|
From Courttv
Obviously this story was written before the dismissal.
The National Enquirer, September 13, 2004 Furious Kobe Nixes Secret Plea
Deal - He's convinced he'll walk
Synopsis:
Kobe Bryant turned down a secret, last minute plea bargain deal from the
prosecutors in his rape trial because he's convinced he's going to walk, The
Enquirer learned exclusively.
(Prosecutors) offered the NBA superstar one year of probation and no fine if
he pleaded guilty to simple assault.
....a defiant Bryant nixed the deal, telling his attorneys, "No! Hell No!
..... I don't want to hear any more. We're gonna carry on fighting this
thing.... the prosecution may make even more tempting offers as the trial
progresses - and Kobe may find them too good to refuse.
To house his enormous defense team (Kobe) "He is renting four luxurious
houses and condominiums in the Colorado resort area to house his defense
team and himself."
"He's signed leases that are costing him more than one million dollars a
month," said the close source.
DAVID WRIGHT
|
| |
| |
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
...
Okay, now get a @$#*in' job.
|
| |
| |
John Griffin wrote:
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, now get a @$#*in' job.
Some of these nutbags must be going through withdrawal now that the
whole turgid mess is over.
Linda C.
|
| |
| |
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, now get a @$#*in' job.
Good idea.
Oh. I thought you wrote "get a @$#*in 'job".
|
| |
| |
In article <mnufj0pfm0uihqg9nocsd3rrk4en969e6c@4ax.com>, Lone Victor
<lone@victor.com> wrote:
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
Good idea.
Oh. I thought you wrote "get a @$#*in 'job".
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in job"
in your book?
--Tim May
|
| |
| |
From Courttv
Obviously this story was written before the dismissal.d
Just goes to show -- you shouldnt get your facts from the Enquirer.
The National Enquirer, September 13, 2004 Furious Kobe Nixes Secret Plea
Deal - He's convinced he'll walk
Synopsis:
Kobe Bryant turned down a secret, last minute plea bargain deal from the
prosecutors in his rape trial because he's convinced he's going to walk,
The
Enquirer learned exclusively.
(Prosecutors) offered the NBA superstar one year of probation and no fine
if
he pleaded guilty to simple assault.
...a defiant Bryant nixed the deal, telling his attorneys, "No! Hell No!
.... I don't want to hear any more. We're gonna carry on fighting this
thing.... the prosecution may make even more tempting offers as the trial
progresses - and Kobe may find them too good to refuse.
To house his enormous defense team (Kobe) "He is renting four luxurious
houses and condominiums in the Colorado resort area to house his defense
team and himself."
"He's signed leases that are costing him more than one million dollars a
month," said the close source.
DAVID WRIGHT
|
| |
| |
lone@victor.com (Lone Victor) wrote:
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
Good idea.
Oh. I thought you wrote "get a @$#*in 'job".
That's odd...I thought you thought I wrote "get a @$#*in' blow job."
|
| |
| |
mslinda <mslinda@earthlink.net> wrote:
John Griffin wrote:
Some of these nutbags must be going through withdrawal now that the
whole turgid mess is over.
The s_knight varmint is really weird, even among that rabble. Posting a
meaningless, out of date newspaper article, with a note acknowledging that
it's meaningless and out of date, was one of the dumbest things I've seen
since one of the alt.fan.oj-simpson featherbrains wrote "Bush stold the
election."
|
| |
| |
Tim May <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote in message news:<020920042225056730%timcmay@removethis.got.net>...
In article <mnufj0pfm0uihqg9nocsd3rrk4en969e6c@4ax.com>, Lone Victor
<lone@victor.com> wrote:
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in job"
in your book?
--Tim May
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
Mez
|
| |
| |
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote:
Tim May <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
I'm not familiar with Tim May (and apparently you aren't either, unless
your implication that you know what he's worth is true). What gave you
the silly idea that something's bothering him? That seems mighty stupid
if it's based on his prediction and question above.
