misc.legal

Must Grandpa's estate be reopened in probate court so that grandchildren can claim a recently discovered stock certificate, or can the grandchildren just submit a motion in court to be declared rightful owners of the stock? Other approaches?

Billy Joe wrote: >> snip> >> It follows from this that *even if* a copyrighted file >> transfer then takes place, the host is not responsible for >> that transfer, which has been initiated and authorised by the >> downloader. >> >> Of course that d

"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message news:c5kv5f01ive@news1.newsguy.com... > informant wrote: > > > > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message > > news:c5hgm60222q@news2.newsguy.com... > >> The officer was being an asshole. >

"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message news:c5kuvu01iq8@news1.newsguy.com... > John Morgan wrote: > > > > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message > > news:c5hgm60222q@news2.newsguy.com... > > <snip> > > >> State laws do not s

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c5k3jr$2i0n4$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message news:pxefc.155$V02.35923@news.uswest.net... > > Rod Speed wrote: > >

"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message news:pxefc.155$V02.35923@news.uswest.net... > Rod Speed wrote: > > "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in > > message news:0w6fc.158$P76.185401@news.usw

"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message news:cvefc.142$V02.35980@news.uswest.net... > slim wrote: > > "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" wrote: > >> > >> Phil wrote: > >>> On 13 Apr 2004 11:59:57 -0700, dnland@spencer-lawf

Daniel wrote: > "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in > message news:ML4fc.135$P76.167828@news.uswest.net... >> >> So Iraq would be justified, morally and legally, in dropping a Nuke, >> if they have one, >> upon NYC or D.C

"slim" <pickens486@nyc.rr.com> wrote in message news:407D5BBE.7BAFCD7E@nyc.rr.com... > > > "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" wrote: > > > > Phil wrote: > > > On 13 Apr 2004 11:59:57 -0700, dnland@spencer-lawfirm.com (David) > > > wrote: > > > > > >>

"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message news:xu6fc.157$P76.185072@news.uswest.net... > Phil wrote: > > On 13 Apr 2004 11:59:57 -0700, dnland@spencer-lawfirm.com (David) > > wrote: > > > >> butch44@id7.com (whesen) w

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 20:58:14 -0600, "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote >> > > and attendees said they felt slighted. >> > My heart bleeds. >> More like your ass bleeds from the constant @$#*ing you'

"Sylvester & Tweety" <sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net> wrote in message news:c655f12c.0404140601.29e582ad@posting.google.com... > > LOL, of course you did. You commented that you thought "spot the irony" was > > a diversion. But even though it wa

Michael Snyder (msnyder@redhat.com) writes: > Child wrote: >> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message >> news:c5i2n6$jme$1@stan.redhat.com... >> >>>But that's not what I said. I said that we must not consider >>>the accusation to be

"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> said: .... > >The whole "prayer" argument is nothing more than a strawman! >The constitution doesn't specify prayer - it talks about government >involvement in religion! Iirc, it has been ruled previously tha

B wrote: > Must Grandpa's estate be reopened in probate court so that grandchildren > can claim a recently discovered stock certificate, or can the > grandchildren just submit a motion in court to be declared rightful > owners of the stock? Othe

informant wrote: > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message > news:c5hgm60222q@news2.newsguy.com... >> The officer was being an asshole. >> The man knew the lights were not working properly and had temporarily > fixed >> the problem

John Morgan wrote: > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message > news:c5hgm60222q@news2.newsguy.com... > <snip> >> State laws do not say where on the vehicle the rear lights must be. But > they >> must be there and functional. >

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:28:47 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote: >Rod Speed wrote: >> "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in >> message news:0w6fc.158$P76.185401@news.uswest.net... >>> Rod S

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:18:37 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote: > ><user@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:407cba35.878698081@shawnews... > >> Quick Call Social Services and have the innocent >> children removed from the homes of smoke

s_knight8 wrote: > "But legal experts also say information about her sexual activity in the > 72 hours surrounding the incident may prove admissible. If so, the > defense will parade an unending string of witnesses eager to destroy the > charact

I am leasing a commerical copier. My company is closing. Not going bankrupt but closing and corporation is disolving. We are not reopening for business. I want the company to pick up the copier and I don't want to pay a fee. There is NO person

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ecudndIVKO7qf-DdRVn-ig@comcast.com... > "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > > >Whatever 'God' you trust in, or under which the nation prospers, no need to make it a 'Christian' que

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:55-dnbZnDoshQODdRVn-hw@comcast.com... > "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > > Once we get the christian "under god" phrase out of OUR pledge, we can > then > > get the christian "god

"Jim07D4" <Jim07D4@nospam.net> wrote in message news:7ndr70p7tf71pe33fbha4511tuu1r6fq3a@4ax.com... > "ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> said: > > ... > > > >The whole "prayer" argument is nothing more than a strawman! > >The constitution doesn'

