|
|
|
Now they can't really work for very long as hookers, but they have to dive
into the industry in order to pay their school bills.
What they do, is they find one or two wealthy men, "whales," who are easily
manipulated, and they service them in return for large amounts of money per
evening. This specific type of whore -- highly intelligent, relatively hot,
and willing to cater to the whale's specific needs -- does not cum cheap.
Her going rate is typically $5,000-10,000 a night.
This allows her to be respectable most of the time to most of the world, and
having to do her "dirtywork" only a few times a year, out of view of
society.
It's a great deal for her and for her Johns, who usually have more money
than they know what to do with in the first place.
So the next time you see some hottie 20-something attorney (not the
washed-up type that graduated in the 70s before the looks bias became bad;
those women are total hags), you can be pretty sure that, at some time or
another, she's had to compromise herself sexually, once to her professors
(to get her grades and stay in the system), and once again to the wealthy
men who pay her school bills.
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Four Free E-books on the seduction of beautiful women
http://www.cybersheet.com/easy.html
Seduction Made Easy: How ASF Changed The World
"I ain't gonna play Sun City" (but our chessplayers played Libya; for
shame).
|
| |
| |
Now they can't really work for very long as hookers, but they have to dive
into the industry in order to pay their school bills.
What they do, is they find one or two wealthy men, "whales," who are
easily
manipulated, and they service them in return for large amounts of money
per
evening. This specific type of whore -- highly intelligent, relatively
hot,
and willing to cater to the whale's specific needs -- does not cum cheap.
Her going rate is typically $5,000-10,000 a night.
you can stop right there, idiot...
there is no way in hell that you can say that you care about what happens to
these women while with every post you make about such "law students" &
"employees" referring to each one as "whores" and "sluts". you don't care
about them so stop acting like you do care, liar.
since i still see no sites and since you would rather drink battery water
than tell the truth, i must let you know that you are making up all of this.
you don't care about sexual harassment in the workplace so quit acting like
you do. you are just using it as a very poorly disguised excuse to use
against ayone who doesn't agree with you on unrelated subjects. sexual
harassment is wrong and you do absolutely nothing to contribute to the
solution with your slobbering rants, you ignorant, vile cartoon of a fool.
you've been unmasked, "spidered man"...how you like them apples, stupid.
aardvark
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
So the next time you see some hottie 20-something attorney (not the
washed-up type that graduated in the 70s before the looks bias became bad;
those women are total hags), you can be pretty sure that, at some time or
another, she's had to compromise herself sexually, once to her professors
(to get her grades and stay in the system), and once again to the wealthy
men who pay her school bills.
It's too bad that it's not libelous to make false and malicious comments
about a class of people in general, otherwise a number of female
attorneys who have not done this could start a class action to bankrupt
your ass forever.
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
It's too bad that it's not libelous to make false and malicious comments
about a class of people in general, otherwise a number of female
attorneys who have not done this could start a class action to bankrupt
your ass forever.
and that's why he won't name names. he has nothing because it's all made up
bull#@($, and although he knows little else, he knows what (he thinks) he
can get away with.
how sad that the idiot would be proud of being such a disgusting thing, but
there he is...
aardvark
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:GExZc.1582$vx6.1035@trndny05:
Now they can't really work for very long as hookers, but they have to
dive into the industry in order to pay their school bills.
What they do, is they find one or two wealthy men, "whales," who are
easily manipulated, and they service them in return for large amounts
of money per evening. This specific type of whore -- highly
intelligent, relatively hot, and willing to cater to the whale's
specific needs -- does not cum cheap. Her going rate is typically
$5,000-10,000 a night.
This allows her to be respectable most of the time to most of the
world, and having to do her "dirtywork" only a few times a year, out
of view of society.
It's a great deal for her and for her Johns, who usually have more
money than they know what to do with in the first place.
So the next time you see some hottie 20-something attorney (not the
washed-up type that graduated in the 70s before the looks bias became
bad; those women are total hags), you can be pretty sure that, at some
time or another, she's had to compromise herself sexually, once to her
professors (to get her grades and stay in the system), and once again
to the wealthy men who pay her school bills.
