|
|
| |
| |
Mr. Bla" <bla@bla.com> wrote in message news:<v4mdnemjRYqmysXdRVn-ug@comcast.com>...
I don't think I've ever specifically responded to one of your postings,
however this one is irresistible! Are you serious? You do realize this is
Usenet don't you?
ofcourse right from the start.
Do you mean to tell me that you seriously contacted an
attorney because someone "slandered" you in Usenet?
And you have a problem with this?
What's next, a Supreme
Court case because someone on the subway called you a bad name?
caling a person a bad name on the subway get dealt with on the spot.
You do
understand what slander is don't you? Slander, and libel are legal terms
for defamatory speech.
exactly, applicable to private citizens
Exactly what fame do you have that has been damaged
by her postings? Are you the king of England? Are you Bill Gates? I am
not the most worldly person, but I don't remember running into the name
Jabriol in medical, engineering, aerodynamics, computers, or any other major
discipline.
do a google search :-)
Let me make a suggestion here, she has done no damage to you by
what she has said, the damage is done by your response.
If I was to call her a whore that derseverd to get beat up by her
husband night after night because she can't resist sleeping around...
because it is usenet, its ok?
Why is it that you,
as well as Mr. Perez seem to immediately lose your man-bits every time you
interact with this person. It's uncommon to see a woman who can invoke such
fear in men.
actually it is the reverse.. there is no fear hear.. as I said, she
can call me up.. show up at my house, whenever she likes.. everybody
knows where I live, have my phone number, know the congregation I go
to.
I bet she can't do the same. People like her hide their identity,
because they are fearful.. and I don't buy that spam excuse neither.
I am in the process of a small exchange with her myself. She
is a counterpuncher, she doesn't take any crap from anybody, and she's not
going to back down from a fight.
And if the fight is dirty and one sided, you don't care I see.
Good, then she can fight in person as well, and not behind the key
board and monitor.
I'm confident enough in my manhood to back
It's always nice
to keep perspective in life. If indeed she has "slandered" you in Usenet,
the worst thing you can do is appear to be less of a man by claiming that
you've spoken with her Internet service provider, and called in an attorney.
The best thing to do is walk away.
why? because is the man thing to do?
cut me a break, as she herself has said.. we are in the 21 century, if
she can dish it out, she can take it in.. if the kitchen get hot, then
she should get out of it.
There's only one thing in the world
stupider than burning yourself with McDonald's coffee........ Suing
McDonald's!
Bla
I guess you miss the boat on that one as well.
You need to catch up on some reading, her ISP has, and they already
aware of the situation..
all she has do is call me a wife beater and prorapist one more time..
she does not back out of a fight..
then she won't have a problem backing out of a court battle... most
likely her ISP will cancel her account and put her on the ISP
blacklist of troublemaker that may cost them money. But I will get a
good amount from her ISP, more so when they allow a user to violate
their TOS.
here is some reading you need to:
http://www.cyberlibel.com/liabilit.html
http://isp-planet.com/politics/isp-lible.html
http://law.buffalo.edu/Academics/courses/629/computer_law_policy_articles/CompLawPapers/holland.htm
Libelous messages placed on the Internet in the United States is
upheld to the same level of scrutiny as other forms of communication.
However, the ease in which a person can keep their identity secret
frequently poses a problem for finding a responsible party. Recent
trends indicate that the owners and operators of on-line services will
sometimes be held liable for what is placed on their services. Recent
case law in the United States considering the liability of owners and
operators of on-line services for items posted upon bulletin boards
exemplify the evolving area of computer law. The courts have looked
upon on-line libel with an eye upon traditional libel law and also
recognizing the uniqueness of on-line circumstances.
The liability of the owners and operators of on-line systems for the
posting of defamatory statements depends on whether they are
considered by the courts as a distributor of information or a
publisher of information. These two categories, publisher and
distributor are treated differently in traditional libel law. The
distributor of information, such as libraries, newsstands, bookstores,
telephone and telegraph operators are not normally held liable.
Publishers, such as newspapers and publishing houses are held
responsible for the materials that they print. (Internet and the Law,
p. 164). Thus, in the Internet world, if the accused is considered to
be a distributor, then no liability will be found unless the
individual had personal knowledge of the contents of the material.
However, if the operator or owner is considered to be a publisher,
then liability will be found.
