misc.legal

Dave C. <mdupre@sff.net> wrote in message news:2hn8vmFf53evU1@uni-berlin.de... > > > > Not logging into the Internet. Logging into the file sharing system. > > That's how it lets other users know that it is available to provide > > songs. > > > >

spammy wrote: > Miguel M wrote: > >> Not that it matters much, but how do we know that the sex she had >> after Bryant was consentual? > > > We don't, other than the fact that it would prove that Kobe didn't > rape her. Not quite

Hey Paul. I'm with the copyright holders on this one.(snip) :-) Good. Line up to take away the single mom's food stamps, and while you're at it, Take the daughter's lunch money, too. That will make the poor, impoverished executives at RIAA a li

Daniel Seriff wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2004 16:37:10 -0500, Miguel M wrote > (in message <10bcnrugtih798d@corp.supernews.com>): > > >>This Prosecution is in full "must-win" mode, no longer seeking the truth. > > > Since you're so absolute

http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040527/NEWS/105270018 The judge in the Kobe Bryant case let the district attorney's neck off the chopping block Thursday, reinstating the prosecution's expert witnesses. District Judge Terry Ru

http://www.vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040527/NEWS/105270017 Judge Terry Ruckriegle ordered that cell phone text messages between Kobe Bryant's alleged rape victim and a former boyfriend be turned over to him to review for possible inc

Miguel M wrote: > > s_knight8 wrote: > > > http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-bryant27may27,1,6954881.story?coll=la-he > > adlines-sports > > > > EAGLE, Colo. - In an unusual move, prosecutors in the Kobe Bryant sexual > > assault case want to

s_knight8 wrote: > > http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-bryant27may27,1,6954881.story?coll=la-he > adlines-sports > > EAGLE, Colo. - In an unusual move, prosecutors in the Kobe Bryant sexual > assault case want to retest samples taken from his ac

In article <2hn943FeuuafU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >> >> You can say that over and over again, but there is no reason why the >> ISP customer can't be sued. Perhaps they might drag the ISP in, >> claiming somehow that the IS

On Thu, 27 May 2004 16:37:10 -0500, Miguel M wrote (in message <10bcnrugtih798d@corp.supernews.com>): > This Prosecution is in full "must-win" mode, no longer seeking the truth. Since you're so absolutely certain of what the truth is, I suggest tha

In article <2hn8t1Feoh8bU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >> >> Until some of them get sued and find that the ISP may have allowed it, >> but won't stand behind them ... > >Someone rides the bus to the airport (or the grocery store

> Or to think of it another way, the >ISP rents space in your home to host a WAP by giving you and your neighbors >a discount. That might be vicarious infringement. That's when there has been a direct infringement by somebody, you are in a positio

In article <c95pcm$j44$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu> hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu (Lee Hollaar) writes: >In article <40B66736.4B66C288@sprintmail.com> "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> writes: >>> Similarly, hard disks are not "digital audio recordi

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> said: >Jim07D4 wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Jim07D4 wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>>>> One who does so is a "giver" and not a "taker". But apparently, you >>>>>>> seem to

In message <40b64bd8$0$87605$af4e6cc9@news.usenetguide.com>, "Tom (the poetry LUUVER)" <Tom@Bishop-NotREAL.com> writes > >> The RIAA has proven their case by the preponderance of the evidence. >> The defendant has to fork over the statutory damages o

In article <40B66736.4B66C288@sprintmail.com> "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> writes: >> Similarly, hard disks are not "digital audio recording media." > >But that section of the hard drive IS a "digital audio >recording media(medium)".

In article <2hn76kFesrprU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >> >> Leave it to a cable company to come up with this scheme. Aside from the >> liability and security issues, how would you do port forwarding, >filtering, >> VPN, IPSEC,

Trevor Zion Bauknight <tzbaukni@mailbox.sc.edu> wrote in message news:<tzbaukni-0380EC.16400527052004@individual.net>... > In article <74f9ab24.0405271056.170159da@posting.google.com>, > LucasWhite@mosszone.com > (LucasWhiteBackAgainAndReadyForChamp

In article <2hn6gtFet46hU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >> >> Wrong. The ISP gets the benefit of the DMCA safe harbor. The person >> running the WAP serving a whole neighborhood likely hasn't done the >> things to prevent liabil

In article <2hn5u4FdastbU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >> The ISP has a customer, who can be identified by the IP address at a >> particular time. RIAA sues that customer. >> >> The RIAA often has more than just an IP address.

In article <tzbaukni-1AA1E7.14582227052004@individual.net>, Trevor Zion Bauknight <tzbaukni@mailbox.sc.edu> wrote: > You jackasses with nothing better to do than suggest as > retribution that my father raped me or some stupid #@($e like that can

Trevor Zion Bauknight <tzbaukni@mailbox.sc.edu> wrote in message news:<tzbaukni-D78622.16425027052004@individual.net>... > In article <10bcjmnd5270o23@corp.supernews.com>, > Miguel M <PoetUNoet@iwon.com> wrote: > > > >>Do you see a motive for her to

Cliff and Linda Griffith wrote: > > She had sperm > on her *neck*??? Or, as Billy Gibbons sang She wore a pearl necklace -- Gary Collard SABR-L Moderator gmcollard@yahoo.com "If he's going to foul me 40 times, I'll probably only go to

In article <2hn3bmFfd1oiU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >Awww, but in the example I posted, the ISP is sharing the connection with >several people. Thus, there would be no "defendant" to begin with, as there >would be no way to de

