|
|
In uk.legal Johnjo <johnjo42@.remove.netscape.-to reply-.net> wrote:
> "Ancient One" <AncientOne@destroyjaimito.com> wrote in message
> news:cgna3c$138$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
> >> > >
> > > >The recalcitrant debtor is something of a myth: mos
|
|
|
I'm NOT a lawyer, but I think that there are "standards" for allowing
evidence. I have heard, for example, that digital photos are not accepted
in NY state courts because they can be easily altered. While it is tempting
to say that if I were a justic
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:fd-dnYVnNM9fWbPcRVn-vQ@comcast.com...
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
> > Are we to believe that she was in serious fear that a world-famous
> > celebrity was going to strang
|
|
|
"Ancient One" <AncientOne@destroyjaimito.com> wrote in message
news:cgna3c$138$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
>> > >
> > >The recalcitrant debtor is something of a myth: most debtors who are
> unable to avoid a baliff's visit are in that position not b
|
|
|
http://www.courts.state.co.us/exec/media/eagle/08-04/ROA082704.pdf
With a list of 53 add'l witnesses who hadn't previously been endorsed. CRT
grants til 5 today for filing of formal rule 16 violation if defns desires
to do so.
|
|
|
How John Kerry got his purple hearts:
>His first was Bacitracin on a shrapnel wound on his upper arm. The
>so-called rice wound occurred early in the day of March 13, 1969.
>That afternoon was the incident for which he received a Bronze
>Star for r
|
|
|
http://www.wpecnews12.com/engine.pl?station=wpec&id=11137&template=breakoutt
opstory.html
Meanwhile, News 12 has learned of A Palm Beach County connection to the
case.
The N-B-A superstar's defense team plans to call two Palm Beach County men
to th
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~28682~2363484,00.html
Ruckriegle was also told that he still has to resolve matters that appear to
go to Bryant's credibility, including the admissibility of tape recordings,
impeachment witnsses that may t
|
|
|
Graham McFadden-Jones wrote:
> In 2000, there was a thread on sci.geo.satellite-nav titled:
>
> "GPS as a Defence Against a Speeding Ticket". In a posting dated
> 2000/06/05 Sigurd Humerfelt said this:
>
> "Please do not tell anyone. There is no n
|
|
|
In article <vTKXc.33$h43.25320@news.uswest.net>, so@damocl.es says...
> Alex wrote:
> > "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> schreef in bericht
> > news:64JXc.17$h43.17754@news.uswest.net...
> >> Alex wrote:
> >>> "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com>
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Uncle Sam wrote:
>
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>> I rather like talking politics, and the weather sucks today.
>>
>>
>> Pity your love of politics isn't bolstered by the ability to be honest.
>
>
> And precisely what am I
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it legal for a man to marry his widow's sister?
The widow's sister lives in Louisiana, which uses the Napoleonic code, if
that's of any relevance...
*****
Tim Horrigan <horrigan@aol.com>
*****
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:39:48 +0100, "Ancient One"
<AncientOne@destroyjaimito.com> wrote:
>
>"Alex Heney" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>news:hrrsi057dlkvjkg3bn0o8arvupbqmtr7qr@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:28:27 +0000 (UTC), "Socrates"
|
|
|
In article <0685e1e68c11a820339bda0b74f95906@tatooine.homelinux.net>, starwars <nobody@tatooine.homelinux.net> wrote:
> How John Kerry got his purple hearts:
>
> >His first was Bacitracin on a shrapnel wound on his upper arm. The
> >so-called rice w
|
|
|
It was reported in New Zealand's Dominion Post of August
21 2004 (p. A7) that a motorist fighting a speeding fine claims
his GPS proves that Police got it wrong.
A motorist was accused by Police of travelling at 113kmh and
this earned him a fine of
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:58:43 GMT, "peejay" <peejay@aa.com> wrote:
>If it happens, will i have a bad faith claim against the insurance company.
>After all they could have limited my liability by settling within my policy
>limit.
>
If it does go t
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:56:08 GMT, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com>
wrote:
>> >> For how long? It's not unusual for the court to take up to 60 days or
>> >> more on a motion.
>> >
>> >Longer than that, and there was no way to amend until they rule
|
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10iuvsd9sft246c@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Aegis" <lordaegis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:IqBXc.5789$I17.348@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Don" <one-if-by-land@concord.com>
|
|
|
"Steve Furbish" <sfurbish@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:s-Odnebwxr6mHrLcRVn-hg@comcast.com...
>
> "Aegis" <lordaegis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:16uXc.5588$sp4.4197@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Snicker" <evilgrin@yahoo.com> wro
|
|
|
Hi david.
You got an interesting name, my ex in law was General sir philip
martel OC SE England, do you know him?
But, it will be almost impossible to prosecute Hellawell even if I win
the debate, and get 3 charges up and proven all I can hope for
|
|
|
"Unabogie" <unabogie@no.spam.hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:xdLXc.12412$d05.1058@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Max Chuang" <mach@[nospam]csua.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
> news:cgnu10$g1r$1@agate.berkeley.edu...
> > Unless they mean t
|
|
|
Ok: I take your points, so lets say I put up certain facts, call it a
version of events from which I say 3 criminal charges can be made out
in totality, for instance. Pick your three cases you wish me to prove.
