misc.legal

"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message news:ujn6d09b1snfmg1ct4s07vvqdelo0ctv3e@4ax.com... > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:13:29 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >In the Kobe case, for example, the judge has spent months holding > >hearings

Bob from Texas wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 21:21:16 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>Court procedures are law. Judicial rulings are law. Statutes are only a small part of law. The CFR's for example are a huge body of federal l

Ted Kerin goes: >Thanks, Alan, for the interesting and educational insights. I appreciate >your taking time. >I honestly wasn't trying to bash the British system; rather, I was trying to >point out (to certain Americans) the disingenuity of some w

http://www.channelcincinnati.com/technology/3435559/detail.html CINCINNATI -- News of a judge's decision to allow text messages to be introduced as evidence in the Kobe Bryant rape trial has shed new light on the young technology. And WLWT Eyewitn

"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.i7tvm@burditt.org> wrote in message news:cavgc6$vf9@library2.airnews.net... > As I understand it, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prevents > collection agencies from calling me at work and leaving messages > with som

http://www.courts.state.co.us/exec/media/eagle/06-04/mredac.pdf 1. The facts from the original statements are as follows: a. The victim stated that the assault occured at approximately 11:00pm b. The victim stated that the defend

On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:08:29 +0200, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> wrote: >>Could you tell us more about trials in Belgium? How many >>judges? What is the division of labor between the judge(s) and the >>lawyers in questioning witnesses? Are the ju

"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40d3583d.87410870@news-server.houston.rr.com... > Can any one offer the legal meaning of the so-called "Reasonable > Person". How about "Reasonable Doubt". > > I am debating my wife about these

Bob from Texas wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:17:55 -0400, wbarwell > <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote: > >>> There could be some physical laws that people don't understand yet. > >>Maybeism is a weak argument. >>maybe there isn't, or

In article <oDbAc.14776$bO6.4303@fe39.usenetserver.com>, Ca!nman says... > >There is a pedophile on the truck.net forums, I was wondering how to get >this person arrested? > > > I am going to help you, Alex. I will send affidavits to the governo

The ballistics of the meter movement are slower than the ability of the unconscious mind, or even the conscious, to generate muscle response. You'd be better off to use a fully balanced bridge to mod a VCA and view the output on a DSO in roll mode. In

> It would be interesting to see how different the world would be if one of > the Roman emperors was interested in science. We'd probably have > intergalactic space travel by now. Romans were clever on the technology side, but not on the science side

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:56:52 +0200, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> wrote: >During the Dutroux trial here >in Belgium, which arrived at a verdict yesterday and goes to the >penalty phase on Monday, jurors were allowed to put questions to >witnesses rout

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:13:29 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >In the Kobe case, for example, the judge has spent months holding >hearings on whether or not some piece of evidence is "admissible" under >Colorado law. > >Every one of thos

Or top posting... Oops. "Riain Y. Barton" <riain802@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:HTIAc.17266$Y3.10014@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > Maybe because they wasted there time posting useless messages on the > internet? > > > "sleeple

jls wrote: > "RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message > news:ujn6d09b1snfmg1ct4s07vvqdelo0ctv3e@4ax.com... > >>On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:13:29 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>In the Kobe case, for example, the judge has spent mont

Bob from Texas wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:13:29 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>I posed that as a serious question. What laws are we talking about - >>>because I would like to know if there are such laws. >> > >>In the Kob

In article <c655f12c.0406180720.68991d70@posting.google.com>, Sylvester & Tweety <sylvesterNtweety@toughguy.net> wrote: >"Cainman" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message news:<vApAc.37018$bO6.15042@fe39.usenetserver.com>... >> "Sky KIng" <laughing@ho

In article <40d2fbdc.63761544@news-server.houston.rr.com>, Bob <spam@spam.com> wrote: >(*) No, Virginia - Lincoln did not free the slaves. The Emancipation >Proclamation only applied to the slaves in the "rebel territories". >The slaves in the CSA (

Maybe because they wasted there time posting useless messages on the internet? "sleepless" <sleepless@stillawake.net> wrote in message news:dXEAc.5947$fd.2060@twister.socal.rr.com... | | "Badinage" <badinage@dataway.com> wrote in message | news:

<jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:e4bcbc36.0406181449.6f0fc18d@posting.google.com... > "Finzy DeFine Onne" <Fins@this.NG> wrote in message news:<JdCdnWj8d7rigE7dRVn-sA@heartoftn.net>... > > <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:49:50 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>We could get rid of the laws that prohibit juries from making informed >>>decisions >> What laws are those? I did not know there were such laws. >How is the weather ther

Alan R Williams goes: >Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> writes: >> Ted Kerin goes: >> >Lawyers in England also literally wear a horse's ass on their heads, as a >> >sign of their profession. It is a disguise, so that litigants won't >> >recognize t

There's another one (a little different) here: http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=ap-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns By JON SARCHE, Associated Press Writer June 18, 2004 Go Lakers!!! andy "agakhan" <agakhan@yahoo.com> wrote news:bhc6d0l

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:48:02 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: >We could get rid of the laws that prohibit juries from making informed >decisions What laws are those? I did not know there were such laws. I thought that what you are talk

Barbara Schwarz wrote: > spam@spam.com (Bob) wrote in message > news:<40cf238d.10795623@news-server.houston.rr.com>... >> On 14 Jun 2004 16:32:10 -0700, StilllovingMarty@myway.com (Barbara >> Schwarz) wrote: >> >> >But you are nevertheless undere

As I understand it, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act prevents collection agencies from calling me at work and leaving messages with someone else about an overdue bill. Does it also prevent *SOMEONE ELSE* (not a debt collector) from calling me

