|
http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=30
Apparently the "alleged" victim was well aware of the financial
resources available to her if she claimed to be the victim of a sexual
assault in the State of Colorado. That's right, even before she cried rape
she knew that she would be eligible for financial aid. She knew in advance
of her claims of rape against Kobe Bryant that if she was the victim of a
sexual assault in the State of Colorado, she could apply, and receive
financial assistance from the state.
It was confirmed on Sunday that the "alleged" victim would have known
about the financial benefits available to her in the State of Colorado at
least six (6) months prior to her encounter with Kobe Bryant. That the
"alleged" victim had personal knowledge in a case where someone she knew was
compensated under similar circumstances, after the police officer in that
case told that victim how to apply for aid. That in that case the victim
did indeed receive funds from the State of Colorado.
As we piece the puzzle together in the Kobe Bryant case. The facts
seem to suggest to us the "alleged" victim knew more about what she was
doing than we've been led to believe. It also brings us back to the
question of just how much of the "alleged" victims claims of rape were
possibly based on financial gain verses her search for justice.
Fratpack.com is offering a $10,000 finders fee to the first individual
who supplies fratpack.com with an original agreement for any production,
movie, book, and/or appearance agreement for compensation entered into by,
or on behalf of, the "alleged" victim in the Kobe Bryant case. Again, this
offer shall apply to any such agreement entered into on behalf of the
"alleged" victim, by any person or persons, legally representing her
interests at the time that any such agreement was entered into. Copies,
drafts, unsigned, and/or voided documents shall not qualify under the terms
of this offer. For complete details and information go to the message
boards at www.fratpack.com
In the alternative we are offering a $5,000.00 finders fee to the first
person who provides fratpack.com with the name of any individual or
organization that is in possession of any such agreements. In this instance
a finder's fee will only be awarded if we are able to obtain the original
contract or agreement from the person or entity you supply. Again, copies,
drafts, unsigned, and/or voided documents shall not qualify under the terms
of this offer.
It is becoming more and more apparent with each passing day that the
"alleged" victim's story is getting weaker and weaker. We've heard an even
stronger argument made on the Abrams Report this past Saturday where the
guest continued to argue that the it had to be rape if the "alleged" victim
had bled.
We want to remind you once again that Laie and the "alleged" victim had
a discussion as to why she had previously bled after having sex with a man
who was larger in size than she was accustomed to. Laie and the "alleged"
victim had a detailed and in depth conversation as to why she would bleed
from that position. That previously when the "alleged" victim had sex with
someone who was larger than she normally was use to in that position that
she had sex with Kobe Bryant in, it would and did cause bleeding by the
"alleged" victim.
We know the main stream media refuses to report all the facts because
they're afraid of offending their advertisers and/or some of their readers,
listeners, or viewers. Fortunately we don't have that problem, and have no
such problem in reporting all the facts available to us in this case. It's
a shame that an innocent man may end up being convicted of a crime because
the main stream media is more concerned about the judge banning their
reporters from the courtroom, rather than reporting all the facts of the
case.
How many other people are out there who have relevant information about
the "alleged" victim? But are unable to bring their information forward
because the main stream media refuses to broadcast or publish the
information. That they are more interested in protecting their advertising
dollars than presenting a fair and impartial representation of the facts in
the Kobe Bryant case.
I hope there never comes a day that your freedom depends on main stream
media providing information that will result in you being found innocent
because of the subject matter. Rape may not be the most popular issue to
defend someone against. But when all the facts in the Kobe Bryant case
point to so many problems with the accuser. It's time that the main stream
media gets their heads out of their wallets, and do the job they're expected
to.
|
| |
| |
In article <cgvdfn$pg@dispatch.concentric.net>,
s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
Fratpack.com is offering a $10,000 finders fee to the first individual
who supplies fratpack.com with an original agreement for any production,
movie, book, and/or appearance agreement for compensation entered into by,
or on behalf of, the "alleged" victim in the Kobe Bryant case. Again, this
In the alternative we are offering a $5,000.00 finders fee to the first
person who provides fratpack.com with the name of any individual or
organization that is in possession of any such agreements. In this instance
My, my, somebody has a lot of money to throw around. Anybody wonder where it's
coming from?
|
| |
| |
It's odd how all this information you're discovering about Kobe's
accuser (the horny, money-grubbing #@&@
!) is all taken from this same
spurious website (c'mon -- "fratpack"? Was http://www.beerbong.com
taken?).
