misc.legal

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:48:30 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > "Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message > news:pan.2004.08.23.21.17.16.322253@curlysurmudgeon.com... >> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:31:06 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:44:05 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: --------------snip-------------- > My guess is that had she actually been a threat, you guys would have been > among the first to point out that there were passengers on the train that > thoug

He has a) dug up the private address and phone number of a woman who has had nothing to do with his feud with Steve Chaney, and posted it online. b) actively encouraged the harassment of this woman. c) issued death threats to her husband, the

Did you write two checks for the RAM and the computer? If not, whatever would make you think you have the right to "stop" payment on the check for the computer? Also ... are you looking at the brand of the actual chips on the memory board? It's typical

"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message... > > I thought the Post Office tried to require "PMB" to be used but the > > requirement was either withdrawn voluntarily or struck down by a > > court shortly before it was to have gon

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<6-udnZB-F5pdFLfcRVn-iA@comcast.com>... > "Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote > >> Only if he did it with people he represents- he's under no such > >> obligation > >> otherw

Deadanus wrote: > > >Hey Wonderbra, >Do you have a permit to purchase and store the alleged explosives that >you threatened to blow people up with on usenet today? I don't have to buy dynamite, you dumbass. I can make what I need at home with leg

"Dave Zero" <davezero@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<VZxWc.2074$Y%3.1821@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>... > Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote: > > In article <cge8ch$1m3@dispatch.concentric.net> > > "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com

john doe wrote: > I think you've been taking it up the ass Nah, you don't think...that would require a brain! -- ÐÏà¡±á

I was a first semester law student at a law school. I am told I failed a final exam in Legal Research and Writing. I asked for a copy of the exam and my answer. The professor refused me a copy. There was nothing in the student handbook or syllabus

In <cgdlj6$t86$1@chessie.cirr.com>, John S <snick@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote: >In soc.singles Steve Chaney, still taunting the happy fun ball <gunhed57@nrismykicktoy.pacbell.net> wrote: > ><snip> > >> You know what's so cowardly about you, Midget man?

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:n2uWc.1607$rT1.1583@trndny02: >> > I am not bound by Google's TOS. >> > >> > Google is bound by copyright law. >> >> Yet you brought up Grace vs Ebay in which the court upheld a >> dismissal > ba

> > I am not bound by Google's TOS. > > > > Google is bound by copyright law. > > Yet you brought up Grace vs Ebay in which the court upheld a dismissal based on a TOS > agreement. Ebay users sell on a closed system. Google archives everything.

http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0408/23a.html The prosecution was the picture of confidence at the start of this saga, but things have definitely changed. We've learned that many employees in the DA' s office are privately conceding this

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHNlYw N0aA--?slug=ap-bryantcase-jury&prov=ap&type=lgns ``Some may want to blame Kobe and say it must be rape because a normal person wouldn't do this,'' Rice said. ``Others might

Naughtius "The Twinkies Made Me Do It" Maximus wrote: > Yuh... No doubt DUHbya will dispose of President Kerry in The Same > Decisive Manner he Dispatches Pretzels for Lunch... The only thing caught in Kerry's throat are waffles... -- ÐÏà¡

John Tibbs wrote: > "Fat Burns" <FatBurns@overcooked.com> wrote in message > news:412a871b$1_1@omega.dimensional.com... > >>"john doe" <bob@nodickandbush.com> wrote : >> >> >>>Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerr

Miles Long wrote: > Miles "Mortimer Snerd" Long I'm sure you're a real afficianado of fisting... -- ÐÏà¡±á

Lance Lamboy wrote: > The Presidential debates will be interesting, but what I am really > interested in are the vice-presidential debates. Who knows what dirty > words Cheney will say. Or whether Edwards will channel dead children like he does

john doe wrote: > Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerry on the > REAL issues. Remember what he did to the Prince of Sighs.. Lol - bring droning taffy-face on! -- ÐÏà¡±á

>So since a public university is a "public agency", they are exempt >from this law and can legally have credit card surcharges?? Is that >correct? Perhaps. You might want to check into the definition of a "public agency." You also might want to se

"Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message news:vwiVc.8743$54.125783@typhoon.sonic.net... > > "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:cg2dip$qek@dispatch.concentric.net... > > http://news.bostonherald.com/nationa

"cbreitel" <charlesbreitel@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:74317df6.0408231654.14117cd8@posting.google.com... > "TinCanMan" <TinCanman@nowhere.nul> wrote in message news:<GoGdnZRUt7gh-bXcRVn-qw@comcast.com>... > > > > I understand what occurs when

"Vince Runza" <v_runza@hotmail.com> wrote in news:2oua83Feluf2U1@uni-berlin.de: > "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message > news:mDfWc.8535$IO1.7295@trndny03... >> > > My GOD what interesting things people say out here. >> > >> > I'm s

Formhandle <formhandle@fastseduction.com> wrote in news:v_GdnXY-F-2Po7fcRVn-hQ@giganews.com: > Ray Gordon wrote: > >> ... >> I am not bound by Google's TOS. >> >> Google is bound by copyright law. > > Yet you brought up Grace vs Ebay in whi

I have read some statements from attorneys on the net stating that in a low-impact rear-end collision, the energy of the collision goes into the person, not the car due to the new bumpers designed not to break... I am looking for evidence of this: s

Player88 <name@host.ws> wrote in news:name-B8D9F9.08433023082004@host-66- 150-105-60.nibble.net: > Plagiarizing someone's name, whether knowingly or unknowingly, isn't > cool. I believe that can be considered identity theft. > > While I'm not

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:GjiWc.17755$3O2.15644@trndny07: >> I wonder how he'll be able to log onto the Internet and claim victory >> when > a >> court-appointed mediator is taking away his computer as part of > comepnsator

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:J2hWc.912$rT1.756@trndny02: >> >> Who hired a lawyer? LTSC hired lawyers. Are you suing ME? No. >> >> I was >> > dismissed, >> > >> > Without prejudice. >> >> Why do you insist on trying to s

"Harry Tuttle" <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote in message news:<9JCdnQ6Dtba9qrTcRVn-sw@bravo.net>... > <hinojo_b@bellsouth.net> wrote... > > I thought you could use # instead of PMB. Check with your local UPS Store. > > This is from August, 2000

Thanks. "Christopher Green" <cj.green@att.net> wrote in message news:0ecgi0d0c3adkt2skvqr0gjko5lcs2koj8@4ax.com... > On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:23:18 -0400, garygilmore@aol.comedian (Gary > Gilmore) wrote: > > >BACKGROUND: > >My father died this year

ninjak@gmx.de (zerang shah) wrote in message news:<4d6c559c.0408231009.2de8a9ab@posting.google.com>... > Hello, > > Suppose that a public university here in California decided to impose > a credit card surcharge on tuition, housing, etc.. payments ma

Ray Gordon wrote: >>Movie Studios Lose In Case Against File-Sharing Apps >>Aug. 20, 2004 > > > File-sharing applications are not websites to which content was published. > > The creator of the app is not the user of the app. The publisher of

allengan2000@yaXYZhoo.com (Allen Gan) wrote in message news:<wuuWc.12259$Xv4.2638@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com>... > I was a first semester law student at a law school. > I am told I failed a final exam in Legal Research > and Writing. I asked for a copy

"Vince Runza" <v_runza@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:2ovc71Fejn1fU1@uni-berlin.de... >> Then why didn't this apply to Napster, which was just shut down? > > Click this link: http://www.napster.com/. Works fine for me. Once again, > GORK talks

thanks

curtisccr@sbcglobal.net (Curtis CCR) wrote in message news:<c678797a.0408231431.144cdcab@posting.google.com>... > ninjak@gmx.de (zerang shah) wrote in message news:<4d6c559c.0408231009.2de8a9ab@posting.google.com>... > > The public schools are "govern

Ray Gordon wrote: >>Of which you failed to avail yourself. Hence, 99 out of 100 dropped. Heh, >>avail yourself of Google's TOS, GORK. It's easy reading. > > > > > I am not bound by Google's TOS. > > Google is bound by copyright law. > > T

In article <cge8ch$1m3@dispatch.concentric.net> "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote: >http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0408/23a.html > >The prosecution was the picture of confidence at the start of this saga, but >things hav

