|
|
in article nf2dnSHvhMC6K8LdRVn-jg@comcast.com, Chas at
chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net wrote on 3/22/04 7:59 PM:
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
>> You're not listening, Chas. It's YOUR assertion. YOU need to cite it.
>> I don't need t
|
|
|
in article jhsu50d1smaj3i92avbs9snvb601tq9pnk@4ax.com, Ann at me@privacy.net
wrote on 3/22/04 3:26 PM:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:04:03 -0800, George Evans <georgee@pe.net>
> wrote:
>
>> in article yKGdnbx7yq85gcLdRVn-tA@comcast.com, Chas at
>> cha
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030006000609040103030308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Chas wrote:
[snip]
>>an idealist,
>
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Mekkala wrote:
>>On Mon 22 Mar 2004 08:52:22a,
>
> No, actually, it was more like 6:52 am. (You must be in the central time
> zone.)
>
>>"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> kicked back with a beer,
>
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:04:03 -0800, George Evans <georgee@pe.net>
wrote:
>in article yKGdnbx7yq85gcLdRVn-tA@comcast.com, Chas at
>chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net wrote on 3/22/04 9:04 AM:
>
>> "George Evans" <georgee@pe.net> wrote
>>
>>> I agree th
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090809090500030401090106
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>[same old bollocks]
|
|
|
"W. Stephen Lush" wrote:
>
> I read that article. Those pakis should hang for their malicious use of a
> joy-bringing, fulfilling toy. Now they will have to hide in the confines of
> Laser Tag or heaven forbid, squirt gun wars. I have an idea,
|
|
|
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:26:26 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000>
wrote:
>The county is technically an extension of the state.
>So it should make no difference in which county the deed is registered.
>As the deed becomes a "state" record.
You rea
|
|
|
On Mon 22 Mar 2004 11:37:04a, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> kicked back with a beer, ruminated at length,
fell asleep, woke up, lit up a joint, then fell asleep again after
thoughtfully blurting out:
> Mekkala wrote:
>
>> On Mon
|
|
|
s_knight8 wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/02/15/dna.prison.release/?related
> NEW YORK (CNN) -- A man who was released from prison after 15 years
> because DNA evidence did not prove his guilt said Friday it feels
> "incredible" to have h
|
|
|
Najena,
I live in Kansas now. How do I research about Kansas Law?
Thanks.
"Najena"
> From what I've read, there are several views on surface waters, and the
> answer will be determined by your state's common law rule or statute.
>
> I've s
|
|
|
"Isaac"> wrote
> >> First, crimes should only be actions that *harm* others.
> >
> > I think that you need to also add to the crime category are those
> > actions that are likely to harm others. If you shoot a gun into a
> > crowd, but hit no one, so
|
|
|
"Ron Peterson"> wrote
> "Don"> wrote
> > First, crimes should only be actions that *harm* others.
>
> I think that you need to also add to the crime category are those
> actions that are likely to harm others. If you shoot a gun into a
> crowd, but
|
|
|
"Number 9"> wrote
> But at minimum, some type of law must be in place,
Why?
|
|
|
Hi all
Maybe someone can give me some suggestions here. I helped a friend in
Toronto file a defence (form 9A) and a pre-trial request (13A) over a
suit filed against him. Here's the gist:
After a brief verbal altercation (not denied) the plainti
|
|
|
google-noreply.a.jp@xoxy.net (Josh Purinton) wrote
> Without privacy in financial matters, how can you have privacy in matters of
> sex and tastes?
Why not? Where's the connection? If you don't want anyone to find out,
you can still pay by ca
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
> In article <c3nkfe$97b$1@stan.redhat.com>,
> Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>Chas wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Within the last hundred years, say, a white man couldn't 'rape' a woman of
>>>color;
>>
>>Absolute bull#@($. "The
|
|
|
>In this particular case we have the utterance of words which describes what
>one person felt was the best description of the events for the moment.
>The plaintiff is arguing the poor choice of words.
>"I saw the man being carried away by the police".
|
|
|
"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
> You're not listening, Chas. It's YOUR assertion. YOU need to cite it.
> I don't need to disprove it until you can show that there's something
> to disprove.
Michael; one cannot prove a negative. My qua
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> Within the last hundred years, say, a white man couldn't 'rape' a woman of
> color;
Absolute bull#@($. "The last hundred years" takes you back only to
1904. Gimme a cite for your claim that white men could not be arrested
or pro
|
|
|
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:37:33 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
>> Nonsense. You're the one making an assertion -- that white men
>> *COULD NOT* be arrested for rape. There's absolutel
|
|
|
He was debating Seamus Hasson, a cathalick interleckchul, on the issues of
the Establishment Clause and his lawsuit.
The moderator whose name escapes me mentioned that fat little il duce Scalia
had recused himself because he painted himself into a co
|
|
|
And your pint is blasmpemy one?
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:<405F76DB.5010200@it.com>...
> Subject: Re: It Really IS About Ken Smith ...
> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:44:03 -0500
> From: John Hattan <john@thecodezone.com>
> Organi
|
|
|
Many times you may be threatened with suit but unless he has lots of cash
floating around for attorneys.. He will have to find one who works on a
contingency basis.. Based on what you have stated, I don't think it will
happen..
Steve
"Richa
|
|
|
Hi,
I am not worried about my company taking revange,
they need me more than I need them.
all I want to know is what I am enititled to.
the WC doesn't provide much information and hasn't offered much information.
thanks
Michael
"McGyver" <G
|
|
|
Joseph Brown wrote:
> I have a question on a potential case for defamation on TV:
> As a producer of a small community television show I assigned a reporter
> to go out and take several interviews on a particular subject. My
> reporter asked
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Chas wrote:
>>> I think they exercised their power capriciously, unfairly, and out of
>>> personal bias.
