misc.legal

Bill <nemesis7@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<sdata0ddvhdgbh2qvh6sq3v7nsjgv63jt5@4ax.com>... > On 21 May 2004 12:01:18 -0700, cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher > Green) wrote: > > >Bill <nemesis7@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<q4

Anyone who has had more than one post to uk.legal.moderated rejected, within a single in a period of 28 days, with be banned from Usenet for 182 days. -- Richard {R} Ashton http://www.ashton.broomleigh.org

On Sat, 22 May 2004 22:20:44 -0400, "MH" <mmh@nospam.com> wrote: >The probate process in NY State requires that certain relatives who have not >been mentioned in a will 'sign off' on the will. That is, relatives who >would have been eligible for inhe

Tom Moore wrote: > Steve Sullivan <none@none.com> wrote : >> I am having problems with a person who >> regularly crank calls me at 3 in the morning. > A memory modem is probably better than answering machine - enables you to > collect faxe

"Ridge" <asfd@thisismyurl.com> wrote in message news:mTasc.10076$sr3.141014@news20.bellglobal.com... > > "Cainman" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message > news:89asc.4568$zs2.1429@fe39.usenetserver.com... > | > | "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> w

"[ Doc Jeff ]" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:Xns94F28751AF2734axe@127.0.0.1... > "Eldridge Currie" <etcurrie@REMOVEcanada.com> wrote in > news:AwXrc.569835$Ig.273448@pd7tw2no: > > >> www.interpol.gov > > > > Doc, > > > > It would be be

"Eldridge Currie" <etcurrie@REMOVEcanada.com> wrote in news:AwXrc.569835$Ig.273448@pd7tw2no: >> www.interpol.gov > > Doc, > > It would be better if you used the correct Interpol url: > > http://www.interpol.int/ Thank you kindly. I knew s

In article <chs1b0dar64vj0e6531vuv9occvc3obl7v@4ax.com> Steven O. <null@null.com> writes: >I will soon be self-publishing a book through VirtualBookworm, and I >am in the final stages of preparing the manuscript. As part of the >copyright notice, I wa

On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:27:18 GMT, "Rik Brooks" <rik@texasmob.com> wrote: >I think that if an accusation of a crime were made and an officer >investigated - even if the accusation included probable cause, that the >policeman could, using his discreti

On 23 May 2004 12:20:10 -0700, jason_dove_uk@hotmail.com (jason dove) wrote: >while the white man is preoccupied with other white men... theres only >the black, asian and other races left to satisfy the needs of the >white woman. > >I did a littl

I think that if an accusation of a crime were made and an officer investigated - even if the accusation included probable cause, that the policeman could, using his discretion, decide not to make an arrest. I think that the only time that an officer sh

Citibank customer service centers use real accounts when training employees and it's my understanding that it may be illegal for them to do that under a 3rd party law. Also it is risky to do such things because they could really mess up someones accoun

"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message news:c8qshj0286n@news2.newsguy.com... > bob wrote: > > > Who thinks I slap him around like a prison #@&@^ and leave him crying > > without him doing a thing to retaliate? > > > ooooooooooooooooooo

On 23 May 2004 17:57:41 -0700, mistress_melodia@yahoo.com (Heather H.) >No major property issues, no children, and we're both fine with >it...what's the fastest and cheapest way to get everything filed and >official? > pistols at 30 paces >He

I will soon be self-publishing a book through VirtualBookworm, and I am in the final stages of preparing the manuscript. As part of the copyright notice, I want to include some specific provisions for fair use, and limitations on fair use. The follow

No major property issues, no children, and we're both fine with it...what's the fastest and cheapest way to get everything filed and official? Heather

On 22 May 2004 03:26:58 GMT, Najena <najena@coldmail.com> wrote: >I'm not an attorney, and I don't know much about NJ law. But, I will give >a list of possiblities to explore. Thank you for your responses. I have been investigating the NJ rules,

On 23 May 2004 09:39:46 -0700, nanas_post@yahoo.com (Spammers Suck) wrote: >this was a journalist quoting an unnamed source, >not a government official or other person of low integrity. LOL Journalists are of the same low integrity as govt off

"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message news:2hbqbnFarde0U1@uni-berlin.de... > Report it to the telephone company. They can help. And it isn't > necessarilly true that the police will do nothing. Sometimes they > act against minor crimes.

"Tom Moore" <email_for_tom_knickers@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message snip> > PS, In our country, 69 is sex act. LOL...for the mutally loving pair...selfish mates just have oral sex. V

"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message news:c8p5er030nr@news1.newsguy.com... > Steve Sullivan wrote: > > > I am having problems with a person who regularly crank calls me at 3 in > > the morning. I know the persons voice, I have told the

"Steve Sullivan" <none@none.com> wrote in message news:none-6E4A66.18205722052004@news.sf.sbcglobal.net... > I am having problems with a person who regularly crank calls me at 3 in > the morning. I know the persons voice, I have told them not to cal

Grill the greedy octupus slowly;-))) http://www.science.uva.nl/~robbert/zappa/albums/Broadway_The_Hard_Way/04.html Broadway The Hard Way Dickie's Such An Asshole November 1988, 5:45 min. Previous Song | Index | Next Song Frank Zappa

while the white man is preoccupied with other white men... theres only the black, asian and other races left to satisfy the needs of the white woman. I did a little research and predicition of my own. In the next 20 years were gonna see a decli