I was a first semester law student at a law school. > I am told I failed a final exam in Legal Research > and Writing. I asked for a copy of the exam and my > answer. The professor refused me a copy. > > There was nothing in the student handbook or s

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:21:18 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> in misc.legal, wrote the following: >That is entirely true, but the author of the story was the Muslim woman, she >may not be aware of what the police did before they got to h

Hey, you are awesome! Thanks for the advice. I already have a good lawyer. The store dropped the charges but it seems the DA wants me to be punished. I am having a hard time deciding if an infraction or misdeanor is the best choices given my situati

tjab wrote: > In article <BYAVc.8959$54.127106@typhoon.sonic.net>, > Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > >>"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message >>news:cg6gel$rhn@rac1.wam.umd.edu... >> >>>In article <78zVc.8921$54.126434@typhoon.son

In article <a83cf0f5.0408231358.5463ceae@posting.google.com>, pete_cym@hotmail.com (EasyB) wrote: > Player88 <name@host.ws> wrote in message > news:<name-B8D9F9.08433023082004@host-66-150-105-60.nibble.net>... > > In article <10ij2obqb851289@corp.

tjab wrote: > In article <yXWVc.9087$54.131312@typhoon.sonic.net>, > Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: > >>"offshore eddie" <eddie@nospam.com> wrote in message >>news:kLVVc.9448$3O3.6020@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> >>>"tjab" <t

"John Tibbs" <jwtibbs@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:wRvWc.1916$Y%3.794@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > "Fat Burns" <FatBurns@overcooked.com> wrote in message > news:412a871b$1_1@omega.dimensional.com... > > "john doe" <bob@nodickandb

> Then why didn't this apply to Napster, which was just shut down? Click this link: http://www.napster.com/. Works fine for me. Once again, GORK talks out of his ass. Vince -- 8===Ð

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:16:27 +0200, Sally <smeg@hotmail.com>, wrote: >Ray Gordon wrote: > >>>Movie Studios Lose In Case Against File-Sharing Apps >>>Aug. 20, 2004 >> >> >> File-sharing applications are not websites to which content was publishe

Ray Gordon (Gordon Roy Parker) wrote: >> > I am not bound by Google's TOS. >> > >> > Google is bound by copyright law. >> >> Yet you brought up Grace vs Ebay in which the court upheld a dismissal >> based on a TOS agreement. > > Ebay users sell

As ya can guess, aka: London's Calling by the Clash -------------------------------- Gordon's failing by the seat of his pants Google is laughing, grp-ie ain't got a chance Gordon's failing to the seduction world He just can't get l

s_knight8 wrote: > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/22/sports/basketball/22araton.html Umm... so who is the allegedly formidable opponent? > IF the State of Colorado v. Kobe Bryant were a basketball game, it would be > nearing the start of the fou

Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > ... > Actually -- the law provides that E-mail may be an official notice if > the message is digitally signed. It would never have occurred to me that Parker would be capable of digitally signing an e-mail. Not for a lac

> You've got your facts flipped mate! Your Ray Gordon is the fake! He > may have been born Ray Gordon but he's trying to ride on the > coat-tails of the seduction guru extra ordinaire. Pathetic! > > Your insolance is so astounding it's not funny. The

" bozak" <bozak@mail.com> wrote in message news:<2oujuhFenvfsU1@uni-berlin.de>... > better to pay 5 mill to defend than to pay that #@&@^ a dime... "He is not giving her five cents!" Gold digger be warned.

"Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote >> Only if he did it with people he represents- he's under no such >> obligation >> otherwise. > No such obligation? This is call deceit. No. It's not. He has discussed nothing that has to do wi

"john doe" <bob@nodickandbush.com> wrote : > Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerry on > the REAL issues. Dumbya won't have his "Swift Boat Cowards for Liars" to > do his talking (smearing) for him. > > Who knows ma

> Movie Studios Lose In Case Against File-Sharing Apps > Aug. 20, 2004 File-sharing applications are not websites to which content was published. The creator of the app is not the user of the app. The publisher of a website IS the user of the w