Gary Collard <garycollard@netscape.net> wrote: >Miguel M wrote: >> This Prosecution is in full "must-win" mode, no longer seeking the truth. > >Their job is to win, not make sure justice is done. Just as the job of the >defense is to get t

Miguel M <PoetUNoet@iwon.com> wrote: >Trevor Zion Bauknight wrote: >> Miguel M <PoetUNoet@iwon.com> wrote: >> >>>>>Do you see a motive for her to cry rape here? See the other postings >>>>>this date, all about false allegations. The "girls" claim

In article <2hn3n5Fekcv4U1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >> I'm a lawyer, not a computer expert. However, my understanding is that an >> IP address identifies a unique physical location on the net. Most people >> with broadband co

Robert Lee <cranchingwire@earthpiddlydiddlydoolink.poop.net.peepee> wrote in message news:<Xns94F66A0C3714cheezycreezy@207.217.125.201>... > "Greg M" <blah@blah.com> wrote in news:Ukntc.1175$n65.753 > @newssvr33.news.prodigy.com: > > > How does this

Trevor Zion Bauknight <tzbaukni@mailbox.sc.edu> wrote in message news:<tzbaukni-1AA1E7.14582227052004@individual.net>... > In article <6Xltc.48918$tb4.1686108@news20.bellglobal.com>, > "Nexus" <nexus@attglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Tests evident

Trevor Zion Bauknight <tzbaukni@mailbox.sc.edu> wrote in message news:<tzbaukni-315533.00205727052004@individual.net>... > In article <4odtc.178$WD5.126082@news.uswest.net>, "1" <1@1.com> wrote: > > > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5070072/ > > > >

Theo wrote: > All the lab results show (if they do indeed even show that much) is > the presence of sperm NOT when it got there. It could just have easily > been deposited days BEFORE her encounter with Bryant. You are being > spun by a very expens

Thanks for the comments ;-) Plaintiff typed his version of the conversation and brought it to the ex parte hearing. He met a surrogate defense lawyer from the same office and gave him the letter (having faxed it late the previous evening to the def

In article <40B64E71.F0608590@sprintmail.com> "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> writes: >Lee Hollaar wrote: > >> In the suits filed, they have not gone after downloaders. Instead, they >> are targetting people who are "sharing" songs by m

And your response is....? "Barstool Lawyer" <Barstool_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:c944ke015gq@drn.newsguy.com... > In article <4e5a357c.0405261442.637f4f8e@posting.google.com>, James says... > > > >People who write books on diet, exe

"David Hamilton" <ScribblerREMOVESPAM@hamilton659.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message news:c95qti$ofh$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk... > Dave C. <mdupre@sff.net> wrote in message > news:2hn8vmFf53evU1@uni-berlin.de... > > > > > > Not logging into the Internet. L

In message <40b63168$0$87565$af4e6cc9@news.usenetguide.com>, "Tom (the poetry LUUVER)" <Tom@Bishop-NotREAL.com> writes > >They might not win, but I doubt exhortion will ever come up. > Or even extortion. Advice: quit newsgroups and get an education.

"PTRAVEL" <ptravel88-usenet@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:2hn1l8Fep35mU1@uni-berlin.de... > > "Tom (the poetry LUUVER)" <Tom@Bishop-NotREAL.com> wrote in message > news:40b64d33$0$87528$af4e6cc9@news.usenetguide.com... > > <snip> > > > Hey Pau

In article <c959d70ajp@news4.newsguy.com> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> writes: > >"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message >news:c94ud6$1h3$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu... >> In article <40B5499F.22588.213EF07@localhost> reamed@post.cz w

In article <c95a4d0bhk@news4.newsguy.com> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> writes: > >"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message >news:c94rko$ssq$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu... >> In article <c94pqb02ppk@news4.newsguy.com> "Richard" <Anonymou

Is there any Washington attorney that can tell me if a defendant that is a city would be able to keep an appeal from being heard in the Washington State Appeals Court and if so, how.

In article <2hmt1bFf0hefU1@uni-berlin.de> "Dave C." <mdupre@sff.net> writes: >Note that means several people at several addresses with several computers >are sharing one IP. Oh, and this is being pushed by the ISP, so there's >nothing illegal or even

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> said: >Jim07D4 wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>>>> One who does so is a "giver" and not a "taker". But apparently, you >>>>>>> seem to be a "taker" -- one whose actions are of a destructi

In article <40bac8f7.3674854@news.mv.net>, Alberto Moreira <junkmail@moreira.mv.com> wrote: > Marriage is a biological institution No, it is not. -- GlennGlenn -- aa#825 -- dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com "As long as half the world's popu

In article <40b9c787.3307065@news.mv.net>, Alberto Moreira <junkmail@moreira.mv.com> wrote: > Said darkstar@shell1.iglou.com (Keenan Clay Wilkie) : > > > >Why should society spend its tax dollars protecting unions between two > >people who ar

"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@faith.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message news:c95qmg$jtm$1@coward.ks.cc.utah.edu... > > Or to think of it another way, the > >ISP rents space in your home to host a WAP by giving you and your neighbors > >a discount. > > That m

> >> You can say that over and over again, but there is no reason why the > >> ISP customer can't be sued. Perhaps they might drag the ISP in, > >> claiming somehow that the ISP indemnifies them, but they can still be > >> a defendant. > > > >WH