|
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 11:17:50 -0500, "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com>
wrote:
>
>"steve sullivan" <steve@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:steve-567CD8.20330805032004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
>> In article <X_2dnX6rJad0VdXdRVn-uQ@comcast.com
|
|
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:20:51 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Nexus" <nexus@at&t.net> wrote
>> Please have the balls to show your pathetic self in this ng after this
>case is laughed right out of court
>
>This is the same lawf
|
|
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 08:16:27 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>Then keep a civil tongue in your head;
Heed your own advice.
>insults go both ways.
That is not true in your case.
Right from the start, anyone who posted any
|
|
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 07:27:19 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Michael Felcher" <mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote
>> What do you mean, "what about it"? So she's so traumatized that she
>> carries on EXACTLY as she had been before?
|
|
|
"slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:404A159E.A5F14F99@nyc.rr.com...
>
>
> rumik wrote:
> >
> > slim wrote:
> > >
> > > Marky wrote:
> > >
> > >>"slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:40494CAF.106D258D@nyc.
|
|
|
"slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:404A1537.380913CF@nyc.rr.com...
>
>
> rumik wrote:
> >
> > Marky wrote:
> > > "slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > news:40494CAF.106D258D@nyc.rr.com...
> > >
> > >>
> > >>P
|
|
|
"Rico X. Partay" <billg@microsoft.com> wrote
> "Stephen Fuld" <s.fuld@PleaseRemove.att.net> wrote
> > I maintain that the competition of the
> > vouchers will get the "juices" going of
> > the public school system and that they
> > will improve as we
|
|
|
"slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:E6E5C828.9C928349@nyc.rr.com...
>
>
> Marky wrote:
> >
> > "slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:40494CAF.106D258D@nyc.rr.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Phil wrote:
> > > >
>
|
|
|
"Rico X. Partay" <billg@microsoft.com> wrote
> "Caroline" <caroline10027remove@earthlink.net> wrote
> > ..this comment was from the dissenting side...
>
> Yes, but the specific issue in question (the courts' refusal
> to micro-manage school curri
|
|
|
Ann <me@privacy.net> wrote in news:lohk40ll7k1dusincn465k622f3sg3hp45@
4ax.com:
> Of course. It's difficult to find stuff that's actually on the web
> but there is some.
>
> http://www.crcl.org.uk/effects.html
Yep, there it is, listed as a lon
|
|
|
On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 14:49:07 -0800, Michael Fletcher
<mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote:
>
>
>tjab wrote:
>
>>>>Sure. Some women become promiscuous, others sink into alcoholism or drug
>>>>addiction, others agoraphobic and reclusive, others suicidal
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 10:29:55 GMT, "Fed Up"
> <returntosender@MtEverest.peak> wrote:
>
>
>>Why aren't you doing your duty fighting in Iraq then
>
>
> Because I'm not in the military you festering @$#*wit!
Spammy is a
|
|
|
On 6 Mar 2004 12:17:12 -0800, mshlomb@yahoo.com (Raul) wrote:
>"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<VdWdnd66Vr_sfdTdRVn-jg@comcast.com>...
>> "steve sullivan" <steve@spamhotmail.com> wrote
>> > You still havent answered the q
|
|
|
In the USA it's considered public domain info and is thus free to publish by
any means. Other countries YMMV.
"Martin Riddle" <martinriddle@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4gq2c.22196$yZ1.1621@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> It is public
|
|
|
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:10:32 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Rich" <rpayne@mybluelight.com> wrote
>> You know, I can't find any reference to this sort of thing at all.
>> Perhaps you can post some sort of a reference?
>
>I do
|
|
|
"Rich" <rpayne@mybluelight.com> schreef in bericht
news:3a256c50.0403060920.705d085@posting.google.com...
> I've not seen a "promiscuity" phase mentioned anywhere, and indeed,
> it's quite contradictory with the effects assigned to rape.
