misc.legal

in article f00c23df.0409021414.56e6be79@posting.google.com, Messalina at messalinana@yahoo.com wrote on 9/2/04 3:14 PM: > George Evans <georgee@pe.net> wrote in message > news:<BD5C030D.12CA%georgee@pe.net>... >> in article ch4tu2$ajh@rac3.wam.umd.e

In article <10jeq0maktoihe3@corp.supernews.com>, Jason Bowen <no@spam.net> wrote: > > He said that she believe that she was raped, and he understands. I > wouldn't understand it if I in fact knew that I didn't rape her. I'd > come out and say

From Courttv Obviously this story was written before the dismissal. The National Enquirer, September 13, 2004 Furious Kobe Nixes Secret Plea Deal - He's convinced he'll walk Synopsis: Kobe Bryant turned down a secret, last minute plea bargain

In article <2i1fj0tg84hpcpeadt6cuhugf07efi6sm7@4ax.com>, ScorpionKing@attNOSPAM.net wrote: > >Seriously dude -- where are you getting that? He said he > >*still* believes the encounter was consensual. > > He can believe what ever he wants. but h

Messalina wrote: > better_yeti@yahoo.com (Thomas Scoville) wrote in message news:<45199a03.0409011725.e71a050@posting.google.com>... > > > -snip- > > >>And now -- I'm hoping -- the rest of the world can read between the >>lines of the "victim'

http://celebrityjustice.warnerbros.com/news/0409/02b.html Kobe Bryant left Eagle, Colorado, late Thursday morning -- but not before leaving a big impression with one local woman. "CJ" has obtained the very first picture seen of Kobe Bryant since the

Kent Wills wrote: >> >>Not "zero basis", but only the Bob Larson witchunt to go on. > > > So posting VERIFIABLE evidence to a web site is a witch hunt? It was designed as such. > And yes, > the evidence is verifiable, or at least was

> Larry Coon wrote: > >> Jason Bowen wrote: >> >> >>> Take off the rose colored Kobe loving glasses. If he had any >>> convictions that he was telling the truth he'd have fought for it. >> >> >> That's extremely easy for you to say when

In article <BD5CA616.2AAF%1921defunctivity@comcast.com>, Tonawanda Kardex <1921defunctivity@comcast.com> wrote: > Celebration of anything that diminishes women's rights is pathetic. > > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/09/02/bryant.chill.ap/index.html

Kent Wills wrote: > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > news:BFGZc.19407$ic1.1144@news.easynews.com... > > [...] > > >>>>Well it's coming from someone who claims not to believe in God...I mean >>>>think about it... >>> >

> > Registering a work makes it "knowingly unavailable" for archiving. Google > > uses an opt-out permission system which has never held up in any other legal > > context. > > How about the phone company that lists your # in the phone book but requ

Serious Sam wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > >> It's sad that "Sam" can't accept that there are those who will hold >> different positions. > > > Oh no...I can and do "accept" it, but I choose to mock truly silly > positions. Bush, Cheney,

"Lictor" <ghostmlNOSPAM-REMOVE@online.fr> wrote in message news:<413742af$0$16140$79c14f64@nan-newsreader-04.noos.net>... > "The Voice of Reason" <i_hate_hibs@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:87bbd508.0409012125.429e7172@posting.google.com... > > F

Serious Sam wrote: > Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > > >> You can't make one cogent point on your own, or without stealing my >> terminology and creative writing. > > > MBWHAHAHAHA!! > > Your best material is the mullet stuff, stick to the

"George Evans" <georgee@pe.net> schreef in bericht news:BD5C2BAF.135E%georgee@pe.net... > in article Sb2dnQhXtOuVEKvcRVn-tQ@comcast.com, Chas at > chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net wrote on 9/1/04 8:01 PM: > > > "Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote > >

"Lictor" <ghostmlNOSPAM-REMOVE@online.fr> wrote in message news:<41374159$0$32522$79c14f64@nan-newsreader-06.noos.net>... > > You can wear contact lenses to change your eye color, and I'm sure permanent > color change would be possible with minor surge

In article <mnufj0pfm0uihqg9nocsd3rrk4en969e6c@4ax.com>, Lone Victor <lone@victor.com> wrote: > John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> wrote: > > >"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >Okay, now get a @$#*in' job. > > Good

"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote in message news:sibfj05rtig1ffba8s0905t4hk99ufsqmf@4ax.com... > On 2 Sep 2004 16:33:43 -0700, messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote: > > >> > > >> > So what did you think of Bryant's apology? > >> > >> i tho

"Messalina" <messalinana@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f00c23df.0409021533.290ee5db@posting.google.com... > "brink" <noemail@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<2pnk86Fmt86uU1@uni-berlin.de>... > > "tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message > >

"Lictor" <ghostmlNOSPAM-REMOVE@online.fr> wrote in message news:<41373f66$0$16140$79c14f64@nan-newsreader-04.noos.net>... > > Where did you get that you can't control your height? Dwa... errr... > vertically challenged people can have surgery to gain

in article h8QZc.177$cV5.91048@news.uswest.net, S. O. Damocles at so@damocl.es wrote on 9/2/04 6:53 PM: > George Evans wrote: > >> in article 1knZc.23$U74.2798@news.uswest.net, S. O. >> Damocles at so@damocl.es wrote on 9/1/04 10:05 AM: >> >>> Y

"Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message news:gFNZc.631856$6p.117224@news.easynews.com... > Kent Wills wrote: > > > >> > >>Not "zero basis", but only the Bob Larson witchunt to go on. > > > > > > So posting VERIFIABLE evidence

"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<G0HZc.9463$Na5.7976@news.cpqcorp.net>... > > Actually, we were talking about people that > don't fit into the standard seat for whatever reason > - height, width, you name it. Are you