The thing that bothers me about the little sex addict is that she might
be suicidal. She had dreams of extorting millions from Bryant, and now
she's just going to have to settle for the book deal and a few days on
the talk show circuit, if that, and she's always going to have to live
with all the slime and #@($ that was thrown at her, whether any of it
stuck or not.
If you think she's going to be able to use the civil courts to rape
Bryant financially, the odds are against you. The rules of evidence are
lots different in civil matters, so for example if they get a big enough
courtroom--like Coors Field maybe, every guy who ever tried to satisfy
her might crowd in there and testify that she craves it and can't say
no. (Yeah, I know...more slime and #@($. I don't care if it sticks or
not.) The facts that you don't need a unanimous jury and that you only
need a preponderance of evidence won't help much. When all you have is
"she said he did it," you probably don't have a winner. On the other
hand, he has a good shot at prevailing in a countersuit, because her
unsubstantiated accusation cost him at least four million dollars, while
the only damage to her was that more people know about her now.
I would expect her to drop the civil case in exchange for a permanent
courtside seat at Lakers' games, i.e., a place in front of fifteen or
twenty thousand people.
By the way, the answer to Tim May's question is that the pussy services
union (I think it's called COYOTE) would proabably make her start as a
trainee in the blow job department.
|
| |
| |
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
She walked EXACTLY where she intended to walk. There is absolutely
no "wrong place at the wrong time" about it.
|
| |
| |
<lone@victor.com> wrote:
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote:
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
Okay, now get a @$#*in' job.
Good idea.
Oh. I thought you wrote "get a @$#*in 'job".
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in
job" in your book?
--Tim May
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
I'm not familiar with Tim May (and apparently you aren't either, unless
your implication that you know what he's worth is true). What gave you
the silly idea that something's bothering him? That seems mighty stupid
if it's based on his prediction and question above.
The thing that bothers me about the little sex addict is that she might
be suicidal. She had dreams of extorting millions from Bryant, and now
she's just going to have to settle for the book deal and a few days on
the talk show circuit, if that, and she's always going to have to live
with all the slime and #@($ that was thrown at her, whether any of it
stuck or not.
If you think she's going to be able to use the civil courts to rape
Bryant financially, the odds are against you.
<snip>
It will never go to court. The maximum she can get under Colorado law is
1.5 million. Considering the new case could cost Kobe $3million or more,
he'll probably settle it quickly, save $$$ and get on with his life.
|
| |
| |
"otter" <otter@oceanside.com> wrote
.....The maximum she can get under Colorado law is
1.5 million.
Federal court- not a problem
probably can get him for violating her civil rights as well- that'd be
funny.
Chas
|
| |
| |
On 3 Sep 2004 06:45:04 -0700, Messalina wrote:
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
But what happened to the innocent victim that didn't want any money, just
jail time for Bryant?
|
| |
| |
Chas wrote:
"otter" <otter@oceanside.com> wrote
Federal court- not a problem
probably can get him for violating her civil rights as
well- that'd be funny.
Wouldn't prison time then be a possibility again, eg - the Alan Berg assassins?
Chas
|
| |
| |
Denis Granic <denis_granic@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 3 Sep 2004 06:45:04 -0700, Messalina wrote:
But what happened to the innocent victim that didn't want any money, just
jail time for Bryant?
Feeding frenzies die hard.
|
| |
| |
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in job"
in your book?
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
I'm always curious why female victims are routinely described in terms
like that: "little girl", etc. When Monica Lewinsky was in the news,
feminists and other supportive pundits would bring up her young age
(22-ish?) and lack of maturity compared to Clinton ("she's a mixed-up,
star-struck kid").
I just don't get it. If Katelyn Faber were attempting to get into
Westpoint or obtain an abortion at 18 or 20, no true feminist would
question her authority to do so. There wouldn't be the condescension.
But a grown woman gets assaulted, allegedly, and suddenly it's
acceptable to refer to her as a child. It's insulting. Is she a
grown-up or not?