> Presuming he ever > gets any kind of hearing on this, a judge would ask him why. I > wonder what he will say? I vote for: "I think you should recuse yourself from this case." [Sorry about the heavy OT today. I am feeling a bit surrly and

"TinCanMan" <TinCanman@nowhere.nul> wrote in message news:<GoGdnZRUt7gh-bXcRVn-qw@comcast.com>... > > I understand what occurs when there is no written instrument memorializing > the agreement. In fact, our Landlord and Tenant Act defines some of it

"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote >>Blacks and Jews have a long-standing animus- maybe Kobe was exercising his >>own racism by attacking someone of a group he's long hated. > You are really an idiot. It's just as possible as some sort of latter-d

> Of which you failed to avail yourself. Hence, 99 out of 100 dropped. Heh, > avail yourself of Google's TOS, GORK. It's easy reading. I am not bound by Google's TOS. Google is bound by copyright law. Tell me: why didn't Napster win its case

john doe wrote: > Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerry on the > REAL issues. Dumbya won't have his "Swift Boat Cowards for Liars" to do his > talking (smearing) for him. > > Who knows maybe Dumbya will amuse us and

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<fOidnWtCTMznjbfcRVn-qg@comcast.com>... > "Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote > >> You know, having a little class. > > Oh, and when did Craig Silverman break this code? Did h

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:21:18 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message >news:BTR1702-96E910.14205820082004@news.west.earthlink.net... >> In article <10icd7jl0p7tj98@corp.supernews.com>

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 08:34:36 -0600, "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >Blacks and Jews have a long-standing animus- maybe Kobe was exercising his >own racism by attacking someone of a group he's long hated. You are really an idiot.

Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerry on the REAL issues. Dumbya won't have his "Swift Boat Cowards for Liars" to do his talking (smearing) for him. Who knows maybe Dumbya will amuse us and wear another GI Joe outfit t

It's impossible to tell, based on the information you provide. If the Chapter 13 Plan provides for a payment of $1,500 to your lawyer, which was already made, then this would appear to be correct. I'd suggest asking your attorney. -- Brett ****

"john doe" <bob@nodickandbush.com> wrote in message news:ddqdndawhNL_qbfcRVn-uQ@adelphia.com... > Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerry on the > REAL issues. Dumbya won't have his "Swift Boat Cowards for Liars" to do

"Michael Price" <nini_pad@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4129e941$0$6809$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au... > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message > news:vwiVc.8743$54.125783@typhoon.sonic.net... > > > > "s_knight8" <s_knight8nosp

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:16:02 -0400, john doe wrote: > Can't wait to see Dumbya's crosseyed look when he has to debate Kerry on > the REAL issues. Dumbya won't have his "Swift Boat Cowards for Liars" to > do his talking (smearing) for him. > > Who

Player88 <name@host.ws> wrote in message news:<name-B8D9F9.08433023082004@host-66-150-105-60.nibble.net>... > In article <10ij2obqb851289@corp.supernews.com>, > Paul Knight <knightp@execpc.com> wrote: > > > Not the same person. The Ray Gordon you ar

"Over40pirate"> wrote > We are negotiating the sale of our boat, and holding a Note for 1 year. Why? The > buyer wants to put the boat in a boat yard for repairs. If the buyer can't pay for the boat, how is he going to pay for the repairs? >

Ray Gordon wrote: > ... > I am not bound by Google's TOS. > > Google is bound by copyright law. Yet you brought up Grace vs Ebay in which the court upheld a dismissal based on a TOS agreement. 1. Upon discovering any violation of your own co

"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message news:pan.2004.08.23.21.17.16.322253@curlysurmudgeon.com... > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:31:06 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > ----------snip------------ > > We do not know what probable cau

"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message news:smoki094ggpun8bt9q1e9krm6k219bdodc@4ax.com... > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:21:18 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message >

Our lawyer just completed a property easement agreement for us. Its been signed and filed with the county clerk. I just got a copy of it sent to me... with a note that the lawyer has the original. I have the original deed for my house in my safe de

We are negotiating the sale of our boat, and holding a Note for 1 year. The buyer wants to put the boat in a boat yard for repairs. I am worried if he defaults on the Note, I will be stuck with the repair bill. It may be 1/2 the value of the boat or

