|
|
Found this in a websurf. Good for some laughs:
http://breaking.examiner.ie/2004/06/21/story153476.html
I'm sure Bush is quivering in fear.-Jitney
|
|
|
thisisme@cotse.net wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
>> Our courts are so broken that they need an immediate overhaul. What
>>needs to be done is to change the law so that (1) citizens can prosecute
>>a judge directly for criminal condu
|
|
|
spam@spamcop.com (Bob from Texas) wrote in
news:40d9f304.3269541@news-server.houston.rr.com:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:43:57 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>
>>> >>>>The Bush administration doesn't need to justify its decision to
>>> >>>
|
|
|
<spike1@freenet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5cuoq1-kpq.ln1@ridcully.fsnet.co.uk...
> Ridge <checkmywebsiteformyrealaddy@thisismyurl.com> did eloquently
scribble:
> > Dear Jette;
> >
> > I am sorry to report that Mike appears to lack a basic under
|
|
|
"David B." <davidb@tronospamchos.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cbcm3s$j14$1@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Martyn Harrison wrote in message
> <4nejd0tivj0rcdlqb8i89p7uu8ktoau3ad@4ax.com>...
> >
> >It must be quite depressing to (quite legally)
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:43:57 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>> >>>>The Bush administration doesn't need to justify its decision to invade
>> >>>>Iraq with anyone.
>Tell that to the American public come election time.
Bush will be re-el
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:22:16 +0100, Alan G <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>Don't mention pigs.
>Your alter ego will get a hard on
Bag it, Al. It's stale.
--
Map Of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy:
http://www.freewebs.com/vrwc/
"It is the Soviet
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:15:22 GMT, "Robert St. James \(el corazon del
demonio\)" <robertstjames@yahoo.com> wrote:
>he'll sue the county,
US CODE TITLE 42 CHAPTER 21 SUBCHAPTER I
Sec. 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person w
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:56:48 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>As compared with Kobe, she's a paragon of virtue.
Does that prove he raped her?
--
Map Of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy:
http://www.freewebs.com/vrwc/
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:02:27 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Does the prosecution even have a case?
>No, there is no credible evicence that any crime was committed.
Then why is this trial even happening?
--
Map Of The Vast R
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:18:24 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
>> The job of a cop is not law enforcement. Law enforcement is merely a
>> tool in doing the real job.
> you just don't seem to have a grasp on what law enforcement really
>does.
|
|
|
"Martyn Harrison" <nospam@spammers.of.the.world.unite> wrote in message
news:4nejd0tivj0rcdlqb8i89p7uu8ktoau3ad@4ax.com...
> Apparently on date Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:03:12 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin"
> <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> said:
>
> >Martyn Harriso
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:15:56 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
>I'm not the one who is ignorant of the law.
Actually you are, like most cops.
>Again, how do you know he ran away?
He disappeared from the courthouse. The judge had someone go
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote
> *Who* convened the "grand jury?" Was it an ad hoc group of
> militiamen in the Patriot movement? We have a mechanism for convening
> grand juries through normal government process and therefore, have no
> parti
|
|
|
"Jette Goldie" <jet@blueyonder.com.uk> wrote in message
news:yS1Cc.171$EC6.1975498@news-text.cableinet.net...
|
| "Ridge" <checkmywebsiteformyrealaddy@thisismyurl.com> wrote in message
| news:Up0Cc.20695$MU4.603941@news20.bellglobal.com...
| >
| >
|
|
|
<spike1@freenet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5cuoq1-kpq.ln1@ridcully.fsnet.co.uk...
| Ridge <checkmywebsiteformyrealaddy@thisismyurl.com> did eloquently
scribble:
| > Dear Jette;
| >
| > I am sorry to report that Mike appears to lack a basic under
|
|
|
Martyn Harrison wrote in message
<4nejd0tivj0rcdlqb8i89p7uu8ktoau3ad@4ax.com>...
>
>It must be quite depressing to (quite legally) post material that is out
of
>copyright, and a few years later, be advised that it's become copyright
again
>and now
|
|
|
No revelation was written in secret code in case the Romans got a hold of
it -- It was written to specific "church/community" that was undergoing
severe persecution from the Romans, it was meant to give them hope that the
end was near and that Jesus wo
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:16:03 GMT, spam@spamcop.com (Bob from Texas)
wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:45:50 GMT, "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>The only thing you have proved is that you are an idiot.
>
>>WHAT????? Did you loose y
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:01:08 GMT, spam@spamcop.com (Bob from Texas)
wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:42:34 GMT, "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>How does one "loose a dictionary"?
>>>Rule 12
>
>>>I don't know...misplace it maybe?
|
|
|
Prince Albert in a Can wrote in message news:<ei0hd0p41jvgrmatp14o9pqp6r768tqk7a@4ax.com>...
> On 22 Jun 2004 11:50:58 -0700, chris.chandler@gmail.com (Jabba the
> Chandler) wrote:
>
> >
> >Show us where I said he said that! He said, lots and lots o
|
|
|
spam@spamcop.com (Bob from Texas) wrote in message news:<40d9b332.9588978@news-server.houston.rr.com>...
> The Bush administration doesn't need to justify its decision to invade
> Iraq with anyone.
So they keep telling us.
I say, @$#* that.
|
|
|
Some days back while watching a trial I saw a defense attorney show a
chart to the jury. It was to illustrate the concept of 'burden of
proof beyond a reasonable doubt'. Basically, the chart showed a man
climbing up a flight of stairs with a burden of
|
|
|
"Doug Weller" <dweller@ramtops.thisremove.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1u60vs58gmtb7$.ou4xxv5j33te.dlg@40tude.net...
