misc.legal

"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message news:cc58nf0m28@news4.newsguy.com... > This case has made a mockery of the justice system. > > ONE year old and STILL not one jury member has been seated. > > The whole affair should be tossed out on

=> Vox Populi © wrote: > King Samuel wrote: > >>=> Vox Populi © wrote: >> >>>King Samuel wrote: >>> >>>>=> Vox Populi © wrote: >>>> >>>>>King Samuel wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>=> Vox Populi © wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Sure Spammy, I'm Penny. >

Take a look at the following page I put up which describes a case against HBO that I am in the process of working on. http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news/sixfeetunder.html Any aggressive copyright lawyers around here want to try to tackle a case a

"Bill in Co." <surly7curmudgeon@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:oslFc.2927$R36.132@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > regn.pickford wrote: > > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > > news:40E59F32.44744B66@worldne

"Don Tiberone" <DonTiberoneNOSPAM@SKP.net> wrote > The prosecution is the one who delayed testing for a year. And they're the > ones who keep asking for extensions on their motions. Even the judge blamed > them for delaying. Kobe waived his right t

regn.pickford wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:40E59F32.44744B66@worldnet.att.net... >> Doug Laidlaw wrote: >> >>> Daves wrote: >> >>>> Dispatcher fired for living with boyfriend >>>> The Associated P

"Ed" <nobody@nospam.com> wrote in message news:020720042021536029%nobody@nospam.com... > In article <RNmFc.75894$sj4.7554@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, Stan > Pierce <tpierce@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > > > "Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore@databasix.com> wro

This case has made a mockery of the justice system. ONE year old and STILL not one jury member has been seated. The whole affair should be tossed out on the premise that it has violated the constitutional right to a "speedy trial". This judge has

"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:40E59F32.44744B66@worldnet.att.net... > Doug Laidlaw wrote: > > > Daves wrote: > > >> Dispatcher fired for living with boyfriend > >> The Associated Press > >> Jun 26, 2004 : 6

"tinydancer" <tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote > Bryant did not invoke his right to a speedy trial. He would have actively had to waive it. A speedy trial is probably not in his best interests. That's mostly for guys being held on a large bond. >...

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHNlYw N0aA--?slug=ap-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns DENVER (AP) -- The judge in Kobe Bryant's sexual assault case urged the Colorado Supreme Court on Friday to back up his order bar

"Edward M. Kennedy" wrote: > "Ed" wrote: >> Stan Pierce wrote: >>> Gary L. Burnore wrote: >>>> How profound. And wrong. Morals in 1804 are different than they were in >>>> 1004 or 0004. Morals change with the times. The law may have been fine

It appears that the posters in this thread have been duped by the people who instigate conflict and war for power and riches. As can be seen by studying history, and by observing current events, a small group of people instigate conflict and war f

"regn.pickford" wrote: > Morals change. 30 years ago in Aus. it was an appropriate recreation for > red blooded young aussie blokes to beat the crap out of effeminate poofs. > Now it is a `hate crime' I know some blokes who still think it's appro

In article <srhi-C88246.19494502072004@news-40.sjc.giganews.com>, Shawn Hearn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote: >In article <3nl6e0lppr2md2egsgu6c5bi258nlcp7j1@4ax.com>, > Daves <25343@socal.net> wrote: > >> Interception of E-Mail Raises Questions >> >>

That would seem to be a good point regarding the privacy of other students. Probably the last thing most folks would want would be for a Michael Moore type to roam around campus taping classes willy-nilly for his next "documentary." But again, it

"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote in news:10eb9t568f48c69@corp.supernews.com: > > "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message > news:O%aFc.5110$i3.3533@nwrdny03.gnilink.net... >> Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/0

In article <3nl6e0lppr2md2egsgu6c5bi258nlcp7j1@4ax.com>, Daves <25343@socal.net> wrote: > Interception of E-Mail Raises Questions > > By MARK JEWELL, AP Business Writer > > BOSTON - In an online eavesdropping case with potentially profound >

King Samuel wrote: > => Vox Populi © wrote: >> King Samuel wrote: >>> => Vox Populi © wrote: >>>> King Samuel wrote: >>>>> => Vox Populi © wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sure Spammy, I'm Penny. >>>>> >>>>> I know. >>>> >>>> >>>> So what's stopping you fr

"Tom Moore" <email_for_tom_knickers@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:Xns9515A490FEFC0emailfortomknickersy@127.0.0.1... > "Maxwell Turnbull" <maxwell.turnbull@btopenworld.com> wrote : > > > You seem to be having just a wee bit of difficulty > > in

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:47:53 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >"regn.pickford" wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Doug Laidlaw wrote: > >>>> It is illegal in Victoria to do that. Under the terms of our Equal >

On 1 Jul 2004 12:19:27 -0700, momofpeanutLiz@netscape.net (scooter34) in misc.legal, wrote the following: >jtnospam@yahoo.com (jitney) wrote in message news:<b8002be7.0407010023.5bfaa883@posting.google.com>... >> pjm@see_my_sig_for_address.com wrote

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: [snip] >>Can't go to SCOTUS until you exhaust all state court remedies, you idiot. > > From: > > <http://www.kscourts.org/ca10/cases/2003/06/02-1481.htm> > > "Plaintiff did not seek rev

"Anne" <xzakisax@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ded2b1e0.0407010827.7127c7bd@posting.google.com... > Is it legal to pay someone that never comes into the office? We have > another company that handles our benefits/payroll/hr etc. On the > payroll