This is the case with many female (and sometimes male) students. Often
female students attack sexually their professors, and when they try to
get their reward they face sexual harrassment accusations.
The best thing for any professor is to reward cockteasers with really bad
grades. At least this will teach them a lesson.
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers. The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love
life.
|
| |
| |
Now they can't really work for very long as hookers, but they have to dive
into the industry in order to pay their school bills.
<snip>
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
Well DUH. You aren't telling us anything we don't already know. This is on
Jerry Springer and Ricki Lake all the time, have you been in a cave the last
10 years?
Rick
;-)
|
| |
| |
aardvark9084 wrote:
It's too bad that it's not libelous to make false and malicious comments
about a class of people in general, otherwise a number of female
attorneys who have not done this could start a class action to bankrupt
your ass forever.
and that's why he won't name names. he has nothing because it's all made up
bull#@($, and although he knows little else, he knows what (he thinks) he
can get away with.
how sad that the idiot would be proud of being such a disgusting thing, but
there he is...
Which do you think Ray is, an idiot, disgusting or both? Disgusting I
have no problem with. But if you're going to call Ray an idiot:
Sir, I believe that is a scurrilous lie and is false and
defamatory. For you to claim one such as Ray Gordon even rises
to the level of idiot is a vile and reprehensible lie and a
slap-in-the-face to the reputation of every idiot in existence.
On behalf of every idiot in the world I DEMAND that you make a
formal, public apology for such libelous remarks, or it may be
necessary to take legal action to restore the unjustly tarnished
reputation of every idiot in the world.
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<GExZc.1582$vx6.1035@trndny05>...
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
Thus sayeth the fortysomething single, never-married net-mass-poster
who still lives at home with Mommy and claims to pick up strippers for
one-nighters. Now that's working with "class" company, for certain.
The source speaks volumes about the quality of the statement.
Especially as he has a documented grudge against women in the legal
profession.
Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
|
| |
| |
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
Thus sayeth the fortysomething single, never-married
Only *desperate* men need to marry, and those who do wind up overpaying for
women whose quality is generally *#@($.* In fact, men on ASF, where this
message was also posted, generally view husbands as "chump providers" for
women who will generally @$#* them over anytime they get the chance. Is he
seeking to somehow bond with those men?
Never mind that the pompous, overbearing windbag that posted this, aside
from missing my age, happens to be *divorced*.
|
| |
| |
in article PQj_c.174$2H5.134@trndny07, Ray Gordon at ray@cybersheet.com
wrote on 9/4/04 9:57 AM:
In fact, men on ASF, where this
message was also posted, generally view husbands as "chump providers" for
women who will generally @$#* them over anytime they get the chance. Is he
seeking to somehow bond with those men?
Gordon again claims to speak for ASF with his own voice.
|
| |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Sep 2004 01:42:11 -0700, mstrhypno@earthlink.net (Lee Darrow)
wrote:
Thus sayeth the fortysomething single, never-married net-mass-poster
who still lives at home with Mommy and claims to pick up strippers
for one-nighters. Now that's working with "class" company, for
certain.
The source speaks volumes about the quality of the statement.
Especially as he has a documented grudge against women in the legal
profession.
Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
why is this so surprising? Just because these women are law students?
Part of the problem is the lack of financial aide available and the
high cost of education. I am not approving or condoning this behavior
but I do understand it.
LV
Lady Veteran
- -----------------------------------
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
when the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank..."
- -Rolling Stones, Sympathy for the Devil
- ------------------------------------------------
People who hide behind anonymous remailers and
ridicule fat people are cowardly idiots with no
motive but malice.
- ---------------------------------------------
For every person with a spark of genius, there
are a hundred more with ignition trouble.
- -Unknown
- -------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQTnWuMjazA1WMM1JEQLXgwCghfG5c7w0Angc1qp5dUm3UMUO+qwAoJqY
nfOXjXXCFXEDibZQ46K3o4Zb
=hHWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| |
| |
In article <PQj_c.174$2H5.134@trndny07>,
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Then why is your method of seduction expressly designed for obtaining a
marriage partner? I've read comments of yours that suggest that in a
competition between you and other seduction experts, the winner would be
determined by who got married first, or by whose wife was of higher
quality. (And just *who* would be the judge of such quality?)