Ken Smith wrote: > Serious Sam wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: >> > >>>> We just know he can't practice law because they judged he *might* be >>>> nutters... >>> >>> >>> And you have no problem with that, because you are a religious >>> nutt

Kent Wills wrote: >> Still, Sam is far more sensible than Ted, who opened himself up to a > > > Given Ted's lack of senses, that really isn't saying much :) > I know, it was a cheap shot, and I should be ashamed. Somehow I doubt

Kent Wills wrote: > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > news:EFGZc.19413$ic1.1091@news.easynews.com... > >>Kent Wills wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Of course there is, there's his suit and the resultant judgment, which I >>>>provided

In article <ch8jdg$fev$2@stan.redhat.com>, Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >tjab wrote: >> In article <3tafj0182c0iis9nsvlie8rp8oeosae32d@4ax.com>, >> Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote: >> >>>On 2 Sep 2004 19:21:40 -0400, tjab@wam.umd

In article <ch8tej$93v@dispatch.concentric.net>, s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote: > http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-09-02-oppose_x.htm > > By Wendy Murphy > > The saddest part of the story may be that the victi

"Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message news:EXMZc.631409$y4.116095@news.easynews.com... > Kent Wills wrote: > > > >> Still, Sam is far more sensible than Ted, who opened himself up to a > > > > > > Given Ted's lack of senses

"Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message news:gVMZc.40375$ic1.3071@news.easynews.com... > Kent Wills wrote: > > > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > > news:EFGZc.19413$ic1.1091@news.easynews.com... > > > >>Kent W

In article <O0sZc.71$U74.7213@news.uswest.net>, S. O. Damocles <so@damocl.es> writes >Fenris Wolf wrote: >> In article <VeqZc.53$U74.6836@news.uswest.net>, S. O. >> Damocles <so@damocl.es> writes >>> Dave Hitt wrote: >>>> On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:52:1

Kent Wills wrote: > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > news:IFGZc.19417$ic1.1073@news.easynews.com... > >>Ken Smith wrote: >> >> >> >>> It always distills to the same argument -- you don't agree with me, so >>>you must th

Kent Wills wrote: > It's sad that "Sam" can't accept that there are those who will hold > different positions. Oh no...I can and do "accept" it, but I choose to mock truly silly positions.

"Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message news:sIMZc.39959$ic1.2933@news.easynews.com... > Kent Wills wrote: > > > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > > news:IFGZc.19417$ic1.1073@news.easynews.com... > > > >>Ken Sm

Kent Wills wrote: > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > news:DFGZc.19409$ic1.1218@news.easynews.com... > >>Kent Wills wrote: >> >> >> >>>>How odd is that? >>> >>> >>> Not necessarily odd at all. How odd is it that whe

"Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message news:1GMZc.630802$y4.115945@news.easynews.com... > Kent Wills wrote: > > > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > > news:DFGZc.19409$ic1.1218@news.easynews.com... > > > >>Kent

On 2 Sep 2004 22:11:45 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <ch8jdg$fev$2@stan.redhat.com>, >Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote: >>tjab wrote: >>> In article <3tafj0182c0iis9nsvlie8rp8oeosae32d@4ax.com>, >>> Sports Fan <sports

On 2 Sep 2004 19:11:18 -0700, messalinana@yahoo.com (Messalina) wrote: >Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote in message news:<v5rej01e5803seqn7lvvulddo2hdu085ai@4ax.com>... >> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:49:57 -0600, "Chas" >> <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net>

"Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message news:sxMZc.629098$6p.116885@news.easynews.com... > Kent Wills wrote: > > > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > > news:CFGZc.19408$ic1.1132@news.easynews.com... > > > >>Kent

Kent Wills wrote: > "Serious Sam" <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote in message > news:CFGZc.19408$ic1.1132@news.easynews.com... > >>Kent Wills wrote: >> >> >> >>>>To be quite accurate they judged him to have competency issues and >>>>"requested" a

EXACTamundo. If you add up all the fuel wasted on carting these people around as well, then there would be a set of scales at checkin... The savings to everyone would be great. Airlines nitpick over 10% overweight luggage, but if someone is waddling

"tjab" <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote in message news:ch8jt1$gfo@rac1.wam.umd.edu... > >How about "Kobe believes that she NOW believes that she > >did not consent THEN." > > How about "I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident >

"Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7648e862.0409012303.5294d324@posting.google.com... > > "Ed" <do_not_spam_me@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:<xKudncbU6fsX1KvcRVn-gg@comcast.com>... > > > "Rodger" <Rodgerthornhill@hotma

Ken&Laura Chaddock <chaddock@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote in message news:<9aBZc.57707$vO1.311156@nnrp1.uunet.ca>... > S. O. Damocles wrote: > > > Said Kobe "the criminal adulterer" Bryant: > > Oh, by the way, there's no such thing as a "criminal" adul

s_knight8 wrote: > http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=42490 > > ``This is not her personal lawsuit,'' said Wendy Murphy, a Boston > attorney. ``This is the public's criminal prosecution. Right -- but without all those annoyin

Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > You can't make one cogent > point on your own, or without stealing my terminology and creative > writing. MBWHAHAHAHA!! Your best material is the mullet stuff, stick to the 80's insults and you'll be fine!

s_knight8 wrote: > http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=1873003 > > "What seems very apparent is the prosecution made missteps early on," said > Denver attorney Lisa Wayne, who has defended numerous sexual assault cases. > "They never got to

Dave Stallard <stallard@nospam.ever> wrote in news:2pp3nkFncs83U1@uni- berlin.de: >> http://www.southwest.com/about_swa/press/additional_seat.html > > I read it. It's eminently clear, reasonable, and fair. I think charging extra for people who us