|
|
cj.green@worldnet.att.net (Christopher Green) wrote in message news:<c31fa7b1.0408250943.22d1e98d@posting.google.com>...
>
> Profs don't "know you passed" and still give you a failing grade. They
> are not in their profession to flunk students.
Whi
|
|
|
them@us.net wrote in message news:<qa9qi0p23333rpjrbrt2mgdmk8mbapl3b0@4ax.com>...
> My wife and I applied for a mortgage. We gave the lender all the
> usual financial info, including a carefully broken-down-by-name
> account of our joint income. The
|
|
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
> Says the right to keep and bear machine guns is in the
> constitution.!!! Well - i can't find it. Hell, machine guns didn't
> even exist in 1789. Anybody ever see a muzzleloading machine gun?
> HAHA
>
|
|
|
"TinCanMan" <TinCanman@nowhere.nul> wrote in message news:<6LidnagOwtYKIrfcRVn-sQ@comcast.com>...
>
> There were of course more issues than the broken entrance door which the
> tenant claimed was due to a breakin and he didn't have an attorney, most
|
|
|
"Ramsey Clark to Join Panel for Saddam's Defense"
Abdul Jalil Mustafa, Arab News(Saudi)25 Aug.'04
EXCERPTS:
AMMAN, 25 August 2004 - Former US Attorney General
Ramsey Clark is expected to join a legal team seeking
to defend former Iraqi President
|
|
|
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@engin.umich.edu> wrote in
news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0408251512290.6527@alumni.engin.umich.edu:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Fay wrote:
>
>> > The US is not a "Christian country".
>
>> It sure is not a muslim country. It is a free
|
|
|
Are not these referred to as the "canons of statutory construction"?
In article <412CFCA6.5B2CE17D@sprintmail.com>, ronnirubin@sprintmail.com
says...
>
>Michelle wrote:
>>
>> 1. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
>
>"The expression of one
|
|
|
Actually, Kerry went to bed with his machine gun and hit the trigger while
sleeping.....
"starwars" <nobody@tatooine.homelinux.net> wrote in message
news:1f3a1f162d2fb5a44c1c8a75bba4b30c@tatooine.homelinux.net...
> Mr. Methane, the resident ass wipe o
|
|
|
Buck Fush wrote:
> JJT <Tashcan@beaner.con> wrote in message news:<bkddi0tvpkp8bue8vq99i66qgi0j1kclto@4ax.com>...
>> >Isn't EditorialStaff a target of Litigation Lad? I fail to see why LTSC should carry
>> I am sick of all of you on here
>> >blowi
|
|
|
Lee Darrow wrote:
> ...
>> The court never explained what was done wrong. That's because nothing was
>> done wrong. This decision will likely be overturned.
>
> Not true. You failed to effect basic notice via Subpoena Teuces Decum
> to 98% of
|
|
|
In article <cgju1i$p5@dispatch.concentric.net>, s_knight8
<s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.courts.state.co.us/exec/media/eagle/08-04/mrbryantsnoticetothecou
> rtsreunresolvedissues.pdf
>
> It appears that the prosecution intends t
|
|
|
In article <9fd1d25a.0408250758.4efddc95@posting.google.com> mekabta@kemi.de (Michael) writes:
>I am from Germany and I'm going to study in the USA during the next
>academic year. I'm a music freak but there is no way to take all of my
>CDs with me. In
|
|
|
"RobATL1711" <robatl1711@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040825182535.03961.00002915@mb-m19.aol.com...
What exactly does it mean when a lawyer objects
> to something and uses the phrase... "Move to strike" ?
In my jurisdiction, a motion to str
|
|
|
To any lawyer, judge, etc.,
I have a general legal queston. What exactly does it mean when a lawyer objects
to something and uses the phrase... "Move to strike" ?
If sustained, which record is it struck from? Does the court reporter back up
and
|
|
|
>My wife is planning to find people jobs as teachers and charge the
>TEACHERS a fee for this
The short answer is that yes it is legal. At least there is no federal law
forbidding this. There may be state laws.
Whether or not this scheme will act
|
|
|
"Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote
>> Yeah; rather interestingly, matter of fact- a credible sequence of
>> events.
