|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c8mi9902qte@news4.newsguy.com...
> Tony wrote:
>
> > This is a question about what to do in handling a problem with a
> > contractor. I'm in a quandary. Please excuse the length of this post.
|
|
|
Why is it that a soldier is being punished for refusing to fight an illegal
war and yet the scum leader of this dubiously elected administration is
being completely let of the hook for starting this illegal war based on
obvious lies.
A war in which th
|
|
|
Are you a jackass in person or is that just your online persona?
> Yet another wannabe who thinks his idea is unique.
I never said it was unique. Just an easy way to make a few bucks on the
side. The semi-unique part is that I've written an appl
|
|
|
"Tony" <nospam@pittarese.com> wrote in message
news:c8lv71$r3u@library2.airnews.net...
> This is a question about what to do in handling a problem with a
contractor.
> I'm in a quandary. Please excuse the length of this post. I've tried to
> boil
|
|
|
<<Of course a written agreement is necessary, as she seems to be an
air-head,
and thus most likely doesn't think logically (as most women don't anyway).>>
If you say so.
<<Of course, birds of a feather flock together (which might help explain
you
|
|
|
Tony,
Froma contractor's perspective, they f'ed up. You have every right to have
the system installed the in which you and the contractor agreed.
Keep a log of your phone calls and faxes. This paper trail is essential
should things turn ugly (I d
|
|
|
http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showa.html?article=37949
CARROLL - A Massachusetts attorney and network news legal analyst told the
audience at the 10th annual Conference on Domestic Violence yesterday that
the time has come to consider repe
|
|
|
Tony wrote:
> This is a question about what to do in handling a problem with a
> contractor. I'm in a quandary. Please excuse the length of this post.
> I've tried to boil it down to essentials.
Having heard the prices, I would have elected to
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c8m0vs02o68@news2.newsguy.com...
>
> "informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
> news:10assnhse1j1i04@news.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
> > news:c8lmd
|
|
|
"informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:10assnhse1j1i04@news.supernews.com...
>
> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
> news:c8lmdn029j4@news2.newsguy.com...
> >
> > "BenjaminT" <btomes@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:5dd5
|
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 15:20:32 -0700, JA MORAN <jamoran@analon.com>
>Latest I heard he was pulled over told a cop he already paid quite a bit well. he got
>into an arguement with the copy which according to his story was not the best thing to
>do....
|
|
|
"D. Gerasimatos" <dim@soda.csua.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
news:c8m61t$ge5$1@agate.berkeley.edu...
> My conclusion when it comes to sprinklers is:
>
> If you want it done right then do it yourself.
Thanks to everyone in this thread who has repl
|
|
|
Added another transcript - Pringle - a cell confession case heard by the
Privy Council; has some interesting comments about DNA evidence, if Mr
Nutteing is around.
This site will shortly be moving to a free host when the current domain
expires
|
|
|
On Thu, 20 May 2004 18:49:20 GMT, "jeff" <jeff23news@optonline.net>
><<I briefly looked at this issue and came to the conclusion that though some
>states say they do not officially recognize common law marriage, in reality
>they nearly all do. Or i
|
|
|
Following are Kenneth Pangborn's views on rape, in his own words:
Subject: Re: A DISGRACE TO ALL MANKIND
From: pangk@aol.com (PangK)
Date: 1997/12/08
Message-ID: <19971208011301.UAA09910@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Newsgroups: talk.rape
>From: s
|
|
|
On Thu, 20 May 2004 06:08:42 -0700, JA MORAN <jamoran@analon.com>
>I've driven with him.. Overall, he's a safe driver, he leaves plenty of distance
>etc, does not weave or tailgate...
But he's stupid enough to leave when an officer is trying to wr
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
> "Steve Walker" <spam-trap@beeb.net> wrote:
>
>> Richard wrote:
>>> "Richard {R} Ashton" <blueshott@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fuck off, @$#*wits.
>>> Ah calling yourself names!