Holding on-line operators liable for material placed on the Internet
is complicated by the uniqueness of the Internet. *The Internet
consists of approximately 7 million computers seamlessly integrated
using a common technology via 60,000 largely private networks . . . It
operates over virtually every kind of underlying means, including:
local networks (LANS), telephone lines, ISDN, CATV, wireless,
cellular, private and common carrier fiber, satellite and submarine
cable circuits. A common joke is that the Internet runs over
everything except wet string. The Internet operates as a highly
d
|
| |
| |
n 17 Mar 2004 20:19:40 -0800, Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) got double
secret probation because:
"Mr. Bla" <bla@bla.com> wrote in message news:<v4mdnemjRYqmysXdRVn-ug@comcast.com>...
ofcourse right from the start.
And you have a problem with this?
caling a person a bad name on the subway get dealt with on the spot.
k00k sign!!!!!!2!!!!
exactly, applicable to private citizens
do a google search :-)
If I was to call her a whore that derseverd to get beat up by her
husband night after night because she can't resist sleeping around...
because it is usenet, its ok?
k00k sign!!!!!!3!!!!
Why is it that you,
as well as Mr. Perez seem to immediately lose your man-bits every time you
interact with this person. It's uncommon to see a woman who can invoke such
fear in men.
actually it is the reverse.. there is no fear hear.. as I said, she
can call me up.. show up at my house, whenever she likes.. everybody
knows where I live, have my phone number, know the congregation I go
to.
I bet she can't do the same. People like her hide their identity,
because they are fearful.. and I don't buy that spam excuse neither.
And if the fight is dirty and one sided, you don't care I see.
Good, then she can fight in person as well, and not behind the key
board and monitor.
why? because is the man thing to do?
cut me a break, as she herself has said.. we are in the 21 century, if
she can dish it out, she can take it in.. if the kitchen get hot, then
she should get out of it.
I guess you miss the boat on that one as well.
You need to catch up on some reading, her ISP has, and they already
aware of the situation..
all she has do is call me a wife beater and prorapist one more time..
she does not back out of a fight..
then she won't have a problem backing out of a court battle... most
likely her ISP will cancel her account and put her on the ISP
blacklist of troublemaker that may cost them money. But I will get a
good amount from her ISP, more so when they allow a user to violate
their TOS.
k00k sign!!!!!!4!!!!
here is some reading you need to:
http://www.cyberlibel.com/liabilit.html
http://isp-planet.com/politics/isp-lible.html
http://law.buffalo.edu/Academics/courses/629/computer_law_policy_articles/CompLawPapers/holland.htm
Libelous messages placed on the Internet in the United States is
upheld to the same level of scrutiny as other forms of communication.
However, the ease in which a person can keep their identity secret
frequently poses a problem for finding a responsible party. Recent
trends indicate that the owners and operators of on-line services will
sometimes be held liable for what is placed on their services. Recent
case law in the United States considering the liability of owners and
operators of on-line services for items posted upon bulletin boards
exemplify the evolving area of computer law. The courts have looked
upon on-line libel with an eye upon traditional libel law and also
recognizing the uniqueness of on-line circumstances.
The liability of the owners and operators of on-line systems for the
posting of defamatory statements depends on whether they are
considered by the courts as a distributor of information or a
publisher of information. These two categories, publisher and
distributor are treated differently in traditional libel law. The
distributor of information, such as libraries, newsstands, bookstores,
telephone and telegraph operators are not normally held liable.
Publishers, such as newspapers and publishing houses are held
responsible for the materials that they print. (Internet and the Law,
p. 164). Thus, in the Internet world, if the accused is considered to
be a distributor, then no liability will be found unless the
individual had personal knowledge of the contents of the material.
However, if the operator or owner is considered to be a publisher,
then liability will be found.
Holding on-line operators liable for material placed on the Internet
is complicated by the uniqueness of the Internet. *The Internet
consists of approximately 7 million computers seamlessly integrated
using a common technology via 60,00
|
| |
| |
"Mr. Bla" <bla@bla.com> wrote in message
news:<v4mdnemjRYqmysXdRVn-ug@comcast.com>...
she has been warned, her ISP as been warned. And it seems they have
taken action, that why she has been as a rabid dog... pretending she
is a victim, when in fact she started by lying about me being a rape
supporter and wife beater..
this is an example for the rest of you.. when Carol slanders you and
lie..
send an e-mail to her webmaster.. not the abuse e-mail on her header..
it inoperable.. Or do what I did. Have an attorney give them a call..
the era of Carol slandering people has gone away.
Freedom of speech is not freedom of slander...
you Slander.. you pay..
a tough pill for Carol to swallow
LOL
I don't think I've ever specifically responded to one of your postings,
however this one is irresistible! Are you serious? You do realize this
is
Usenet don't you?
ofcourse right from the start.
** Then act like it and stop THREATENING me that you'll hunt me down. THAT
post was your BIG MISTAKE Jabriol.