> Does it include how she had swap her schedule in advance, place his
> security guards three doors away, sneaks outsi
|
|
|
in article f00c23df.0408251431.2de17c8e@posting.google.com, Messalina at
messalinana@yahoo.com wrote on 8/25/04 3:31 PM:
<snip>
> ...I don't think the fact that they are not making a profit would not save
> them legally, as long as commercial use
|
|
|
in article cgipth$tge$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu, Wendy at wendy@nospam.edu wrote on
8/25/04 12:39 PM:
> In alt.true-crime George Evans <georgee@pe.net> wrote:
>>
>> Do either of you two think that a woman could ever be so noble as to come to
>> the *aid*
|
|
|
Tony Holland wrote:
> Ann Abraham is a straight out pervert, [ . . . ].
Probably best not to express any opinion of Ann Abraham, Parliamentary
Commissioner for Administration (Ombudsman) and Health Service
Commissioner for England, former supporte
|
|
|
Tom M. wrote:
> Hi, I am in need of serious help in California.My insurance Co. says
> my payment check (by mail) was delivered to them 12 days late ( based
> on the postmark) therefore there is a 12 day lapse in the policy with
> no coverage .A driv
|
|
|
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpYTg2ZTBwBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHNlYw
N0bQ--?slug=ap-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns
DENVER (AP) -- Two days before the start of jury selection in Kobe Bryant's
rape case, prosecutors charged that crucial DNA evide
|
|
|
"BTR1701" <BTR1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:BTR1702-94C94F.23330324082004@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <B5qdnQ6BLKdqVrbcRVn-gg@comcast.com>, "Chas"
> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.u
|
|
|
> I don't see where Ray has ever prevented anyone from posting what they
> want. It's actually YOU who are @$#*iing with Ray's freedom of speech.
Then you have not seen the times in the past few years that Ray's act of
threatening to sue have made p
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> [bollocks]
Ken, what are you doing still hanging around misc.legal? I thought you were
going to drop out of the group after I left.
BTW, in another 4 1/2 months, you will be eligible to reapply to the Colorado
Bar. What sub
|
|
|
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:24:20 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
<beerman@yahoo.com> in misc.legal, wrote the following:
>Well, the "unfounded passenger suspicions" aboard a United Arilines Flight
>over Pennsylvania on the morning of September 11, 2001, show u
|
|
|
1. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
2. Noscitur a sociis
3. Ejusdem generis
What do you call these?
In article <2p3k28Ffd7qvU1@uni-berlin.de>, Greyprof@msn.com says...
>
>No difference.
>
>McGyver
>
>"Michelle" <ladylaw888@yahoo.com>
|
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> seems to think in
news:10ipo2s2u4p9k5e@corp.supernews.com:
>
> "Katherine Griffis-Greenberg" <egylist@deadspamgriffis-consulting.com>
wrote
> in message news:8ueoi0dcbu0blaofdsncmt2b7nci2rd5g7@4ax.com...
>>
|
|
|
Says the right to keep and bear machine guns is in the
constitution.!!! Well - i can't find it. Hell, machine guns didn't
even exist in 1789. Anybody ever see a muzzleloading machine gun?
HAHA
http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-sen2
|
|
|
My Aunt just passed away. She was a widower and one of six children
with no children of her own. Her parents are deceased, as are three
of her siblings. So, her only remaining surviving close relatives are
one brother (my dad) and one sister.
She
|
|
|
In alt.true-crime George Evans <georgee@pe.net> wrote:
>
> Do either of you two think that a woman could ever be so noble as to come to
> the *aid* of a man she believes has been falsely accused?
Sure. In that case, volunteering to testify for th
|
|
|
> My wife is planning to find people jobs as teachers and charge the
> TEACHERS a fee for this. So she'll charge the employee a fee not the
> employer. Is this legal? What are the legal consequences of this in
> Texas, In any state? Her company is a
|
|
|
Hello
Started a new job in factory with about 30 employees
been there 3 weeks
when boss gathered everyone around telling us the usal health and safety
stuff
and then proceed to to say that if none of thes managers in the building
(theres 4 of them
|
|
|
"Robert Miller" <stargazzr@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<rKCdnc4PgeGnpbHcRVn-rQ@hemc.net>...