>> On what basis? Ken has only ASSERTED that they had a personal bias
>> against him, but
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> The legal profession is replete with assholes- it's a reasonable stereotype
> to assume, subject to definitive proof to the contrary. They deserve Ken.
And vice versa.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
PTRAVEL wrote:
> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
> news:c3nhfl0g9q@enews1.newsguy.com...
>> PTRAVEL wrote:
>>
>>
> >> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> wrote in message
> >> news:c3n17f01ms8@enews2.newsguy.com...
> >>> Jo
|
|
|
"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
> Nonsense. You're the one making an assertion -- that white men
> *COULD NOT* be arrested for rape. There's absolutely no reason
> why you can't be asked to back up that assertion.
Actually, I qualified
|
|
|
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/02/15/dna.prison.release/?related
NEW YORK (CNN) -- A man who was released from prison after 15 years
because DNA evidence did not prove his guilt said Friday it feels
"incredible" to have his freedom.
One of Bruce Gods
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" brayed that we owe gratitude to the thugs of the
Colorado bar.
For defecating all over constitutional rights?
|
|
|
I'm trying to find the law or section that is in the New Hampshire law that
pertains to the illegal acquision of medical records.
Do any of you know what that/those may be?
What type of penalty does this usually carry?
Thank you.
|
|
|
www.mer-con.biz
|
|
|
kmclaurin@yahoo.com (The Coach) wrote in message news:<66b4e28b.0403201735.362e14a2@posting.google.com>...
> I am currently receiving unemployment benefits in CA.
> I have put in a bid to perform some computer consulting
> work (probably about 2 weeks
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote
> I already told you, didn't you read it?
So your ad hominem to Smith is meant to be read in a more general context?
> You're a malcontent.
Yessir.
The present state of abuse and corruption i
|
|
|
> Have you tried offering this "mr xyz" an interview wherein he can state
his
> side of the story?
verbally, over the phone: yes. I'll make it in writing.
> Finally - do you have E&O insurance? If so, contact your insurance company
> for advice.
|
|
|
"Sky King" <rebeo727@adelphia.net> wrote
>....In the Marines you are a rifleman FIRST.
Not if you're an airedale.
> So we can have separate but equal standards in civilian life then too
> right?
We may can.
> For instance if a job requires a
|
|
|
"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
> >>>Within the last hundred years, say, a white man couldn't 'rape' a woman
of
> >>>color;
> >>Absolute bull#@($. "The last hundred years" takes you back only to
> >>1904. Gimme a cite for your claim tha
|
|
|
In article <c3nkfe$97b$1@stan.redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote:
>Chas wrote:
>
>> Within the last hundred years, say, a white man couldn't 'rape' a woman of
>> color;
>
>Absolute bull#@($. "The last hundred years" takes you
|
|
|
On Mon 22 Mar 2004 08:52:22a, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> kicked back with a beer, ruminated at length,
fell asleep, woke up, lit up a joint, then fell asleep again after
thoughtfully blurting out:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> [s
|
|
|
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, "Joseph Brown" <joebrown@wdontspam.edu>
said/asked in substance:
> I'm in Quebec, Canada, and have some
> questions about defamation law.
In evaluating whatever responses there may be to your posting/query,
bear in mind that
|
|
|
> Absolutely.
> It's a relatively new crime, as regards rape.
> Within the last hundred years, say, a white man couldn't 'rape' a woman of
> color; a husband couldn't 'rape' his wife; a whore couldn't be 'raped',
and
> a woman caught in the company o
|
|
|
"Heidi Graw" <heidigraw@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:77o7c.873399$ts4.78932@pd7tw3no...
> (snip)
>
> >S quoted article:
> > I am sick of the attacks on Kobe Bryant's attorney, Pamela Mackey. She
is
> > doing exactly what she should be doing. Anyt
|
|
|
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c3kq0v$eqv@dispatch.concentric.net...
>
http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040320/NEWS/103200007&
> Avis=&Dato=&Kategori=&Lopenr=&rs=3
>
> As a woman, it is very disc
|
|
|
in article yKGdnbx7yq85gcLdRVn-tA@comcast.com, Chas at
chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net wrote on 3/22/04 9:04 AM:
> "George Evans" <georgee@pe.net> wrote
>
>> I agree that she must resist all the way for there to be rape.
>
> I think that one can su
|
|
|
"Health Sleuth" <healthsleuth@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040322124334.01049.00000153@mb-m02.aol.com...
>
> I'm trying to find the law or section that is in the New Hampshire law
that
> pertains to the illegal acquision of medical records.
>
>
|
|
|
"z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>An instructor working for a [state] university slandered me (per se) in
>class.
>Can I file a slander (per se) case against both the person and the
>university
>in state court,
>and a discrimination case against both th
|
|
|
"Joseph Brown" <joebrown@wdontspam.edu> wrote in message
news:OLA7c.11959$ZY6.250055@wagner.videotron.net...
> Are there any case laws or something in the constitution that protects
> reporters from statements made by interviewees? I'm in Quebec, Ca
|
|
|
Answer:
Based on your name, I would offer that usually states such as the one you're
in give rights to every property along the source of the water. Beyond
that, the laws differ because a lot of ground water is regulated by
administrative and legisla
|
|
|
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 15:11:12 +1100, "Darkfalz" <darkfalz@xis.com.au>
wrote:
>> And any woman who falsely claims rape hurts other women who really may |
