|
|
"L Perez" <LPerezDncr@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:s5adncU82dT2kW_dRVn_iw@comcast.com...
> LOL!
>
> and that's just with Carol's deceitful names!!!
===========
A handle cannot be "deceitful" or "fraudulent" as that doesn't apply on
Usenet.
|
|
|
"Precision" <precision@Usenet.com> wrote in message
news:40f20698_1@Usenet.com...
> Thanks for the suggestion. Along that vein I had a humorous but at the
same
> time troubling thought the other day; I wondered if eventually your kill
> filter will
|
|
|
"Precision" <precision@Usenet.com> wrote in message
news:40f1fb93_1@Usenet.com...
> I'm finding myself in agreement with LP's admonishment to Jabriol in the
> topic Jabriol: Request For The Truth on the alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
> newsgroup - if in
|
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote
news:40F19C22.6010205@hotmail.com...
>
>
>
> Most young women are sexually attracted to older men
> who can provide for their family. It's been that way for
> a million years. It's built into the biology.
Wel
|
|
|
Sons aof a #@&@^es to you both,,,,,, I'be been quit for five yrears not you
sjutls shut upa!!!!
--
"Float like a butterfly! Sting like a Bee!"
Muhammed Ali!
"Marky" <akwaraaat8@look.ca> wrote in message
news:SuWdnXZStsyJNm3dRVn_iw@look.ca...
>
|
|
|
"Dave Zero" <davezero@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:gaWHc.265$sV2.114@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > Konan the Kuffir wrote:
> >> On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:14:38 -0400, wthh blurted:
> >>
> >>> Is this a contest to see how many time
|
|
|
thomandpam@yahoo.com.au (Thom) writes:
>On 19 Apr 2004 18:23:30 GMT, "ian maclure" <ibm@svpal.org> wrote:
>>On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:29:37 -0600, ** Bu$h's Porch Monkey ** wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Still doesn't mo
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030908040607010204020709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> SolarChase wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:13:24 GMT, "Bill in Co."
<surly7curmudgeon@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Now you are calling me a rapist, are you? LOL
>Well, you kind of sound like one. So are you?
>Well, on second thought, rapists are really cowards, so I w
|
|
|
"L Perez" <LPerezDncr@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:s5adncU82dT2kW_dRVn_iw@comcast.com...
> LOL!
>
> and that's just with Carol's deceitful names!!!
> but seriously, I've been here quite some time and must have 1,000 of
Carol's
> fraudulent
|
|
|
FernDog wrote:
> Bob,
>
>
>>The problem is that by age 14 to 16, young women are NOT children
>>biologically. They are in their PRIMARY adult breeding years. They are
>>at their physical peak of ability to bear their children. It is really
>>qu
|
|
|
truckinsp wrote:
>>Bob wrote:
>>
>>>The problem is that by age 14 to 16, young women are NOT children
>>>biologically. They are in their PRIMARY adult breeding years. They are
>>>at their physical peak of ability to bear their children. It is reall
|
|
|
"Marc H Shiers" <user@brimscombe.fslife.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ccpubr$q6f$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
> There are others out here against SW's and SS within the U.K. We are
> fighting for review and reform. Visit my site www.socialservicesabuse.c
|
|
|
truckinsp wrote:
> Bob wrote:
>
>>The problem is that by age 14 to 16, young women are NOT children
>>biologically. They are in their PRIMARY adult breeding years. They are
>>at their physical peak of ability to bear their children. It is really
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis
>Why even bother? Who gives a toss about whatever the f*** you have to say?
Welllllllllll.... based on the sheer volume of posts you have exchanged with
him since the dawn of the cyber era, its a safe bet to say "you do."
--
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Dan Evans wrote:
>>>>> legalfilings@usa.com (Legal Filings) wrote:
>>>>>> My own case is proof of America's tragically laughable level of legal
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion. Along that vein I had a humorous but at the same
time troubling thought the other day; I wondered if eventually your kill
filter will get too large and cause the newsreader to crash? I've seen it
happen with other sorts of th
|
|
|
"Precision" <precision@Usenet.com> wrote in message
news:40f1fb93_1@Usenet.com...
> I'm finding myself in agreement with LP's admonishment to Jabriol in the
> topic Jabriol: Request For The Truth on the alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
> newsgroup - if inde
|
|
|
_ G O D _ wrote:
> "Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote
> news:40F19C22.6010205@hotmail.com...
>
>>
>>
>>Most young women are sexually attracted to older men
>>who can provide for their family. It's been that way for
>>a million years. It's built
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> I care that the truth be told. Consequently, I am compelled to set the
>> record straight.
> Then by all means, let us do so.
Fine. But are you even capable of doing so? We already know that
|
|
|
General Sam <patriot@americans.biz> wrote in message news:<9a4eb1c6e1859bc489a1504bdfba6fec@news.teranews.com>...
> JGB wrote:
>
> > General Sam <patriot@american.biz> wrote in message news:<9461af9b57eaf7033eae5b5492ae48ee@news.teranews.com>...
> >
|
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:13:24 GMT, "Bill in Co."
<surly7curmudgeon@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Now you are calling me a rapist, are you? LOL
>Well, you kind of sound like one. So are you?
>Well, on second thought, rapists are really cowards, so I w
|
|
|
This sinks beneath the proverbial sludge at the bottom of the sewage
processing plant! Could Jabriol have really meant it? He has failed to
express his deep sorrow for the death of this precious life and his outrage
at even the IMPLICATION that he is r
|
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> The prime biological breeding years for women are from
> about 16 to 26. After 26 female fertility starts declining.