> If asked to take a drug test do I have the right to the
> results of the drug test? I may want to protest it's results.
>
> Robert Miller
If you
|
|
|
--0-896403394-1093485793=:83855
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Civic associations are not elected. The people who get involved are the loudest. They impose their will on the quietest. In some cities, they also have advisory boards where ci
|
|
|
"***Fintan***" <tpotty@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2p4389FgpnemU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Hello
> Started a new job in factory with about 30 employees
> been there 3 weeks
>
> when boss gathered everyone around telling us the usal health and
safe
|
|
|
>My wife is planning to find people jobs as teachers and charge the
>TEACHERS a fee for this. So she'll charge the employee a fee not the
>employer. Is this legal?
This practice is widely regarded as a scam. Whether or not what
your wife is doing
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<gOCdnSTOTvQUUbHcRVn-oA@comcast.com>...
> "Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote
> > Did her account detail out how she arranged herself to be in that
> > particular situation?
>
|
|
|
>JJT <Tashcan@beaner.con> wrote in message news:<bkddi0tvpkp8bue8vq99i66qgi0j1kclto@4ax.com>...
>> but to be blunt, it
>> isn't "..my.." red wagon.
>Translated: I'm just an internet pussy who will hide under the nearest
>rock when the #@($ hits
|
|
|
"Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote
> English is not my first language, but there is something called a
> DICTIONARY.
Yes; and that puts you two down- understanding English and understanding
English legal jargon.
People are restrain
|
|
|
"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote
>>Resisting? What resisting? Were there marks on her neck? Were there
>>noise that the neighbor could hear? Were there signs of struggle?
>>Were there torn clothes? Were there broken #@($s?
>>Oh she said she r
|
|
|
apprenticeq@aol.com (ApprenticeQ) wrote in message news:<20040821120221.10848.00009005@mb-m25.aol.com>...
> " jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:r60Wc.13727$%n4.8977@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> >
> > "Tarkus" <Tarkus@homeland.security.
|
|
|
In article <412c7647.172505890@enews.newsguy.com>,
Steve Chaney, still taunting the happy fun ball <gunhed57@NRismykicktoy.pacbell.net> wrote:
>Deadanus wrote:
>>
>>Hey Wonderbra,
>>Do you have a permit to purchase and store the alleged explosives th
|
|
|
Christopher Green <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:
>>Christopher Green <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>>"Harry Tuttle" <htuttle@central.services.gov> wrote:
>>>>Remember that in free countries
|
|
|
Ray Gordon (Gordon Roy Parker) wrote:
> ...
> What is someone talking about taking away my computer doing then?
Maybe you'll get an answer - when you answer why you answer about your the same thing in
reverse.
--
Form <formhandle@fastseductio
|
|
|
> > Good to know his opinion on this!
>
> Pardon me, but isn't the guy who's talking about what he'll do after he
> wins you, GORK? The sentence, "This decision will likely be overturned",
is
> just that.
What is someone talking about taking away
|
|
|
mfarid1@yahoo.com (Programmer) wrote in message news:<f26cce3f.0408250936.43c0b998@posting.google.com>...
> My wife is planning to find people jobs as teachers and charge the
> TEACHERS a fee for this. So she'll charge the employee a fee not the
> empl
|
|
|
On 24 Aug 2004, dland@mytrashmail.com (David) said/asked in substance:
> I recently petitioned pro se for Ch. 7 bankruptcy relief
> and am now getting letters from attorneys saying I have
> to either surrender my collateral consisting of furniture/
|
|
|
Michelle wrote:
(after fixing her idiotic top-posting)
> In article <412CFCA6.5B2CE17D@sprintmail.com>, ronnirubin@sprintmail.com
> says...
> >
> >Michelle wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
> >
> >"The expression of o
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<_8SdnSgNnOwbWbHcRVn-jQ@comcast.com>...
> "Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote
> >> He opines on the process, the procedure- not the evidence, testimony or
> >> confidential mat
|
|
|
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, alexgan2000@yahoo.com (Alex Gan) wrote:
> The professor knows I passed and I cannot
> show anyone my work. The school will protect
> their interest and let me burn. Cost me about
> $15k and I have nothing to show for it. I am
>
|
