|
|
in article Kq2dnReSK85klPvdRVn-vg@comcast.com, Chas at
chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net wrote on 3/27/04 3:10 PM:
> "Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote
>
>> And every moronic defender of the accuser, fwiw.
>
> It may just be that the cas
|
|
|
"Gary Collard" <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:40660901.14C3383E@netscape.net...
> V wrote:
> >
> > "agakhan" <agakhan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:oti960lsj794cv5i767j7q139vgpd07ljo@4ax.com...
> > >> I stopped being a Democ
|
|
|
in article 3c2dnTjHwNJTLvjdRVn-ig@comcast.com, Chas at
chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net wrote on 3/27/04 9:03 AM:
> "George Evans" <georgee@pe.net> wrote
>
>>> Are you serious? You think the general tenor of the coverage has
>>> been pro-prosecution?
|
|
|
Larry, you leave the body bags of idiots strewn all over these non-hoops
groups. Son of spam is only the latest notch on your keyboard. Kudos.
Larry Coon wrote:
>
> Son of Spam wrote:
>
> > Then why does it describe the legal relationship betw
|
|
|
On 27 Mar 2004 06:24:56 -0800, T0n4w4nd4 K4rd3x wrote:
>A woman can have sex with 100 guys in one day, but if she says no to
>the 101st, and he forces himself upon her anyway, it's legally defined
>as rape - even if the woman is a known prostitute, s
|
|
|
The Second Restatement of Torts says that a defamatory communication in the
form of an opinion is not actionable unless it implies the allegation of
undisclosed defamatory facts as the basis for the opinion.
Recall the professor stated that "all my c
|
|
|
T0n4w4nd4 K4rd3x <tonawandakardex@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Tim Brown" <tuffgong@charter.net> wrote in message
> news:<106afvsi8sh4d3e@corp.supernews.com>...
>> OK now I get it...but three diff guys is kinda sick IMO.
>
> Unelss you're one of the guys, of
|
|
|
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:59:27 -0900, "Child"
<beth@NOT-SO-bad-dawgs-in-ak.com> wrote:
>
>"Sky King" <rebeo727@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>news:16232246.0403270811.700012ae@posting.google.com...
>
>
>
>> > > > My husband has told me time and a
|
|
|
T0n4w4nd4 K4rd3x wrote:
>
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message news:<x0_8c.2014$Fo4.22597@typhoon.sonic.net>...
> > "tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
> > news:c41aal$68i@rac2.wam.umd.edu...
> > > In article <c4068o$3p9@d
|
|
|
In article <c655f12c.0403271846.1289a85b@posting.google.com>,
Sylvester & Tweety <sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net> wrote:
>
>...that according to the NY City DA's office
>* 40% of rape accusations are PROVEABLY FALSE
> and
>* 40% of rape ac
|
|
|
V wrote:
>
> "agakhan" <agakhan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:oti960lsj794cv5i767j7q139vgpd07ljo@4ax.com...
> >> I stopped being a Democrat in 1995. snip
>
> How do you "stop being a democrat?"
> I thought once you were a democrat, there was
|
|
|
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 16:00:05 -0500, buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
> TO BE ADDED TO OUR WEB SITE
>
> CURRENT EVENTS
> LATEST DEVELOPMENTS--PLEDGE
> AND SOME OF OUR THOUGHTS AND COMMENTS
>
>Wednesday, March 24, 2004.
|
|
|
bondrock@ifx.net (Info Junkie) wrote in message news:<4065a355.15834733@news.ifx.net>...
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:31:06 GMT, "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"Info Junkie" <bondrock@ifx.net> wrote in message
> >news:40658eb6.10555208@news.if
|
|
|
In article <BC8B5070.260E%georgee@pe.net>,
George Evans <georgee@pe.net> wrote:
>in article c43tdu$3tq@rac1.wam.umd.edu, tjab at tjab@wam.umd.edu wrote on
>3/27/04 4:52 AM:
>
>> In article <BC8A6C1F.2581%georgee@pe.net>,
>> George Evans <georgee@p
|
|
|
In article <4064E392.6090301@inparticular.net>, Chainsaw
<noone@inparticular.net> wrote:
> T0n4w4nd4 K4rd3x wrote:
>
>> http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=1769181
>>
>> Ahem.
>
> Maybe you can learn how to spell Kotex. Ahem.
May
|
|
|
"Lennie the Lurker" <lenniethelurker@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:15a48d98.0403271729.276b05c@posting.google.com...
