misc.legal

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >""Due process of law" in California is not as the Founding Fathers envisioned it." Given the background of our "day in court" discussion, I'd say its a safe bet that *your* definition of "due process of law" isnt quite wh

Hi, After I took the second HIV testing through my family doctor (my health insurance is provided by my employer), I was eruptly dismissed by my employer along with a few other people. Official reason was lack of sales. Both test results came b

Sun Jul 4,10:13 PM ET By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer CHARLESTON, W.Va. - <snip> Two Bush opponents, taken out of the crowd in restraints by police, said they were told they couldn't be there because they were wearing shirts that s

At 10:00 AM 7/3/2004 -0700, Scott Jordan wrote: >> From: Sam Sloan [mailto:samsloan@samsloan.com] >> Subject: Re: [I-S] Sloan vs. Rudiano, 04 Civ. 2791 (DGT) was >> filed today >> >> >> At 07:26 AM 7/3/2004 -0400, bobhunt@starpower.net wrote: >

Ken Smith wrote: > When confronted by a mug like yours, the only responsible rection is > laughter (http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/kaldis.html). You > might even be able to moonlight at Cirque du Soleil. > "Kaldis: The only male with

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> jls wrote: >>> It'll be the day when Kaldis wishes for Ken the same due process of law he >>> wishes for Cam. >> "Due process of law" in California is not as the Founding Fathers >> envisioned it

Steve Kobes wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Whether it is legal or not, I am sure that there are many who are doing >> such things (using methods you have described, or other methods), and they >> don't seem to concern themselves terribly mu

On 1 Jul 2004 17:21:30 -0700, cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) >errishuman2000@yahoo.com wrote in message news:<5db37e8f.0406301913.4185852a@posting.google.com>... >> hi, >> i have a conviction of petty theft(misdeamnor).i am a softwar

Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote in message news:<slrncedg9e.1m8.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org>... > On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 00:49:28 -0600, => Vox Populi © <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > McGyver wrote: > >> "Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.n

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:39:16 GMT, spam@spamcrap.com (VRWC) wrote: >http://www.verisign.com/products/class1/index.html?from=ql053 > >Digital IDs for Secure E-mail > >In the physical world, you protect your written correspondence by >putting it in a

Harold, Your post was dated 6/29/04. It was posted by HaroldA. It was entitled "zoneing problem it a long story". Any of these can be used to find your post if you're using Outlook Express. Your ISP may have already removed the post. You should

On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 17:21:36 GMT, Howard Goldstein <hgoldste@mpcs.com> wrote: > On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 01:53:27 GMT, Manhattaner32 <mattypom@yahoo.com> wrote: > : I'm thinking about attending law school part time in the evenings. I'm > : trying to get

Chas wrote: > "Mark K. Bilbo" <inv@lid_email.no> wrote > >>A Christian swearing on a bible to the Christian god will either tell the >>truth or not. > > And he will do it in contemplation of being judged in eternal life, and in > the knowledge th

jls wrote: > "SolarChase" <solarchase@aol.com> wrote in message > news:20040704135724.04966.00000707@mb-m24.aol.com... >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>>>So, *everything* a court says or does is right, eh? >>> >>>"Whether it

SolarChase wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote >>># Michael Simons wrote: >>># >>># > So I've checked the phone book. There are 3 Coons in brisbane, >>># > 26 Coons in Melbourne and 9 Coons in Sydney alone >>># >>># Only nine? I'm sure I saw more than that

Chas wrote: > "SolarChase" <solarchase@aol.com> wrote > >>Wait. Dont tell us, let us guess: he's the *devil* now, right ??? > > He's just pissed 'cause he'd been running his industrial strength microwave > for free, and now the world knows all.

SolarChase wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>>Chas wrote >> >>>A silver cloud in every lining- >>>they put a battery charger on it, and she now powers about half the Fresno >>>grid. > >>>*Clean California Energy* >> > "Thank you, Chas, for te

SolarChase wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>>Ken Smith wrote: > >>>So, *everything* a court says or does is right, eh? >> >>"Whether it is "right" or not, their order is ENFORCED." > > Speaking of "enforced"... what *is* the update on the Cam

At 07:26 AM 7/3/2004 -0400, bobhunt@starpower.net wrote: >On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 04:53:09 Sam Sloan <samsloan@samsloan.com> wrote: > >>I filed the case, Sloan vs. Rudiano, today, July 2, 2004, in the Eastern >>District of New York. > >Again please do n

>Ken Smith wrote >> # Michael Simons wrote: >> # >> # > So I've checked the phone book. There are 3 Coons in brisbane, >> # > 26 Coons in Melbourne and 9 Coons in Sydney alone >> # >> # Only nine? I'm sure I saw more than that on a drive throu

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>Ken Smith wrote: >> So, *everything* a court says or does is right, eh? >"Whether it is "right" or not, their order is ENFORCED." Speaking of "enforced"... what *is* the update on the Cameron Brown case, specifical

=> Vox Populi © wrote: > sanjian wrote: >>Lone Haranguer wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>Of course it won't. >>>> As long as the Bush Administration and their supporters engage in >>>>activities dangerously remini

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >"Does Black's trump the Word of God? No." Wellllll, its not every day i see someone argue a *dictionary* definition of a legal term. I'm certain that you have advised Cam to drop his counsel and highlighted certain Bibli

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>Chas wrote >> A silver cloud in every lining- >> they put a battery charger on it, and she now powers about half the Fresno grid. >> *Clean California Energy* "Thank you, Chas, for telling me who you REALLY are."