This suggests that, at the time, you intended to marry, and expressed an
implicit need to marry (unless you were intending to lose the
competition you asked for). Therefore, according to your own reasoning,
you are desperate.
Never mind that the pompous, overbearing windbag that posted this, aside
from missing my age
Why, are you older?
--
Visit the official Ray Gordon website at http://www.raygordonbooks.co.uk
|
| |
| |
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Then why is your method of seduction expressly designed for obtaining a
marriage partner?
Degree of difficulty.
The idea is to sharpen one's skills by pursuing the most desirable hotties
for the most difficult type of relationship to secure with them.
|
| |
| |
in article pzl_c.867$sS4.181@trndny03, Ray Gordon at ray@cybersheet.com
wrote on 9/4/04 11:55 AM:
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Then why is your method of seduction expressly designed for obtaining a
marriage partner?
Degree of difficulty.
The idea is to sharpen one's skills by pursuing the most desirable hotties
for the most difficult type of relationship to secure with them.
Gordon again shows his utter lack of comprehension regarding how the outside
world actually works.
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:PQj_c.174$2H5.134@trndny07:
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
Only *desperate* men need to marry, and those who do wind up
overpaying for women whose quality is generally *#@($.* In fact, men
on ASF, where this message was also posted, generally view husbands as
"chump providers" for women who will generally @$#* them over anytime
they get the chance. Is he seeking to somehow bond with those men?
There you go again, trying to say that your cockeyed views are views held
by the ASF 'group'. 'tain't so, Ray, those views are held by you.
Never mind that the pompous, overbearing windbag that posted this,
aside from missing my age, happens to be *divorced*.
Are you saying that your inability to even attract a woman into considering
marriage puts you in a superior position compared to those who have gotten
married and then divorced? 'tain't so, Ray, that's just your cockeyed view.
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:pzl_c.867$sS4.181@trndny03:
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Then why is your method of seduction expressly designed for obtaining
a marriage partner?
Degree of difficulty.
The idea is to sharpen one's skills by pursuing the most desirable
hotties for the most difficult type of relationship to secure with
them.
Don't you ever get tired of demonstrating your inability to deal understand
and deal with women to the whole world?
|
| |
| |
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Then why is your method of seduction expressly designed for obtaining a
marriage partner?
Degree of difficulty.
The idea is to sharpen one's skills by pursuing the most desirable hotties
for the most difficult type of relationship to secure with them.
and that, everyone, is the sound of high speed backpedalling.
shut up, stupid.
aardvark
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<PQj_c.174$2H5.134@trndny07>...
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Weren't you a few years ago arguing with Ross Jeffries saying you
wanted a competition comparing your wife to his? Didn't you want to
get married then, but now you've changed your mind because you didn't
find a woman who wanted you?
|
| |
| |
In article <pzl_c.867$sS4.181@trndny03>,
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Only *desperate* men need to marry,
Then why is your method of seduction expressly designed for
obtaining a marriage partner?
Degree of difficulty.
The idea is to sharpen one's skills by pursuing the most desirable
hotties for the most difficult type of relationship to secure with
them.
Why would one sharpen one's skills by becoming desperate?
Or are you saying that it's to a man's advantage to be desperate?
You didn't address my other questions, which I consider quite rude.
I've reposted them in case you haven't cached them in your computer.
I've read comments of yours that suggest that in a competition
between you and other seduction experts, the winner would be
determined by who got married first, or by whose wife was of higher
quality. (And just *who* would be the judge of such quality?)
This suggests that, at the time, you intended to marry, and
expressed an implicit need to marry (unless you were intending to
lose the competition you asked for). Therefore, according to your
own reasoning, you are desperate.
Never mind that the pompous, overbearing windbag that posted
this, aside from missing my age
Why, are you older?
--
Visit the official Ray Gordon website at http://www.raygordonbooks.co.uk
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
Only *desperate* men need to marry, and those who do wind up overpaying for
women whose quality is generally *#@($.* In fact, men on ASF, where this
message was also posted, generally view husbands as "chump providers" for
women who will generally @$#* them over anytime they get the chance. Is he
seeking to somehow bond with those men?