>On 17 Jun 2004 16:02:07 -0700, jimwatt@talk21.com (Jim Watt) wrote: >jaj116@hotmail.com (JAJ) wrote in message news:<9cbef67a.0406132334.65d73788@posting.google.com>... > >> The Falkland Islands and Gibraltar are probably more accessible than >> the

> You're sadly mistaken if you think it violates Bryant's rights > for Cainman to presume him guilty. youre sadly mistaken if you think cainman has sufficient mental machinery to presume anything arf meow arf

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:12:20 -0400, "Ca!nman" <noemail@there.invalid> >> You must be a direct witness to a person having committed a known criminal >> act. >> This does not include words of wisdom in public forums as that falls under >> the protect

In article <cat73t$div$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk>, David Keates <david@keates338.freeserve.co.uk> writes > >"Alexander Baron" <a_baron@abaron.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:azasbfA+1h0AFwqO@abaron.demon.co.uk... >> >> An appeal against sentence h

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 17:11:06 GMT, spam@spam.com (Bob) >On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 16:23:37 -0700, Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> >wrote: > >>>If these maintenance/repair people were featherbedding, as you allege, >>>then they would be reported by the Che

"trebor@sirius.com.no.more" wrote: > Patricia Heil wrote: >> "trebor@sirius.com.no.more" wrote: >>> "Riain Barton" <riain@columbus.rr.com> wrote: >>>> 4. I am a Jewish, and G-d already knows that christianity is false pagan >>>> religion. >

"Alan Hope" <ahope@skynet.be> wrote in message news:uck6d0tfdq7anicq6018ull34pb25huelu@4ax.com... > > > Asking a question does not bypass the rules of evidence at all. If the > question risks straying into areas of inadmissibility, the lawyers can

"jim" <jimalias2@no.spam.blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:6_DAc.3897$bR4.34715844@news-text.cableinet.net... >> An appeal against sentence has just been dismissed by the Court of >> Appeal stating that the previous good character of the appel

In article <%BFAc.39828$4S4.17959@fe34.usenetserver.com>, tsa@biostat.wisc.edu says... > > > Bob wrote: > > >On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:30:06 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >Take a close look at the system in Britain.

"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message news:cavic201nh9@news1.newsguy.com... > > Why do you crosspost unrelated off topic bull#@($ to groups not related to > the topic? > Why do you insist you aren't a pedophile when you clearly are?

In article <cOKdnUFyiJToQkzdRVn-uw@comcast.com>, chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net says... > "Sky KIng" <laughing@home.net> wrote > > The trial would never end. Its the DA and the defense that has to put > > on a case. Its not the juries job to do THAT

On 18 Jun 2004 16:33:52 +0100, Alan R Williams <alanrw@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: >> No wonder Tony Martin was railroaded. And it's no wonder that Britain >> is a totalitarian dictatorship. >Blair may be following in his master's footsteps, but things h

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:26:30 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote: >It is illegal to linger in the left lane unless you are turning left or >passing. I do not understand the meaning of the term "linger" in the context of my comments. There is n

In article <walAc.6319$vA5.6009@bignews2.bellsouth.net>, tinydancer@nowhere.com says... > > "Sky KIng" <laughing@home.net> wrote in message > news:MPG.1b3cfa235b36cab39897f4@news.snet.sbcglobal.net... > > In article <kq53d0l8acampc6kfqp0mh3du9blsbf

In article <40D1F58E.9020709@hotmail.com>, boby23456@hotmail.com says... > Sky KIng wrote: > > In article <40D1B139.6010309@hotmail.com>, boby23456@hotmail.com says... > >> > >>Yes, the American Injustice System (AIS) deliberatly prevents jurors > >

In article <40D1F697.3060901@hotmail.com>, boby23456@hotmail.com says... > Sky KIng wrote: > > The trial would never end. > > Nonsense. The jurors have other things to do. They are likely to find > a verdict a lot sooner than the year and some

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:20:36 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote: >> And hope you never have to depend on an angry citizen for your life. >That is fine. Walk in to your local police agency and do a demonstration. Ineffectual. Cops are so brai

"Disgruntled Customer" <nowhere@nowhow.com> wrote in message news:10d54aobtchtc87@corp.supernews.com... > "sleepless" <sleepless@stillawake.net> enscribed: > > > > "Riain Barton" <riain@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message > > news:skaAc.38973$ih7.264

"Badinage" <badinage@dataway.com> wrote in message news:co56d0peiopn6g57e87esfmeephu8jtpk0@4ax.com... > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 04:24:27 GMT, "sleepless" > <sleepless@stillawake.net> wrote: > > > > >"Riain Barton" <riain@columbus.rr.com> wrote in mess

spam@spam.com (Bob) writes: > On 18 Jun 2004 10:38:50 +0100, Alan R Williams <alanrw@cs.man.ac.uk> > wrote: > > >> Also, they [in England] have the Judge, rather than the lawyers, render the closing > >> arguments. > > >No they (i.e. we) don't.

"Finzy DeFine Onne" <Fins@this.NG> wrote in message news:<JdCdnWj8d7rigE7dRVn-sA@heartoftn.net>... > <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:e4bcbc36.0406180616.4bbf30e8@posting.google.com... > > "Finzio" <Finz@this.NG> wrote in message > news:

In article <uwnoenhq6ef.fsf@cs.man.ac.uk>, Alan R Williams <alanrw@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > > Juries in the English system have no right to question witnesses. > > Are you sure? The courtservice handbook disagrees: > > <quote> > Asking question