|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> What is the application of a "writ of
> mandate" towards exhausting all available
> administrative (etc.) remedies?
It's your state's (Calif.'s) codified version of part of the former
common law
|
|
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
.....................................
But does what does it really matter?
In what sense do any of the candidates:
Those selected for the 'team', or
those proposed by Mr. Sloan,
represennt anything about any kind of U.S. image?
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d5d1d6.249622287@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:18:24 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >I want my son and daughter to take some type of
> >martial arts. I
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:m9qdnShMh6NMSEjdRVn-ig@comcast.com...
> "Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote
> > The best self defense training I ever received was by two police
> > instructors at a local gun range. Th
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d5d228.249704105@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:33:47 -0600, "Chas"
> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >Check out your local judo. It's a strong martial art;
|
|
|
> Bryant's defense attorneys have said that DNA from a male - not Bryant - was
> found on the alleged victim's underwear, inner thigh and perineum.
>
>
Did she kiss Madonna?
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1pydnUWQO5fRPUjdRVn-vg@comcast.com...
> "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote
> > Oh man how great is that? I want my son and daughter to take some type of
> > martial arts. I have seen some
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d5ce14.248660104@news-server.houston.rr.com...
snip
>
> That does not sound like the Alabama I once knew. Our next door
> neighbor bought an intrusion alarm with a remote that operated thru
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:37:42 GMT, sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan)
>
>Should this be changed?
Is it really any different from any other professional sport?
Players are bought and sold. How many of the Lakers are from LA or even
California? Ho
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:30:43 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>What this country needs is to call a convention to redraft the
>>Constitution and reaffirm the basic rights of Americans.
>
>
> That would be
|
|
|
Bob from Texas wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:53:53 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>A million men are now in prison because of police lying.
>
>
> Sounds like there are going to be a million dead cops some day.
>
>
That
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote
> >So; how's the killing going for you?
> HUH?
You seem to be anxious to shoot someone; I wondered how many graveyards
you've filled so far.
> >I recommend that one stays at least 21 ft. away from anyone who
|
|
|
"Mike Z. Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote
> >For one thing, the internet doesn't fall under US juristiction.
> >There IS no "first amendment", "second amendment" or any other amendment
> >here in the UK, therefore, it's impossible for you to cry "free s
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:40d4d949.185987906@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:01:02 -0400, "Steve Furbish"
> <sfurbish@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
> >Oh, I bet Jaybird is or has been a cop alright. There'
|
|
|
ron__hunter@hotmail.com (Ron Hunter) wrote in message news:<426bc688.0406191610.2307c006@posting.google.com>...
> I predict a hung jury or a mistrial maybe three months after pre trial motions.
I'm sure he's as innocent as O.J. and Michael.
|
|
|
RHR goes:
>On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:27:12 +0200, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> wrote:
>>I'm not sure I said "the lawyers call the witnesses". Each side puts
>>forward its list of witnesses at the start, some or all of whom are
>>allowed. Dutroux's sid
|
|
|
"Mike Z. Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message
news:87bcd09ngefcob625vt7q2pihh33mtonc7@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:48:11 GMT, "Jette Goldie" <jet@blueyonder.com.uk>
|
| >
| >"Mike Z. Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote
| >> >For one thing, th
|
|
|
"Jette Goldie" <jet@blueyonder.com.uk> wrote in message
news:vCnBc.1311$8N7.11643937@news-text.cableinet.net...
|
| "Mike Z. Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote
| > >For one thing, the internet doesn't fall under US juristiction.
| > >There IS no "first
|
|
|
In article <40d5cb26.247909935@news-server.houston.rr.com>,
spam@spam.com says...
> On 20 Jun 2004 12:34:55 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
> >Yes, which is why you do your views a disservice when you mistate the
> >facts.
>
> Isn't the
|
|
|
In article <cb4ic2$gis@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu says...
> In article <40d5caf3.247859172@news-server.houston.rr.com>,
> Bob from Texas <spam@spam.com> wrote:
> >On 20 Jun 2004 12:27:17 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
> >
> >>Courts h
|
|
|
"Fred" <freeloosedirt@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:XrjBc.3012$fD.2957@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cb4fsb$con@dispatch.concentric.net...
> > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2
|
|
|
Jette Goldie <jet@blueyonder.com.uk> did eloquently scribble:
> As far as I understand it, the "first amendment" only applies
> to the *government* not being able to censor the people - not
> private individuals. I'm sure our US back-room-lawyers will
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, LeMod Pol wrote:
> Excess newsgroup/s trimmed
> Original newsgroups restored
> buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
> > junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote:
> > >:|Said Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu> :
> > >
|
|
|
Thanks Bob, I believe the lawsuit would have originated in Moreno
Valley. Do you know if that is in Orange county? Also, where can I
find the website for the court? I tried a web search, but I can't
figure out how to search for the case from any of
|
|
|
In article <_vydncWlwvQlAUjdRVn-jg@comcast.com>,
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"STANLEY SILER" <stanley.siler@worldnet.att.net> wrote
>> Do you think attorneys have more rights to pratice law, than a person
>> representing himself?
|
|
|
"greg brown" <noway@way.com> wrote in message
news:vgmBc.8386$w07.8097@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Fred" <freeloosedirt@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:XrjBc.3012$fD.2957@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "s_knight8" <s_knight8
|
|
|
"David Marc Nieporent" <nieporen@alumni.princeton.edu> wrote
> Yes, in your fairy tale world of persecution. In the real world, judges
> bend over backwards for pro ses.
