|
|
freethinker wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:31:16 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:24:23 -0600, "Kingfish"
>> <Spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Where are the atheist-based charity groups? How
|
|
|
Note that the estate is already closed and the executor is now dead, too.
Does that change your answer?
"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message
news:c5mbfr$33omm$1@ID-75195.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "B" <nospamblam@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
Lord Samuel wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:25:51 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
> wrote:
>
>> Not everyone accepts the christian
>> God, as the true God.
>
> There is but one God.
>
> All others must ...eat #@($ like you do Spammy !!!
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> said:
>"Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote
>> > Doesn't have to. for the purposes of governance, 'God' is deemed
>> > self-evident.
>> No. Not with everyone.
>
>But certainly for the purposes for which it
|
|
|
freethinker wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:42:04 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:14:37 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
>> <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:08:41 -0600, Lord Samuel <don'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barstool Lawyer <Barstool_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<c4872702lfu@drn.newsguy.com>...
>
> Having a presence on the web seems to inspire a small group of misfits to harass
> the rest of us. Get used to it. I looked at your website and
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:42:04 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
wrote:
snippage
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:14:37 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
>>Hey, moron, they tell us to have YOUR god.
>
>"My" God?
>
>I think you mean "our" god.
No, stup
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Sundberg wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:27:57 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **"
> <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve Sundberg wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:47:36 -0600, "/ Voice of God \\"
>>> <voxdei@heaven.above> wrote:
>>>
|
|
|
Christopher Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:00:55 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **"
> <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote:
>
>> Christopher Morton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:24:00 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **"
>>> <cuntyrice@lying.s
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:08:41 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:18:20 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>
>>And the very fact that there can be so many
>>and varied personal estimations of what constitutes a good C
|
|
|
Steve Sundberg wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:26:52 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **"
> <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve Sundberg wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:50:15 -0400, "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:24:23 -0600, "Kingfish"
<Spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Where are the atheist-based charity groups? How many starving kids do
>atheists raise money for and feed? All they seem to care about is *their*
>feelings - do *w
|
|
|
Hü©k Hö§hïmötö ! wrote:
> "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in
> message news:T1ffc.170$V02.39055@news.uswest.net...
>> Steve Sundberg wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 11:22:19 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
>>> wrote
|
|
|
teve Sundberg wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:05:34 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **"
> <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote:
>
>> jnn7@webtv.net wrote:
>>> Japan probably wouldn't have gotten nuked if they hadn't attacked
>>> the U.S........they are v
|
|
|
rumik wrote:
> => Vox Populi © wrote:
>> Bruce Watson wrote:
>>
>>> In article <Xns94C9EF024BAEAjkjIImmLQSX@216.168.3.44>,
>>> DogWag <esmith@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04 Apr 2004, Dan Peduzzi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I would love to see a "Whe
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>> They are the people claiming
>> it exists, so they must provide proof of this existance. (which nobody
>has)
>
>It is 'self-evident'.
>Should you question that, feel free to summon your proofs. Otherw
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote
>> There is absolutely NO valid evidence that ANY deity actually exists - so
>> making claims about that deity MEAN NOTHING.
>
>Doesn't have to. for the purpose
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:35:21 -0600 in episode
<SeGdnSUDS7wnNuPdRVn-gg@comcast.com> we saw our hero "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net>:
> The FF's found the rights endowed by our Creator to be 'self-evident'.
> That is to say that for purposes of
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 02:11:20 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
wrote:
>95% of money collected for the poor, is spent
>in a effort to get the poor in church.
Anecdotal and unproven statement masquerading as a class dismissal.
You are a
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 02:04:37 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
wrote:
>Unfortunately christians only solicit donations for funds to feed
>children.
Um nope.
Ever run into the YMCA?
Idiot.
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:25:51 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
wrote:
>Not everyone accepts the christian
>God, as the true God.
There is but one God.
All others must pay cash.
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:06:59 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
wrote:
>Can you say sock puppet?
Sure, can you ASSHOLE?
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:38:09 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:42:04 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
>wrote:
>
>snippage
>
>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:14:37 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
>
>>>Hey, moron, they tel
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:34:40 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>And beyond different translations, there
>are different interpretations.
For shame, just as we have a multitude of languages there are also
variances in interpretation - who knew?
|
|
|
On 15 Apr 2004 16:36:09 -0700, crazybeast@my-deja.com (Roger Andrews)
wrote:
>Not many would want "evil" money.
Money in and of itself is not evil, only those who handle it.
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:31:16 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
wrote:
>What christian would accept help from
>an atheist charity?
One who knows you're just lost souls.
