|
http://www.divorces.com/stats.html
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, National Center for Health Statistics,
Americans for Divorce Reform, Institue for Equality in Marriage)
|
| |
| |
http://www.divorces.com/stats.html
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, National Center for Health Statistics,
Americans for Divorce Reform, Institue for Equality in Marriage)
Just out of curiousity, do you know the percentage of married
people who get divorced?
I'll be damned,...it's about 50%.
<shakes head>
Don't let that sway you, though.
Continue with your propaganda.
Hey Bogey,...friend of yours?
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 15:11:09 -0400, "YooperBoyka"
<cj.don'twant@no.spam> wrote:
Just out of curiousity, do you know the percentage of married
people who get divorced?
I'll be damned,...it's about 50%.
<shakes head>
Don't let that sway you, though.
Continue with your propaganda.
Hey Bogey,...friend of yours?
Quit feeding the @$#*ing trolls, people. Sheesh.
-James
Remove the _CATION to send email
|
| |
| |
http://www.divorces.com/stats.html
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, National Center for Health Statistics,
Americans for Divorce Reform, Institue for Equality in Marriage)
Percent of overall population that have been divorced: 50%.
Percent of non-smokers that have been divorced...51%?
D
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
S. O. Damocles wrote:
http://www.divorces.com/stats.html
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Which means that the percentage of "non-smokers" who had
been divorced is 51%.
So that tells me that non-smokers are LESS likely to hold
on to their marriage, or to conduct a long-lasting relationship.
No surprise there...
|
| |
| |
S. O. Damocles wrote:
Which means that the percentage of "non-smokers" who had
been divorced is 51%.
So that tells me that non-smokers are LESS likely to hold
on to their marriage, or to conduct a long-lasting relationship.
No surprise there...
You've got it backwards.
It doesn't say "Percentage of divorced people who were smokers".
What it means is that 51% of smokers remain married.
Not that it matters.
The percentage of married people who divorce is still
around 50%.
Which means that married smokers are about the same as
all other married people.
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
Rambler wrote:
|
| |
| |
You've got it backwards.
It doesn't say "Percentage of divorced people who were smokers".
What it means is that 51% of smokers remain married.
Not that it matters.
The percentage of married people who divorce is still
around 50%.
Which means that married smokers are about the same as
all other married people.
Ack ... mea culpa. Time to adjust the previous post.
Rambler
|
| |
| |
rumik wrote:
S. O. Damocles wrote:
Which means that the percentage of "non-smokers" who had
been divorced is 51%.
How stupid are you rimik?
And you fancied yourself at the upper end of the moron smoker
intelligence curve ---
So that tells me that non-smokers are LESS likely to hold
on to their marriage, or to conduct a long-lasting
relationship. No surprise there...
Idiot.
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
You've got it backwards.
She's a drug-addled idiot tobacco addict --- what'd you expect?
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
Rambler wrote:
Ack ... mea culpa. Time to adjust the previous post.
You @$#*ing idiot.
Rambler
|
| |
| |
Rambler wrote:
|
| |
| |
"Rambler" <iamrambler at yahoo dot com> wrote in message
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
You've got it backwards.
He's got "smoker's brain".
It doesn't say "Percentage of divorced people who were
smokers". What it means is that 51% of smokers remain
married.
No, it doesn't mean that at all.
Try again.
Not that it matters.
Especially since your claim is false.
The percentage of married people who divorce is still
around 50%.
Irrelevant.
Which means that married smokers are about the same as
all other married people.
Wrong again.
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
She's a drug-addled idiot tobacco addict --- what'd you expect?
So what the @$#* is YOUR problem???
I have to assume you were born this way.
I smoke,... you @$#*ing dolt!
....and I just proved to you that the original post was
ignorant propaganda.
<shakes head>
Fuckin' kids.
|
| |
| |
No, it doesn't mean that at all.
Try again.
What the @$#* is 100 minus 49, asshole?
nevermind.
Plonk.
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
So what the @$#* is YOUR problem???
Asks the statistically challenged "smoker idiots".
I have to assume you were born this way.
Like you falsely assume "that 51% of smokers remain married."
I smoke,... you @$#*ing dolt!
Yep, and you got it wrong also, although you were
1/2 right, which is more than the other tobacco junkie morons
who illustrated their drug-addled spongiform brain dysfunction.
...and I just proved to you that the original post was
ignorant propaganda.
You only proved that you were 1/2 as stupid as the other
lowlife smoker idiots.
<shakes head>
Fuckin' kids.
Fucking idiot smoker. Ain't it time for you to suck down some
more tobacco smoke, addict?
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
What the @$#* is 100 minus 49, asshole?
You really are another one of those
tobacco-addicted morons, aren't you?
nevermind.
Plonk.
Yep, run and hide from your own ignorance, it's worked
so well for you in the past, eh junkie?
|
| |
| |
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:31:26 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Which means that the percentage of "non-smokers" who had
been divorced is 51%.
