|
|
in article v5rnb0df9eji45utt4sutqjccolufju566@4ax.com, Colin Ward at
kaltica@mts.net wrote on 5/31/04 11:10 PM:
> On 1 Jun 2004 01:48:35 -0000, RaVeN
> <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>> In article <JNjuc.2052$OW7.1389@newssvr27.news.
|
|
|
"Zeb Quinn" <nastygram@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:2fb0d153.0405301003.52a18adb@posting.google.com...
> theophanie@excite.com (Theo) wrote in message
news:<d6b3dd5e.0405271753.5dd216b0@posting.google.com>...
>
> > You are being
> > spun
|
|
|
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:gCRuc.18683$be.4661@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:DvQuc.23549$3X4.3685@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> >
|
|
|
On 31 May 2004 21:51:39 GMT TOTE@dog-play.com whittled these words:
> On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:35:51 -0400 Jud McCranie <youknowwhat.mccranie@adelphia.net> whittled these words:
>> On 31 May 2004 01:09:39 GMT, TOTE@dog-play.com wrote:
>>>Whether it wil
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:19:22 -0500 Richard <Anonymous@127.001> whittled these words:
> Jud McCranie wrote:
> > On 31 May 2004 01:09:39 GMT, TOTE@dog-play.com wrote:
> >>Whether it will work depends upon whether there was notice of the pending
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:32:52 -0500, Chris Smith wrote
(in message <UDMuc.16925$Tn6.5668@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>):
> In article <0001HW.BCE0EE4D02FF89DAF02845B0@news-server.austin.rr.com>,
> Daniel Seriff <microtonal@nospam.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
On 1 Jun 2004 01:48:35 -0000, RaVeN
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>In article <JNjuc.2052$OW7.1389@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>
>"PTRAVEL" <ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote:
>>
>> "RaVeN" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
|
|
|
RaVeN wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> In article <40B9846C.E4FBB89E@arvig.net>
> "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlmark@arvig.net> wrote:
> >
> > RaVeN wrote:
> > >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >
> > > In article <2h
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:15:53 -0500 Richard <Anonymous@127.001> whittled these words:
> This is not legal advice. Legal advice is obtained by hiring an attorney.
Legal advice OUGHT to be obtained by consulting an attorney, but any real
attorney wou
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:35:51 -0400 Jud McCranie <youknowwhat.mccranie@adelphia.net> whittled these words:
> On 31 May 2004 01:09:39 GMT, TOTE@dog-play.com wrote:
>>Whether it will work depends upon whether there was notice of the pending
>>court act
|
|
|
Ok this is weird.
I'm told deposition papers were dropped off at my parents house, I
don't know all the details and of course it was never handed to me. I
don't live there.
This has to do with a civil lawsuit between 2 people I know, but
haven't
|
|
|
Thanks to everyone who has replied. I'm going to pursue this more
tomorrow (Tuesday).
---
Replace you know what by j to email
|
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:18:24 -0500, "tomG" <tmg@jorsm.com> wrote:
>Oh, I see. When you said "their bill" you meant the unpaid tax on your
>house.
No, things are getting confused. When I said "their bill", I did mean
the tax bill to the previous o
|
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:32:32 -0500, "tomG" <tmg@jorsm.com> wrote:
>Fortunately the amount of the unpaid tax, you said in another post,
>is only $160. If the real estate agent, closing attorney, title insurance
>company, and/or bank were actually resp
|
|
|
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:AsQuc.18556$be.13564@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
snipped>
> The "arresting officer" (and I use the term loosely) will have to claim
that
> he confiscated an eigt
|
|
|
On 31 May 2004 21:51:39 GMT, TOTE@dog-play.com wrote:
>Well I don't know what the rules are for your state. In some states the
>notice of action would have to be filed in the slace as deds and liens are
>filed. Exactly so that a title search could
|
|
|
And why would I not?
...both slurp and pay.
I have both spit and money to do so.
Tauger is free to do whatever he wants.
Why would I seek to constrain him?
