|
|
"PeteM" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:aIByTSAqX+0AFwZ4@privacy.net...
> Hooda Gest <Be@One_With.Calm> posted
> >
> >"PeteM" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> >news:fgbz5UAcT2zAFwjW@privacy.net...
> >> Hooda Gest <Be@One_With.Calm> poste
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:19:09 +0200, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> wrote:
>>I do remember reading the Dutroux was examined by the judge at the
>>start of the trial. So please explain the judge's role in
>>questioning. Also CNN has this about the verdi
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestions, I may try the phone company but I doubt it will
help. As far as a lawyer, this is an issue that would have to be
researched, probably in a costly manner. I am wondering if someone knows
anything about it already, which is
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:53:41 -0400, " jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
>
>"Bob" <booby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > You bear the burden of
>> > proof.
>>
>> Wrong. Denying the obvious requires proof.
>
>Well, yes, to a tangle-
|
|
|
Said buckeye-ELO@nospam.net :
>If he got his way, you being Catholic may present you or your children some
>real problem unless they or you lived in a state or area that was
>predominately Catholic.
>
>If he got his way, the majority religion i
|
|
|
Said buckeye-ELO@nospam.net :
>If he got his way it could have profound effect on you or your children in
>this country.
Thomas is right.
Alberto.
|
|
|
In message <kvWdncRDk6U6OUndRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Chas
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> writes
>
>I haven't read any books on the subject.
>The attorney/handwriting analyst, Tom Miller, and I have been associated for
>a few years now. His companion is
|
|
|
In message <rNCdnd3Y1vntO0ndRVn-hg@comcast.com>, Chas
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> writes
>"V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote
>> I believe there was strong indication on the handwriting analysis.
>
>As well as the materials used. The paper and pe
|
|
|
Ted Kerin goes:
>Believe me, there's plenty of non-adversarial cooperation that goes on
>behind the scenes, and I mean that in a positive way that is productive and
>fair. But, in Court, when push comes to shove, we'd rather have each side
>represen
|
|
|
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote in message news:<1jo8d01vc38erlvf531i9cmoonft1n82si@4ax.com>...
> bill.white@us.army.mil (RTO Trainer) wrote:
>
> >:|Justices disagreeing with each other is nothing terribly new. What's the point?
>
> I will apologize
|
|
|
In article <Si7Bc.75606$e02.58734@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>, z says...
>
>What is the application of a "writ of mandate" towards
>exhausting all available administrative (etc.) remedies?
>
>In particular, can it apply to an administrative outcome
|
|
|
RHR goes:
>On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:08:29 +0200, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> wrote:
>>>Could you tell us more about trials in Belgium? How many
>>>judges? What is the division of labor between the judge(s) and the
>>>lawyers in questioning witness
|
|
|
Excess newsgroups trimmed
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
>
> LeMod Pol <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote:
I usually don't bother reading that which you post.
LOL - your loss
>You don't like what I post, don't read it. I'm not
going to lose any
>slee
|
|
|
"z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote in message
news:Si7Bc.75606$e02.58734@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> What is the application of a "writ of mandate" towards
> exhausting all available administrative (etc.) remedies?
Surely you refer to a "Writ Of *Ma
|
|
|
In article <D%1Bc.3037$T_1.2412@clgrps12>, Don Zimmerman says...
>
>"Barstool Lawyer" <Barstool_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
>news:cb0hl501tpo@drn.newsguy.com...
>
> Remember that it is a crime to lie to the
>> police.
>
>Is it really a c
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:24:14 -0700, "Rico X. Partay"
<billg@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> No one lied about any WMD.
> It's mind-bogglin how many people there are who haven't so
>much as read a newspaper or watched the new in the last two years.
|
|
|
That lawsuit was just a quick way to get money in my oppinion.
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:29:16 -0700, "Rico X. Partay"
<billg@microsoft.com> wrote:
>"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
>news:40d49fa9.171235703@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>
>> The latest US SC rulings allow the
>> police to search
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:31:08 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>The right wing thing gives you away ;-)
You mean the Map of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. I am a Charter
Member in the VRWC.
I am also a Life Member of the NRA and the TSRA
|
|
|
"Barstool Lawyer" <Barstool_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:cb0hl501tpo@drn.newsguy.com...
Remember that it is a crime to lie to the
> police.
Is it really a crime to lie to the police? It is my understanding that it is
a crime only i
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:22:29 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> My father drove until the day he died. He was 90. In fact he was out
>> of town when he died, having driven about 150 miles on the Interstate
>> highway. He was a very safe driv
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:cb1tdl01hqm@news1.newsguy.com...
> Just a little note to say, Hasta La Vista, baby!
>
> Headin out today for orientation on monday.
And you'll be scrounging for bus fair on Tuesday.
> T
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:24:39 -0400, buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
>junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote:
>
>>:|Said buckeye-ELO@nospam.net :
>>:|
>>:|
>>:|>If you want to see some of the things Thomas has tried to pull read the
>>:|>
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d4a169.171683547@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:09:06 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >I think it was in the family.