So that tells me that non-smokers are LESS likely to hold
on to their marriage, or to conduct a long-lasting
relationship. No surprise there...
You've got it backwards.
She's a drug-addled idiot tobacco addict --- what'd you expect?
Actually, all three of you are wrong. The percentage of non-smokers
who were divorced can't be extrapolated from the percentage of smokers
who were divorced.
BTW - In 2002, the US Census Bureau reported the overall divorce
rate at 50%. The one percent difference in favor of smokers staying
married is statistically insignificant.
|
| |
| |
Nick reponds to this jackass with:
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message
What the @$#* is 100 minus 49, asshole?
You really are another one of those
tobacco-addicted morons, aren't you?
Yep, run and hide from your own ignorance, it's worked
so well for you in the past, eh junkie?
This poor anal retentive basket-case is a prime example of not being toilet
trained on time.
|
| |
| |
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message
You. . .
<snip>
Yep, . . .
<snip>
|
| |
| |
Douglas Manz wrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:31:26 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Which means that the percentage of "non-smokers" who had
been divorced is 51%.
So that tells me that non-smokers are LESS likely to hold
on to their marriage, or to conduct a long-lasting
relationship. No surprise there...
You've got it backwards.
Actually, all three of you are wrong. The percentage of non-smokers
who were divorced can't be extrapolated from the percentage of smokers
who were divorced.
BTW - In 2002, the US Census Bureau reported the overall divorce
rate at 50%. The one percent difference in favor of smokers staying
married is statistically insignificant.
Maybe. But if that 1% difference was in favor of Non-Smokers,
they'd be bellowing about it for the next 2 weeks.
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
It doesn't say "Percentage of divorced people who were
smokers". What it means is that 51% of smokers remain
married.
What the @$#* is 100 minus 49, asshole?
How would he know? He flunked elementary math.
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
You've got it backwards.
It doesn't say "Percentage of divorced people who were smokers".
What it means is that 51% of smokers remain married.
Not that it matters.
The percentage of married people who divorce is still
around 50%.
Which means that married smokers are about the same as
all other married people.
I still like my interpretation better.
Besides, my interpretation is sure to piss off the
anti-smokers and get them all hysterical, which is a
good way of entertaining the regulars on this newsgroup. :-)
|
| |
| |
S. O. Damocles wrote:
rumik wrote:
How stupid are you rimik?
And you fancied yourself at the upper end of the moron smoker
intelligence curve ---
If you had a third of my IQ, you'd be considered
a highly intelligent man.
Start smoking. It can only help you.
|
| |
| |
Douglas Manz wrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:31:26 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
Which means that the percentage of "non-smokers" who had
been divorced is 51%.
So that tells me that non-smokers are LESS likely to hold
on to their marriage, or to conduct a long-lasting
relationship. No surprise there...
You've got it backwards.
Actually, all three of you are wrong.
The correct version is the one that pisses off
S.O.B. Damoclueless the most.
|
| |
| |
YooperBoyka wrote:
So what the @$#* is YOUR problem???
I have to assume you were born this way.
Go easy on him, Yooper.
The poor guy was born with physical deformities.
Luckily, they are matched by his mental deformities.
I smoke,... you @$#*ing dolt!
...and I just proved to you that the original post was
ignorant propaganda.
<shakes head>
Fuckin' kids.
|
| |
| |
ipad@ptd.net wrote:
Nick reponds to this jackass with:
What the @$#* is 100 minus 49, asshole?
This poor anal retentive basket-case is a prime example of not being toilet
trained on time.
Not his fault. There isn't a toilet seat around that
will hold his fat ass.
|
| |
| |
S. O. Damocles wrote:
Rambler wrote:
You @$#*ing idiot.
What would you know about @$#*ing?
The way you're built, you can't do it anyway.
|
| |
| |
If you had a third of my IQ, you'd be considered
a highly intelligent man.
"man"?
|
| |
| |
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:40:43 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
wrote:
You @$#*ing idiot.
Try anger management. Or suicide.
|
| |
| |
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:53:54 -0400, rumik <rumik@newsgroups.com>
wrote:
Percentage of smokers who had been divorced: 49%
[snip]
BTW - In 2002, the US Census Bureau reported the overall divorce
rate at 50%. The one percent difference in favor of smokers staying
married is statistically insignificant.
Maybe. But if that 1% difference was in favor of Non-Smokers,
they'd be bellowing about it for the next 2 weeks.
Why? A conclusion based on a statistically insignificant result is
meaningless. There isn't anything to bellow about one way or the
other.
|
| |
| |
Alex W. wrote:
"man"?
Creature?
It?
|
| |
| |
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 09:40:43 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
wrote:
Try anger management. Or suicide.
Suicide would be the best choice for him.
|
| |
| |
rumik wrote:
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
Suicide would be the best choice for him.
Can't do it until my life is complete ---
and it ain't complete 'till I've massaged your breasts.
|
| |
| |
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 00:10:51 -0600, "_Breaking News_" <news@usenet.net>
wrote:
|
| |
| |
|
