|
Hell-- Drunk drivers kill and/or maim kids every HOUR in this country.
If this campaign is really about saving children, then we must
publicly expose the DUIs too - at least the ones that have harmed a
kid. Here's the article.
By Ken Kusmer Associated Press Writer
Published: Mar 15, 2004
MUNCIE, Ind. (AP) - Robert Enochs was starting to turn his life
around last fall. He had moved out of his car and in with his
girlfriend, and they had gotten engaged. He soon landed a job driving
a tow truck. Then the local paper ran photographs of him and 62 other
sex offenders on the front page. <snip>
At least five of the 63 Muncie-area men and women pictured in The Star
Press on Feb. 15 have lost their jobs, some of them because they had
not revealed their past to their employers, said sheriff's Deputy
Steve Case.
Other papers around the country have run photos of sex offenders. But
The Star Press may have gone further than most, devoting half of the
front page of the Sunday paper to the photos. It also listed the
offenders' crimes along with their home addresses inside the paper.
<snip>
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAZ94LWURD.html
|
| |
| |
Hell-- Drunk drivers kill and/or maim kids every HOUR in this country.
If this campaign is really about saving children, then we must
publicly expose the DUIs too - at least the ones that have harmed a
kid. Here's the article.
Why stop at that? What makes women and children so special that people who
commit crimes against them should never be permitted to move on with their
lives? Hell, lets print out pictures of everybody who has been convicted. I
wanna know if I'm living near someone who got a speeding ticket 15 years ago, so
I can make sure I'm out of the way when I see him/her pulling out of their
driveway. The newspaper has an obligation to inform me if I'm living next to a
burgler, so I can build a wall and mine my yard.
Personally, I think there has got to be a line. I don't know where it is, and I
doubt if any of us here will ever be able to define it, but I truly believe that
this newspaper crossed it.
"Civic duty" my ass. They did it for the hype and the sales.
Mike
|
| |
| |
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
Hell-- Drunk drivers kill and/or maim kids every HOUR in this country.
If this campaign is really about saving children, then we must
publicly expose the DUIs too - at least the ones that have harmed a
kid. Here's the article.
I think every damn one of them should sue the paper collectively for
invasion of privacy and perhaps violation of civil rights.
Yeah, ok. The information is public record. But that does not give the
newspaper the damn right to publish the information anywhere. Not even on
the front page.
Mr. Enochs, the guy interviewed, said he had spent 2 years in prison for his
one time wrong.
What makes a child molester any more dangerous than a drug dealer?
where are the photos of all those convicted and sentenced for drug dealing?
I'll bet that would take up several pages.
Meagan's law is a travisty to justice in America.
A child molester is the only type of criminal who MUST register with the
local sheriff and notify the neihgbors of where he intends to live.
Does a serial rapist do that? No.
Not even a convicted multi-murderer.
Not even a bank robber.
The term pedophile wasn't even in American vocabulary until the tv show
"Quincy" aired an episode in which Quincy ranted and raved about the
murderer of a little girl being a pedophile.
Megan's law was created because of the actions of ONE person who comitted
murder.
So why are drug dealers, DUI offenders, and all the others treated so
differently?
Because they don't get the headlines.
Have a two car crash right in front of the newspaper office. You never hear
about it.
Include a truck, it goes on the front page.
News reporting isn't about informing the people.
It's about how to sell the newspaper and make money.
|
| |
| |
In article <c388ro02esh@enews4.newsguy.com>, Richard <Anonymous@127.000> wrote:
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
I think every damn one of them should sue the paper collectively for
invasion of privacy and perhaps violation of civil rights.
Yeah, ok. The information is public record. But that does not give the
newspaper the damn right to publish the information anywhere. Not even on
the front page.
First Amendment.
|
| |
| |
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
I think every damn one of them should sue the paper collectively for
invasion of privacy and perhaps violation of civil rights.
Yeah, ok. The information is public record. But that does not give the
newspaper the damn right to publish the information anywhere. Not even on
the front page.
Mr. Enochs, the guy interviewed, said he had spent 2 years in prison for
his
one time wrong.
What makes a child molester any more dangerous than a drug dealer?
where are the photos of all those convicted and sentenced for drug
dealing?
I'll bet that would take up several pages.
Meagan's law is a travisty to justice in America.
