Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
sworn oath?



The_Dave©
9/3/2004 5:44:46 PM


Just an intellectual curiosity, but what would happen if a witness in a
court trial said "no" when asked to swear or affirm to tell the truth?
Court: "Do you swear to tell the truth..."
Witness" "No."
--
Q. - Why do men die before their wives?
A. - Because they want to.
 
 
"McGyver"
9/3/2004 10:58:57 AM




"The Dave" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:i42_c.3093$z%3.1412@news01.roc.ny...

Just an intellectual curiosity, but what would happen if a witness
in a
court trial said "no" when asked to swear or affirm to tell the
truth?
Court: "Do you swear to tell the truth..."
Witness" "No."
A typical response would be: first, the witness would be asked if he
would "affirm" that he would tell the truth, and would be told that
the word "affirm" has no religious significance. If the witness again
said "No," the witness would be politely told that he is subject to
the laws or perjury regardless of the oath. That's all. Not a big
deal.
McGyver
 
 
"The Dave©"
9/3/2004 6:32:34 PM


McGyver wrote:
in a
truth?
A typical response would be: first, the witness would be asked if he
would "affirm" that he would tell the truth, and would be told that
the word "affirm" has no religious significance. If the witness again
said "No," the witness would be politely told that he is subject to
the laws or perjury regardless of the oath. That's all. Not a big
deal.
The religious aspect is separate from what I was asking.
So, if you *must* tell the truth, regardless of whether you want to or
not, what is the purpose of the oath/affirmation?
It seems to be just a psychological game to impress upon people the
importance of telling the truth.
--
Q. - Why do men die before their wives?
A. - Because they want to.
 
 
"McGyver"
9/3/2004 2:45:45 PM




"The Dave" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:6N2_c.3095$z%3.3080@news01.roc.ny...

McGyver wrote:
Just an intellectual curiosity, but what would happen if a
witness
in a
court trial said "no" when asked to swear or affirm to tell the
truth?
Court: "Do you swear to tell the truth..."
Witness" "No."
A typical response would be: first, the witness would be asked if
he
would "affirm" that he would tell the truth, and would be told
that
the word "affirm" has no religious significance. If the witness
again
said "No," the witness would be politely told that he is subject
to
the laws or perjury regardless of the oath. That's all. Not a
big
deal.
The religious aspect is separate from what I was asking.
You asked what would happen.
So, if you *must* tell the truth, regardless of whether you want to
or
not, what is the purpose of the oath/affirmation?
It seems to be just a psychological game to impress upon people the
importance of telling the truth.
You got it.
McGyver
 
 
nospam@isp.com
9/3/2004 9:56:05 PM


On 03 Sep 2004, =?iso-8859-1?Q?The_Dave=A9?= <no@no.com> wrote:
Just an intellectual curiosity, but what would
happen if a witness in a court trial said "no"
when asked to swear or affirm to tell the truth?
Court: "Do you swear to tell the truth..."
Witness" "No."
The witness probably would be subjected to a colloquy consisting of
questions and also a clearly-stated directive from the judge to
confirm whether the witness understood and, if so, s/he would be told
that all the witness' answers to questions posed to which the court
did not sustain an objection (i.e., quesitons to which answers were
required) would be deemed provided under penalty of perjury and,
depending what if any reason the witness gave when asked to explain
the witness' hypothesized "No" above, the witness probably also would
be notified of the nature/meaning of whatever is the case-specific
combination of civil or criminal contempt of court sanctions.
(You don' provide enough information even hypothetically whether it
would/wouldn't be relevant also to discuss the witness' federal
constitutional Fifth/Fourteenth Amendment "privilege" against
compelled self-incrimination or its state constitutional analogues or
to consider other principles that might be relevant if the witness
provided a good factual explanation for the "No" statement you posit.)
 
 
Report this post for offensive content


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004