In article <40e830a0.61955467@news-server.houston.rr.com>, spam@spamcrap.com wrote: > >>> Encryption is no big deal if you know what you are doing. > >>True, but most people DO NOT KNOW what they are doing and they don't >>want to learn more. >

i cannot find my post of zoneing problem i clicked list all

SolarChase wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >> "Due process of law" in California is not as the Founding Fathers >> envisioned it." > Given the background of our "day in court" discussion, I'd say its a safe > bet that *your* definition of "du

qin, You need to sit down with John and discuss these issues. Since you are uncomfortable with English I think you need to seek advice in French (?) from someone who understands the trucking business and small business principles before you ta

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 04:00:52 -0400, lone@victor.com (Lone Victor) wrote: >>Politics makes for strange bedfellows. The DA is distancing himself >>from this case because it's an election year and he is concerned about >>what this case may do to his po

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 10:12:28 -0400, Shawn Hearn <srhi@comcast.net> wrote: >> There is nothing complicated about the procedure - it amounts to an >> extra mouse click. >Not really. Yes, really. >The certificate needs to be installed on the ma

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > TinCanMan wrote: >>"Dodge Hemi" wrote: > >>>An ad for an internet dating service popped up on my screen just now and >>>the following "warning" appeared: >> >>>"If you are married and posing as single, be aware that you

"SolarChase" <solarchase@aol.com> wrote in message news:20040704135724.04966.00000707@mb-m24.aol.com... > >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > > >>Ken Smith wrote: > > >> So, *everything* a court says or does is right, eh? > > >"Whether it is "right" or

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Of course it won't. As long as the Bush Administration and their supporters engage in activities dangerously reminiscent of those of the Third Reich, such comparisons are not only invited but logical and necessary.

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > "Edward M. Kennedy" wrote: >>"Ed" wrote: >>>Stan Pierce wrote: >>>>Gary L. Burnore wrote: >>> >>>>>How profound. And wrong. Morals in 1804 are different than they were in >>>>>1004 or 0004. Morals change with the time

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Doug Laidlaw wrote: >>Daves wrote: > >>>Dispatcher fired for living with boyfriend >>>The Associated Press >>>Jun 26, 2004 : 6:34 pm ET >>>WILMINGTON, N.C. -- A former dispatcher for the Pender County Sheriff's >>>De

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > "regn.pickford" wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Doug Laidlaw wrote: > >>>>It is illegal in Victoria to do that. Under the terms of our Equal >>>>Opportunity laws, which prohibit discrimination based on marital sta

jls wrote: > It'll be the day when Kaldis wishes for Ken the same due process of law he > wishes for Cam. "Due process of law" in California is not as the Founding Fathers envisioned it. Cam has been in jail since mid-November, and a hearing stil

Paul Rubin wrote: > Sam Sloan wrote: >> If I win these two lawsuits, I will be up there in US Congress, mightiesy >> of the mighty, highest of the high, hobnobbing every day with the greatest >> leaders of our land and foreign nations too, and I w

Hi, Try http://www.Network2020.com/go Select Legal and then you will see what you need under legal forms. There is also a Human Resources section. Good luck, Dave > I am just starting out and would like to have a few freelance writers > do some

Sam Sloan wrote: > bobhunt@starpower.net wrote: >> Sam Sloan wrote: >>> I filed the case, Sloan vs. Rudiano, today, July 2, 2004, in the Eastern >>> District of New York. >> Again please do not post your law suit fillings. Hold off for >> ann

Richard wrote: > "Dodge Hemi" wrote: >> An ad for an internet dating service popped up on my screen just now and >> the following "warning" appeared: >> "If you are married and posing as single, be aware that you could be guilty >> of fraud and

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> TinCanMan wrote: >>> "Dodge Hemi" wrote: >>>> An ad for an internet dating service popped up on my screen just now and >>>> the following "warning" appeared: >>>> "If you are married and posing a

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Whether it is legal or not, I am sure that there are many who are doing such > things (using methods you have described, or other methods), and they don't > seem to concern themselves terribly much about the legalities. Per

"SolarChase" <solarchase@aol.com> wrote > There is NO way that pic is right. Cant be. Really? Odd, it's precisely the way I had always pictured him; sort of a 'Picture of Dorian Grey' without an attic. Chas

sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) writes: > If I win these two lawsuits, I will be up there in US Congress, > mightiesy of the mighty, highest of the high, hobnobbing every day > with the greatest leaders of our land and foreign nations too, and I > wil

"SolarChase" <solarchase@aol.com> wrote > Wait. Dont tell us, let us guess: he's the *devil* now, right ??? He's just pissed 'cause he'd been running his industrial strength microwave for free, and now the world knows all. Chas

sanjian wrote: > Lone Haranguer wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >> >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> >>>> Of course it won't. >>> >>> >>> As long as the Bush Administration and their supporters engage in >>> activities dangerously reminiscent of th

"VRWC" <spam@spamcrap.com> wrote > His election run is why he wants to step down. He accomplished what he > wanted and now it's time to move on. No irony here. He's been getting a lot of flak for letting other cases go because of his preoccupation w

scoopdamedia wrote: > USA is sinking in its own created quick-sand trap and cannot get > itself out! And the House of Saud is now jumping from that sinking ship like the rats that they are ... "assurancetourix" <assurancetourix2003@yahoo.ca> wrot