I'm thinking maybe Matty Drudge has an athletic brother.
|
| |
| |
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<cgvnlg$k8m@rac1.wam.umd.edu>...
In article <cgvdfn$pg@dispatch.concentric.net>,
s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
My, my, somebody has a lot of money to throw around. Anybody wonder where it's
coming from?
Victims of false accusation fund?
|
| |
| |
It's odd how all this information you're discovering about Kobe's
accuser (the horny, money-grubbing #@&@
!) is all taken from this same
spurious website (c'mon -- "fratpack"? Was http://www.beerbong.com
taken?).
I'm thinking maybe Matty Drudge has an athletic brother.
I.e., Richard Mellon Scaife or someone like him is a Laker's fan
|
| |
| |
Here are some Orkut comments on Laie:
"You really don't want to be friends with anyone with legal trouble,
but obviously, someone as innovative as she is to turn an ugly situation
into something profitable is enterprising and deserves to be mooched
off of...."
"Ask her to be your friend, sleep with her brother and sue him. See
if she writes something cool about YOU."
"It looks like she and her friends get some high quality
bouncy-bouncy from some high quality men. And they
get it on a relentless schedule."
"but Laie herself looks like she was kicked in the head by a mule.
She writes like it, too. If I could hear her bark we might have a
trifecta: PASS, to win, place, and show."
|
| |
| |
s_knight8 wrote:
Apparently the criminal adulterer and liar, Kobe Bryant
was well aware of the rape convictions and imprisonment of
other Black celebrities and wealthy sports figures.
That's right, even before he cried that he didn't do it,
he knew that he would be eligible for 20 years to Life in prison.
He knew in advance ...
|
| |
| |
On 30 Aug 2004 13:20:48 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
In article <cgvdfn$pg@dispatch.concentric.net>,
s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
My, my, somebody has a lot of money to throw around. Anybody wonder where it's
coming from?
It seems that finding the truth scares you too much.
There are lots of prizes and rewards for people who come forward to
expose criminals or to lead authorities to the place that fugitives and
criminals are hiding in, what about those?
You'll say that they are OK because they are not about women.
|
| |
| |
In article <4b8fa98.0408301459.65050be0@posting.google.com>,
Huang Gang <kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com> wrote:
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote in message news:<cgvnlg$k8m@rac1.wam.umd.edu>...
Victims of false accusation fund?
Somehow I doubt it.
|
| |
| |
"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote
There are lots of prizes and rewards for people who come forward to
expose criminals or to lead authorities to the place that fugitives and
criminals are hiding in, what about those?
You'll say that they are OK because they are not about women.
Well, yeah, they are; post office walls are full of posters of women with
bounties on them.
But that aside; you're right- bounties and rewards are sterling ways in
which to engender information about crimes and criminals.
And the accuser can't be immune from it- cash rewards for information
leading to the.......
good call.
Chas
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:01:31 -0600, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote
Well, yeah, they are; post office walls are full of posters of women with
bounties on them.
But that aside; you're right- bounties and rewards are sterling ways in
which to engender information about crimes and criminals.
And the accuser can't be immune from it- cash rewards for information
leading to the.......
good call.
So you admit that the accuser is looking for money after all.
|
| |
| |
"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote
So you admit that the accuser is looking for money after all.
It's the only redress of grievance (check your 1st Amendment) available for
damages. They don't allow her to have done to him what he did to her- she's
got to settle for a monetary compensation.
would you prefer a punishment suited to the crime, or something inventive
she comes up with as a means of revenge?
If not, you must be satisfied with a pay-off.
How much would you want if he did it to you?
Chas
|
| |
| |
In article <WemdnaeyzN4Cca7cRVn-tw@comcast.com>, Chas
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote
It's the only redress of grievance (check your 1st Amendment) available for
damages. They don't allow her to have done to him what he did to her- she's
got to settle for a monetary compensation.
would you prefer a punishment suited to the crime, or something inventive
she comes up with as a means of revenge?