Do you mean to tell me that you seriously contacted an
attorney because someone "slandered" you in Usenet?
And you have a problem with this?
** Another Jabriol LIE. I have yet to hear from his attorney. I am anxious
to hear what his att' thinks of his THREATENING posts.
What's next, a Supreme
Court case because someone on the subway called you a bad name?
caling a person a bad name on the subway get dealt with on the spot.
* Not by you. You are self admittedly about ready for your final
(punishment).
You do
understand what slander is don't you? Slander, and libel are legal
terms
for defamatory speech.
exactly, applicable to private citizens
* But it's OK for you to libel others by calling them names right? Why is
that Jabbers> Because you claim to be one of god's people? A Jehovah's
Witness?
Exactly what fame do you have that has been damaged
by her postings? Are you the king of England? Are you Bill Gates? I
am
not the most worldly person, but I don't remember running into the name
Jabriol in medical, engineering, aerodynamics, computers, or any other
major
discipline.
do a google search :-)
* His FAME is to be the most despised poster in Usenett - bar none!
Let me make a suggestion here, she has done no damage to you by
what she has said, the damage is done by your response.
If I was to call her a whore that derseverd to get beat up by her
husband night after night because she can't resist sleeping around...
because it is usenet, its ok?
* You've made similar remarks and accusations in the past. You accused me
taking my 6 year old son to wild sex parties at Motels. What did your lawyer
think of that one Jabbers?
Why is it that you,
as well as Mr. Perez seem to immediately lose your man-bits every time
you
interact with this person. It's uncommon to see a woman who can invoke
such
fear in men.
actually it is the reverse.. there is no fear hear.. as I said, she
can call me up.. show up at my house, whenever she likes.. everybody
knows where I live, have my phone number, know the congregation I go
to.
* I wouldn't go near you! But it seems from your THREATS you sure want to
come out here and "HUNT CAROL DOWN." That post was your BIG MISTAKE.
I bet she can't do the same. People like her hide their identity,
because they are fearful.. and I don't buy that spam excuse neither.
* Why do you ant to know where I live? You're a known sociopath here on
Usenet and you want me to give YOU my address?
I am in the process of a small exchange with her myself. She
is a counterpuncher, she doesn't take any crap from anybody, and she's
not
going to back down from a fight.
And if the fight is dirty and one sided, you don't care I see.
Good, then she can fight in person as well, and not behind the key
board and monitor.
* Are you suggesting you "HUNT CAROL DOWN" to kill her? Stab her? Or in
your own past words "womp her face in. Mash her face in gravel. Womp her
head in?" What did you lawyer think of that Jabbers?
I'm confident enough in my manhood to back
away without needing to invoke some great legal defense.
ofcourse until she start slandering you, and call you a rapist and
wife beater.
* Where is the post accusing you of being a rapist? You never did produce
it we see. Produce these posts as I have produced your, all headers
included.
It's always nice
to keep perspective in life. If indeed she has "slandered" you in
Usenet,
the worst thing you can do is appear to be less of a man by claiming
that
you've spoken with her Internet service provider, and called in an
attorney.
The best thing to do is walk away.
why? because is the man thing to do?
* I'm waiting to hear from Jabber's attorney to see what he thinks of
jabber's THREATENING posts and accusations I took my little boy to "wild sex
parties at Hotels".
cut me a break, as she herself has said.. we are in the 21 century, if
she can dish it out, she can take it in.. if the kitchen get hot, then
she should get out of it.
* I'm waiting to hear from your attorney and my ISP to go over your
THREATENING and disgusting posts regarding my son.
You need to catch up on some reading, her ISP has, and they already
aware of the situation..
* Yes he is - and so is Jabriol's ISP.
all she has do is call me a wife beater and prorapist one more time..
she does not back out of a fight..
* Produce the PROOF! Where are all these posts where I made these claims?
PRODUCE THEM YOU SLIMY LIAR.
then she won't have a problem backing out of a court battle... most
likely her ISP will cancel her account and put her on the ISP
blacklist of troublemaker that may cost them money.
* Never happen! Get out of your dream world. You don't even have posts as
PROOF of your accusations - accusations NO ONE including myself ever made
here. Are you delusional as well as a pathological liar?
But I will get a
good amount from her ISP, more so when they allow a user to violate
their TOS.
* Keep dreaming. Try working for a living if you need more money. Produce
all these posts or shut up about it already.
--
Alissa....
"Thou seest the mote in thy brother's eye, but thou seest not the beam
in thine own eye. When thou castest the beam out of thine own eye,
then wilt thou see clearly to cast the mote from thy brothe
|
| |
| |
|