Never mind that the pompous, overbearing windbag that posted this, aside
from missing my age, happens to be *divorced*.
Only the really *desparate* men need to pick up strippers for one night
stands. Although, in your case, I suspect the strippers won't spend more
than one night with you.
--
Carl cfb01@earthlink.net
Research is a formalized curiosity. It is poking
and prying with a purpose.
Zora Neale Hurston
Man's mind, once stretched by a new idea, never
regains it's original dimension.
Oliver Wendall Holmes
Only a fool tests the depth of the water with
both feet.
African Proverb
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Albert Einstein
What would life be if we had no courage
to attempt anything?
Vincent Van Gogh
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 09:52:49 -0500, Lady Veteran <armyvet@bigfoot.com>
in misc.legal, wrote the following:
why is this so surprising? Just because these women are law students?
Part of the problem is the lack of financial aide available and the
high cost of education. I am not approving or condoning this behavior
but I do understand it.
It's also pretty much BS, I'm afraid. Most women have a wide array of
choices in attending law schools these days, and provided their income
base stands perusal, most are available for _some sort_ of financial
aid, if they need it. Others choose other routes.
For example, I worked full-time while attending law school at night - it
took longer, of course, but I had the ultimate satisfaction of knowing
that I worked for (and personally paid for) every moment of training I
received, and once achieved, made a darned good living based upon the
skills derived - at university, in government, and as a consultant on
contract/grants.
It never occurred to me to consider methods envisioned in Gordon's
fantasies about female law students in attending law school, nor in the
minds of any of my fellow female students, I daresay.
--
Katherine Griffis-Greenberg, J.D.
DISCLAIMER:
Not a practicing attorney, and no attorney-client relationship
is created. This response is for discussion purposes only. It
isn't meant to be legal advice. If you wish legal advice, seek
out an attorney in your own state who is familar with your
state's laws and applications thereof.
|
| |
| |
For example, I worked full-time while attending law school at night -
Women have about 2/3 of the jobs in corporate America, and one-sided
affirmative-action regulations to give them help they don't need in
categories where they are already a majority.
What is it you did while in school?
|
| |
| |
Women have about 2/3 of the jobs in corporate America, and one-sided
affirmative-action regulations to give them help they don't need in
categories where they are already a majority.
Ummm...NO! Unless you are counting education and health services as
"corporate America", according to the Bureau of Labor statistics, women
comprise less than 50% of the jobs in "corporate America."
See ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aat16.txt
Once again, Ray fails to get his facts straight.
|
| |
| |
Women have about 2/3 of the jobs in corporate America, and one-sided
affirmative-action regulations to give them help they don't need in
categories where they are already a majority.
Ummm...NO! Unless you are counting education and health services as
"corporate America",
For these purposes, they should be included.
Should have used a different term then.
At UPenn, for example, the staff is about 2/3 female, while the professors
are 70 percent male, with 76 percent males among tenured professors.
|
| |
| |
in article KiK_c.5222$wF4.3382@trndny09, Ray Gordon at ray@cybersheet.com
wrote on 9/5/04 4:03 PM:
Women have about 2/3 of the jobs in corporate America, and one-sided
affirmative-action regulations to give them help they don't need in
categories where they are already a majority.
Ummm...NO! Unless you are counting education and health services as
"corporate America",
For these purposes, they should be included.
Should have used a different term then.
At UPenn, for example, the staff is about 2/3 female, while the professors
are 70 percent male, with 76 percent males among tenured professors.
Gordon continues to confuse the academic world with the corporate one.
|
| |
| |
In article <bBB_c.900$Gi5.830@trndny05>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Women have about 2/3 of the jobs in corporate America, and one-sided
affirmative-action regulations to give them help they don't need in
categories where they are already a majority.
What is it you did while in school?