--Amy
|
| |
| |
Denis Granic <denis_granic@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1xht8t7w2p398$.d46jc6imzski$.dlg@40tude.net>...
On 3 Sep 2004 06:45:04 -0700, Messalina wrote:
But what happened to the innocent victim that didn't want any money, just
jail time for Bryant?
Don't interrupt me when I'm taunting Tim, please.
Mez
|
| |
| |
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote in message
-snip-
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in
job" in your book?
--Tim May
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
I'm not familiar with Tim May (and apparently you aren't either, unless
your implication that you know what he's worth is true). What gave you
the silly idea that something's bothering him? That seems mighty stupid
if it's based on his prediction and question above.
Search his previous posts. They make quite an amusing read; in
particular don't miss the one where he suggests that someone who found
two lost dogs sell them to a lab for scientific experiments. He's
either a hopeless curmudgeon or a serial troll or perhaps some
combination thereof. In any event, there's nothing lost in taunting
him since you can't take a single thing he says seriously anyway.
Mez
|
| |
| |
wee_bit_strange@yahoo.com (Wee Bit Strange) wrote in message news:<29db2d75.0409042111.27950262@posting.google.com>...
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in job"
in your book?
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for no
better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong time.
Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
I'm always curious why female victims are routinely described in terms
like that: "little girl", etc. When Monica Lewinsky was in the news,
feminists and other supportive pundits would bring up her young age
(22-ish?) and lack of maturity compared to Clinton ("she's a mixed-up,
star-struck kid").
I just don't get it. If Katelyn Faber were attempting to get into
Westpoint or obtain an abortion at 18 or 20, no true feminist would
question her authority to do so. There wouldn't be the condescension.
But a grown woman gets assaulted, allegedly, and suddenly it's
acceptable to refer to her as a child. It's insulting. Is she a
grown-up or not?
--Amy
Point 1; the preferred term "survivor" not "victim." Point 2; I'm not
a feminist. Point 3; anyone under 21 is just a kid in my book,
whether applying to Westpoint or attempting to buy liquor with a false
ID.
Mez
|
| |
| |
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote:
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote in message
-snip-
Katelynn may soon be working at the Bunny Ranch. Is that a "@$#*in
job" in your book?
--Tim May
Soon that little girl will be able to buy and sell you, and all for
no better reason than she walked into the wrong place at the wrong
time. Isn't that whats really bothering you, Timmay?
Search his previous posts.
I'll just take your word for it.
They make quite an amusing read; in
particular don't miss the one where he suggests that someone who found
two lost dogs sell them to a lab for scientific experiments. He's
either a hopeless curmudgeon or a serial troll or perhaps some
combination thereof. In any event, there's nothing lost in taunting
him since you can't take a single thing he says seriously anyway.
Mez
Makes sense to me! (I think maybe the lab should take him instead, if he
really did that dog thing. Certain restaurants pay better than labs.)
However, I'm inclined to believe that the "little girl" calculated every
move in this case. She recognized Bryant and figured she could use him as
a sort of money tree.
|
| |
| |
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote in message news:<Xns955E1F24B1AFEthathillbillyyahooco@130.133.1.4>...
messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote:
I'll just take your word for it.
Makes sense to me! (I think maybe the lab should take him instead, if he
really did that dog thing. Certain restaurants pay better than labs.)
"labs-for-labs.com" *snicker*
However, I'm inclined to believe that the "little girl" calculated every
move in this case. She recognized Bryant and figured she could use him as
a sort of money tree.
That being the case you'd think she would have stayed clear of any
sexual contact until after the rape exam was completed.
Mez
|
| |
| |
messalina@gmail.com (messalina) wrote:
John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote
"labs-for-labs.com" *snicker*
That being the case you'd think she would have stayed clear of any
sexual contact until after the rape exam was completed.
No kidding...that period of time was a sort of IQ test,
and her score was "No."
|
| |
| |