> Women of age 14 to 16 are biologically the right age to
> begin being married an having th
|
|
|
I'm finding myself in agreement with LP's admonishment to Jabriol in the
topic Jabriol: Request For The Truth on the alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
newsgroup - if indeed Jabriol is one of Jehovah's Witnesses! I'm seriously
doubting he could possibly be a b
|
|
|
"krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<S9VHc.44628$qw1.21995@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>...
> "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:780ea958.0407100803.50449a3e@posting.google.com...
> >
> > The Vice
|
|
|
"ThomasT" <mauicop@hawaii-politics.com> wrote
> >I think he just means that women seem always to have an ulterior motive
in
> >their sexuality- it isn't as casual as men's perspective, and often very
> >commercially oriented.
> >You want to do some '
|
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriol1@excite.com> wrote in message
news:9e9431eb.0407111429.12068ab8@posting.google.com...
===============================
Will you blame your poor writing skills on this post too?
Path:
internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nnt
|
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriol1@excite.com> wrote in message
news:9e9431eb.0407111429.12068ab8@posting.google.com...
> take a look a the truth as, Carol witkowski continues to lie.
> let talk to the dead man himself and see who caused his suicide.
> http://tiny
|
|
|
My wife and I have divorced 3 years ago, but I would still adopt my
ex-stepson Yegor. Who
is now almost 20 years old. How difficult is it if we both want this?
A simple form from the Clerk of the Court to be completed and signed?
Our thanks in a
|
|
|
VRWC wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:28:08 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>>> You anal types take life far too seriously.
>
>> I work with women who are beaten and raped by men with your "nonchalant"
>> attitude.
>
> Now you are callin
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:40F06800.8DF35A67@worldnet.att.net...
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > [usual bollocks]
>
> Without a computer of my own for the past few days, I haven't been able to
> post. It's gonn
|
|
|
Chainsaw <i'm@mywitsend.net> wrote in message news:<Fz_Hc.8841$VM.2618@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>...
> Forget the debate. I think they should mudwrestle.
>
Gah, no one wants to see that. The girl is a dog.
Mez
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010305080402070808000908
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020209070108010109030509
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>Just to let you know,
|
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:28:08 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> You anal types take life far too seriously.
>I work with women who are beaten and raped by men with your "nonchalant"
>attitude.
Now you are calling me a rapist, are you? L
|
|
|
"Precision" <precision@Usenet.com> wrote in message news:<40f17754_1@Usenet.com>...
> "Finzio & Freda" <FreeThem@thisNG.com> wrote in message
> news:fb6dnRdTp_bU7GzdRVn-vg@heartoftn.net...
> <snip>
> > * You need to look into Jabriol a little closer
|
|
|
"VRWC" <spam@spamcrap.com> wrote in message
news:40f0acc0.197222601@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:17:43 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >> >>>Hookers have been with us since the beginnning of time.
>
> >> >>Th
|
|
|
Please consider posting your original question to the alt Newsgroup
alt support child-protective-services.
It is carried by http://www.Google.com
Groups
We talk about international issues devoted to CPS interventions. The good and
the bad
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
[to Ken Smith]
>> Why even bother? Who gives a toss about whatever the f*** you have to
>> say?
> Welllllllllll ... based on the sheer volume of posts you have exchanged
> with him since the daw
|
|
|
# IMO is the European "affirmative action," AKA numerous
# clausous, is the key for the Jews' success.
> > Here we disagree.
> > A good scientist needs two things, talent and effort.
> > Those who try harder are more likely to be good scietists.
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Dan Evans wrote:
>>> legalfilings@usa.com (Legal Filings) wrote:
>>>> My own case is proof of America's tragically laughable level of legal
>>>> corruption. I am a writer with my freedom of speech b
|
|
|
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:sv41f0tkng4knhngtb0i6msotn1ajr89i5@4ax.com...
> >> The Vice President is currently under investigation by French
> >> authorities for bribery, money laundering and misuse of corporate
> >> ass
|
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:17:43 GMT, "V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>"Candlemoth" <nospam@invalid.com> wrote in message
>news:6cLHc.27139$o62.9962@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>> V wrote:
>>
>> > "VRWC" <spam@spamcrap.com> wrote in message
>> >
|
|
|
in article ccqqqi$blh@dispatch.concentric.net, s_knight8 at
s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com wrote on 7/11/04 12:38 AM:
> http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=5633371
<snip>
> Pretrial hearings on whether the woman's sex
|
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:06:05 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"V" <vbiggs@frontiernet.net> wrote
>> I am fun loving, but start to refer to women as hookers, and I will let
>you
>> know it is not okay.
>
>I think he just means
|
|
|
_ G O D _ wrote:
> "Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote
>
>>The prime biological breeding years for women are from
>>about 16 to 26. After 26 female fertility starts declining.
>>Women of age 14 to 16 are biologically the right age to
>>begin being
|
|
|
angrygerman@worldemail.com (Xavier) wrote in
news:c5cd03d6.0407082034.61849e1f@posting.google.com:
> "Swillabrew" <don'tspam@any.net> wrote in message
> news:<dvmdnRRqaruBTHDdRVn-hQ@scnresearch.com>...
>> "Terraholm" <terraholm_SpamGoAway@hotmail.
|
|
|
Dan Evans wrote:
> legalfilings@usa.com (Legal Filings) wrote:
>> My own case is proof of America's tragically laughable level of legal
>> corruption. I am a writer with my freedom of speech banned by the USA
>> government - after I dared to criti
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050609070001030300040405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>[what Ted can't bear t
|
|