Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Exempt vs non-exempt employees (2nd attempt)
Curtis CCR wrote: >>Can anyone tell me--DEFINITIVELY, and with sources--what the laws are in >>Texas concerning -salaried- white-collar employees? Specifically, I >>need to know about the issue of being docked for time off during a week >>in which


Re: New York City to Celebrate Smokefree Anniversary
slim wrote: > > rumik wrote: > > > Tax evasion is NOT a criminal offence. > > Until you get caught! ;-) Not an offence. But it is a criminal offense.


Re: Exempt vs non-exempt employees (2nd attempt)
Thanks! It pointed me in the right direction. McGyver wrote: > I didn't read it carefully, so I can't be sure, but this site seems to have > the answer: > http://www.employersassoc.com/FOD/1010.pdf > > McGyver > > "Happy Thoughts" <BogusAddre


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 22:32:53 -0000, "Chris X" <Chris_X@postmaster.co.uk> typed: > >"abelard" <abelard@abelard.org> wrote in message >news:jabf40tp77hsjipjrf2l644ujbr39nkt1q@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:19:21 -0000, "Chris X" <Chris_X@po


Re: 2 Moron Liberals protest Bush ads
<<< Moron liberals think 9-11 was a part of history only for themselves to discuss. Well many 9-11 victims families approve of Bush reminding americans about our being attacked and their loved ones dying. >>> Thankfully, moron Bush apologists se


Re: => Jew ADL Guilty of Defamation ! - must pay $10,000,000.00 damages !! - oh the irony! <=
"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:a%H1c.635$Zl5.14769@news.uswest.net... | Ed Cogburn wrote: | > => Vox Populi © wrote: | >> Quant wrote: | >> | >>> Read the article - they lost the case because of technical reasons. | >>> Th


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
Greg wrote: >Now here's a multiple choice question: >A. They'll prosecute mainly men. >B. They'll prosecute mainly women. >C. They'll prosecute both equally. Dead on. Exactly. >> "The bill is about accepting responsibility and not tak


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:19:21 -0000, "Chris X" <Chris_X@postmaster.co.uk> typed: >Date Abelard's posts Vox's posts >29/02 22 0 >02/03 36


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
Chainsaw wrote: > > I think this guy is a candidate for Guantanamo Bay. :-) Who knows what that even means.


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
Dave Zero wrote: > "Sean MacCloud" sounds pretty damn > Western to me. Makes what I'm saying all the more valid. I believe in scuttleing the ship.


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) deliciously posted in news:6bd12cd6.0403040735.622f9559@posting.google.com: > http://www.southbendtribune.com/stories/2004/03/01/local.20040301-sbt-M > ICH-A1-_Kobe__bill_would.sto > > LANSING -- "You can't legi


Re: New York City to Celebrate Smokefree Anniversary
rumik wrote: > Tax evasion is NOT a criminal offence. Until you get caught! ;-) -- http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html "Bubba got a blowjob, BU$H screwed us all!" - Slim George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://awol.gq.nu/4dawol.h


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
"abelard" <abelard@abelard.org> wrote in message news:jabf40tp77hsjipjrf2l644ujbr39nkt1q@4ax.com... > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:19:21 -0000, "Chris X" <Chris_X@postmaster.co.uk> > > typed: > > > >Date Abelard's posts Vox's po


Re: Who Really Killed Jesus?
>> > It's the having it shoved at him so forcefully that gets him riled. >> > Ask me, I know! >> Christians living in places like Saudi-Arabia, India, Japan, or China >> have learned to make do, > >Yeah, they get a taste of their own medicine! W


Re: WHY WON'T BUSH TESTIFY UNDER OATH?
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 03:53:33 GMT, Happy Thoughts <BogusAddress@no.spam.com> wrote: >Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote: >> bRING-EM-ON BUSH agreed to tear himself away from his fundraising for >> one hour and appear befor the 9-11 panel but re


Re: => Vox going on Vacation !
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:38:59 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >King Pineapple wrote: >> Smirking Leftist Beavis "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in >> message news:UXH1c.634$Zl5.14670@news.uswest.net... >>> Hey assclowns, >>> >>>


Re: => Firefighter Guilty of Arson - Bu$h a Wartime "president" ...anysimilarities?
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:55:08 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Uncle Samuel wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>> Uncle Samuel wrote: > >>>>>> You have no "right" to practice law in lieu