> After a protracted abscense from the groups, Whack-A-Loon has noticed
> a falling off of orders for our Loon Mallets.
>
> Althou
|
|
|
In article <c44ndb$3p1@dispatch.concentric.net>, "Don Tiberone"
<DonTiberoneNOSPAM@SKP.net> wrote:
>> so since she's such a hose queen, she's no longer able to say she
>> didn't wanna screw Kobe? I hope you have a daughter one day...
>>
>> NO me
|
|
|
[Sylvester & Tweety (sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net)]
[27 Mar 2004 19:35:01 -0800]
:As a soldier in the United States Army, my oath of enlistment obligates me
:to defend that Constitution against ALL enemies, both foreign AND DOMESTIC.
:(i.e. pieces
|
|
|
<thisisme@cotse.net> wrote in message news:<dGhpc2lzbWU=.f4bef9245a148df47e0047fe3b6c8efa@1080413375.nulluser.com>...
> Chas wrote:
>
> > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> wrote
> > > > I'm thinking of making my own energy bar in my kitchen and
> > >
|
|
|
Dennis <drjudsjr@earthlink.netSCRAPE.com> wrote:
>so since she's such a hose queen, she's no longer able to say she
>didn't wanna screw Kobe? I hope you have a daughter one day...
>
>NO means NO, period.
>
And Yes means YES. She's not allowed t
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.000> wrote
> >> I'm thinking of making my own energy bar in my kitchen and
> >> selling it on the net. Does anyone know the legalities of
> >> this? Do I need a license or have to go through any other
|
|
|
in article wpedndVT0NISO_jdRVn-hQ@comcast.com, Chas at
chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net wrote on 3/27/04 8:06 AM:
> "George Evans" <georgee@pe.net> wrote
>
>> Your opinion is absolutely incorrect and for obvious reasons. The nation is
>> generally pro
|
|
|
tonawandakardex@yahoo.com (T0n4w4nd4 K4rd3x) wrote:
>And truthfully, it's irrelevant how many guys she slept with.
No mater how many times you keep repeating that, it won't make it
true. It's *not* irrelevant. Simply put, it makes his story much
|
|
|
hanks, perhaps I need to understand why a defamatory/slanderous statement
prefaced by "I think" grants the speaker some sort of immunity
from liability in a slander civil court action.
(If not slander, perhaps discrimination may apply...)
BTW I do
|
|
|
Ann <me@privacy.net> wrote in news:6dua6096q7tgsv5j45j10ti9ioifpljkqv@
4ax.com:
> Oh okay. Funny though.. other men I know like all that female stuff
> and wouldn't want it washed out. YMMV and does I suppose ;-)
>
Yeah, I'm with you on that
|
|
|
"Amen!" :-)
"Newton Joseph" <drnjoseph@socal.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Tm09c.26844$h85.582@twister.socal.rr.com...
> If I had a child in school I would not want him or her to be exposed to
what
> I consider a superstitious concepts. Not only t
|
|
|
"R&B Wiz" <RB@Wiz.com> wrote in message news:<Acj9c.5507$y62.4767@fe1.columbus.rr.com>...
> It "appears" to be illegal from the standpoint of Ohio and fedreal
> law that if someone is deemed to have a disability (i.e. drinking),
> that that employer is
|
|
|
In article <EZg9c.4472$y62.2621@fe1.columbus.rr.com>, R&B Wiz says...
>
>If a person is fired, and there are allegations made (drinking on the job,
>"improper touching"),
>and these are all not true, can you take the employer to court?
>
>Thnx,
>Me
|
|
|
Do we have access to the transcripts of the argument yet?
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and onl
|
|
|
"Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@sti.net> wrote in message news:<vvSdnVHv1o7q2fndRVn-sw@sti.net>...
> "Sublimus" <sublimus@freenet.de> wrote in message
> news:4063e797$0$708$5402220f@news.sunrise.ch...
> > Tarver Engineering wrote:
> > > "Sublimus" <subl
|
|
|
"klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote
> Well, no, it would be because I didn't know them and therefore wouldn't
know
> what to expect.
Sure; someone might rape you.
Or at least get fresh enough to make you report them.
> Besides, it just looks sleaz
|
|
|
Well, as you might have guessed by now, I am deep in a historical
controversy
concerning ownership of property in California (not mine, fortunately, I am
just an interested party) in the 1850's.
