McGyver wrote:
Just an intellectual curiosity, but what would happen if a
witness
in a
court trial said "no" when asked to swear or affirm to tell the
truth?
Court: "Do you swear to tell the truth..."
Witness" "No."
A typical response would be: first, the witness would be asked if
he
would "affirm" that he would tell the truth, and would be told
that
the word "affirm" has no religious significance. If the witness
again
said "No," the witness would be politely told that he is subject
to
the laws or perjury regardless of the oath. That's all. Not a
big
deal.
The religious aspect is separate from what I was asking.
You asked what would happen.
So, if you *must* tell the truth, regardless of whether you want to
or
not, what is the purpose of the oath/affirmation?
It seems to be just a psychological game to impress upon people the
importance of telling the truth.
You got it.
McGyver