Legal Spring Logo

"Should I form an Incorporation or an LLC?"
Find out at LegalSpring.com
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:6DPWc.8059$VY.5199@trndny09: >> In anybody's book, 2% success rate is a dismal failure. No spin >> possible. > > Let the Third Circuit check in before you rant. > > No check needed - failure t


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:rNPWc.12002$IO1.7636@trndny03: >> > The court would have said what that was. I read the procedures and >> > followed them. If there were something wrong with what I did, the >> > court could easily


Re: In Court, Bryant Finds a Formidable Opponent
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:M7adnVpDj6f0NbbcRVn-gg@comcast.com... > "Scotius" <wolvzbro@mnsi.net> wrote > > Any man who'd rape a woman ought to have his dick cut off, but > > I don't think Kobe did it, > > But, if


Ex-Microsoft Employee Chris "akula" Caputo Admits to Organized Software Piracy (was Re: Such a shame)


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
> > The courts provide equal access to all. I showed good cause for not > > serving; the court did not refute my argument. > > It (the court) denied your argument's validity, I believe. It > may very well not have "refuted" your argument, but it com


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
> > The court would have said what that was. I read the procedures and > > followed them. If there were something wrong with what I did, the > > court could easily have noted it the way they do in countless other > > rulings. In fact, I did exactly


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
> > > The only lack of action was on your part: Failing to serve the Does. > > Therefore, the > > > court dismissed those Does for lack of prosecution. > > > > Failure to serve isn't lack of prosecution. That was a misnomer. > > Nope, it's called


Be Your Own Private Investigator website update
I recently updated much of the content on my website "Be Your Own Private Investigator" and moved it to a new domain: http://pi.mcdonnellresearch.com If you operate a web site that would be relevant and would like me to include a link, please emai


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:12:40 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@engin.umich.edu> wrote in message >news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0408242106250.13947@alumni.engin.umich.edu... >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jeff Strickla


Re: You must leave your home (hurricanes)
"David Martel"> wrote > Maradcliff, > Are you sure of your facts? Where and when were people forced from their > homes by the government? Just recently a hurricane struck in Florida causing > great damage and loss of life. Prior to landfall the


Re: Stop payment issue - Best Buy
Sorry, as a computer repair professional ... I had to comment. How in the !@#$ did you wind up checking "plugs" on a power supply at BB? As far as I knew they (and Compusa, etc) only sell standard ATX. What is there to check?! Maybe you don't know w


Re: Letter To Media Regarding Bryant Case
Wendy <wendy@nospam.edu> wrote in message news:<cgg286$rpd$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>... > In alt.true-crime s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=27 > > [...] > > > In case I haven't been 100%


Re: Stop payment issue - Best Buy
Hey Damodoof.... Why don't you go stop payment on another check and get sued. You deserve it. Quit putting bad ideas in other weak minds via the Internet. You're a bad influence. PS. I have been running a small business for years ... and I always wi


Re: Letter To Media Regarding Bryant Case
George Evans <georgee@pe.net> wrote in message news:<BD50F627.B05%georgee@pe.net>... > in article T3LWc.45141$PG2.4694665@twister.tampabay.rr.com, LadyLibra at > LadyLibra@nospam.com wrote on 8/24/04 10:40 AM: > > > Bull#@($. > > She's getting paid


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:52:31 -0400, "Yankee Rebel" <emall@police.blot> wrote: >> Not if you believe in banning religious items from public. That >violates >> the "freedom of expression" clause of the 1st Amendment as well as the >> "free exercise c


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:17:02 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: >The point is, we are a nation at war against an unknown enemy. Had this >woman really been a threat, and had the police not investigated, and the >wiman succeeded in c


Kerry Wimps Out
Bob Dole shoots one over his bow and Kerry asks him to quit. Some kind of hero. I think Kerry's exact words were "I'm disappointed in you, Bob." What the hell? What's wrong with this country anyway? Why can't we find real men to run for presiden