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:31:06 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: ----------snip------------ > We do not know what probable cause may or may not exist here. All we know > is the picture painted by one party, but there is ALWAYS another side to > any story, a

ilv2sl@aol.comnospam (Ilv2sl) wrote in message news:<20040822200919.12124.00003854@mb-m01.aol.com>... > If a person sells a boat, and holds a short term Note on the boat, for 80 % of > the sale price of the boat, what happens, if the new owner takes the

"Paul Knight" <knightp@execpc.com> wrote in message news:10ijqamd4ect2e4@corp.supernews.com... > Your post hit the nail right on the head. We've wondered that too! > > I wonder if the UK Ray Gordon knows about Gordon Roy Parker's pseudonym? when

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:1TiWc.2247$oD2.727@trndny08... > > Not the same person. The Ray Gordon you are referring to appears to be > sane. > > This one is quite sane as well. > > Any competent psychologist could con

Formhandle wrote: > > Ray Gordon wrote: > > > ... > > I am not bound by Google's TOS. > > > > Google is bound by copyright law. > > Yet you brought up Grace vs Ebay in which the court upheld a dismissal based on a TOS > agreement. > > 1. U

>tjab wrote >"It's more reported than jaywalking too, liar." Tough to argue *that* one for sheer numbers.... Anyway, seeing that Colorado is the host state for this posting marathon, i thought you guys might like to see some numbers for Adult a

" bozak" <bozak@mail.com> wrote in message news:2oujuhFenvfsU1@uni-berlin.de... > better to pay 5 mill to defend than to pay that #@&@^ a dime... oh yeah, and spend another million or so suing the #@($ out of her... make her owe you or attorneys fo

better to pay 5 mill to defend than to pay that #@&@^ a dime...

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:RadWc.1310$1M3.103@trndny01... > > > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a lawyer in the first > place > > be > > > able to analyze the case himself? > > > > > > About the most ab

"Katherine Griffis-Greenberg" <egylist@deadspamgriffis-consulting.com> wrote in message news:21cki0d8otrmpfsbn1nr3pibm2rgh8nf48@4ax.com... > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:21:18 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> in misc.legal, wrote the followi

"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:BTR1702-1BB302.02055123082004@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <scSdnUxP5rxWo7TcRVn-tA@bravo.net>, "Harry Tuttle" > <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote: > > > "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.net

"Harry Tuttle" <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote in message news:nLOdnc4kb_AHRLrcRVn-rw@bravo.net... > "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote... > > In article <cg80pm01q86@enews1.newsguy.com>, "Yankee Rebel" > > <email@police.blot> wrote: > >

"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:BTR1702-5EFB3D.16003221082004@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <cg80pm01q86@enews1.newsguy.com>, "Yankee Rebel" > <email@police.blot> wrote: > > > "LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in

On 23 Aug 2004 11:07:31 -0700, messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote: >Osama Bin Bush <Bushin2004@bush.com> wrote in message news:<Bushin2004-943B66.23591220082004@newssvr23-ext.news.prodigy.com>... >> Seriously, I hope l lin wood is regarded as th

Hello, Suppose that a public university here in California decided to impose a credit card surcharge on tuition, housing, etc.. payments made with credit card. There is a section of the civil code which states: 1748.1. (a) No retailer in any sale

Osama Bin Bush <Bushin2004@bush.com> wrote in message news:<Bushin2004-943B66.23591220082004@newssvr23-ext.news.prodigy.com>... > Seriously, I hope l lin wood is regarded as the scum of attorneys after > this case is over with. I hope she doesnt win a

-- Rusty The preceeding message reflects my beliefs and opinions. Veracity of statements is left to the common sense of the reader. "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:7idWc.2717$Ff2.2342@trndny06... > > > LTSC has filed a m

"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message news:pan.2004.08.20.21.54.27.721542@curlysurmudgeon.com... > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:34:28 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > > > > "Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote i

Michael wrote: > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<4124FB14.6F220782@sprintmail.com>... > > Michael wrote: > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > Looking for a professional law firm or attorney that handles > >