"In keeping with the eye-for-an-eye principle, the court hereby orders
the defendant, one Kobe Bryant, to walk through the lodge where the
actions occurred and brag about what a "gaping pussy" the accuser, one
Katelynn Faber, had, and to instant message (IM) his friends with
reports of his conquest. Only after he is questioned by a former
girlfriend may the defendant then echo the accuser's words, converted
to his gender: "No, of course I didn't have sex with her...you know I
don't @$#* whites!" "
--Tim May
|
| |
| |
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
In article <cgvdfn$pg@dispatch.concentric.net>,
s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
My, my, somebody has a lot of money to throw around. Anybody wonder
where it's coming from?
rotfl. I'd bet it isn't coming from the Nicole Brown Charitable
Foundation.
I'm pretty sure Bryant is going to be able to buy his way out of this. It's
too bad he can't prove the slattern is lying and get the judge to order her
pay all of his lawyer fees and expenses.
|
| |
| |
"John Griffin" <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote
I'm pretty sure Bryant is going to be able to buy his way out of this.
Oh no!
Say it isn't so.
It's
too bad he can't prove the slattern is lying and get the judge to order
her
pay all of his lawyer fees and expenses.
Or play a little one-on-one to 21 with the DA; winner takes all and gets to
do it again.
Chas
|
| |
| |
Apparently the "alleged" victim
By the way, there's proof positive that the author of this article is
(1) totally biased, and (2) has the knowledge of a six-year-old.
Why's "alleged" in quotes? One generally puts questionable claims in
quotes: e.g., the "doctor," the "victim," the "hunky" guy. Replace
"alleged" with "so-called," though, and you've got something that
makes no sense. The victim didn't claim to be "so-called."
In the future, then, go for "victim." It won't make your ceaseless
attacks on the victim any more believable, but they won't look quite
so third-grade.
|
| |
| |
In article <3pl7j0hqko071k4lmltdrp2m4k4kp2odgv@4ax.com>,
Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote:
On 30 Aug 2004 13:20:48 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
It seems that finding the truth scares you too much.
There are lots of prizes and rewards for people who come forward to
expose criminals or to lead authorities to the place that fugitives and
criminals are hiding in, what about those?
You name one and I'll bet I can tell you where it's coming from. Can you
tell me where this one is coming from?
By the way, signing a book contract is not a crime.
|
| |
| |
You're citing an article from something called "Fratpack.com"?
I am sure Bluto Blutarski and his 0.0 GPA have a lot to say on the matter.
God, you're an idiot.
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<cgvdfn$pg@dispatch.concentric.net>...
http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=30
Apparently the "alleged" victim was well aware of the financial
resources available to her if she claimed to be the victim of a sexual
assault in the State of Colorado. That's right, even before she cried rape
she knew that she would be eligible for financial aid. She knew in advance
of her claims of rape against Kobe Bryant that if she was the victim of a
sexual assault in the State of Colorado, she could apply, and receive
financial assistance from the state.
It was confirmed on Sunday that the "alleged" victim would have known
about the financial benefits available to her in the State of Colorado at
least six (6) months prior to her encounter with Kobe Bryant. That the
"alleged" victim had personal knowledge in a case where someone she knew was
compensated under similar circumstances, after the police officer in that
case told that victim how to apply for aid. That in that case the victim
did indeed receive funds from the State of Colorado.
As we piece the puzzle together in the Kobe Bryant case. The facts
seem to suggest to us the "alleged" victim knew more about what she was
doing than we've been led to believe. It also brings us back to the
question of just how much of the "alleged" victims claims of rape were
possibly based on financial gain verses her search for justice.
Fratpack.com is offering a $10,000 finders fee to the first individual
who supplies fratpack.com with an original agreement for any production,
movie, book, and/or appearance agreement for compensation entered into by,
or on behalf of, the "alleged" victim in the Kobe Bryant case. Again, this
offer shall apply to any such agreement entered into on behalf of the
"alleged" victim, by any person or persons, legally representing her
interests at the time that any such agreement was entered into. Copies,
drafts, unsigned, and/or voided documents shall not qualify under the terms
of this offer. For complete details and information go to the message
boards at www.fratpack.com
In the alternative we are offering a $5,000.00 finders fee to the first
person who provides fratpack.com with the name of any individual or
organization that is in possession of any such agreements. In this instance
a finder's fee will only be awarded if we are able to obtain the original
contract or agreement from the person or entity you supply. Again, copies,
drafts, unsigned, and/or voided documents shall not qualify under the terms
of this offer.
