|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:25 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:31:16 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
>wrote:
>
>>What christian would accept help from
>>an atheist charity?
>
>One who knows you're just lo
|
|
|
"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message
news:RaLfc.102$eB2.85128@news.uswest.net...
> For the same reasons 9/11 happened in the first place ...?
>
9/11 in your view happened why? Because the US openly
supports Israel?
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:27:33 -0500, "Mark Test" <mgtest@the-i.net>
wrote:
>9/11 in your view happened why?
Jihad.
Envy.
Too many unemployed camel humpers.
Next.
|
|
|
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 05:17:19 GMT, Orwellian Prophecy
<Orwell@told.youso.org> wrote:
>Lord Samuel wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:27:49 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>However i am aware
>>>that forcing my belie
|
|
|
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 05:15:49 GMT, Orwellian Prophecy
<Orwell@told.youso.org> wrote:
>Lord Samuel wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:46:57 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:25 -0600, Lord Samuel <
|
|
|
Jingo <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in
news:nak080hgaimil5dvevpa48hq9scsgmgkok@4ax.com:
> On 16 Apr 2004 12:10:00 -0700, anrwlias@hotmail.com (Andrew Lias)
> wrote:
>
>>buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote in message
>>news:<bp4o701uc6lhrra8me0lvmfocej
|
|
|
No but you cannot ban #@($ting as they have in Ireland.
"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message
news:EaWfc.55$lI2.23710@news.uswest.net...
> Kyoteee wrote:
> >
>
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040
|
|
|
On 16 Apr 2004 17:18:32 -0700, burgerwars@yahoo.com (burgerwars) wrote:
>I've sent in many rebates for stuff I purchased at OfficeMax
>(http://www.maxmyrebates.com), being ever so careful to complete
>everything correctly, tape the rebate receipt and
|
|
|
"** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **" <cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote in message
news:EaWfc.55$lI2.23710@news.uswest.net...
> Kyoteee wrote:
> >
>
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040414/ap_on_fe_st/norway_smoker_s_rights
> >
> > Norwegian Co
|
|
|
"burgerwars" <burgerwars@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1c251713.0404161618.5983f926@posting.google.com...
> I've sent in many rebates for stuff I purchased at OfficeMax
> (http://www.maxmyrebates.com), being ever so careful to complete
> everythi
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c5q2mo01i06@news1.newsguy.com...
> Enjoy Life wrote:
>
> > I know someone that took an 36" HDTV from the possessions thrown out
> > of an apartment of an evicted tenant. I know the landlord isn
|
|
|
When flying on an international airline in international airspace
which country laws are you subject to? For example, if you bring and
drink an alcoholic beverage on a plane owned/operated by a country
which prohibits alcohol can you get into trouble i
|
|
|
On 16 Apr 2004 12:10:00 -0700, anrwlias@hotmail.com (Andrew Lias)
wrote:
>buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote in message news:<bp4o701uc6lhrra8me0lvmfocejv49tk8l@4ax.com>...
>
>> Our beliefs get stronger as we age.
>> Of those 25 to 29 years old, 71 perc
|
|
|
baboon@mighty.co.za (Terence Fformby-Smythe) wrote in message news:<cec18032.0404160315.57618005@posting.google.com>...
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:<407E7852.3030507@it.com>...
> > Ed wrote:
> > > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote
|
|
|
"Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:<2tXfc.17343$bl.1791@okepread03>...
> "Andrew Lias" <anrwlias@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:6d60aaf8.0404161110.3688ca14@posting.google.com...
> > buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote in message
>
|
|
|
Enjoy Life wrote:
> I know someone that took an 36" HDTV from the possessions thrown out
> of an apartment of an evicted tenant. I know the landlord isn't
> responsible by law. I am wondering however if the person that took
> the television br
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:46:57 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:25 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:31:16 GMT, Steve Knight <whooly@sonic.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>What chris
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:27:49 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
wrote:
>However i am aware
>that forcing my beliefs on others is bigotry
No that would be unwanted proselytizing, bigotry would be the
intolerance of others beliefs, or the l
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:43:28 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Lord Samuel wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:34:28 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Which 10, numbnuts ...?
>>
>> The 10 nihilist.
>
>Which Ten
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:38:16 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:52:55 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:10:03 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>>
>>>>Actually you initially claimed them
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:17:56 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:49:07 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
>Packman) wrote:
>
>>In article <5uuv7010332gj3nnv0rc418f596l2jii5q@4ax.com>,
>>Lord Samuel <al
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:49:07 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
Packman) wrote:
>In article <5uuv7010332gj3nnv0rc418f596l2jii5q@4ax.com>,
>Lord Samuel <all that I say and do> wrote:
>>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:43 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
>><cal
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:21:24 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:27 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 02:04:37 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:25:16 -0600 in episode
<95udnTiboepQceLdRVn-sA@comcast.com> we saw our hero "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net>:
> "Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote
>> Interesting. But irrelevant. The DoI is not the foundational do
|
|
|
cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote in message news:<c31fa7b1.0404151020.55fe4235@posting.google.com>...
> mrtrentd@yahoo.com (chris) wrote in message news:<da5d71cf.0404141734.5635a4a@posting.google.com>...