>>
>> No, it's just Tom Moore being a div (still
|
|
|
krp wrote:
> FROM DAVID DENNIS MOORE AGAIN!!!
>
> "futureworlds" <nobody@mail.futureworlds.it> wrote in message
> news:4aae9b004fd855939192832050b528e1@mail.futureworlds.it...
>> Following are Kenneth Pangborn's views on rape, in his own words:
>
|
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 15:56:25 -0400, "Matt Fuerst"
<fuerstma@jackasscritics.com>
>Young and dumb I was...
>
>17, driving from Michigan to Myrtle Beach for Spring Break. After driving
>south all day, me and a buddy finally see a sign.. 75 miles to M
|
|
|
On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:37:17 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
<beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Toto happens to have provided support for my
>assertion, so maybe she (?) is not the best example for you to have used.
>
Yes, I did provide support.
>And, I do kn
|
|
|
"chad thompson" <chad1zack@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:414b5bcb.0405211927.196b5d82@posting.google.com...
> What is a good site to do a search on someone for
> outstanding federal arrest warrents? (not state)
>
> Thanks.
You can go to your
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
>
> "informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
> news:10assnhse1j1i04@news.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
>> news:c8lmdn029j4@news2.newsguy.com...
>> >
>> > "BenjaminT" <btomes@wi.rr.com> wr
|
|
|
What is a good site to do a search on someone for
outstanding federal arrest warrents? (not state)
Thanks.
|
|
|
Following are Kenneth Pangborn's views on rape, in his own words:
Subject: Re: A DISGRACE TO ALL MANKIND
From: pangk@aol.com (PangK)
Date: 1997/12/08
Message-ID: <19971208011301.UAA09910@ladder01.news.aol.com>
Newsgroups: talk.rape
>From: s
|
|
|
"Fred the Red Shirt" <fredfighter@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:c1ac4858.0405200953.3acbc790@posting.google.com...
> "My Friend Who Is" <A Really Great Guy @NGs.Everywhere> wrote in message
news:<Q6xqc.2657$YB6.471@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
|
|
|
"TonyaK9" <TonK911@excite.com> wrote in message news:<drqqc.284$be.39@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> "Pat Harrington" <PatrickDHarrington@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7517a083.0405180410.46cbe202@posting.google.com...
> > "TonyaK9" <Ton
|
|
|
lars <sorry@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:<Xns94F086B6511C4nonenonecom@24.93.43.121>...
> A friend and I are considering starting a small part-time unclaimed
> property finder service. Basically, we would search through the state's
> uncla
|
|
|
"Susan Cohen" <flaviaR@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<zXrqc.138041$G_.58780@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>...
> "Pat Harrington" <PatrickDHarrington@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7517a083.0405180410.46cbe202@posting.google.com...
> >
> > But s
|
|
|
"Steve Walker" <spam-trap@beeb.net> wrote:
>Richard wrote:
>> "Richard {R} Ashton" <blueshott@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fuck off, @$#*wits.
>> Ah calling yourself names!
>
>No, it's just Tom Moore being a div (still)
>
I am sorry, are you imp
|
|
|
Another point is that some churches have no prohibition against gay marriage.
In fact, a few especially liberal churches have been blessing gay partnerships
for decades. And even some mainstream churches have been at least tolerating
gay partnerships
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
> "Richard {R} Ashton" <blueshott@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Fuck off, @$#*wits.
> Ah calling yourself names!
No, it's just Tom Moore being a div (still)
|
|
|
Richard <junk@kultureshock.co.uk> wrote :
>> No, it's just Tom Moore being a div (still)
>>
> I am sorry, are you implying I am
> someone else, or have I mis-understood you.
How on earth could anyone believe I am you?
Thank you for sticking up
|
|
|
"Steve Walker" <spam-trap@beeb.net> wrote :
> No, it's just Tom Moore being a div (still)
Are you suggesting I am the only UK usenet user to have the courage to
stand up to that complete #@($ of bully, Richard {R} Ashton?