Re: Who Really Killed Jesus?
>> > Because we have no evidence that your ancient tribal sky-daddy >> > exists, and conclusive evidence from *YOUR* life that your Jesus is >> > either dead or sodomizing young boys on the golf course. >> >> You seem awfully upset over something y


Re: => Vox going on Vacation !
In article <UXH1c.634$Zl5.14670@news.uswest.net>, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >Hey assclowns, > >Vox will be on vacation for the next 2 weeks, >and won't have Usenet access. So enjoy yourselves >while I'm gone and try not to make a mess of


Re: Who Really Killed Jesus?
>> > > You seem awfully upset over something you claim doesn't exist. You >sound >> > > almost, well, biblical in your wrath. >> >> > At Ted Kaldis? You bet! The guy's just a peach, and he's got a >> > Texas-sized cockroach not named Bush up his


Re: New York City to Celebrate Smokefree Anniversary
In article <h89g40loea7omqi15v64hfl1ljah9vnlep@4ax.com>, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote: >wrote: > >>Phil wrote: >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> If there is such a law, I'd like to see it too. >>>>> What is surprising is that in a country of over >


An advocate's motives (was: Re: Random Thoughts...)
Stephen Fuld wrote: > Questioning advocate's motives rarely > helps to decide the truth of a proposition. I would have agreed until recently, but now I'm not so sure. I recently had to figure out how to prove that some corporate directo


Re: Of criminal accusations and other rhetorical tools
In article<170ee625.0403031746.13cfb486@posting.google.com>, Mona <mercurialbroad@aol.com> writes: >It is true the issue could not have been raised on appeal if it was not >preserved at trial. However, it is not necessary for an expert witness >to


Re: Criminal smoker chooses habit over family.
In article <9FS1c.2057$Zl5.65670@news.uswest.net>, => Vox Populi © <vox@popu.li> wrote: >Bruce Watson wrote: >> In article <gmbf40l60rl5tu6t95v1atdhpje97t4nj2@4ax.com>, >> Moi <zis_guy@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:18:41 -05


Re: what does "ex rel" mean
cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote in message news:<c31fa7b1.0403041005.5ea2e65c@posting.google.com>... > kathy9810@yahoo.com (Kathy) wrote in message news:<b98653c0.0403040051.2909d5a1@posting.google.com>... > > I've seem "United State


Re: 2 Moron Liberals protest Bush ads
"Juan Pablo Montoilet" <McWillimas Sucks@F1A.org> wrote in message news:LtidnW-n6cl449rd4p2dnA@adelphia.com... > Moron liberals think 9-11 was a part of history only for themselves to > discuss. Well many 9-11 victims families approve of Bush remindi


pro se plaintiff needs help
I'm a pro se plaintiff in a medical malpractice case in New York. I've conducted extensive depositions of the defendant doctors, but the doctors on instruction of their attorneys refused to answer many questions. I then filed a motion to strike t


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:41:05 -0600, "The Department of Defense" <thecats@ss.mil> typed: > >"abelard" <abelard@abelard.org> wrote in message >news:ekue401g64ki8evklukgb1qu6b9ncqb8jb@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:41:35 -0700, "=> Vox Popu


Re: RR Xing Sting in Pomona
steinsphil@hotmail.com (Phil S Stein) wrote in message news:<8bcc5bbc.0403041044.3da2cb79@posting.google.com>... > cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote in message news:<c31fa7b1.0403031500.5ec97a4a@posting.google.com>... > > "=> Vox Popul


Re: 2 Moron Liberals protest Bush ads
On 4 Mar 2004 15:02:46 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <LtidnW-n6cl449rd4p2dnA@adelphia.com>, >Juan Pablo Montoilet <McWillimas Sucks@F1A.org> wrote: >> >>"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >>news:qvK1c.36$RQ.31868@n


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
"abelard" <abelard@abelard.org> wrote in message news:ekue401g64ki8evklukgb1qu6b9ncqb8jb@4ax.com... > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:41:35 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> > > typed: > > >abelard wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:24:16 -0700, "=>


Re: Michael Stone granted leave
> >Michael Stone has been granted leave to appeal his conviction for the > >Chillenden murders. Personally I'm not hopeful but if anyone wants to > >see the evidence - or lack of - against this guy, check out the url > >below. > > http://www.ismich


An advocate's motives (was: Re: Random Thoughts...)