I don't think there is any problem with the scheme I outlined
but be nice to get ot
|
|
|
In article <0001HW.BCE0EE4D02FF89DAF02845B0@news-server.austin.rr.com>,
Daniel Seriff <microtonal@nospam.com> wrote:
>> No, no, no, Daniel. "I know you are, but what am I?" is a question I
>> already knew the answer to so it never bore asking. Y
|
|
|
Steve Walker wrote:
> Dr Zoidberg wrote:
>> Tom Moore wrote:
>>>
>>> No one else has an interest in me. The manner of withdrawal is the
>>> same as the way legal services, and housing services, and
>>> employment, are withheld from me.
>>>
>>> To
|
|
|
"John Smith" <invalid@example.com> wrote :
> Complaints-To: webmaster@yahoo.co.uk
Nature of complaint: definition of character of bent Jewish solicitors
Clifford Pfeffer Group - Clifford, Coppock & Co. - Clifford, Cohen & Foster
- Clifford, Coh
|
|
|
Dr Zoidberg wrote:
> Tom Moore wrote:
>>
>> No one else has an interest in me. The manner of withdrawal is the
>> same as the way legal services, and housing services, and employment,
>> are withheld from me.
>>
>> To suggest that lightening has s
|
|
|
"Dr Zoidberg" <AlexNOOOO!!!!@drzoidberg.co.uk> wrote :
> <holds head in hands>
Do me a favour: leave it there.
--
http://www.tom-moore.com
http://www.tom-moore.com/exten2/docs/ccf
|
|
|
"Steve Walker" <spam-trap@beeb.net> wrote :
>> So what common factor is present
>> in all of these situations?
>
> ** FREEMASONS!**
How stupid can you get: there's 4 of the @$#*ers (not 3).
Have you got a second hand apron?
--
http:/
|
|
|
You should pay for your legal advice like the rest of us do assbasket! Tauger
probably has better things to do with his time then help you set up your freaky little
porn SUCK feed.
|
|
|
Neil Ellwood <cagoanywhere2@beenandgonet.com> wrote :
>>>>>> You go straight into insult mode; direct
>>>>>> into pretending you are a psychopath.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes - emulating yourself
>>>>> except for the self-pity.
>> I said you are not a psy
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:35:04 GMT, "Another Apostate"
<AnotherApo@hotmail.com>, Message ID:
<cssuc.7349$DG4.5732@fe2.columbus.rr.com> wrote in alt.atheism;
>
>"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
>news:2lkkb016h8a586nn2i2tltsl307v7krca8@4ax.co
|
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 13:33:21 -0500, Chris Smith wrote
(in message <RTKuc.16806$Tn6.7832@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>):
> In article <0001HW.BCE0546402DB7701F02845B0@news-server.austin.rr.com>,
> Daniel Seriff <microtonal@nospam.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 08:44:31 +0000, Tom Moore wrote:
> Neil Ellwood <cagoanywhere2@beenandgonet.com> wrote :
>
>>>>> You go straight into insult mode; direct
>>>>> into pretending you are a psychopath.
>>>>
>>>> Yes - emulating yourself
>>>> ex
|
|
|
In article <0001HW.BCE0546402DB7701F02845B0@news-server.austin.rr.com>,
Daniel Seriff <microtonal@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> Is Texas Road Runner the new Web TV?
>>>
>>> Thank you for making my point for me.
>>
>> Welcome. My point is that you're
|
|
|
On 31 May 2004, salbelmae@hotmail.com (sallie mae) wrote:
>In a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, two disputed creditors are also
>competitors and debtors of debtor. Reorganization plan is not due yet.
>These disputed creditors have not filed their claims yet.
|
|
|
IN New Jersey
My son has been convicted of a sexual offense and will need to register at the
highest teir in NJ. We have just regained contact after 12 years of separation
due to a angry divorce.
What kind of scrutiny should we prepare ourselves
|
|
|
Complaints-To: webmaster@yahoo.co.uk
|
|
|
"Bo Raxo" wrote:
> In fact, after hacking in to AT&Ts mainframe I was able to extract the
> following text message exchange. It is between two AT&T customers who are
> both named George Bush:
>
> 41: U like Saddam?
>
> 43: h8 him. he sux
>
> 4
|
|
|
"X-Delta" <whoknows@nospamme.net> wrote in message
news:buKuc.2200$Ha2.1886@twister.socal.rr.com...