A child molester is the only type of criminal who MUST register with the
local sheriff and notify the neihgbors of where he intends to live.
Does a serial rapist do that? No.
Not even a convicted multi-murderer.
Not even a bank robber.
The term pedophile wasn't even in American vocabulary until the tv show
"Quincy" aired an episode in which Quincy ranted and raved about the
murderer of a little girl being a pedophile.
Megan's law was created because of the actions of ONE person who comitted
murder.
So why are drug dealers, DUI offenders, and all the others treated so
differently?
Because they don't get the headlines.
Have a two car crash right in front of the newspaper office. You never
hear
about it.
Include a truck, it goes on the front page.
News reporting isn't about informing the people.
It's about how to sell the newspaper and make money.
Brought to you by "Richard" the St00pid Bullis, Pedophile.
Richard the St00pid Bullis stated in Message-ID:
<bo0vfv0svc@enews2.newsguy.com> You claim I am a pedophile simply for the
fact I state I enjoy looking at naked kids. Show me the law, any state or
federal law, in which this is a criminal act. Some state laws may say that
posession may be illegal, but not the actual viewing of.
"Richard" <screw-lart@old.man> wrote: "I may have fantasies involving rape
of a child, but you're no mindreader and as long as the thoughts remain a
fantasy, there is no possible way to convict".
Photos of unemployed, trailer dweller Bullis
http://www.lart.com/stupidrichard/
http://convict.iwarp.com/bullis-single.jpg
Richard Bullis FAQ 5.0
http://www.lart.com/rtsfaq/
Path:
sn-us!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.oc
tanews.net!news.octanews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.g
lorb.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn51feed!worldnet.att.ne
t!129.250.169.16!pln-e!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
From: "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: Newspaper runs FRONT PAGE pics of molesters
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:15:47 -0600
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <c388ro02esh@enews4.newsguy.com>
References: <u8re50l9fcbcn0nhhk50nj0tg1klafsfeq@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-602.newsdawg.com
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-No-Archive: yes
FL-Build: Fidolook 2002 (SL) 6.0.2600.78 - 24/10/2002 21:18:29
Xref: sn-us alt.politics.democrats.d:1135259 alt.true-crime:812410
misc.legal:484005 soc.culture.usa:1440677
|
| |
| |
his
dealing?
hear
Brought to you by "Richard" the St00pid Bullis, Pedophile.
"What makes a child molester any more dangerous than a drug dealer?"
"Meagan's law is a travisty [sic] to justice in America."
And then of course there's the gratuitous -- and inaccurate -- television
reference from "Quincy." It's almost as if st00pid goes into some kind of
trace when he writes these things. Good lord!
Richard the St00pid Bullis stated in Message-ID:
<bo0vfv0svc@enews2.newsguy.com> You claim I am a pedophile simply for the
fact I state I enjoy looking at naked kids. Show me the law, any state or
federal law, in which this is a criminal act. Some state laws may say that
posession may be illegal, but not the actual viewing of.
"Richard" <screw-lart@old.man> wrote: "I may have fantasies involving rape
of a child, but you're no mindreader and as long as the thoughts remain a
fantasy, there is no possible way to convict".
Photos of unemployed, trailer dweller Bullis
http://www.lart.com/stupidrichard/
http://convict.iwarp.com/bullis-single.jpg
Richard Bullis FAQ 5.0
http://www.lart.com/rtsfaq/
Path:
sn-us!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.oc
tanews.net!news.octanews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.g
lorb.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn51feed!worldnet.att.ne
t!129.250.169.16!pln-e!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4 From: "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> Newsgroups: alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,soc.culture.usa Subject: Re: Newspaper runs FRONT PAGE pics of molesters Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:15:47 -0600 Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Lines: 48 Message-ID: <c388ro02esh@enews4.newsguy.com> References: <u8re50l9fcbcn0nhhk50nj0tg1klafsfeq@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-602.newsdawg.com X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-No-Archive: yes FL-Build: Fidolook 2002 (SL) 6.0.2600.78 - 24/10/2002 21:18:29 Xref: sn-us alt.politics.democrats.d:1135259 alt.true-crime:812410 misc.legal:484005 soc.culture.usa:1440677 |
| |
| |
"What makes a child molester any more dangerous than a drug dealer?"