What crap-
self-serving crap at that.
Chas
|
|
|
"V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote
> Chas I would like to get some ideas from you soon.
Happy to help- watch the spoofed address.
Chas
|
|
|
"V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote
> ..... is Judo more flexible as far as training?
Good judo is everywhere; rec centers, fraternal orgs, through schools and
colleges, adjunct to military bases- it's very cheap, you can train as much
as you want, o
|
|
|
Excess newsgroup/s trimmed
Original newsgroups restored
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
>
> junkmail@moreira.mv.com (Alberto Moreira) wrote:
>
> >:|Said Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu> :
> >:|
> >:|
> >:|>Watch out for Thomas.
> >:|
> >:
|
|
|
Excess newsgroups trimmed
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
> The consquences?
> Re study the history of unions between church and state in Europe and this
> country.
> It's not a pretty sight.
> Read the writings of the Christian Reconstructioniasts.
|
|
|
Different courts have different services available. You'd have to
look at the websites for each county you think the case may have been
filed in. For example, LA County has a way of ordering copies of
documents online. You can get them immediately i
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:33:47 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>Check out your local judo. It's a strong martial art; easily available and
>usually cheap- they start kids young and there's a lifelong association for
>them if they
|
|
|
<spike1@freenet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:s25gq1-rgk.ln1@ridcully.fsnet.co.uk...
> Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> did eloquently scribble:
> > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 00:12:20 -0400, "Ca!nman" <noemail@there.invalid>
> >
> >>> You must be a direct w
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:18:24 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>I want my son and daughter to take some type of
>martial arts. I have seen some great results in other children, even an
>increase in academic success.
I thought about my child
|
|
|
"John Henry" <jhd@inSPAMBLOCKsurgent.orgy> wrote in message
news:Xns950EAFB6848CBjohnhenrylowgeniusco@216.168.3.44...
> informant, you know who I am. But you don't...know why...I'm here.
>
> >> If I am Bullis then you are John Henry Dejong, the une
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:11:12 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>Wentzels is still operating. Big catering business right now.
I suppose the walls are still covered with those quips.
>LOL...Free Freeman....he is an embezzler. And the Sherif
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:37:16 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Please cite any SCOTUS case where they ruled that blue gun thugs have to
>tell the truth in court.
McCloskey (1989) lists police lies on the witness stand, police
pressure to
|
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 12:34:55 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>Yes, which is why you do your views a disservice when you mistate the
>facts.
Isn't the truth somewhere in the middle gray zone of jurisprudence -
like where cops can lie as long as th
|
|
|
The US Olympiad team which has already been selected to represent the
US in Spain consists entirely of former Soviet players, including some
fairly recent arrivals here.
I have no problem with this if it enriches the chess experience for
players her
|
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 12:27:17 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>Courts have ruled that police may lie in questioning witnesses and
>suspects. They have never ruled that police may lie in court. You
>do not do your views any service when you misstate t
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:18:09 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> The Supreme Court has ruled that police may lie in court? Cite, please.
>There is a long list of SCOTUS decisions declaring that police have no
>obligation to tell the truth
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 21:48:11 GMT, "Jette Goldie" <jet@blueyonder.com.uk>
>
>"Mike Z. Helm" <mhelm@not.known> wrote
>> >For one thing, the internet doesn't fall under US juristiction.
>> >There IS no "first amendment", "second amendment" or any other
|
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 12:05:46 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>In article <40D3C8CC.60607@hotmail.com>, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Bob from Texas wrote:
>>
>>Repeated SCOTUS cases have held that gun thugs may LIE whenever they
>>want, a
|
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 11:59:14 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>>>You're presuming guilt, which violates the defendant's rights.
>>>You're sadly mistaken if you think it violates Bryant's rights
>>>for Cainman to presume him guilty.
>>It would
|
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 11:57:42 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>The 13th Amendment was passed before the end of the war. It was ratified
>by the states after the war ended, but in the same year.
Thanks you for that heads up.
>Lincoln had "taken c
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:58:00 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Indeed. The SC tossed the constitution out the window about a century
>ago, and have been making up whatever they like since.
According to Professor Jeffrey Hummel, Fellow at
|
|
|
On 20 Jun 2004 10:32:02 GMT, Tom Moore
<email_for_tom_knickers@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"SimonJ" <me@mine.net> wrote :
>
>>> Broomleigh Housing Association has threatened
>
>> Why don't you just @$#* off
>> you paranoid tosser.
>
>You still have a
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:31:26 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>> Actually he settled.
>Cite?
Jeniffer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick to name two.
--
Map Of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy:
http://www.freewebs.com/vrwc/
"We don't
|
|
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:29:36 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>> The latest US SC rulings allow the police to search you on the basis
>> of "reasonable suspicion". Probable cause went out the window a long
>> time ago. And if you are suspecte
|
|