> Also see this:
> http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/emily_somma_v_gosh_peter_.shtml
Great, some movie author is suing a
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:27:36 -0700, Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> William Black wrote:
>>
>> "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:40D9B7D0.B4542CCC@sprintmail.com...
>>
>>> Actually, that probably COULd occur. It di
|
|
|
Ridge <checkmywebsiteformyrealaddy@thisismyurl.com> did eloquently scribble:
> Dear Jette;
>
> I am sorry to report that Mike appears to lack a basic understanding of
> Scottish/English history and/or cultural relations. On a plus side however,
> I
|
|
|
"BOB #1" <bob@bob.bob> wrote
> > Chris Green
> I don't know where you stand on all this, but I have been a
born-again,
> blood-washed Christian for 21 years, and I am only slightly more
> conservative than Ronald Reagan, and I think both of the
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote
> The notion that he could face some form of vigilante justice is not a
> threat of harm?
Who said anything about 'vigilantes'?
Is a Grand Jury a bunch of vigilantes?
Chas
|
|
|
In article <8bhjd010rfkfu918i3q3c3f2mdrus3sc79@4ax.com>, Prince Albert
in a Can says...
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:43:14 -0400, hjkl <hjkl@hjkl.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:37:55 -0500, Prince Albert in a Can wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 23 Jun
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
news:40d9550b.49348960@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:57:38 GMT, "jaybird" <nospam@me.com> wrote:
>
>
> >I think that people just don't understand the whole picture, just
|
|
|
Apparently on date Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:03:12 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin"
<ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> said:
>Martyn Harrison wrote:
>
>> In much the same way, Inger believes that copyright laws can be "sharpened" to
>> act retrospectively on previously
|
|
|
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:40D9B7D0.B4542CCC@sprintmail.com...
> Actually, that probably COULd occur. It didn't, but it's not a
> violation
> of the Constitution. I believe English law recategorized a cer
|
|
|
"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:u7jCc.3$fk7.2@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)" <robertstjames@yahoo.com> wrote
> in message news:JXiCc.91976$HG.11948@attbi_s53...
> >
> > "tinyda
|
|
|
Has anybody ever tried to sue a school (university) over a stolen bike
in New York (or elsewhere) and with what results?
I've asked this question in the rec.bicycles.soc group, but nobody had
given me a positive answer. With bicycle theft being so w
|
|
|
Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> Tom McDonald wrote:
>
>>Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Inger E Johansson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Arthur L,
>>>>???????? read the lawtexts and also what's been up in courts. It cost much
>>>>money to disobey copyright law
|
|
|
"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:LLiCc.80$1d2.23@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:i-KdnUEcPMjSK0TdRVn-vw@comcast.com...
> > "Don Tiberone" <DonTiberoneNOSPAM@SKP
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote in message
news:40d9b6a5.10472538@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:50:42 GMT, "Robert St. James \(el corazon del
> demonio\)" <robertstjames@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> I think the fact t
|
|
|
"Paul Murray" <paul@murray.net> wrote in message
news:4RaCc.18023141$Id.2970150@news.easynews.com...
> In article <7n4Cc.96670$dP1.317928@newsc.telia.net>, Inger E Johansson
wrote:
> > Arthur,
> > sorry you haven't been updated with the impact of t
|
|
|
"Bob from Texas" <spam@spamcop.com> wrote
> Your primary responsibility to the citizens who consent to being a cop
> is to protect the essential rights of individuals and promote the
> public trust. Law enforcement is not an end unto itself - it is a t
|
|
|
Bjórrúnar skaltu truckinsp rista --
> Yep, I ADMITTED I made a mistake......so I'll ask the
> question again....did you lose your dictionary?
I must be running loose in his house...
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:42:34 GMT, "truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com>
wrote:
>>>How does one "loose a dictionary"?
>>Rule 12
>>I don't know...misplace it maybe??
>My mistake, the word should have been lose....
It sure took long enough.
N
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:50:42 GMT, "Robert St. James \(el corazon del
demonio\)" <robertstjames@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I think the fact that she had to clean up, was crying and disheveled is a
>> good indication
>What Chas is trying to say is--no, th
|
|
|
<buckeye-ELO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:rl9jd0569nlm78nfaq5ltap3g157fli5s6@4ax.com...
> "BOB #1" <bob@bob.bob> wrote:
>
> >:|
> >:|"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> >:|news:c31fa7b1.0406221043.58e5c724@posti
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:07:45 -0600, Bob <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote:
>True. The whole thing is doing a pretty good impression of a Burlington
>Northern coal train. A total railroad job.
Based on what appears to be trumped up evidence that canno
|
|
|
On 23 Jun 2004 11:42:45 EDT, "Don Tiberone"
<DonTiberoneNOSPAM@SKP.net> wrote:
>Funny how the first person who saw her, the night auditor,
>didn't see her crying or disheveled.
>You mean on the shirt that he wore the day after and not on the shirt
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote
> That is precisely what I am proposing: that the citizen has the same
> power to convene a grand jury in this limited area, and the grand jury
> may return an indictment against a judge in response to that citizen'
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:36:29 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>The will not find any.
Maybe they won't. But if they do, it will be timed for the elections.
>you and I know they have looked under every
>grain of sand.
Actually neither
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:35:49 GMT, Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote:
>> >Are you saying that they are using this for political reasons?
>> What other reasons could there be?
>Surely not for getting the truth out.
The Bush administration has
|
|
|
On 23 Jun 2004 08:53:13 -0700, chris.chandler@gmail.com (Jabba the
Chandler) wrote:
>So you're saying the administration is just stupid? They hand picked a
>guy to go look for the evidence they desperately need to make their
>case for war look justi
|