Potential respondents should be aware that "Ray Gordon", whose real name is
Gordon Roy Parker, is well known to be mentally ill and to spend extremely
large amounts of time on Usenet (which he has for over 8 years under a variety
of identities). If in doubt, use the Google-Groups-Advanced search function
and try searching for posts by author name "Ray Gordon" or "LeModern Caveman"
|
| |
| |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 22:30:08 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
In article <bBB_c.900$Gi5.830@trndny05>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Potential respondents should be aware that "Ray Gordon", whose real
name is Gordon Roy Parker, is well known to be mentally ill and to
spend extremely large amounts of time on Usenet (which he has for
over 8 years under a variety of identities). If in doubt, use the
Google-Groups-Advanced search function and try searching for posts
by author name "Ray Gordon" or "LeModern Caveman"
I am sure that if that were true you would not be posting with an
anonymous remailer you simpering coward.
Be a mensch. Grow up
LV
Lady Veteran
- -----------------------------------
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
when the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank..."
- -Rolling Stones, Sympathy for the Devil
- ------------------------------------------------
People who hide behind anonymous remailers and
ridicule fat people are cowardly idiots with no
motive but malice.
- ---------------------------------------------
For every person with a spark of genius, there
are a hundred more with ignition trouble.
- -Unknown
- -------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
iQA/AwUBQTt5IMjazA1WMM1JEQLYawCgpEQDXb3QFKyQ4e9D0pIcfMWVxxgAoKGJ
S1bPG+LsjYmLGCr1mGJ6IV3Q
=gjm2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| |
| |
In article <bBB_c.900$Gi5.830@trndny05>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Women have about 2/3 of the jobs in corporate America, and one-sided
affirmative-action regulations to give them help they don't need in
categories where they are already a majority.
What is it you did while in school?
Potential respondents should be aware that "Ray Gordon", whose real name is
Gordon Roy Parker, is well known to be mentally ill and to spend extremely
large amounts of time on Usenet (which he has for over 8 years under a variety
of identities). If in doubt, use the Google-Groups-Advanced search function
and try searching for posts by author name "Ray Gordon" or "LeModern Caveman"
|
| |
| |
I'm taking a break from work, and laughing
@ Gordon Roy Parker, so I just re-read a book..
...on Pro Wrestling..
......by an ex-wrestler..
And I can't put it down..let me explain...
1st off, I don't care if ya love or hate PW, think it's
a fake, or even care about what is today's example of PW..
This book has little to do with today's farce known as P/W..
....anyway, this guy, after being a wrestler, promoter, owner, booker,
champion, writer, U name it, exposes how BUSINESS was done back in
the 60's-70's-80's-90's, involving MILLIONS of $$, and people like
Ted Turner, V.K.McMahon, and the like. How people were screwed,
house shows were sold, PRE-CABLE TV was raped, and how the 'stars' we
grown to "..know and love.." were such losers/pansies/fakes/jokes..
How many of them did it for -$100 a night.. The 'stars, $600..
They sold out $40k shows every week... WEEK AFTER WEEK..
TOWN AFTER TOWN..STATE AFTER STATE... YEAR AFTER YEAR !
I suggest to all of those who HATE PW to read this 380 page
book. Sorry, there are few photos..no real details about
the author, save for how he handled the business. And ask
anyone, it's a name, that when dropped, cracks the ground..
...but detailed names ARE named, dates exposed..
I have met the man twice, 1st while shooting photos at ringside,
then when he was at a long forgotten event. Both times,
if my memory serves me well, now that I read his book, he installed
the concept of who he was, how to sell himself, yet STILL scare
the #@($ out of ya..make you think he was tough..KNEW he really was..
While I worked on a WCW video game way back when, I learned that
to this day, his name is spoken in awe. He does the talk circuit,
events, and while might be a bit bitter over it all, survives today..
Yet, the whole story about this book is how to stand up for what you
believe in, lose when life demands it, 'job' when biz demanded it,
yet 'shoot' when LIFE demanded it. This man is Ole Anderson..
GOTO: http://www.1wrestlinglegends.com/oleanderson/index.html
Buy it at your local bookstore, or online. $20
Online, I got a auto'd photo, and 2 day shipping..
Tell 'em JJT said hi..
....It is history in the making...
.......and it's in the Key of ' A '..
....what more can any civilized man want...
|
| |
| |
TOO easy....
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<PQj_c.174$2H5.134@trndny07>...