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: [colloquy] >>>>For a statute to be unconstitutionally vague in a First Amendment >>>>context, all it has to do is BE ABLE TO reach protected speech. >>> >>>So the members of the Examiners' Board in

toto wrote: > > On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:37:17 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >Toto happens to have provided support for my > >assertion, so maybe she (?) is not the best example for you to have used. > > > Yes, I di

"My Friend Who Is" <A Really Great Guy @NGs.Everywhere> wrote in message news:<8swrc.5481$Sc.3566@bignews1.bellsouth.net>... > "Fred the Red Shirt" <fredfighter@mailandnews.com> wrote in message > news:c1ac4858.0405200953.3acbc790@posting.google.com...

In article <i9n0b09cmtgkcd3ove4l46bfm6migp5oaj@4ax.com>, blthecat@ckdog.co.uk says... > >Your middle name is Gullible. I can't believe that even the most > >@$#*witted arsehole would have fallen for that. > > He's talking to himself. Look at

I noticed that Message-ID: <MPG.1b19fdec6a36d73b989996@news.clara.net> from Alan LeHun contained the following: >> That Richard {R} @$#*ing Ashton is just a pain in the arse: I didn't >> check. Still, at least we all know he's gay now. >> > >Y

"TheWandererT" <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:d3c4421a40f9aa435a1c684dbf6426dd@news.teranews.com... > PS.. > > NCIC is not for a search "warrants" > > It is a internal tool for law enforcement to look up history or information > on a

"[ Doc Jeff ]" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:Xns94F1B939736994axe@127.0.0.1... > www.interpol.gov Doc, It would be better if you used the correct Interpol url: http://www.interpol.int/ Eldridge > irc2.peacefulhaven.net -or- h

"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40af8559.6086682@news-server.houston.rr.com... > On Sat, 22 May 2004 12:06:48 -0400, je <esler@knology.net> wrote: > > >chad thompson wrote: > > > >> What is a good site to do a search on someone for >

Steve Sullivan <none@none.com> wrote : > I am having problems with a person who > regularly crank calls me at 3 in the morning. A memory modem is probably better than answering machine - enables you to collect faxes, and they generally have a kno

PS.. NCIC is not for a search "warrants" It is a internal tool for law enforcement to look up history or information on a suspect. "chad thompson" <chad1zack@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:414b5bcb.0405211927.196b5d82@posting.google.com... > W

On 23 May 2004 02:14:24 GMT, "Richard {R} Ashton" <blueshott@aol.com> wrote: >"Paul C. Dickie" <pcd@bozzie.demon.co.uk> wrote : > >>> <meta name="Author" content="Tom Moore"> >> >> Content? >> >> Malcontent, surely? > >Doesn't say that. I w

Salty <another@sock> wrote : > Has anyone considered that this "Richard {R} > Ashton" may actually be THE Richard Ashton? Well I'm not Tom @$#*ing Moore am I? That cunt's going to be dead soon. As a friend of Keith Exford, I can say, and I do k

ty <ty@spamtraper.uk.org> wrote : > Just curious where you stand legaly on that. Are you questioning my decisions, @$#*wit? -- Richard {R} Ashton http://www.ashton.broomleigh.org

In article <+2JQHoAqw7rAFwWB@uk.essex.org.uk>, ^Thunder^ <Thunder@ukessex.org.uk> writes >On Sat, 22 May 2004 , In message ><Xns94F1D346541A1blueshottaolcom@127.0.0.1> on uk.net.news.config , >Richard {R} Ashton <blueshott@aol.com> wrote :- > Rich

"Paul C. Dickie" <pcd@bozzie.demon.co.uk> wrote : >> <meta name="Author" content="Tom Moore"> > > Content? > > Malcontent, surely? Doesn't say that. I write my own HTML. -- Richard {R} Ashton http://www.ashton.broomleigh.org

Alan LeHun <zzars@lehun.clara.co.uk> wrote : > But then, you are the most @$#*witted arsehole. He's second to you, arse wipe. -- Richard {R} Ashton http://www.ashton.broomleigh.org

I am having problems with a person who regularly crank calls me at 3 in the morning. I know the persons voice, I have told them not to call, they continue to call. They wake me up at 3 in the morning. It is solely to harrass me. I have tried * 6

In article <Xns94F2B599AA6emailfortomknickersy@127.0.0.1>, email_for_tom_knickers@yahoo.co.uk says... > That Richard {R} @$#*ing Ashton is just a pain in the arse: I didn't > check. Still, at least we all know he's gay now. > Your middle name

chad1zack@yahoo.com (chad thompson) wrote in news:414b5bcb.0405211927.196b5d82@posting.google.com: > What is a good site to do a search on someone for > outstanding federal arrest warrents? (not state) > > Thanks. www.interpol.gov D

"Michael" <mpmorgan(no spam)@adelphia.net> wrote: > > When arrests are not mandated, officers usually have wide discretion in > deciding what an appropriate course of action might be. So you are saying you believe a police officer has the l