Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
Re: Highway Sniper Suspect Identified and On The Run



ManualInsert@DB.com
3/16/2004 11:10:17 PM


 
 
"A. Cain"
3/17/2004 12:50:49 AM




"informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:105fp386q5oa684@news.supernews.com...

http://roundtable.truck.net/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8893
lost4evermore
Senior member
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2004 11:24 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
----
People, have we not forgotten one very aspect of American Justice?
Innocent until PROVEN guilty.
I guess that whole "we've got evidence linking him and his fingerprints to
the crime scenes" thing was completely overlooked by Bullis.
This announcement was totally out of line and only aids to panic the
public
even more and become something of concerned watch dogs for the police.
The police should have first had the suspect in custody before making this
asenine statement.
Yea, the police are going to tell the public he's on the run after they have
him in custody.
Now, the suspect may flee knowing he is a suspect if he is guilty.
Never mind the fact that if he's the one who's been doing it he'd already be
aware that he'd be a suspect and guilty.
If he is not guilty, you can bet he'll be in the police chief's office
making one hellatious uproar over the announcement.
He'll "challenge" them on the guilty assessment.
The "Columbus Dispatch" went so far as to publish the supsect's photo and
print the license number.
Why didn't they just go ahead and publish his address and phone number
too?
Because everybody knows you can find someone driving down the highway using
their cell phone number and home address.
A fair tiral? Not likely with this stunt.
Why was it made?
Hello. It's march madness time. Columbus is a center of tournaments and
the
police are thinking they have to say something to still the tourists
coming
in to spend their money.
Bad move legally speaking.
It could cost the city a lot more than they bargained for.
Wow. That's an even dumber Bullis conspiracy theory than the one where he
claimed the federal government influenced and bullied the writers and
producers of "X-Files" because they were getting too close to the truth.
*********************
Only you would gibber out this nonsense, St00pid. The suspect has already
fled and the ballistics match. The public should be given all the
information. It has nothing to do with basketball, you utter moron.
 
 
"informant"
3/17/2004 12:10:17 AM




"A. Cain" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:2IR5c.10856$CI3.6205@fe03.usenetserver.com...



"informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:105fp386q5oa684@news.supernews.com...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
I guess that whole "we've got evidence linking him and his fingerprints to
the crime scenes" thing was completely overlooked by Bullis.
public
Yea, the police are going to tell the public he's on the run after they
have
him in custody.
Never mind the fact that if he's the one who's been doing it he'd already
be
aware that he'd be a suspect and guilty.
He'll "challenge" them on the guilty assessment.
too?
Because everybody knows you can find someone driving down the highway
using
their cell phone number and home address.
the
coming
Wow. That's an even dumber Bullis conspiracy theory than the one where he
claimed the federal government influenced and bullied the writers and
producers of "X-Files" because they were getting too close to the truth.
Yeah, dumber than Bullis' claim that prostitute rape laws were changed due
to some TV movie starring Elizabeth Montgomery. Or that he was driving a
taxi in the opening credits of WKRP. Or that "Quincy" invented the word,
"pedophile". And he wonders why people call him St00pid.
*********************
Only you would gibber out this nonsense, St00pid. The suspect has
already
fled and the ballistics match. The public should be given all the
information. It has nothing to do with basketball, you utter moron.
 
 
"A. Cain"
3/17/2004 2:40:43 AM




"informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:105fqu2rosphpd1@news.supernews.com...



"A. Cain" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:2IR5c.10856$CI3.6205@fe03.usenetserver.com...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
have
be
using
Yeah, dumber than Bullis' claim that prostitute rape laws were changed due
to some TV movie starring Elizabeth Montgomery. Or that he was driving a
taxi in the opening credits of WKRP. Or that "Quincy" invented the word,
"pedophile". And he wonders why people call him St00pid.
He sure does watch a lot of television, doesn't he? Especially re-runs from
the 1980s. Next thing you know he's going to be saying that robots are
smarter than us because he caught an episode of "Small Wonder" on at 3 a.m.
*********************
Only you would gibber out this nonsense, St00pid. The suspect has
already
fled and the ballistics match. The public should be given all the
information. It has nothing to do with basketball, you utter moron.
 
 
"informant"
3/17/2004 1:05:07 PM




"Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
news:c392l10113d@enews1.newsguy.com...

informant wrote:
http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/publia.htm
Read the section titled "False light/Defamation".
You may want to reconsider your crusading policies.
Under that argument alone, I can have your ass hung high in court.
And it makes no difference if damage was done to my reputation or not.
Do note, that's texas law, chicken#@($ from texas.
You might want to have someone read the "Consent" section to you, Prosecutor
Bullis. All those challenges you've issued comprise permission. Besides, if
you deny your own words, then you have no case anyway. HAND.
 
 
"informant"
3/17/2004 1:09:13 PM




"Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
news:c394sq014b3@enews1.newsguy.com...

informant wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/12/12/findlaw.analysis.hilden.libel/
Ever hear of "Libel by fiction"?
Best read the article, texas chicken#@($.
Irrelevant, Bullis. I quote your own words and that's not fiction. You sure
do squawk a lot about that which you deny is yours. Next!
 
 
Report this post for offensive content


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004