said the list will be updated weekly. Attorneys for media organizations including The Associated Press had asked Ruckriegle last month for access to that information. The existence of some documents was unknown until Jan. 26, when a defense document referred to a sealed filing by prosecutors. Defense attorney Hal Haddon had argued against giving the public access to the full list of filings, saying secret documents needed to be referred to only as "sealed document." Prosecutors said they had no objection to releasing a full list of documents. Ruckriegle said state law specifically provides for the public release of such a list. "Failure to reference the nature of the documents precludes or unnecessarily complicates any meaningful opportunity for public or media review or challenge," Ruckriegle said. "Although specific factual assertions may be prejudicial, general identification of the contested issues is typically not prejudicial and is necessary for an informed public." Ruckriegle said he was particularly concerned about prosecutors' "lack of compliance" with his order denying their request to file under seal any documents mentioning evidence or potential evidence. "It appears to the court that many of the documents could have been filed as a public motion with a sealed offer of proof as ordered or could also have been submitted in redacted form for public distribution," he said. Ruckriegle said no documents can be filed secretly without either a public request to the judge, or by simultaneously filing a redacted version for public view.
|
| |
| |
|