I think
|
|
|
"steve sullivan" <steve@spamhotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:steve-567CD8.20330805032004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> In article <X_2dnX6rJad0VdXdRVn-uQ@comcast.com>,
> "Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
> > She has the
> > option of
|
|
|
"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nospam.com> schreef in bericht
news:dLm2c.31803$6e7.10616@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "steve sullivan" <steve@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:steve-567CD8.20330805032004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> > You still hav
|
|
|
"Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
news:c2dmm5010mo@enews3.newsguy.com...
> Martin Riddle wrote:
>
> > It is publicly available information. So I dont believe there are any
> > legal laws against it.
>
>
> > "Ben" <ben@benfontanaw
|
|
|
<no@spam.email> wrote in message
news:97dfc910b3c68c5065c40d3c61554c5b@news.teranews.com...
snipped> >
>
> It doesn't make sense no matter how you look at it.
> A person being a victim of rape can have some weird behavior after a
> while, that mak
|
|
|
It is publicly available information. So I dont believe there are any legal laws against it.
"Ben" <ben@benfontanawebnetter.info> wrote in message news:4049CFDE.20105.58725C8@localhost...
> Hi. Is it legal to post the WHOIS data about a domain regis
|
|
|
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 00:56:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 12:32:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> [snipped to focus on this point]
>
>>> I know you like the Jim Bakkers and Bob Lar
|
|
|
----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Potomac Watch: A baconburger for fatso here, and hold the lawsuits
Saturday, March 6, 2004
By JUDY HOLLAND
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER WASHINGTON BUREAU
WASHINGTON -- Congress is poised to tell fat Americans: Y
|
|
|
ttp://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/comment/0,12956,1163522,00.html
Need to build a case for war? Step forward Mr Chalabi
If governments are going to rely on intelligence, its reliability is critical
Isabel Hilton
Saturday March 6, 2004
The
|
|
|
"Dickmcb" <mcburney.r@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:GIOdnfrXbPp1YtTd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
>
> "Jon C" <news@jonnythan.com> wrote in message
> news:j8e2c.115255$n62.72080@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > "Richard" <anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
|
|
|
fenix2828@aol.com (fenixx29) wrote in message news:<2ee9185b.0403061039.559c59f@posting.google.com>...
> I live in Phoenix, AZ and I am on probation for an AGG. DUI. Class 4
> Felony. I have never been in any other trouble. My Fiance' lives in
> New
|
|
|
yardleymj@yahoo.ca (Michael Yardley) wrote in message news:<858bd3a9.0403061537.7259bcae@posting.google.com>...
> I would like to read this law.Where can I find it? I have searched the
> Net on Google, but cannot find anything. Can anybody assist? Thank
|
|
|
>>>>>Sure are the first 5,000 though, aren't they?
>>>>This is the lemming fallacy or, as your mamma said,
>>>>"If they were jumping off cliffs would you do it too?"
>>> I would estimate that the Christian cult never numbered more than a
>>>hun
|
|
|
"Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@sti.net> wrote in news:v4-dnSg7MMuti9fdRVn-
uw@sti.net:
>
> "Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns94A47DC9D86A9ta2eenew@204.127.204.17...
>> "Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@sti.net> w
|
|
|
No Spam wrote:
>
> > None of the vouchers programs I've seen provide enough money to interest
> > someone with a profit motive.
>
> That is partly my point. If getting poor kids out of failing schools
> is really the goal (as opposed to providing
|
|
|
memory_345@yahoo.com (innocent) wrote in message news:<d89178c9.0402141420.38014c96@posting.google.com>...
> Before jumping to conclusions and accusing me of paranoia, why dont
> you people verify or investigate some of the email ids, ebay ids,
> vehic
|
|
|
>"Disgruntled Customer" <nowhere@nowhow.com> wrote in message
>news:104fs25q8stoh53@corp.supernews.com...
>> > So he calls the God of Abraham a lot of disparaging names,
>
>No, he did nothing of the sort.
>
>> > and you
>> > simply disagree with th
|
|
|
"Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@sti.net> wrote in news:19adnSWOVKtajNfdRVn-
hQ@sti.net:
>
> "Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns94A463C664F4Dta2eenew@204.127.199.17...