These women can make great lays but are generally unfit as wives or
mothers.
The man who forgets this runs the risk of ruining his love life.
--
Only *desperate* men need to marry, and those who do wind up overpaying for
women whose quality is generally *#@($.* In fact, men on ASF, where this
message was also posted, generally view husbands as "chump providers" for
women who will generally @$#* them over anytime they get the chance. Is he
seeking to somehow bond with those men?
Never mind that the pompous, overbearing windbag that posted this, aside
from missing my age, happens to be *divorced*.
Wrong again, Mister Information. I happen to be married to a former
Miss Chicago, the divorce was quite a while ago and, unlike you, I
learn from my mistakes! Thanks for falling into THAT trap!
Proves once again that you cannot read for content, ignore facts and
generally have no idea what you are talking about. Again, thanks for
proving my point!
Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<GExZc.1582$vx6.1035@trndny05>...
Now they can't really work for very long as hookers, but they have to dive
into the industry in order to pay their school bills.
So, no such thing as student loans on your planet?
Anyone who habitually engages in unlawful activity while in law school
is a fool; a criminal record can keep you of your state's bar.
Depending on illicit funds to pay for law school risks doing it all
for nothing.
Mez
|
| |
| |
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote in message news:<f00c23df.0409071552.3faa8abf@posting.google.com>...
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<GExZc.1582$vx6.1035@trndny05>...
So, no such thing as student loans on your planet?
Anyone who habitually engages in unlawful activity while in law school
is a fool; a criminal record can keep you of your state's bar.
Depending on illicit funds to pay for law school risks doing it all
for nothing.
Mez
Participation in criminal activities such as are alleged by Ray can
also ban someone from getting ANY insurance license, realtor's
license, CPA certification and even bar someone from being a Notary
Public in many states.
No law student with even a moiety of her marbles would risk all of
that!
It's unsupported hyperbole, just like his 'stage hypnotists rape high
school students' rants.
until he supports it with REAL cases, actually tried and successfully
prosecuted - it's nothing more than an inurbane (pun intended) myth.
Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
|
| |
| |
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote in message news:<f00c23df.0409071552.3faa8abf@posting.google.com>...
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<GExZc.1582$vx6.1035@trndny05>...
So, no such thing as student loans on your planet?
Anyone who habitually engages in unlawful activity while in law school
is a fool; a criminal record can keep you of your state's bar.
Depending on illicit funds to pay for law school risks doing it all
for nothing.
Mez
Participation in criminal activities such as are alleged by Ray can
also ban someone from getting ANY insurance license, realtor's
license, CPA certification and even bar someone from being a Notary
Public in many states.
No law student with even a moiety of her marbles would risk all of
that!
It's unsupported hyperbole, just like his 'stage hypnotists rape high
school students' rants.
until he supports it with REAL cases, actually tried and successfully
prosecuted - it's nothing more than an inurbane (pun intended) myth.
Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
|
| |
| |
mstrhypno@earthlink.net (Lee Darrow) wrote in message news:<815b360f.0409081856.6bd70dbf@posting.google.com>...
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote in message news:<f00c23df.0409071552.3faa8abf@posting.google.com>...
Participation in criminal activities such as are alleged by Ray can
also ban someone from getting ANY insurance license, realtor's
license, CPA certification and even bar someone from being a Notary
Public in many states.
No law student with even a moiety of her marbles would risk all of
that!
I have to think that any young woman who is smart enough to get
through law school could figure out a legal way to use her sexual
attractiveness to get money from wealthy older men.
And wouldn't this be useful career training for a law student?
After all, lawyers get paid to bend the law right up to the
breaking point without technically breaking it. O.J. Simpson
is 100% not guilty and all that. Surely the lawyers who enabled
O.J. to walk could figure out a legal way to connect wealthy
older men with financially needy attractive young women. Young
women in law school are probably poised, intelligent, classy,
and less likely to be the kind of low-class drug-addicted
mentally disturbed women who would end up having to walk the
streets to solicit cheap tricks. In other words, female law
students are probably the kind of young women a wealthy older
man would pay a premium to enjoy discreetly and serially-
monogamously.
Would it be illegal for an attractive young female law student
to | | |