"Jeff George" <george666@comcast.net.munged> wrote in message news:j8eci01m07okkp60ngc7240lsqihl7d0bg@4ax.com... > On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:45:04 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> added the following words, followed by my wisdom: > > >

Ray Gordon wrote: > > > > I'd also like to see a policy that says that an overdraft fee cannot > exceed > > > the amount of the overdraft. > > > > What you'd like to see has nothing to do with the law. > > Never said it did! So, why are you p

"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:BTR1702-96E910.14205820082004@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <10icd7jl0p7tj98@corp.supernews.com>, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.co

"Jeff George" <george666@comcast.net.munged> wrote in message news:rfdci0dm7dpgaomvd9frg6gg6vinblvb49@4ax.com... > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:58 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> added the following words, followed by my wisdom: > > >

"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message news:pan.2004.08.20.01.16.50.192421@curlysurmudgeon.com... > On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:19:36 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > -----------snip--------- > >> > The reaction of the police was

http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/lakers/la-sp-bryant23aug23,1,16 75516.story?coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakers "If she is strong and points across the courtroom and says, 'That man raped me,' that is very powerful," said Norm Early, a l

"Ilv2sl" <ilv2sl@aol.comnospam> wrote in message news:20040822200919.12124.00003854@mb-m01.aol.com... > If a person sells a boat, and holds a short term Note on the boat, for 80 % of > the sale price of the boat, what happens, if the new owner takes t

apprenticeq@aol.com (ApprenticeQ) wrote in news:20040821235406.04727.00003231@mb-m10.aol.com: > Due to the insensitivity that i have experienced after my first time > posting here, i don't feel that this group is for me. I will not > continue to po

"Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote >> You know, having a little class. > Oh, and when did Craig Silverman break this code? Did he lie about > certain facts? Did he misstate anything? Or does having class means > saying things you li

"Over40pirate" <over40pirate@aol.comnospam> wrote in message news:20040823104039.25600.00004539@mb-m29.aol.com... > We are negotiating the sale of our boat, and holding a Note for 1 year. The > buyer wants to put the boat in a boat yard for repairs.

> Not the same person. The Ray Gordon you are referring to appears to be sane. This one is quite sane as well. Any competent psychologist could confirm that.

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:mDfWc.8535$IO1.7295@trndny03... > > > My GOD what interesting things people say out here. > > > > I'm sure Google said the same thing when they read your WTC posts. > > I had forgotten how much

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:GjiWc.17755$3O2.15644@trndny07... > > I wonder how he'll be able to log onto the Internet and claim victory when > a > > court-appointed mediator is taking away his computer as part of > comepn

"GaryMO" <garymo@aol.com> wrote in message news:20040823104252.22107.00002152@mb-m07.aol.com... > Our lawyer just completed a property easement agreement for us. Its been > signed and filed with the county clerk. > > I just got a copy of it sent to

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:nCfWc.5856$Nn2.773@trndny05... > > > Which means he has to rely on third-party analysis of his case. > > > > It means LTSC does not have have the time to put into hands-on dealing > with it, >

> I wonder how he'll be able to log onto the Internet and claim victory when a > court-appointed mediator is taking away his computer as part of comepnsatory damages That is not a wise threat to be making, as even your stupid wet dreams wouldn't al

In article <10ij2obqb851289@corp.supernews.com>, Paul Knight <knightp@execpc.com> wrote: > Not the same person. The Ray Gordon you are referring to appears to be sane. I was told something similar earlier by a Mr. Robinson. Given that both Ray G

"Raul" <mshlomb@yahoo.com> wrote > Since the slut went to his room late at night to "flirt" with him, it > would've made no difference. Maybe she got up there and his breath stank- >> For attacking a Jewish lady? > This is the first time I've hea

Your post hit the nail right on the head. We've wondered that too! I wonder if the UK Ray Gordon knows about Gordon Roy Parker's pseudonym?

