misc.legal

LIBERATOR wrote: Qwest Communications NET-QWEST-BLKS-4 (NET-65-112-0-0-1) 65.112.0.0 - 65.127.255.255 HOLTZ EXECUTIVE VILLAGE Q0925-65-117-49-32 (NET-65-117-49-32-1) 65.117.49.32

LIBERATOR wrote: > Dawn, STFU and take your cartoon friend Pat Edwards back to traitor land. Hey kooky, go steal a cell phone. -- ÐÏà¡±á

Malev wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:22:04 GMT, General Sam <patriot@american.biz> wrote: > > >>=> Vox Populi aka @$#*wit, wrote: >> >> >> >>>Ohhh, those poor oppressed suffering Israeli Jew Bastards ... >> >> >>Thanks for showing what a

=> Vox Populi © wrote: >>Not without a court order. > > > Thanks for confessing once again that you are a lying sack of > #@($ ... your false cowardly claims that I or other's know > your location is exposed again. Yer a venal port sniffer

Moe wrote: > "Bootstrap Bill" <wrcousert@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<oW7Gc.25685$%_6.3332@attbi_s01>... >>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:40E6A64A.4010406@it.com... >>>fasgnadh wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> >>> [

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > tjab wrote: >>Jon C wrote: >>>tjab wrote: >>>>VRWC wrote: >>>>>David Martel wrote: >>>> >>>>>>It's not illegal to wear anti-bush t-shirts. However, for quite some >>>>>>time the Secret Service has protected the Preside

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > [anti-Bush tosser] wrote: >>Sun Jul 4,10:13 PM ET >>By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer >>CHARLESTON, W.Va. - >><snip> >>Two Bush opponents, taken out of the crowd in restraints by police, SAID >>THEY WERE TO

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: [I'm posting my response to the legal boards, as your position is so astounding that it almost defies description, but the legally trained will be more appalled by it then laymen.] >>Therefore, ev

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>When confronted by a mug like yours, the only responsible reaction is >>>>laughter (http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/kaldis.html). You >>

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: [snipped to focus on this astounding point] >>Therefore, even in the absence of the incorporation doctrine, I would be >>entitled to procedural due process as a matter of Colorado law. > > Let me

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004, Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote: > The following page I put updescribes a case > against HBO that I am in the process of working on. > http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news/sixfeetunder.html > >Any aggressive copyright lawyers

**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com **** ............................................................................. ............................ Prepare Yourself for a Trial, Representing Yourself, or assisting your lawyer t

in article r7eje05js89l0r8mk3hvab83o8bklb0fop@4ax.com, Strabo at strabo@flashnet.com wrote on 7/5/04 4:29 PM: > They can not only read your email but break into your house and > bug your computer or, just make you disappear with no habeas > corpus o

"General Sam" <patriot@american.biz> wrote in message news:beb5d53a16a228034d696e4d5481c174@news.teranews.com... > Malev wrote: > > > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:22:04 GMT, General Sam <patriot@american.biz> wrote: > > > > > >>=> Vox Populi aka @$#*w

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 17:26:17 -0500, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote: > >"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message >news:O%aFc.5110$i3.3533@nwrdny03.gnilink.net... >> Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.html?th >>

"Florence Henderson Had A Mullet" wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> And they refused, > As well they should have. And they took their lumps. As well they should have. (And as presumably you did in Kentucky in 2000.) > It's a free cou

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:16:27 -0400, "ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote: >"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message >news:O%aFc.5110$i3.3533@nwrdny03.gnilink.net... >> Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.html?th

"Florence Henderson Had A Mullet" wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis said: >> As, for instance, that they might have started fighting with the cops? > Sounds to me like the cops started trouble, just like they did in Kentucky > in 2000. You need to

On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:43:58 GMT, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: >Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.html?th > > >When you click on "send" to deliver that e-mail note to your lover, mother >or boss, you realize that

On 5 Jul 2004 15:36:14 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >>Strawman. >Hypocritical evasion. >>Anti-Clinton people know better than waste their time. >Are you dishonest, or ignorant? You are a Troll. -- Map Of The Vast Right Win

In article <2lmje09tnhpoqifpui6be44bp28msbmgf8@4ax.com>, Pandy Michaels <nospamforme@junkaddress.com> wrote: >On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:43:58 GMT, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> >wrote: > >|>Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/02/opinion/02FRI2.h

I quit the job after having worked for him six weeks. I didnot put him in the court immediatly, because I always thought he shouldnot be that bad. He has very bad/dangerous driving habits. I helped him avoid at least three serious accidents when I wa

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:ccbjes$494@rac1.wam.umd.edu... > In article <40e94a59.134082079@news-server.houston.rr.com>, > VRWC <spam@spamcrap.com> wrote: > >On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:25:19 GMT, "David Martel" > ><marte005@earthlink.