It is becoming more and more apparent with each passing day that the
"alleged" victim's story is getting weaker and weaker. We've heard an even
stronger argument made on the Abrams Report this past Saturday where the
guest continued to argue that the it had to be rape if the "alleged" victim
had bled.
We want to remind you once again that Laie and the "alleged" victim had
a discussion as to why she had previously bled after having sex with a man
who was larger in size than she was accustomed to. Laie and the "alleged"
victim had a detailed and in depth conversation as to why she would bleed
from that position. That previously when the "alleged" victim had sex with
someone who was larger than she normally was use to in that position that
she had sex with Kobe Bryant in, it would and did cause bleeding by the
"alleged" victim.
We know the main stream media refuses to report all the facts because
they're afraid of offending their advertisers and/or some of their readers,
listeners, or viewers. Fortunately we don't have that problem, and have no
such problem in reporting all the facts available to us in this case. It's
a shame that an innocent man may end up being convicted of a crime because
the main stream media is more concerned about the judge banning their
reporters from the courtroom, rather than reporting all the facts of the
case.
How many other people are out there who have relevant information about
the "alleged" victim? But are unable to bring their information forward
because the main stream media refuses to broadcast or publish the
information. That they are more interested in protecting their advertising
dollars than presenting a fair and impartial representation of the facts in
the Kobe Bryant case.
I hope there never comes a day that your freedom depends on main stream
media providing information that will result in you being found innocent
because of the subject matter. Rape may not be the most popular issue to
defend someone against. But when all the facts in the Kobe Bryant case
point to so many problems with the accuser. It's time that the main stream
media gets their heads out of their wallets, and do the job they're expected
to.
|
| |
| |
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1871371
"Hey kids ..."
Nice line.
|
| |
| |
In article <Xns95564A91A803Ethathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4>,
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
rotfl. I'd bet it isn't coming from the Nicole Brown Charitable
Foundation.
I'm pretty sure Bryant is going to be able to buy his way out of this. It's
too bad he can't prove the slattern is lying and get the judge to order her
pay all of his lawyer fees and expenses.
It looks like the only one who's going to come out ahead is Bryant's wife,
who apparently got some very nice jewelry out of this.
|
| |
| |
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<cgvdfn$pg@dispatch.concentric.net>...
http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=30
Apparently the "alleged" victim was well aware of the financial
resources available to her if she claimed to be the victim of a sexual
assault in the State of Colorado. That's right, even before she cried rape
she knew that she would be eligible for financial aid. She knew in advance
of her claims of rape against Kobe Bryant that if she was the victim of a
sexual assault in the State of Colorado, she could apply, and receive
financial assistance from the state.
What kind of mental midget wrote this? Try alleged "victim" instead
of "alleged" victim, moron. Use of the quotation marks in this manner
is meant to indicate that the validity of the term is in doubt. By
using them on the word alleged instead of the word victim you are
indicating the exact opposite of what we assume you intended.
Mez
|
| |
| |
pluto@quentincrisp.com (Walter Blickner) wrote in message news:<75e8f32a.0408301245.fc48607@posting.google.com>...
It's odd how all this information you're discovering about Kobe's
accuser (the horny, money-grubbing #@&@
!) is all taken from this same
spurious website (c'mon -- "fratpack"? Was http://www.beerbong.com
taken?).
beerbond.com, LOL!
I'm thinking maybe Matty Drudge has an athletic brother.
Try an autistic brother.
Mez
|
| |
| |
In alt.true-crime Messalina <messalinana@yahoo.com> wrote:
What kind of mental midget wrote this? Try alleged "victim" instead
of "alleged" victim, moron. Use of the quotation marks in this manner
is meant to indicate that the validity of the term is in doubt. By
using them on the word alleged instead of the word victim you are
indicating the exact opposite of what we assume you intended.
