John Lansford wrote:
Can your local convenience store be held liable for a fatal DUI incident
because the driver bought the crap there?
No.
Wrong.
Then why should a restraunt be held liable?
Laws, which you obviously know nothing about, Bullis.
There is only one person responsible for his actions behind the wheel.
YOU!
Did the restraunt act irresponsibly by continuing to serve the person
drinks
knowing that his condition was not favorable for driving?
No. Because the restraunt does not know or care what the person does once
that person leaves the establishment.
43 states say you're wrong AGAIN, St00pid, including Wisconsin.
http://www3.madd.org/laws/law.cfm?LawID=DRAM
The story does not give the details of the incident. So we do not know
what
the time frame was between the time the person left the restraunt and the
incident occurred.
Is it possible he was legally sober when he left and consumed more
elsewhere?
Could be. We do not know this.
Well, you know nothing, but that doesn't stop you from yammering like an
idiot.
Then why stop with the restraunt? Why not sue the manufacturers of the
alcohol, liquor, the car he was driving and even the clothes he was
wearing?