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:34:40 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>If there is
>objective clarity, why are there different lists, and why is the
>designated Commandments list almost entirely ignored?
Actually you initially claimed them vacuous, were r
|
|
|
"David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:d3zfc.11637$k05.4470@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Doreen,
>
> The best answer to your questions will come from a local lawyer who
> specializes in medical malpractice. Look in
|
|
|
"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
news:c5hu2t$j46@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>
> Michael Snyder wrote...
> >
> > tjab@wam.umd.edu wrote...
> >>
> >> Michael Snyder noted for the record...
> >> >
> >> > You try to pretend that rape shield laws d
|
|
|
"Kevin" <kevprice1@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9342cef7.0404151310.9ace0bf@posting.google.com...
> "James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:<5kmfc.8715$zj3.47@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
> > "Kevin" <kevprice1@
|
|
|
you're the moron,......and the story that you write is body bags
everyday~ all for nothing, widows, lasting wounds and all the
rest.........it isn't the politicians that are over there....
Iraq is a Military Blunder...
Someday it will be on the H
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<407ED746.7C7AD7BF@worldnet.att.net>...
> Chas wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> >> ... And moreover, he seems to miss completely the point of the Gospel --
> >> someth
|
|
|
s_knight8 wrote:
>
> "After that,
> every time we got * ed up
Well now I get it - she's a Spurs fan!
--
Gary Collard
SABR-L Moderator
gmcollard@yahoo.com
"I don't hate anyone, at least not for more than 48 minutes, barring
overtime." --
|
|
|
"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message
news:c5fi3e$ddf@rac1.wam.umd.edu...
>
> Michael Snyder wrote...
> >
> > As with your pitiful attempt to debate women's
> > suffrage earlier, I need explain nothing, since
> > everyone here but you can clea
|
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote
> Don't bother with the DofI. It is not law. And Congress nowadays
> could not write a law that said that a deity was self-evident, because
> of the 1st amendment (which was not in force in 1776).
the Do
|
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote
> In our society, for purposes of government, 'God' may NOT be deemed
> self-evident. The 1st amendment specifically forbids Congress from so
> deeming in law.
The endowment by our Creator is deemed in th
|
|
|
"Ken&Laura Chaddock" <chaddock@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote in message
news:lllec.25184$kc2.366144@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
>
> The "fiction" that a accuser's history has no bearing
> upon a current charge. By shielding the accuser from
> questioning concerning h
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:41:30 -0600, Chas wrote:
> "Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote
>> ,,,,,Also, the Vice Mayor showed up at the conference on his own to
>> welcome the attendees,]
>
> Would you welcome NAMBLA to exercise their 'fre
|
|
|
"freethinker" <Freethinker@utopia.com> wrote
> No we have to mean our God. Not everyone accepts the christian
> God, as the true God. and the ten commandments have no power with
> them.
Then praise your own that the FF's accepted that on a very
|
|
|
"freethinker" <Freethinker@utopia.com> wrote
> :>) How do you pith some one :>)?
Cork'em a good one.
Chas
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
"Carter's a loser. And moreover, he seems to miss completely the point of the
Gospel -- something that you are completely oblivious of."
Are you seriously trying to say you have a better grip on the TRUE meaning of
the Go
|
|
|
On 12 Apr 2004 07:37:42 -0700, rich_235@hotmail.com (Rich) wrote:
>Laurie S. <lauriellen@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<5d0i7093vg3pcdqaou4c6lmv180s5sed7o@4ax.com>...
>> On 9 Apr 2004 09:42:59 -0700, rich_235@hotmail.com (Rich) wrote:
>>
>> >"
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c5kuvu01iq8@news1.newsguy.com...
> John Morgan wrote:
>
>
> > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
> > news:c5hgm60222q@news2.newsguy.com...
> > <snip>
>
> >> State laws do not s
|
|
|
I just thought the below reply by Kevin <kevprice1@yahoo.com>,
was concisely addressed to your Calivar's comments and should be
allowed to be side-step.
"James Calivar" <amheiserbush@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>
> I am willing to bet real mone
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:08:40 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:55:32 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
>wrote:
>
>> But you are a self righteous bigoted obnoxious christian.
>
>Oh get real, Ted has been
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:08:41 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:18:20 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>
>>And the very fact that there can be so many
>>and varied personal estimations of what constitutes a good C
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 10:24:23 -0600, "Kingfish"
<Spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:z_qdnef-0cKiMOPd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
>| "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote
>| > And what is your r
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:06:54 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Robibnikoff" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote
>> Here you go, dingleberry:
>>
>> http://www.atheistcharities.com/
>
>"Serving the community proudly since day before
|