However, I think that Laie might be more dangerous if she were
intelligent. Right now, she just seems vicious and at least somewhat
narcissistic.
|
| |
| |
Messalina wrote:
What kind of mental midget wrote this? Try alleged "victim" instead
of "alleged" victim, moron.
Actually, just the word "alleged" serves that purpose.
To quote "victim" as well is redundant.
Larry Coon
University of California
The NBA Salary Cap FAQ:
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm
|
| |
| |
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote:
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote
http://www.fratpack.com/article-main.php?id=30
Apparently the "alleged" victim was well aware of the financial
resources available to her if she claimed to be the victim of a
sexual assault in the State of Colorado. That's right, even before
she cried rape she knew that she would be eligible for financial aid.
She knew in advance of her claims of rape against Kobe Bryant that
if she was the victim of a sexual assault in the State of Colorado,
she could apply, and receive financial assistance from the state.
What kind of mental midget wrote this? Try alleged "victim" instead
of "alleged" victim, moron. Use of the quotation marks in this manner
is meant to indicate that the validity of the term is in doubt. By
using them on the word alleged instead of the word victim you are
indicating the exact opposite of what we assume you intended.
Mez
Why are you all so excited about this trivia item, and how do you know
that the whole crew of you made the same assumption?
The trollop is allegedly a victim. That makes her an alleged victim. No
quotation marks are appropriate, except that they're sometimes used for
emphasis (even though the practice is mostly discouraged). You might
want to ask that babbling fool s_knight8 if that's what he(?) meant.
Whether it is or not, you'll want to adjust your narrow view of the
usage of quotation marks.
|
| |
| |
In article <Xns95564A91A803Ethathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4>,
It looks like the only one who's going to come out ahead is Bryant's wife,
who apparently got some very nice jewelry out of this.
Don't forget the jeweler. I bet he made at least a million in profit on
that piece.
|
| |
| |
In article <WemdnaeyzN4Cca7cRVn-tw@comcast.com>
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote
It's the only redress of grievance (check your 1st Amendment) available for
damages. They don't allow her to have done to him what he did to her- she's
got to settle for a monetary compensation.
The skank claimed she is not in this for the money.
Stop being her apologist and get a clue.
would you prefer a punishment suited to the crime, or something inventive
she comes up with as a means of revenge?
What would Kobe do to her if the trial ended up in her being exposed for
the liar that she is?
Oops, you never though of that.
If not, you must be satisfied with a pay-off.
How much would you want if he did it to you?
You keep having some weird sexual fantasies.
|
| |
| |
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message news:<OQ9Zc.4094$w%6.3466@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Don't forget the jeweler. I bet he made at least a million in profit on
that piece.
Typical profit margin for jewlery is 40-80%. If he only make a
milliong, he would be quite a loser....
|
| |
| |
On 1 Sep 2004 02:40:36 -0700, kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com (Huang
Gang) wrote:
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message news:<OQ9Zc.4094$w%6.3466@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Typical profit margin for jewlery is 40-80%. If he only make a
milliong, he would be quite a loser....
but the profit margin probably drops as the price goes up. 25% on a
$4mil piece sounds about right, if not a bit high.
|
| |
| |
You're citing an article from something called "Fratpack.com"?
I am sure Bluto Blutarski and his 0.0 GPA have a lot to say on the matter.
God, you're an idiot.
Actually, one of the witnesses is involved with that website. At first most
people didn't believe it, but the accuser's lawyers confirmed it.
*Flush*
--
"The Federal Reserve(Banks) are one of the most corrupt institutions the
world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who
does not know that this Nation is run by the International Bankers."
- Congressman Louis McFadden
|
| |
| |
In article <ch5tr0$93u@dispatch.concentric.net>,
Don Tiberone <DonTiberoneNOSPAM@SKP.net> wrote:
Actually, one of the witnesses is involved with that website. At first most
people didn't believe it, but the accuser's lawyers confirmed it.
And?
|
| |
| |
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message news:<dbQYc.52$xV3.109590@news.uswest.net>...
s_knight8 wrote:
|
| |
| |
|