> > in cailfornia can u sue f
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:43 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:13:22 GMT, Freethinker@utopia.com (freethinker)
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:40:26 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
>>wrote:
>>
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:29:32 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote
>> There is one thing just as plain. The Constitution is the basic law
>> of the US; no other document takes legal
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:40803E88.25AA0845@worldnet.att.net:
> Fred Stone wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Fred Stone wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> LisaKay wrote:
>
>>>>>> It's kinda
|
|
|
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message news:<166080p16ic2kccvocietrv42psien94p9@4ax.com>...
> mark_evins@sbcglobal.net (mark evins) wrote:
> >"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<i9KdnaXb3JTY1-LdRVn-sw@comcast.com>
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<quKdnTmMXL1YgR3d4p2dnA@comcast.com>...
> "mark evins" <mark_evins@sbcglobal.net> wrote
> > The DoI was a legal document of separation between a people and their
> > government.
>
> A gove
|
|
|
--0-1178588141-1082167706=:52641
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Civic associations are not elected. The people who get involved are the loudest. They impose their will on the quietest. In some cities, they also have advisory boards where c
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
>
>
> actually, Christians seem to take the pipe for everybody. You can slur them
> like you would dare with no other group.
> And it's despicable.
>
Well, fundamentalists do get bashed. How can they not. They're
shrill, fascis
|
|
|
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> said:
>"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Do you not understand the legal process by which authority was vested in
>>'We, the People'?
>
>We said so. Britain said no. We fought a war. France and S
|
|
|
"Sigourney Smoley" <sigourney.smoley@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:827c686d.0404160317.4f972ae7@posting.google.com...
> Miguel <MickBarr@juno.com> wrote in message
news:<1077fbipt6615b8@corp.supernews.com>...
> > s_knight8 wrote:
> >
> > > h
|
|
|
"Lug Nut" <noneofyourbusiess@NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:1080bkg1spj9n53@corp.supernews.com...
> He's in the Kerry CoolAid line, for sure!
>
> "The Original Rocky Rooky Roads" <notarealemailaddress@sorry.too> wrote in
> message news:107vv2sgc
|
|
|
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> said:
....
....
>
>Sovereign individuals in our society were endowed with rights by the
>patriots who fought in the Revolution and the soldiers who died for
>this country in every war since then. Their actions
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:52:55 -0600, Lord Samuel <don't@tread on me>
wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:10:03 GMT, void@isp.com (Kronk) wrote:
>
>>>Actually you initially claimed them vacuous,
>>
>>Did I? Gracious, that wasn't at all what I meant to s
|
|
|
I've sent in many rebates for stuff I purchased at OfficeMax
(http://www.maxmyrebates.com), being ever so careful to complete
everything correctly, tape the rebate receipt and UPC to a piece of
paper, and mail them in. OfficeMax about once a month adv
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:49:07 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
Packman) wrote:
>In article <5uuv7010332gj3nnv0rc418f596l2jii5q@4ax.com>,
>Lord Samuel <all that I say and do> wrote:
>>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:43 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
>><cal
|
|
|
> Was it okay for Bush to sanction the killing of thousands
> of old men, women, and children in Iraq by dropping bombs
> on them from the safety of their airplanes, thousands of
> feet up in the air?
Your "their" in "their airplanes" has no anteced
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in
news:407FFFA4.A92FF9D0@worldnet.att.net:
> Fred Stone wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> LisaKay wrote:
>
>>>> It's kinda cute, in a way ... to see the Christians fighting about
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
In article <5uuv7010332gj3nnv0rc418f596l2jii5q@4ax.com>,
Lord Samuel <all that I say and do> wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:22:43 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
><calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>>All cultures have rules about murder
>And all laws of this
|
|
|
Was your sentence that was suspended an SES (Suspended Execution of
Sentence) or and SIS (Suspended Imposition of Sentence)? If it is an
SIS, for all purposes, you were NOT convicted of a felony. If it is
an SES, you were.
On 16 Apr 2004 07:01:03
|
|
|
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:52:37 GMT, "B" <nospamblam@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>Note that the estate is already closed and the executor is now dead, too.
The fact that the executor is dead is a problem, because in some
states it is possible to get letters tes
|
|
|
"Andrew Lias" <anrwlias@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6d60aaf8.0404161110.3688ca14@posting.google.com...
> buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote in message
news:<bp4o701uc6lhrra8me0lvmfocejv49tk8l@4ax.com>...
>
> > Our beliefs get stronger as we age.
>
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> said:
>"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote
>> There is one thing just as plain. The Constitution is the basic law
>> of the US; no other document takes legal precedence.
>
>A constitution could
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> said:
>"Joni Rathbun" <jrathbun@orednet.org> wrote
....
>> Good stuff but not required for the development of
>> the resulting Constitution....
>
>Unless you consider the Constitution to be of more authority
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> said:
>"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote
>> Interesting. But irrelevant. The DoI is not the foundational document of
>> this government.
>
>It most certainly is.
>The government is 'constituted' under
|
|
|
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 00:51:20 -0600, "** Bu$h's Porch Monkey **"
<cuntyrice@lying.slut.com> wrote:
>magnulus wrote:
>> I don't even smoke cigarettes, bub. I just think it's very
>> "nazi-ish" to tell people what they can and can't do with their ow
|