If I fail to the standard of proof requir
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>The problem with a Mandamus is you run the risk of alienating the very
>>>judge whom you wish to rule in your favor.
>>
>>He already did that by filing a motion to recuse based on a flimsy
>
> argument.
>
> You're saying i
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004"Mike" <anonymous@nobody.net> wrote:
> If I could *prove* that Google has rejected
> my ad based on an inconsistent, unfair, and/or
> biased criteria, would I have a case against
> them that could at least get heard in court (if
|
|
|
> >> For how long? It's not unusual for the court to take up to 60 days or
> >> more on a motion.
> >
> >Longer than that, and there was no way to amend until they ruled.
>
> So you wait until the court rules, or file a mandamus.
That's just it:
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:17:45 -0600, Uncle Sam <patriots@americans.biz>
wrote:
>Uncle Sam wrote:
>
>
>
>"When I prayed for Rudy, he instantly manifested violent demons. A
>threatening voice spoke from his body in a strange language. At first I
|
|
|
I would think what is needed would be some certification that the unit is
capable of being within x% of the true speed 99.5% of the time - perhaps
from a UL labs kind of place or ISO. However, GPSs are subject to a variety
of environmental influences
|
|
|
I hope you are locked up somewhere.
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:412F5B61.812E5F6C@sprintmail.com...
> RealityTVSucks wrote:
> >
> > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:412E8
|
|
|
"Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote
>> No; I just phrased it to omit 'even a partisan asshole like Silverman is
>> starting......'
> And why did you omit it when you preached against him every time
> before? Consistency, ha ha ha.
D
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Uncle Sam wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Uncle Sam wrote:
>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On second thought, you're right -- The Big Dick's blue streaks
>>>>>> would embarrass even the legendary Big
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> http://www.boblarson.org/TV_RADIO/tv_radio.html
>
> BOB LARSON PRESENTS: SPRITUAL FREEDOM on television features Bob live
> and in action during his Spiritual Freedom Conferences.This one-half
> hour program is telecast world-wi
|
|
|
IanAl wrote:
> > Ann Abraham is a leading supporter of Tunbridge Wells
> > Psychopathic Gay Society. Nothing wrong with her.
>
> Is this loony corner, or what?
The software for uk.legal.moderated was written by a psychopathic gay.
We do not al
|
|
|
aegxgea@aegxgea.cxm.eu wrote:
> Is there a legal obligation on local councils to
> tell us where the council tax goes in detail?
They do not have to tell you, but they do have to make to place the
information in the public domain. It's not very h
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Uncle Sam wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> But of course, General Shame wholeheartedly endorses these classic
>>>> Ted Kaldis pearls (attached)....
>>>
>>> I do?
>
>> You do, General Shame.
>
>
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Uncle Sam wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> On second thought, you're right -- The Big Dick's blue streaks
>>>> would embarrass even the legendary Big Dick (Nixon himself)....
>>>
>>> Aug 27, 2002: H
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Uncle Sam wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> On second thought, you're right -- The Big Dick's blue streaks
>>>> would embarrass even the legendary Big Dick (Nixon himself)....
>>>
>>> Aug 27, 2002: H
|
|
|
"Huang Gang" <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote
> Can't deal with what had been happening for over a year, eh, Chas?
Oh, it's great theatre; I'm enjoying it immensely.
I don't often see such committed political agendas and starstruck athletics
f
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> I rather like talking politics, and the weather sucks today.
>
> Pity your love of politics isn't bolstered by the ability to be honest.
And precisely what am I not being honest about, Shame? Remembe
|
|
|
horrigan@aol.com (Horrigan) wrote in message news:<20040827183738.04299.00003817@mb-m15.aol.com>...
> Is it legal for a man to marry his widow's sister?
>
> The widow's sister lives in Louisiana, which uses the Napoleonic code, if
> that's of any rel
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:54:38 GMT, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com>
wrote:
>> >> >Even then, the Complaint had to be amended to name the actual
>Defendants.
>> >>
>> >> So?
>> >
>> >The court left a motion for leave to amend hanging.
>> >
>> >
|
|
|
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> On second thought, you're right -- The Big Dick's blue streaks would
>> embarrass even the legendary Big Dick (Nixon himself)....
>
> Aug 27, 2002: Having been asked if he would ever considered gettin
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070108070508000609050909
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Uncle Sam wrote:
> FACT.
Your buddy Ted's got mental problems in a
|
|
|
Pieter Litchfield wrote:
> I'm NOT a lawyer, but I think that there are "standards" for allowing
> evidence. I have heard, for example, that digital photos are not accepted
> in NY state courts because they can be easily altered. While it is tempti
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090006080609090203070403
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Uncle Sam wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> But of course, General Shame w
|
|
|
"Messalina" <messalinana@yahoo.com> wrote
>> even Silverman tonight is starting to respect her tenacity and to allow
>> that
>> maybe she *was* raped. Something has hit the courthouse grapevine that
>> puts
>> her case in a stronger light- wonder w
|
|
|
horrigan@aol.com (Horrigan) wrote in news:20040827183738.04299.00003817
@mb-m15.aol.com:
> Is it legal for a man to marry his widow's sister?
>
> The widow's sister lives in Louisiana, which uses the Napoleonic code,
if
> that's of any relevance
|
|
|
|
|