>
> I suppose you think OJ's wife's
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d4a0f9.171571737@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:04:32 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >You baffle me: Bob from Texas, aka "bob" asks the question, provides
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:09:06 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>I think it was in the family.
I suppose you think OJ's wife's murder was "in the family" too.
What I cannot figure out, after being brainwashed by these forensic
dramas like
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:04:32 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>You baffle me: Bob from Texas, aka "bob" asks the question, provides the
>answer and then tells everyone else their answers are wrong.
>::sigh::
I try to be as helpful as I can
|
|
|
"Cainman" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:0XQAc.49447$bO6.46848@fe39.usenetserver.com...
>
> "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:ewNAc.6483$eA4.902@news02.roc.ny...
> >
> > "Cainman" <noemail@there.invalid> wrote in
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:02:53 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>Police could barge into anyones house or car or place of business with NO
>warrent and NO proof of any wrongdoing.
You do not have one thing to back up your claims...why am I n
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d3bed0.113669738@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 02:23:50 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >If you are not passing or turning: get back over in the right lane.
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:56:20 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>> Good for what? Serial rapist,
>He was never charged or convicted of any crime.
Actually he settled.
> serial liar,
>Lies about having his dick sucked is better then li
|
|
|
"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:SMiIedLJNI1AFwxZ@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
> In message <-4SdnXzti8tRqUndRVn-sw@comcast.com>, Chas
> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> writes
> >"Richard Miller" <richard@seasalte
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:-4SdnXzti8tRqUndRVn-sw@comcast.com...
> "Richard Miller" <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote
> > The Boulder, Colorado police just decided that JonBenet Ramsay's parents
> > were guilty
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 19:03:13 -0400, wbarwell
> <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>
>>> That is a disengenuous statement. No one is going to take you
>>> seriously if you make a fool out of yourself like that.
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d3c183.114360421@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 22:42:20 -0500, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
> wrote:
>
> >Unlike in the UK where "Guilty until proven innocent" rules,
|
|
|
In article <40D443A9.2010800@hotmail.com>, boby23456@hotmail.com says...
> Sky KIng wrote:
> > In article <40D347A6.2070907@hotmail.com>, boby23456@hotmail.com says...
> >
> >>
> >>>For instance if the police do not
> >>>get a search warrant but s
|
|
|
"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d2f950.63109466@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 05:21:34 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
>
> >(I'm not one for pointing out spelling and grammar as you just did to me
a
> >few
|
|
|
In article <40d457b5.152815517@news-server.houston.rr.com>,
spam@spam.com says...
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:21:23 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>
> >> Depends on what the meaning of "is" is. Klintoon.
>
> >No....however I do think he w
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:31:26 -0400, wbarwell
> <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>
>>>>Reason alone lead to the notion that heavier objects fell faster than
>>>>lighter objects,
>
>>> No, reason did not do any s
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:27:31 -0400, wbarwell
> <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>
>> Reason lead Galileo to reject all physics in his day and start again.
>
> Absurd.
>
>
Truth. He knew it was nonsense
|
|
|
"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d23851.13704936@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:27:11 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
>
> >> I have made it abundantly clear that I am trying to reach honest cops
> >> and l
|
|
|
"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d236ed.13349625@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:43:57 -0400, "Steve Furbish"
> <sfurbish@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> >> You are a tight ass. Loosen up.
>
> >Won't help much - Either
|
|
|
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote
> > 'Science' tests that which fits it's experimental protocol; replicable
> > circumstances and so forth. It has huge gaps in it's scope.
> Anddddddd? Does that mean its reliable to try to fill thos
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "wbarwell" <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote
>> Science is based on testing all assertions, all theories.
>> Reason cannot be divorced from observation of the realities of
>> the natural world.
>
> 'Science' tests that which
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote
> I wish I could. It had to do with a search conducted in Arizona.
Cases like 'ex rel. Eckstrom' would seem to be counter to that perspective.
An individualized suspicion is necessary- for instance, a cracked wi
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:37:44 -0400, wbarwell
> <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>
>>>>I believe there is no God.
>
>>> Then how do you explain the existence of the Universe?
>
>> The Easter Bunny did it.
>
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 11:39:17 GMT, Frank Kendall <nospam@none.com>
wrote:
>My question:can the info he provides on his tax returns
>be used in any way to either initiate an investigation of his
>activities,to aid the police *during* an investigation
|
|
|
"Paul Robinson" <Postmaster@paul.washington.dc.us> wrote in message
news:2HSwc.20257$AU1.11452@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
> John R Cambron <*cambronj@chesapeake.net*> wrote in message
> <10c44q71qv05m74@corp.supernews.com>...
>
> >> At the end of a Me
|
|
|
On 19 Jun 2004 10:55:25 GMT, Richard <youwont@know.com> wrote:
>Is it possible, for a charity/non-profit incorporation, to grant a loan to
>one of its founders/directors ?
It depends.
If the corporation is a private foundation (i.e., a charita
|
|
|
"privacy.at Anonymous Remailer" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in
message news:280fa7df9b9e66e2532a9579e66f8b2c@remailer.privacy.at...
At the end of a Memorial Day weekend during which Time magazine revealed
that our "dead or alive" Presiden
|