Re: => Vox going on Vacation !
Smirking Leftist Beavis "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:UXH1c.634$Zl5.14670@news.uswest.net... > Hey assclowns, > > Vox will be on vacation for the next 2 weeks, Just so we can warn them, where are you headed? -- "Ther


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
On 4 Mar 2004 07:35:09 -0800, s_knight8@hotmail.com (s_knight8) wrote: >http://www.southbendtribune.com/stories/2004/03/01/local.20040301-sbt-MICH-A1-_Kobe__bill_would.sto > >LANSING -- "You can't legislate morality." > >That's what the former dir


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
"s_knight8" <s_knight8@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht news:6bd12cd6.0403040735.622f9559@posting.google.com... > http://www.southbendtribune.com/stories/2004/03/01/local.20040301-sbt-MICH-A1-_Kobe__bill_would.sto > > LANSING -- "You can't legislate m


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.vwa58@sneaky.lerctr.org> wrote in message news:c284og$41r@library2.airnews.net... > >LANSING -- "You can't legislate morality." > > > >That's what the former director of the state appellate defenders > >office, F. Martin T


Re: 2 Moron Liberals protest Bush ads
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 22:05:19 GMT, "Fed Up" <returntosender@MtEverest.peak> wrote: > >Well don't forget to remind the people too, of Bush on 911 sitting on his >backside for over 15 mins, doing nothing, after Card had told him America >was under a


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
Irrelevant College Kid "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:qvK1c.36$RQ.31868@news.uswest.net... > Bush ads outrage 9/11 families Actually, according to the article, it outraged TWO people. And ONE other person approved of the ads


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
>LANSING -- "You can't legislate morality." > >That's what the former director of the state appellate defenders >office, F. Martin Tieber, said about a proposal by Sen. Bruce >Patterson, R-Canton, to treat adultery as a form of criminal sexual >assa


Re: New York City to Celebrate Smokefree Anniversary
Phil wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:17:49 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> > wrote: > > >>> If there is such a law, I'd like to see it too. >>> What is surprising is that in a country of over >>> 270 million, not ONE person has been able to


Re: Buying Goods As-Is
>It is fairly common these days for large amounts of computer and networking >electronic equipment to be available through auctions and in surplus where >the seller has no time or expertise required to test the equipment. Many >sellers try to insula


Re: Criminal smoker chooses habit over family.
Bruce Watson wrote: > In article <gmbf40l60rl5tu6t95v1atdhpje97t4nj2@4ax.com>, > Moi <zis_guy@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:18:41 -0500, "magnulus" >> <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote in >> <QTN1c.44765$0l1.1533@bignews3.bellso


Re: => Vox going on Vacation !
King Pineapple wrote: > Smirking Leftist Beavis "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in > message news:UXH1c.634$Zl5.14670@news.uswest.net... >> Hey assclowns, >> >> Vox will be on vacation for the next 2 weeks, > > Just so we can warn them, where


WHY WON'T BUSH TESTIRY UNDER OATH?
bRING-EM-ON BUSH agreed to tear himself away from his fundraising for one hour and appear befor the 9-11 panel but refuses to answer questions under oath!! Someone want to explain why an honest man would make such a refusal???


Re: Kobe bill would criminalize adultery
Sean Maccloud wrote: > > s_knight8 wrote: > > >>http://www.southbendtribune.com/stories/2004/03/01/local.20040301-sbt-MICH-A1-_Kobe__bill_would.sto >> >>LANSING -- "You can't legislate morality." >> > > > Western culture is a disease


Re: Who Really Killed Jesus?
>>>Sure are the first 5,000 though, aren't they? >> This is the lemming fallacy or, as your mamma said, >> "If they were jumping off cliffs would you do it too?" > I would estimate that the Christian cult never numbered more than a >hundred in


Re: Rape Shield Law and Feminist Jurisprudence Corrupt Justice
The quote seems to be speaking out against "arbitrary impeachment's, arbitrary methods of prosecuting pretended offenses, and arbitrary punishments upon arbitrary convictions..." as "the great engines of judicial despotism" while advocating trial b


Re: => Bu$h pisses on the families of 9/11 for cheap political gain ...! <=
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:41:35 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> typed: >abelard wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 11:24:16 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> >> >> typed: >> >>> Bush ads outrage 9/11 families >> >> you said you were g


Re: The benefit - innocent men in prison: was-<<<Re: Woman won't tesify until late March
On 4 Mar 2004 10:46:25 -0800, rpayne@mybluelight.com (Rich) wrote: >"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<Uwu1c.29552$Tn.14031@bignews5.bellsouth.net>... >> <ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net> wrote in message >> news:fehc401vk6gaugm3