"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote > > > and attendees said they felt slighted. > > My heart bleeds. > More like your ass bleeds from the constant @$#*ing you're taking from > Jeebus. Yeah; you're a pleasant guest to look forward to- I'm sure yo

Chas wrote: > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote > >>>Surely Mensa has dispatched the FoolKillers by now, and he stands in > > peril > >>>as we speak. >> >>Speaking as a Mensan, if we had FoolKillers, you are the one >>who would be i

Child wrote: > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message > news:c5i2n6$jme$1@stan.redhat.com... > >>But that's not what I said. I said that we must not consider >>the accusation to be TRUE. > > > If this is literally what you sa

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>>> Vox Populi wrote: >>>>>> Rod Speed wrote: >>>>>>> Vox Populi wrote: >>>>>>>> Amnesty International: >>>>>>>> U.S. Joins

Followups set. Chris Smith <chriso1976@earthlink.net> wrote in message: news:c1qk705a7ruq67lrkkg0nub25di159ppcf@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net: > On 12 Apr 2004 09:48:35 GMT, Neil <ix_tabTRAP@saintly.com> blurted: > >>Chris Smith <chriso1976@e

Dust likes pipe <chriso1976@earthlink.net> wrote in message: news:6cNec.7870$A_4.1573@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net: > In article <Xns94C96DF38FDB7steakandblackonions@130.133.1.4>, Neil > <ix_tabTRAP@saintly.com> wrote: > > >>> You can also

> Neil, you too have my blessings to commit suicide. I wouldn't be so > presumptuous as to tell a complete stranger that he can't decide what's > right for himself and what he can and can't do with his own body. That > would be like me telling a woma

"Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > > A freedom endowed by your Creator; no 'trust' necessary. > Exactly. There can be no "trust" in an evolutionary process. > Life will > evolve with or without any human "trust". > Even after the human species

"Vox Populi" wrote: > Atheists feel unwelcome in Colorado And what makes those demented malcontents think that they should be welcomed? > COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (AP) -- Gov. Bill Owens and Mayor Lionel Rivera > declined to extend an official

"Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > I don't trust in any imaginary, fictional "god". A freedom endowed by your Creator; no 'trust' necessary. Chas

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:44:12 -0800, "Child" <dawg@alaskaSPAMFREE.com> wrote: > >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:3u8m70hpkfb0b3vm45um1fjrn3huc007r5@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:07:06 -0800, "Child" <dawg@alaskaSPA

<buckeye-ELO@nospam.net> wrote > Your unsubstantiated claim is noted. Actually, I've been presenting a refutation for months, buddy; where were you? The best reply you folks have been able to muster is that the Declaration of Independence is a poli

"Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > Once we get the christian "under god" phrase out of OUR pledge, we can then > get the christian "god" off of OUR money too. Neither phrase is worthy of being 'Christian' as any sort of credential in any case

"Nivlem" <mlml@svn.net> wrote > This isn't celebrating America that annoys me. It's the special > treatment of a particular set of religious beliefs. None there. A really basic misconception on your part. > The two concepts are > entirely separa

in cailfornia can u sue for pain and suffering due to auto accident in small claims court.............. ty chris

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:407CA32A.4080909@it.com... > Ed wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:407C7D63.7010401@it.com... > >>Ed wrote: > >>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message > > news:407B

"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message news:0w6fc.158$P76.185401@news.uswest.net... > Rod Speed wrote: > > <user@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:407cba35.878698081@shawnews... > > > >> Quick Call Social Services and

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:407CA340.5000500@it.com... > Ed wrote: > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:407C7D43.1080402@it.com... > >>the neutral wrote: > >>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in message > > ne

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote: > I only learned about the California Leonard Law > a couple of weeks ago . . . not through any of your > . . . responses . . . its potential applicability. I did not cite that statute to you only b

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:eI6dnRii-txZ7eDdRVn-sQ@comcast.com... > "tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote > > Glad to see that 145 IQ of yours isn't going to waste. > > Surely Mensa has dispatched the FoolKillers by now,

"scooter34" <momofpeanutLiz@netscape.net> wrote in message news:1731eefe.0404140428.66251d3e@posting.google.com... > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message news:<oxRec.5360$Fo4.66090@typhoon.sonic.net>... > > "scooter34" <momofpeanut

"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in message news:107r9md80d0pgb2@corp.supernews.com... > > <buckeye-ELO@nospam.net> wrote in message > news:pp3r70lh12l1trl4ad2212loi1j93uuhi7@4ax.com... > > Received in my email this morning: > > > > > >

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:EOadnSm_Q6d6PODdRVn-sQ@comcast.com... > "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:l7hfc.12417$bl.10511@okepread03... > > I agree with Patrick! > > Pity. > His drab little a

"Laurie S." <laurienews@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:lkkp7054759ptqf6clnb94fkkippf868o3@4ax.com... > On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:44:12 -0800, "Child" <dawg@alaskaSPAMFREE.com> > wrote: > > > > >"Laurie S." <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message