>> "Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@sti.net> w
|
|
|
rumik wrote:
>
> slim wrote:
> >
> > Marky wrote:
> >
> >>"slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>news:40494CAF.106D258D@nyc.rr.com...
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Phil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On 4 Mar 2004 22:15:42 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net
|
|
|
rumik wrote:
>
> Marky wrote:
> > "slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:40494CAF.106D258D@nyc.rr.com...
> >
> >>
> >>Phil wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 4 Mar 2004 22:15:42 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
> >>>wrote:
> >
|
|
|
>>>>>>You seem awfully upset over something you claim doesn't exist. You
>>>>>>sound almost, well, biblical in your wrath.
>>>>>
>>>>> At Ted Kaldis? You bet! The guy's just a peach, and he's got a
>>>>>Texas-sized cockroach not named Bush up his
|
|
|
"Rico X. Partay" <billg@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4049e7b4$0$177$812600b3@news.nntpaccess.com...
> "Stephen Fuld" <s.fuld@PleaseRemove.att.net> wrote in message
> news:1V22c.76304$aH3.2338180@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> > S
|
|
|
<no@spam.email> wrote
> Right from the start, anyone who posted anything in this thread got your
> lame "your mom" insults from you.
No; they started with 'skank' or whatever, and we just went from there.
People don't mind insults until they're the
|
|
|
<no@spam.email> wrote
> 1. Her demeanor.
> 2. Sleeping with others few hours after allegedly being raped.
> 3. Going on vacation few hours after reporting the incident.
> 4. Going to a party, few days after the alleged rape, joking about the
> size o
|
|
|
"Michael Fletcher" <mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote
> Actually, when you were asked for some evidence all you said was "well,
> that's I've seen."
And you got a couple of good cites from someone else-
seemed sufficient, for anyone but you guys anyway
|
|
|
"Rich" <rpayne@mybluelight.com> wrote
> BTW, I don't see how you could experience promiscuity in these women
> unless you were the ones they @$#*ed after being raped. I'm quite
> serious here, I don't see how your claims could be objectively
> reached
|
|
|
"Michael Felcher" <mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote \
> Rich, on the other hand, provided some pretty conclusive evidence to
> counter Chas. Chas had no comment.
I answered it in the next post after his-
and he's got plenty more after that too.
> >
|
|
|
Martin Riddle wrote:
> It is publicly available information. So I dont believe there are any
> legal laws against it.
> "Ben" <ben@benfontanawebnetter.info> wrote in message
> news:4049CFDE.20105.58725C8@localhost...
>> Hi. Is it legal to
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> <no@spam.email> wrote
>
>>1. Her demeanor.
>>2. Sleeping with others few hours after allegedly being raped.
>>3. Going on vacation few hours after reporting the incident.
>>4. Going to a party, few days after the alleged rape, jok
|
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the statistics a google search on
"American divorce rate" found. This is just a measure
of how many marriages end end in divorce.
The statistic simply compares the number of marriages
to the number of divorces the occur within the same tim
|
|
|
In article <3a256c50.0403060920.705d085@posting.google.com>,
Rich <rpayne@mybluelight.com> wrote:
>"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<gpmdnVTemKzLeNXd4p2dnA@comcast.com>...
>> "broadway" <blah@microsoft.com> wrote
>> > So, a
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Michael Fletcher" <mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote
>
>>Actually, when you were asked for some evidence all you said was "well,
>>that's I've seen."
>
>
> And you got a couple of good cites from someone else-
> seemed sufficien
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Michael Felcher" <mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote \
>
>>Rich, on the other hand, provided some pretty conclusive evidence to
>>counter Chas. Chas had no comment.
>
>
> I answered it in the next post after his-
If by "answere
|
|
|
Ann wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 14:49:07 -0800, Michael Fletcher
> <mfletcher@serverart.org> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>tjab wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>Sure. Some women become promiscuous, others sink into alcoholism or drug
>>>>>addiction, others agoraphobi
|