"Richard Kaszeta" <rich@kaszeta.org> wrote in message news:y6xlli3qzr9.fsf@pomme.me.umn.edu... > I have a subscription to a magazine that is tied to an organization's > membership, and my membership is paid through December 2008 (yes, > almost anoth

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:O%aFc.5110$i3.3533@nwrdny03.gnilink.net... > Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.html?th > > > When you click on "send" to deliver that e-mail note to your lover, mother

On 2 Jul 2004 09:22:18 -0700, MrPepper11@go.com (MrPepper11) wrote: >Dave Christian <dcnews@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1b4e8ca85706b63198972e@news-server.cfl.rr.com>... >> In article <8vs6e0l44i37ro5h4c57qnmvjso0v8r4g4@4ax.com>, 25343@socal

It is reassuring to know Cheney will not be forced to go @$#* himself at the RNC. I bet Ms Cheney will be releived too. In article <57cfd534.0407020822.51915b60@posting.google.com>, MrPepper11 wrote: > Dave Christian <dcnews@nc.rr.com> wrote in mess

"Dr Nancy's Sweetie" <kilroy@elvis.rowan.edu> wrote in message news:cc1fec$nre$2@pcls4.std.com... > > In response to a story about a Sheriff firing a woman for living with > her boyfriend, "Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@myaccess.com.au>" wrote: > > It is

"regn.pickford" wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Doug Laidlaw wrote: >>> It is illegal in Victoria to do that. Under the terms of our Equal >>> Opportunity laws, which prohibit discrimination based on marital status, >>> even the Catholic C

>"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message >news:yE3Fc.119$aq.98275@news.uswest.net... >> Faris Jawad wrote: The two of you make a pair of perfect assholes.

I wrote that the government should not force religious groups to hire people who actively reject that religious group's teachings. Several replies came in: "pjm@see_my_sig_for_address.com" wrote: > So, they can discriminate in hiring practices ba

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Can't go to SCOTUS until you exhaust all state court remedies, you idiot. >> From: >> <http://www.kscourts.org/ca10/cases/2003/06/02-1481.htm> >> "Plaintiff did not

>> Oooh! An attaboy from one brainwashed robot to another. > How impressive. Not. Methinks Ivan is one of those guys who thinks the only PARTS of the US Consitution apply and only when HE wants them to apply....

>> > Ivan, >> > You are truly clueless......don't you know those "rules" of yours have been >> > around a LONG, LONG time???? Tell me HOW crime has gone down in the last 50 >> > years? Tell me HOW there are less prisoners now than there ever were?

Access the latest article (for today) at the following URL to see how Rumsfeld gave instructions for the torture at Abu Ghraib: Rumsfeld Gave Instructions for Torture at Abu Ghraib: http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/signal/iraq/ Plan to Ca

"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message news:yE3Fc.119$aq.98275@news.uswest.net... > Faris Jawad wrote: > > In case you missed it: > > Noam Chomsky Interview > > BBC 05/20/04 > > > > "BBC" If George Bush were to be judged by the standard

In article <2kj38vF300oaU1@uni-berlin.de>, me@privacy.net says... > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:18:16 GMT, kb <kno-buddy@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >Ending Poverty Will End Terrorism > > > >=============================== > > > >"The day that hunger is er

In Arizona, is there a way to get a civil trial reopened after the 15 day limit specified by "Rules of Civil Procedure 59(d)"? It has been two years, but we found some new evidence yesterday which would be grounds for a mistrial.

So are you in favor of the court ruling or against it? In article <O%aFc.5110$i3.3533@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: > Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.html?th > > > When you click on "

In uk.politics.censorship Dave Bird <dave.xemu.deleteThe@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>Now for all your Psychotic Monopolist scenarios where one guy has all >>the food or whatever and makes everyone starve by refusing to trade, >>this hasn't actually

=> Vox Populi © wrote: > King Samuel wrote: > >>=> Vox Populi © wrote: >> >> >>>King Samuel wrote: >>> >>> >>>>=> Vox Populi © wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Sure Spammy, I'm Penny. >>>> >>>>I know. >>> >>> >>>So what's stopping you f

Hi, I, in New York State, am confused. Could you provide some help? Thank you. Two years ago, I have an equity line of credit From F Bank, and I got some cash from the account to make home improvement. In this April, there was a home equity l

Doug Laidlaw wrote: > Daves wrote: >> Dispatcher fired for living with boyfriend >> The Associated Press >> Jun 26, 2004 : 6:34 pm ET >> WILMINGTON, N.C. -- A former dispatcher for the Pender County Sheriff's >> Department said her bosses forc

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.html?th When you click on "send" to deliver that e-mail note to your lover, mother or boss, you realize that you are not communicating directly with that person. As you well know, you have st

The hussy! -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken's proper avenue of redress was to file a cert petition with SCOTUS. > [...] >> But it seems that he was afraid to do so. > Afraid of what? Afraid that they will decline to grant cert, p

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote >....So tell me, Teddi, does Patty > enjoy that BIG, *BLACK* DILDO you must have gotten her to replace Cam -- A silver cloud in every lining- they put a battery charger on it, and she now powers about half the Fres

Chas wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> ...So tell me, Teddi, does Patty enjoy that BIG, *BLACK* DILDO you must >> have gotten her to replace Cam -- > A silver cloud in every lining- > they put a battery charger on it, and she now powers about half t