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote: > Frankly, the Muslim woman herself harbors a bit of bigotry if you think > about it. SHE thinks that she was targetted because she is Muslim in a > Christian country. The US is not a "Christian country"


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
Ray Gordon wrote: > >> > There are three levels of court that have to say that before it would >> > hold. >> > >> >> We've all already covered this crap before. >> >> The only way I can see it is that there is something about the situation >>


Re: Malpractice:
Well now. Seems we have an intelligent person amongst us, lets offer him the biggy and see if he runs away: is he going on my cockle doo do file or can he stay the course, is he an honest yank or a blow hard, lets put him to the test. David you a


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in news:pMLWc.3853$oA.2763@trndny04: > >> > There are three levels of court that have to say that before it >> > would hold. >> > >> >> We've all already covered this crap before. >> >> The only way I c


Re: DA's office admit they have a losing case
On 24 Aug 2004 19:36:12 -0700, kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com (Huang Gang) wrote: >"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<97ednfRuZtphOrbcRVn-gg@comcast.com>... >> "Ralph DuBose" <rdubose@pdq.net> wrote >> > The core difficul


Judge Limits Video in Kobe Bryant Case
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=sportsNews&storyID=6060456 DENVER (Reuters) - Television cameras will be limited to closing arguments in the rape case against professional basketball star Kobe Bryant, the judge presiding over the trial


Re: Need a mailing address, not a "PMB"
Christopher Green <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >"Harry Tuttle" <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote: >>Remember that in free countries you don't need to tell the government >>where you live. Only totalitarian states require their citizens >>t


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message news:07uni09ke2hhii1kveaut7bo7ic3gu3enq@4ax.com... > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:17:02 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >The point is, we are a nation at war against an unknown en


Re: DA's office admit they have a losing case
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<97ednfRuZtphOrbcRVn-gg@comcast.com>... > "Ralph DuBose" <rdubose@pdq.net> wrote > > The core difficulty for the proscecution is that the accusers > > approach towards Mr. Byrant looks so


Re: Need a mailing address, not a "PMB"
"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.chinet.com> wrote in message news:<10in711n3piksfe@corp.supernews.com>... > Christopher Green <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > >"Harry Tuttle" <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote: > > >>Remember that in free countri


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@engin.umich.edu> wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0408242106250.13947@alumni.engin.umich.edu... > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > > Frankly, the Muslim woman herself harbors a bit of bigotry if you think


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
> >... read the procedures and followed them. > > No, you didn't. Actually, I did. >You MIGHT have read the procedures but you either did not understand > them or did not follow them. Rather, you expected the court to do your work for you. I


Re: Letter To Media Regarding Bryant Case
In alt.true-crime s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote: > http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=27 [...] > In case I haven't been 100% clear in what I've just said. Let me state > this one last time for those of you who are eit


Re: Stop payment issue - Best Buy
Don't stop payment on your check. File a small claims lawsuit against the local Best Buy store for the amount you paid for the memory ($160) plus the cost of suit (about $35 in many areas). It's easy to do -- just a simple form. The matter is bet


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
> > There are three levels of court that have to say that before it would > > hold. > > > > We've all already covered this crap before. > > The only way I can see it is that there is something about the situation > that YOU do not understand, due


Re: Looking for Law Firm That Handles Passenger-Airline Cases?
"Michael" wrote: > . . . In the way back from Cairo, Y airline requested the > US-born kids to have US passports so they were NOT allowed > on board. Did this situation, by any chance, involve the parents attempting to invoke the pass


Re: Stop payment issue - Best Buy
Christopher Green wrote: > "Jean Luc Skywalker Baggins" <frodo@jean.luc> wrote in > message news:<dNxWc.1987$1M3.1188@trndny01>... >> Saturday afternoon I purchased a brand new HP pavilion >> desktop PC for around $1,000 and an extra 512 megs worth >