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:22:04 GMT, General Sam <patriot@american.biz> wrote: >=> Vox Populi aka @$#*wit, wrote: > > >> Ohhh, those poor oppressed suffering Israeli Jew Bastards ... > > >Thanks for showing what a racist lowlife you are poxie - you

Someone once told me that on Mon, 05 Jul 2004 16:01:46 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Moe wrote: > >> Naw that's typical of Callous, actually. Not only is he racist but he is >> sexist as well, calling females like m

Someone once told me that on 5 Jul 2004 11:51:08 -0700, fvrnite@yahoo.com (Moe) wrote: > > Naw that's typical of Callous, actually. Not only is he racist but >he is sexist as well, calling females like me whores and so forth. >Maybe it was becau

Dave, Thanks for your reply. I'm not sure if my doc gave me copies of the papers I signed. I didn't think it was a big deal at the time so I didn't ask for copies. As far as STDs, both tests came back negative. My doc did ask me lots of questi

cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote in message news:<c31fa7b1.0407051022.5ca8ce0b@posting.google.com>... > turnkey4099@hotmail.com (Harry K) wrote in message news:<751f8d35.0407041910.2151c303@posting.google.com>... <massive snip> >

Ken Smith wrote: > [usual bollocks] Ken, I might potentially be very busy this coming week -- perhaps even too busy to bother much with you tossers. We'll see how things shake out, but it's possible that I might not be able to get to much of this

EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> Our judges are not called upon to dispense "justice" but rather, to >> interpret the law. We as a society decide what is just, and implement that >> judgment through law. > I'm no exper

=> Vox Populi © wrote: > Ohhh, those poor oppressed suffering Israeli Jew Bastards ... Thanks for showing what a racist lowlife you are poxie - you've really come out of your shell of late!

=> Vox Populi © wrote: > It's also like infantile children who place their fingers in their ears Kenny-boy yer in great company, poxie likes you - what a coup!

Gregory Franklyn wrote: > > "LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message > news:40CF615E.DE749E34@igs.net... > > > > Actually the pledge does not say who's g-d and thus > > dodges the establishment problem, rather neatly. > > > > I tend t

unclesam wrote: <snip> Didn't make any more sense the first time you posted it, you stammering #@($stain. "Imagine the people who believe such things and who are not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient findings of thinking minds thro

unclesam wrote: > => Vox Populi © wrote: > >> If your ISP supposedly told you "who was sniffing around" > > > Not "supposedly" Walnut-brain. Sure Spammy ... > >> were they stupid enough to have divulged your name >> and address, then tell yo

"Gregory Franklyn" <gregoryf@zcloud.net> wrote in message news:10ej0je8n5qn066@corp.supernews.com... > > "LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message > news:40CF615E.DE749E34@igs.net... > > > > Actually the pledge does not say who's g-d and thus

On Sun, 04 Jul 2004, Dodge Hemi <none@phoneydomain.com> wrote: >An ad for an internet dating service popped up on my screen >just now and the following "warning" appeared: > > "If you are married and posing as single, be aware that you could be >

unclesam@linuxmail.org (unclesam) wrote in message news:<1eae9afd.0407050729.6b65fa38@posting.google.com>... > => Vox Populi © wrote: > > > If your ISP supposedly told you "who was sniffing around" > > > Not "supposedly" Walnut-brain. > > > we

In article <40E9B293.146C87BB@worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >[anti-Bush tosser] wrote: > >> Sun Jul 4,10:13 PM ET > >> By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer > >> CHARLESTON, W.Va. - > >> <snip> > >> Two

Ken Smith wrote: > God has answered Voltaire's prayer for me, as evidenced by the subject > header. :) Are you just now discovering that injustice occurs in this world? Put your schoolbooks away, the world isn't really the same as they depict it.

In article <LaiGc.8061$bp1.7653@twister.nyroc.rr.com>, Jon C <news@jonnythan.com> wrote: >"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message >news:ccbjes$494@rac1.wam.umd.edu... >> In article <40e94a59.134082079@news-server.houston.rr.com>, >> VRWC <spam@spa

Moe wrote: > AllI can say if he attracts a sexy female, Darling it's happened many a time, and it never ceases to amaze even me. I'm talking about first-rate babes, the kind you wish you were in your deepest desires. > he'd better be sure she

Moe wrote: > Naw that's typical of Callous, actually. Not only is he racist but he is > sexist as well, calling females like me whores When did I ever call you a 'ho? -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

DarkMatter wrote: > Is that really Ted? I mean, SERIOUSLY? Is that him? The picture's a few years old, but, yeah, that's me. (And I haven't changed all that much since then, except maybe have gotten a little greyer.) > If so, holy #@($. Pass

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> [anti-Bush tosser] wrote: >>> Sun Jul 4,10:13 PM ET >>> By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer >>> CHARLESTON, W.Va. - >>> <snip> >>> Two Bush opponents, taken out of the crowd in restraint

tjab wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >> [anti-Bush tosser] wrote: >>> Sun Jul 4,10:13 PM ET >>> By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer >>> CHARLESTON, W.Va. - >>> <snip> >>> Two Bush opponents, taken out of t

PJM will defend any republican, any place, any time, regardless of the situation. In article <W8NFc.93$sD4.3@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>, usenetreader.biteme@earthlink.biteme.net says... > Gee - I can't wait to see how many people at the

In article <40e95c0f.138615478@news-server.houston.rr.com>, VRWC <spam@spamcrap.com> wrote: >On 5 Jul 2004 09:03:16 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >>>Only after they were pistol whipped half to death. > >>Another Bush supporter against the

In article <40e95be1.138569953@news-server.houston.rr.com>, VRWC <spam@spamcrap.com> wrote: >On 5 Jul 2004 09:01:16 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >>>Public nuisance for one. People come to rallies to support their >>>candidate, not to liste