Ray Gordon (Gordon Roy Parker) wrote: > ...even your stupid wet dreams > wouldn't allow for something like that. Feeling bitter? -- Form <formhandle@fastseduction.com> Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/ Class is now in sess

> >> Who hired a lawyer? LTSC hired lawyers. Are you suing ME? No. I was > > dismissed, > > > > Without prejudice. > > Why do you insist on trying to see that having something DISMISSED without > prejudice is a victory? It's neither a victory

GOP reluctant to criticize Edwards over tort reform Some Republican strategists are reluctant to criticize Democratic vice-presidential candidate John Edwards too harshly for spending his career as a personal-injury lawyer, though polls show the majori

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:34:12 -0700, Winston §mith <spamtrap@1stconnect.com> wrote: >> >>If you fell that you also get spam, use the free email service from >>http://www.myTrashMail.com. You dont need a signup nor password. You >>can use >>any name

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:LCfWc.8533$IO1.3294@trndny03: > >> > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a lawyer in the first > place be >> > able to analyze the case himself? >> >> Who hired a lawyer? LTSC hired law

In article <scSdnUxP5rxWo7TcRVn-tA@bravo.net>, "Harry Tuttle" <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote: > "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote... > > > But I would like to see the First Amendment interpreted as not only > > > permitting freedom OF r

> > My GOD what interesting things people say out here. > > I'm sure Google said the same thing when they read your WTC posts. I had forgotten how much our society and the courts defend the player lifestyle. Thanks for reminding me!

> > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a lawyer in the first place be > > able to analyze the case himself? > > Who hired a lawyer? LTSC hired lawyers. Are you suing ME? No. I was dismissed, Without prejudice.

> > Which means he has to rely on third-party analysis of his case. > > It means LTSC does not have have the time to put into hands-on dealing with it, And therefore has to rely on third-party analysis.

tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<cgahks$cnt@rac1.wam.umd.edu>... > In article <MPG.1b93be995e9a1ecd989af1@news.snet.sbcglobal.net>, > Sky KIng <laughing@home.net> wrote: > >In article <cg7j9d$681@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu says.

Ray Gordon wrote: > My GOD what interesting things people say out here. Stop using my name in vain, Gordo. And you were never my Son; stop claiming you were.

Formhandle wrote: > And excuse me about claiming I am asking people to fight "my" > battles. Pick out one instance where I am demanding people > help. The only INFERENCE in that regard was telling people > to HELP THEMSELVES before they start

"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:7idWc.2717$Ff2.2342@trndny06: >> > LTSC has filed a motion to dismiss that hasn't been ruled upon. >> > That's not exactly a nut-kicking. >> > >> > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a law

Krus T. Olfard wrote: > "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in > news:LCfWc.8533$IO1.3294@trndny03: > >> >>> > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a lawyer in the first >> place be >>> > able to analyze the case himself? >>> >>

> > LTSC has filed a motion to dismiss that hasn't been ruled upon. > > That's not exactly a nut-kicking. > > > > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a lawyer in the first > > place be able to analyze the case himself? > > > Possibly by ta

> > Then again, how would someone who had to hire a lawyer in the first place > be > > able to analyze the case himself? > > > About the most absurd statement you have ever made. He has expert legal > advice. Which means he has to rely on third-

"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<G5ednYEA58VvIrXcRVn-qg@comcast.com>... > Obviously not. > Perhaps if he had been a little better, who knows how it might have turned > out? Since the slut went to his room late at night

I agree with the poster Chris Green...I have a petty theft from California...another conviction would be a felony<my 3rd strike>. If store security would catch me in the act and grabbed me and I ran I have been told this "might" lean towards a strong a

Not the same person. The Ray Gordon you are referring to appears to be sane. > Ray's not like this all the time. I know, because I've read nearly all > of his books, and his e-books that he has on his website. Everyone > should check his website ou

hmm I responded to this and my post's not showing up for some reason. An infraction is not considered a criminal offense. It's an administrative offense, such as a speeding ticket, jaywalking, etc. It is not considered a "crime" per se. A misdem

On 22 Aug 2004 08:07:33 -0700, harr5127@yahoo.com (Sarah Jones) wrote: >Looking for some advice, > >I'm dealing with a legal case right now where my options are either to >accept an infraction or misdemeanor regarding a petty theft case in >Califor

If a person sells a boat, and holds a short term Note on the boat, for 80 % of the sale price of the boat, what happens, if the new owner takes the boat to a boat yard and has a lot of work done on it, then,boat owner fails to pay the Note? He default