>
> "jitney" <jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b8002be7.0405271600.5937f79d@posting.google.com...
You can download 1000+ songs over ni
|
|
|
"jitney" <jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b8002be7.0405271600.5937f79d@posting.google.com...
> RIAA is getting its jollies pounding away on a single working mom who
> doesn't know how to use a computer, much less download music. Her 14
> y
|
|
|
"Bobby The D" <bobbythed@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:390d0720.0405280950.3ba69447@posting.google.com...
> > RIAA is getting its jollies pounding away on a single working mom who
> > doesn't know how to use a computer, much less download music.
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:c9fhjs0q9b@news3.newsguy.com...
> PTRAVEL wrote:
>
>
> > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
> > news:c9e5mv02e0q@news2.newsguy.com...
> >> laura wrote:
> >>
> > >> I make red
|
|
|
Bremer threatens to veto Iraqis' choice of president
By Justin Huggler in Baghdad
01 June 2004
Talks on naming an interim president for Iraq were deadlocked yesterday as a
rift between US occupation officials and the Iraqi leadership they appo
|
|
|
I noticed that Message-ID:
<Xns94FA8E8A1E2D1emailfortomknickersy@127.0.0.1> from Tom Moore
contained the following:
>Is this an excuse for bent solicitors like Cook and Partners ?
We only have your word that they are bent. And frankly, that is wo
|
|
|
Dear All,
I am researching when, exactly, state convictions are taken into
account for federal sentencing purposes on a subsequent federal crime
conviction.
Specifically, if there is confusion whether or not a defendant was
adjudged guilty dur
|
|
|
Geoff Berrow <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote :
>> Is this an excuse for bent
>> solicitors like Cook and Partners ?
>
> We only have your word that they are bent.
and theirs:
http://www.defamation.broomleigh.org
http://letter.broomleigh.com/
|
|
|
"Jud McCranie" <youknowwhat.mccranie@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:h8tmb095l1ai6b2njb0vu89nq5q34nhir2@4ax.com...
> >So what? That just shows that you would have known all about this
> >before the closing if only you had investigated more carefu
|
|
|
"Jud McCranie" <youknowwhat.mccranie@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:11tmb05i3jp356gl4bh2lsfn67103qp0hh@4ax.com...
> >> Well, their bill is $160 and my parents are using a real estate lawyer
> >> right now for something else, and he charges $17
|
|
|
On 31 May 2004 14:51:01 GMT, Tom Moore put finger to keyboard and
typed:
>Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote :
>
>>> http://www.defamation.broomleigh.com/
>
>> They're the ones calling it "urgent", so they're also the
>> ones wh
|
|
|
On 31 May 2004 14:04:40 GMT, Tom Moore put finger to keyboard and
typed:
>Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote :
>
>>> So when I am going to get a copy of the Claim?
>>
>> Maybe they have't actually sued you yet.
>
>Then you are
|
|
|
I'm really confused as to what going on here. I'm the defendant in a small
claims case, and was told by the court the plaintiff moved it to civil court. I
just got a letter in the mail mailed to me by the plaintiff that says "Order to
show cause". On t
|
|
|
On 31 May 2004 13:16:36 GMT, Tom Moore put finger to keyboard and
typed:
>Mark Goodge <usenet@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote :
>
>>> http://www.defamation.broomleigh.org/frameset3.html ?
>>
>> They're suing you because you are libelling them.
|
|
|
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> wrote :
> Can I help too...I cannot stand cry babies..
Thank God for that, you're a man, albeit a cross dressing man. I know bent
Jewish solicitors Clifford Pfeffer Group - Clifford, Coppock & Co. -
Cliffor
|
|
|
edens morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges <mair_fheal@yahoo.com>
wrote :
>> See? You porove my point.
>> You are a bigot, plain & simple
>
> testify
>
> tell us more about palestinians
That's not fair.
I do have a towel on my he
|
|
|
In article <e1ulb0phtmjbfiks3m7hpihicfhg7tugo1@4ax.com>,
blthecat@ckdog.co.uk says...
> Tom is just scratching the surface - he has no idea how deep the rabbit
> hole really is.
>
Indeed. I notice that Richard has got himself accepted for BB5. Fo
|
|