In the 1850's, apparently, there was an existing profe
|
|
|
"Tarver Engineering" <jtarver@sti.net> wrote in message news:<9fmdnRgSIYmJMfjdRVn-gw@sti.net>...
> "Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:5f89c.2562$tL6.498@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "Tarver Engineering" <jta
|
|
|
Biznatch Hadhersnatch wrote:
>
> s_knight8 wrote:
>
>
>>http://entertainment.tv.yahoo.com/entnews/ap/20040326/108032640000.html
>>
>>For obvious reasons, Vanessa Williams doesn't have much to say about the
>>ongoing Kobe Bryant situation.
|
|
|
"klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote
> Right, her behavior didn't change. She was promiscuous before,
promiscuous
> afterwards. No behavioral changes, thus no trauma. If she had been
raped,
> she would be traumatized.
Of course, if she was all tha
|
|
|
"klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote
> Well, I sure wouldn't be in a hotel room the first day I met someone.
Afraid they'd rape you?
> The girl was a fool.
No #@($; who could trust Kobe Bryant?
Chas
|
|
|
"Bryan S. Slick" <usenet@slick-family.not> wrote
> For what it's worth, I doubt very much that you are in the United States
> Army.
I don't think he meant *our* Army, surely.
> In fact, after reading your posts, I hope very much that you
> aren't
|
|
|
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:18:28 -0800, "klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote:
>
>"Sky King" <rebeo727@adelphia.net> wrote in message
>> Trolls don't bother me at all. I can simply ignore them. Everyone
>> here could do the same but they insist on posting
|
|
|
In article <bc5d9065.0403272003.4d95a975@posting.google.com>, jen says...
>
>Hello- I am new to this forum, but have a question regarding travel
>time pay.
>
> Our employer ( a national company ) which by all indications should
>be governed by the
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<Ktc9c.3316$hS3.2591@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>...
> > > "They" are an anonymous remailer. The complaint covers the publisher of
> the
> > > site.
> > >
> > Oooooh. So an ISP is responsible for th
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:B-Cdna-0XqUBx_vd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
> "klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote
> > Well, no, it would be because I didn't know them and therefore wouldn't
> know
> > what to expect.
>
> Sure
|
|
|
"klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote
> Dear, I would be just who I have always been and I was never an easy mark.
Well; no worries about Kobe then.
Chas
|
|
|
[Dennis (drjudsjr@earthlink.netSCRAPE.com)]
[Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:31:53 GMT]
:Bryan S. Slick <usenet@slick-family.not> encouraged me to rspond to
:this SH^H^H^H STUFF:
:
:>[Chris Smith (chriso1976@earthlink.net)]
:>[Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:47:42 GMT]
|
|
|
"Sylvester & Tweety" <sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net> wrote
> ALL indications--especially her behavior both before, during, and after
> the night in question are that she was EXTREMELY willing.
Well, forgiving the rape complaint until they dismissed i
|
|
|
The only thing I enjoyed even more than seeing the picture of this dead
islamic criminal is hearing the angry but completely helpless voices of the
islamists and the dhimmi scum whining about the loss of their spiritual
leader.
Obviously Israel has hi
|
|
|
In article <5ad47acc.0403271127.4330f361@posting.google.com>, William Prien
says...
>
>I am not an attorney,so this is just my opinion. I think small claims
>court is probably the best way to go. I just wonder why your Mother
>didn't use an attorney
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsFLAME@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:mNmdnbpMS4ksxfvdRVn_iw@comcast.com...
> "klm" <nonospammer@com.com> wrote
> > Right, her behavior didn't change. She was promiscuous before,
> promiscuous
> > afterwards. No behavioral
|
|
|
"Sylvester & Tweety" <sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net> wrote
> Chas, just because YOU'RE as queer as a $3 bill has not the slightest
impact
> on the rest of us.
Geez, Tweets, you're the one talking about blowing his stinger- do you
fantasize him in a
|
|
|
lenniethelurker@lycos.com (Lennie the Lurker) wrote:
>
> After a protracted abscense from the groups, Whack-A-Loon has noticed
> a falling off of orders for our Loon Mallets.
>
> Although we have had to discontinue the Ralphie, we are still offerin
|
|
|
"Sylvester & Tweety" <sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net> wrote
> > > Anyways, this motion was merely an attempt by Mommy Faber to play up
the
> > > "victimhood" status of her loose ho of a daughter for the press.
> > Yeah; your Mom didn't ever do that for
|