Elsewhere in the Usene
|
|
|
A friend and I are considering starting a small part-time unclaimed
property finder service. Basically, we would search through the state's
unclaimed property database and locate the people who have money coming to
them. We'd simply complete the c
|
|
|
"informant" <xxx@yyy.zzz> wrote in message
news:10assnhse1j1i04@news.supernews.com...
>
> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
> news:c8lmdn029j4@news2.newsguy.com...
> >
> > "BenjaminT" <btomes@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:5dd5
|
|
|
"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <bsni7f902@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
[PsychoBabble Begone]
> "On a sunnier note," says Slopewin, "this phenomenon may well serve to
> degrade current population to a more acceptable level."
"On a Sunnier Not
|
|
|
"jeff" <jeff23news@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:0AQqc.94394$MH.18892083@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> My girlfriend will be moving in with me soon. We're both single. I own a
> house and have substantial financial assets. She earns very litt
|
|
|
This is a question about what to do in handling a problem with a contractor.
I'm in a quandary. Please excuse the length of this post. I've tried to
boil it down to essentials.
After several years of savings, my wife and I decided to have an lawn/g
|
|
|
Sounds like you may've gotten a bad foreman -- even the best of companies
sometimes hires a joker who screws up a few jobs before getting the axe. The
acid test is going to be how well the company "makes it right".
Now, here I'm assuming you had th
|
|
|
On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:53 -0500, anon@mylinuxisp.com wrote:
>
>Person A was posting on an internet forum
I'm not sure that anything written in an Internet forum could ever be
libel. It's kind of like shouting "theater" in a crowded fire.
|
|
|
In the April 23rd issue of British scientific journal Lancet, Rita
Slopewin, contributing research author and professor of sociology at
Oxford University, unveiled startling news concerning the dramatic
rise of homosexuality among Britishers, historica
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c8ln5i02ahs@news2.newsguy.com...
>
> "Super Pissed Dad" <visa365@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20040521095449.28807.00002041@mb-m28.aol.com...
> > I was involved in an accident with a police ca
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c8lmdn029j4@news2.newsguy.com...
>
> "BenjaminT" <btomes@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:5dd5180d.0405210846.6aa3bc30@posting.google.com...
> > In Wisconsin, there are clear penalties for claim
|
|
|
On Fri, 21 May 2004, "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote:
>"anony" <anony@dslextreme.com> wrote...
>
>> is it legal in california for a distributor to
>> refuse to sell to a retailer?
>> i hear about this all the time; if you open
>> a small store
|
|
|
"JaBrIoL" (Antonio J Santana of Camden NJ)<Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in
message news:d222de3e.0405210836.7b9d8490@posting.google.com...
nothing the same old lies and WTS wickedness ....... SNIP!
> "TuSents" <FreeTheJWs@this.net> wrote in message
|
|
|
Interestingly, I'd heard from some people who whined that allowing
same-sex marriage was an infringement upon religious freedom. Apparently
forcing them to acknowledge as legal a union that their religion condemns
as immoral is some kind of viola
|
|
|
"PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2h774iF9rd2gU1@uni-berlin.de...
> You didn't say where you are posting from. In California, for example,
> malpractice insurance is not required. However, attorneys are required to
> discl
|
|
|
"Super Pissed Dad" <visa365@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040521095449.28807.00002041@mb-m28.aol.com...
> I was involved in an accident with a police car.The cop didn't have his
cherry
> on going to a call.I thought he was driving too fast.Our ca
|
|
|
"Duke of Hazard" <squash@peoriadesignweb.com> wrote in message
news:2d21b838.0405210535.40c04d83@posting.google.com...
> i served my jury duty this week for a silly trial that just lasted a
> few hours. It was a simple car-accident and he said/she sa
|
|
|
"BenjaminT" <btomes@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:5dd5180d.0405210846.6aa3bc30@posting.google.com...
> In Wisconsin, there are clear penalties for claimants who falsely file
> or unemployment benefits or who are willfully dishonest in a
> fact-fi
|
|