Re: DA's office admit they have a losing case
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 07:39:18 GMT, catchmerevisited <catchmerevisited2004@yahoo.ca> wrote: >in article 8g9li011kij5ba47f21b2esl8o8lgqjrcv@4ax.com, Sports Fan at >sports@fan.home wrote on 8/23/04 7:39 PM: > >> In article <cge8ch$1m3@dispatch.concentr


Re: This is scary!
If anyone's interested, you can read and learn Sun Tzu's The Art of War at www.sonshi.com > We knew that we didn't need to go in then. We should have known that > the Ba'athists would have fought a guerilla war -- at least, anyone who > has


Re: Letter To Media Regarding Bryant Case
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cge8pc$6p@dispatch.concentric.net... > http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=27 > > For the record, I want to make it perfectly clear that s5000.com and > fratpack.com are not re


Re: Correct legal tearm BAD MOUTHING OLD EMPLOYEE ?
"Prof Marvel" <garee_remove_@cinci.rr.com> wrote in message news:4sJWc.34033$cT6.29413@fe2.columbus.rr.com... > Don wrote: > > > "Tim Kettring" <tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> wrote in message > > news:2ovvvuFeqovrU1@uni-berlin.de... > > > >>What i


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote > Was it an unreasonable search and seizure? Sounds like kind of a pedestrian 'Terry stop'; allowed. Chas


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
In article <cgfogh0cr0@enews4.newsguy.com>, "Yankee Rebel" <emall@police.blot> wrote: > "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message > news:BTR1702-FF1F79.00052624082004@news.west.earthlink.net... > > In article <cgd3bf01t20@enews1.newsguy.co


Re: Car accident advice
steveshasha@hotmail.com (Steve Shasha) wrote in message news:<b7a8a16a.0408240221.4597e7bf@posting.google.com>... > Hi All, > > I have a dilemma, and I'm not sure what to do about it. I'd greatly > appreciate any advice that might recommend a course


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message news:pan.2004.08.24.21.27.08.618805@curlysurmudgeon.com... > On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:09:24 -0700, Holy Crusader wrote: > > >> Fitchburg woman says she was targeted because of Muslim head


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"Jeff George" <george666@comcast.net.munged> wrote in message news:b0nmi0pol6r2r6ffmrrnj6e4m8s48ebgij@4ax.com... > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:24:47 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> added the following words, followed by my wisdom: > > >


Re: Stop payment issue - Best Buy
"Jean Luc Skywalker Baggins" <frodo@jean.luc> wrote in message news:<dNxWc.1987$1M3.1188@trndny01>... > Saturday afternoon I purchased a brand new HP pavilion desktop PC for around > $1,000 and an extra 512 megs worth of Kingston RAM for around $160. >


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:BTR1702-74FDAE.23594123082004@news.west.earthlink.net... > In article <10ik9t4dqaueh7e@corp.supernews.com>, "Jeff Strickland" > <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > "BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.co


Chapter 7 and Reaffirmation vs. surrender
Hello Everyone, I'm hoping that there is someone out there that can help me. I recently filed Chapter 7 which I prepared myself and filed. I am now getting letters from attorneys (we have not had the meeting of creditors yet) and they are all saying t


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote: > "Jeff George" <george666@comcast.net.munged> wrote in message > news:rfdci0dm7dpgaomvd9frg6gg6vinblvb49@4ax.com... > > Did YOU bother to read the original complaint? They also took her > > backpack.Tha


Re: Will the Colorado Bureau of Investigation actually testify for Kobe?
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<iL-dnY1FqOUF17bcRVn-hA@comcast.com>... > "Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote > > He has violated an order of the court which you sheepishly admited. > > What part of 'no, he


Re: Woman Targeted Because of Muslim Headscarf
"Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message news:pan.2004.08.24.06.41.55.620530@curlysurmudgeon.com... > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:44:05 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: > --------------snip-------------- > > My guess is that had she a


Re: Ten BILLION Dollars! <pinky to corner of lip>
Ray Gordon wrote: > The courts provide equal access to all. I showed good cause for not > serving; the court did not refute my argument. It (the court) denied your argument's validity, I believe. It may very well not have "refuted" your argume