"Meagan's law is a travisty [sic] to justice in America."
And then of course there's the gratuitous -- and inaccurate -- television
reference from "Quincy." It's almost as if st00pid goes into some kind of
trace when he writes these things. Good lord!
I meant "trance" but like it @$#*ing matters. Anybody can see st00pid is a
danger to children and an idiot to boot.
sn-us!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.oc
tanews.net!news.octanews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.g
lorb.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn51feed!worldnet.att.ne
t!129.250.169.16!pln-e!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews4
From: "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,soc.culture.usa
Subject: Re: Newspaper runs FRONT PAGE pics of molesters
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:15:47 -0600
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <c388ro02esh@enews4.newsguy.com>
References: <u8re50l9fcbcn0nhhk50nj0tg1klafsfeq@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-602.newsdawg.com
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-No-Archive: yes
FL-Build: Fidolook 2002 (SL) 6.0.2600.78 - 24/10/2002 21:18:29
Xref: sn-us alt.politics.democrats.d:1135259 alt.true-crime:812410
misc.legal:484005 soc.culture.usa:1440677
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
Bill Jackson wrote:
|
| |
| |
Bill Jackson wrote:
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
Bill Jackson wrote:
|
| |
| |
his
dealing?
hear
Brought to you by "Richard" the St00pid Bullis, Pedophile.
Aaahhh, my specialty! Child molesters/pedophiles average about 125 victims
before being caught. And they historically molest again and again, even
after being caught many times. The average number of victims in a lifetime
is about 500 average! This is why EVERY organization that deals with
children MUST be required to do a criminal background check on every single
worker, not just the teachers and others in direct contact with children,
but the incidental workers, like maintenance and janitorial staff too.
Anyone that has a reasonable chance of having any contact with a child needs
to be screened.
Megan's Law is not about 1 incident, but about the other thousands such
incidents that were NOT brought to public light. Megan's Law is a vital
tool in protecting children from molestation as only about 2% of pedophiles
are ever considered cured, and even then they are never to be trusted around
children again.
This abuse is also very extensive. The FBI now estimates that 1 out of 3
girls and 1 out of 4 boys will be sexually assaulted before reaching age 18.
My work with prevention unfortunately seems to prove this correct. When
talking about my own abuse at age 11 and my wife's extensive abuse many
people come up to tell me about their experience. In women's self defense
classes that we (RAD Systems) do blind surveys on shows about 1/2 the women
have been sexually assaulted as children. The new men's classes are not
much different.
Richard the St00pid Bullis stated in Message-ID:
<bo0vfv0svc@enews2.newsguy.com> You claim I am a pedophile simply for the
fact I state I enjoy looking at naked kids. Show me the law, any state or
federal law, in which this is a criminal act. Some state laws may say that
posession may be illegal, but not the actual viewing of.
Pedophilia is not just a legal definition, but a psychological condition.
It is a MEDICAL definition first and foremost. It is described in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
"Richard" <screw-lart@old.man> wrote: "I may have fantasies involving rape
of a child, but you're no mindreader and as long as the thoughts remain a
fantasy, there is no possible way to convict".
This is an admission and description of the medical disorder called
pedophilia.
--
Mike D.
www.stopassaultnow.org
Remove .spamnot to respond by email
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 3/5/2004
|
| |
| |
"AlienZen" <XjunkX@XalienzenX.com> wrote in message news:<fFM5c.33043$U94.5175@fe22.usenetserver.com>...
Why stop at that? What makes women and children so special that people who
commit crimes against them should never be permitted to move on with their
lives? Hell, lets print out pictures of everybody who has been convicted. I
wanna know if I'm living near someone who got a speeding ticket 15 years ago, so
I can make sure I'm out of the way when I see him/her pulling out of their
driveway. The newspaper has an obligation to inform me if I'm living next to a
burgler, so I can build a wall and mine my yard.
Personally, I think there has got to be a line. I don't know where it is, and I
doubt if any of us here will ever be able to define it, but I truly believe that
this newspaper crossed it.
I think the line should be drawn based on how recent the crime was.
If some guy was convicted of rape yesterday, then sure the press can
run his pic. But if it was years ago and he's been released from
prison, then the press should leave him alone as long as he causes no
trouble.
|
| |
| |
|
