|
Yes, in addition to legal secretaries and paralegals, even female attorneys
have to deal with a professional "casting couch."
Since the practice of law is a monopoly, this can even extend to law
schools, where the hotter female students are given the choice, usually
early in their third year, of playing along or having a very difficult time
careerwise. If they're lucky, they might wind up being exploited at $60k a
year by some big firm that never makes them partner.
Now of course these, um, "women" (okay, whores) would not admit to this
because too much is at stake and they'd be harming their reputations along
with their careers.
The good news for men is that these "secret sluts" often make great lays,
but the bad news is that they are 100 percent unfit to be wives or mothers.
The man who forgets that will ruin his love life.
--
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Four Free E-books on the seduction of beautiful women
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy: How ASF Changed The World
"I ain't gonna play Sun City" (but our chessplayers played Libya; for
shame).
|
| |
| |
Yes, in addition to legal secretaries and paralegals, even female
attorneys
have to deal with a professional "casting couch."
Since the practice of law is a monopoly, this can even extend to law
schools, where the hotter female students are given the choice, usually
early in their third year, of playing along or having a very difficult
time
careerwise. If they're lucky, they might wind up being exploited at $60k
a
year by some big firm that never makes them partner.
Now of course these, um, "women" (okay, whores) would not admit to this
because too much is at stake and they'd be harming their reputations along
with their careers.
The good news for men is that these "secret sluts" often make great lays,
but the bad news is that they are 100 percent unfit to be wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets that will ruin his love life.
Whats the matta NETKOOK? Not getting any? This post is just a bitter jealous
rant in disguise.
Get a @$#*in life ASSHOLE.
|
| |
| |
Yes, in addition to legal secretaries and paralegals, even female
attorneys
have to deal with a professional "casting couch."
did your amazing "spidered sense" tell you that? i don't see...lemme
check...nope i don't see any sites to anything real, dummy. must be you
crying "wolf" again. yeah, that's the stinkin' ticket.
---
spouts his rants, full of lies
opens his mouth, catches flies
"spidered man" - aardvark
---
did you forget again that you're gordon roy parker and not peter parker?
yeah, i think that's what happened.
Since the practice of law is a monopoly, this can even extend to law
schools, where the hotter female students are given the choice, usually
early in their third year, of playing along or having a very difficult
time
careerwise. If they're lucky, they might wind up being exploited at $60k
a
year by some big firm that never makes them partner.
and this presupposes what now? yes (and repeat after me so you don't get
lost, lamebrain) it presupposes that these women are utterly helpless
against their professors (or employers) to fight back against such blatantly
wrong sexual harassment. that they would have no remedy at all is a lie. it
presupposes that there is an absence of law or any stern penalties for
breaking it, in regards to such harassment. you've got no explaination for
that one, i'll bet. the penalties alone would (and they should) make it much
less the rampant plague you claim infects all workplaces. you are a liar who
can't get anyone to believe his baseless lies but you just can't help
repeating them over and over. how utterly sad and ignorant you are, foolish
dork.
Now of course these, um, "women" (okay, whores) would not admit to this
because too much is at stake and they'd be harming their reputations along
with their careers.
ahhhh. i see. just another excuse for you to paint all women with the nasty
smear of "whore" to feed your jealous rant-du-jour. well, gumby, why didn't
you just come out and say that's what you wanted to do in the first place?
The good news for men is that these "secret sluts" often make great lays,
no such thing as a "slut", you inept waldo. you could not even respond to my
previous post regarding an objective definition of your mythical "slut".
what makes you think that a kro-mag headed loser like you could even start
to define what one actually is?
but the bad news is that they are 100 percent unfit to be wives or
mothers.
and how many of your stripper pals who turn tricks to supplement their
income on the dance floor are "fit to be wives or mothers"? lemme'
guess...they're not whores because what? because the baron of barratry says
so?
what a joke you've become, ray. here comes 2 (that's the whole number
between 1 and 3, stupid) hard cold realities of life.
1) gymnasts are not sexual performers while strippers are in fact, so.
2) working in an office does not automaticly make a woman promiscuous and a
sexual slave of her male boss, even if it's a lawyer's office.
again you are forgetting your place in the dank sub-basement of the food
chain. you are unfit to judge anyone in the known universe. you are just
jealous because when you attempted to form your "worldwide network of
lawyers" and the few lawyers that actually spoke to you, told you to take a
flying leap. for this you viciously attack their women. how unmanly of you,
jerk.
hypocritical too but there's nothing new about that, right?
do something smart for once in your life and stop acting like you care about
these women at the same time that you're calling them "sluts" and "whores",
you lying idiot. can't you even notice just how easy it is for everyone to
see through such obvious nonsense?
The man who forgets that will ruin his love life.
like you're ever going to have one of those hahahahahaha you can also quit
acting like you care if men get what they want from women, schmuck. you
don't care.
now, the apples await.
and while you're chewing on them, shut up, stupid.
aardvark
<spam snipped with no apologies offered>
|
| |
| |
Please stop crossposting this Off Topic spew to alt.seduction.fast.
Vince
--
8===
|
| |
| |
Vince Runza wrote:
Please stop crossposting this Off Topic spew to alt.seduction.fast.
Vince
And misc.legal (on YOUR part).
|
| |
| |
Vince Runza wrote:
And misc.legal (on YOUR part).
It comes from alt.seduction fast, and it reads the rest.
|
| |
| |
Whats the matta NETKOOK? Not getting any? This post is just a bitter
jealous
rant in disguise.
Most men who cheat cite this specific taunt as one of the reasons they don't
feel guilty about it.
After all, a male cheater "gets" more than other men.
If your intent was to hurt women with your remark, you succeeded.
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
Whats the matta NETKOOK? Not getting any? This post is just a bitter
jealous rant in disguise.
Most men who cheat cite this specific taunt as one of the reasons they don't
feel guilty about it.
After all, a male cheater "gets" more than other men.
But what's your excuse that you seem to be incapable of getting any at all?
If your intent was to hurt women with your remark, you succeeded.
I don't think someone pointing out that you not getting laid hurts women
in some way, unless you think depriving them of your disease infected
body does so. If anything, I think they'd be relieved.
|
| |
| |
If your intent was to hurt women with your remark, you succeeded.
---- Proof of Gordon Roy Parker stating women deserve to be raped & murdered :
From: r____a___y_gordon@juno.com (Outfoxing The Foxes)
Subject: Re: Need A Piece Of Advice
Date: 1998/11/02
Message-ID: <19981102.144604.26486.3.r____a___y_gordon@juno.com>
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,3-5,10-14,23-29,32-45,47-50,55-58,60-61,74-77,
79-87,95-97,99-102,105-112,121-122,130-131,138-139,146-147,
156-157,160-161,163-164,181-182,196-197,199
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Look at the way women treat "losers" and you will see
why they wind up beaten, murdered, raped, robbed, disrespected, and
oppressed. It is because women DESERVE it. The ones who harmed me
should thank their lucky stars that I didn't react like a primate and
just dump them six feet underground. Unfortunately, premeditated murder
would ruin this ethical thing I have going for me, although on a primal
level it is quite appealing.
|
| |
| |
If your intent was to hurt women with your remark, you succeeded.
Now, move your eyes up to the Subject line of this post. Repeat what you
just said to I.C. Then go wash your socks or something. You stink.
Vince
--
8===
|
| |
| |
I think the subject would've worked better as "Female law students GIVES HEAD
to GET AHEAD"
~El Senor~
|
| |
| |
|
