|
Make sure that it is illegal for all non-smokers to
barbeque or grill outside. We don't want our air
contaminated with their nasty smoke.
|
| |
| |
Diesel fumes are the most deadly form of smoke to breathe. Ban buses and
trucks from the roads. At least no one forces you to enter a restaurant
that permits smoking.
|
| |
| |
and that's how these controlling fanatics work. Trying to make
everyone else live just like them - oh happy joy joy!
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:30:25 GMT, "R&B Wiz" <RB@Wiz.com> wrote:
Make sure that it is illegal for all non-smokers to
barbeque or grill outside. We don't want our air
contaminated with their nasty smoke.
Nor are they allowed to drive or ride in motor vehicles of any kind.
All that toxic crap spewing out the tailpipes is killing their
children and everyone else's children.
|
| |
| |
Lest we forget their nasty fanatical carbon dioxide eminating
from their ignorant controlling mouth. Gosh - don't we all wish
we were as perfect as them? We humbly bow to their self-righteous,
ever persistent, ever obnoxious, wisdom. My god!! I so wish I
could be just like them - don't you???
|
| |
| |
R&B Wiz wrote:
Make sure that it is illegal for all non-smokers to
barbeque or grill outside. We don't want our air
contaminated with their nasty smoke.
There may be a lot of things that you don't want. Tell you what... go to
your local city council, board of supervisors, or whatever, and ask them
politely to pass a bylaw prohibiting non-smokers to barbecue or grill
outside. Let us know what sort of results you get. In particular, let us
know if the result is a fit of uncontrollable laughter from everyone
present.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
can happen to Canadians who use foul language in the US."
mailto:stanlee_98@yahoo.com , Nov. 30, 2003
|
| |
| |
Well, where I live, they stopped the smoking ban.
So I guess you lost here. To bad.
Ah-h-h, the smell of nazis in the morning air.
Damn! I thought we got rid of you people in 1945.
|
| |
| |
Heil to ya goofball!
|
| |
| |
I made it to near 25yrs on the railroad (brakeman/conductor) before
gettin' "Reaganized" back in '89. I'd put diesel fumes from railroad
locomotives right up there in pollutants. On our sub-division....we
got all the junk power (not fit to run on the main line)...and there
were few if any exhaust restrictions.
Ed Duncan, Batavia, NY
***********************
"El Rey del Philly" <mfeller99@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<qb-dnZblAJxHfqHcRVn-vg@comcast.com>...
Diesel fumes are the most deadly form of smoke to breathe. Ban buses and
trucks from the roads. At least no one forces you to enter a restaurant
that permits smoking.
|
| |
| |
Well, where I live, they stopped the smoking ban.
So I guess you lost here. To bad.
Damn! I thought we got rid of you people in 1945.
Naw, the world put a stop to you worthless maggots
back then --
--
"Imagine! ...Niggers speaking French!"
- William Jennings Bryan,
secretary of state to U.S.
President Woodrow Wilson,
expressed the contempt in which
the Haitians are held by U$ power structure:
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:48:05 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
R&B Wiz wrote:
There may be a lot of things that you don't want. Tell you what... go to
your local city council, board of supervisors, or whatever, and ask them
politely to pass a bylaw prohibiting non-smokers to barbecue or grill
outside. Let us know what sort of results you get. In particular, let us
know if the result is a fit of uncontrollable laughter from everyone
present.
I don't think a ban on barbeque would be any more ridiculous
than a ban on smoking. EBS must be just as bad as ETS.
|
| |
| |
Make sure that it is illegal for all non-smokers to
barbeque or grill outside. We don't want our air
contaminated with their nasty smoke.
OH NO. We can't do that.
That would infringe on THEIR RIGHTS.
SCOTTY
|
| |
| |
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 16:48:05 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
I don't think a ban on barbeque would be any more ridiculous
than a ban on smoking.
Then take up my suggestion: go to your local governing body, and see if you
can convince them to pass an anti-barbecuing bylaw. And, as I wrote
earlier, give us full reports on the success or failure of your effort.
EBS must be just as bad as ETS.
Do you know anyone who barbecues indoors?
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
can happen to Canadians who use foul language in the US."
mailto:stanlee_98@yahoo.com , Nov. 30, 2003
|
| |
| |
That's funny, I must have missed that part in history class.
Of course, this just convinces us of you stupidity.
|
| |
| |
As I said before meathead. They tried one of your Nazi tricks here
and was rejected. I believe it was the city government "body".
I'm so glad I don't live in your gestapo city.
|
| |
| |
Do you know anyone who barbecues indoors?
Yep. And people that have gas fires, charcoal fires and wood fires indoor.
All produce smoke that contains chemicals and carcinogens.
|
| |
| |
Todd Benson wrote:
Yep. And people
Careful. "People" is plural.
that have gas fires, charcoal fires and wood fires
indoor.
Do they have chimneys?
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
can happen to Canadians who use foul language in the US."
mailto:stanlee_98@yahoo.com , Nov. 30, 2003
|
| |
| |
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:35:58 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
Then take up my suggestion: go to your local governing body, and see if you
can convince them to pass an anti-barbecuing bylaw. And, as I wrote
earlier, give us full reports on the success or failure of your effort.
Why would I ask for another stupid ban? We already have too many of
them. Just becuse the anti-smoker law passed, it doesn't make it
good or acceptable or necessary or anything.
|
| |
| |
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:35:58 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
Why would I ask for another stupid ban?
I agree that the idea of banning outdoor barbecuing (as expressed by "R&B
Wiz") is pretty stupid.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
can happen to Canadians who use foul language in the US."
mailto:stanlee_98@yahoo.com , Nov. 30, 2003
|
| |
| |
Contaminated air is contaminated air, and you are certainly
contaminating mine.
|
| |
| |
Contaminated air is contaminated air, and you are certainly
contaminating mine.
Dinsdale?
|
| |
| |
Todd Benson wrote:
Careful. "People" is plural.
No kidding?
Do they have chimneys?
Some do, some don't. Some chimneys don't work.
|
| |
| |
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
I agree that the idea of banning outdoor barbecuing (as expressed by "R&B
Wiz") is pretty stupid.
Just as stupid as smoking bans.
|
| |
| |
Todd Benson wrote:
Just as stupid as smoking bans.
Hmm, New York, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Ireland, Norway, Bhutan,
Singapore... my, there's a lot of stupid people around. Maybe you should
find another planet to live on. Or go and live in a cave.
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
can happen to Canadians who use foul language in the US."
mailto:stanlee_98@yahoo.com , Nov. 30, 2003
|
| |
| |
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 07:48:53 -0700, Robert Broughton
<rbronews@brou8ghton.ca> wrote:
Just as stupid as smoking bans.
Hmm, New York, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Ireland, Norway, Bhutan,
Singapore... my, there's a lot of stupid people around.
True. Stupid people outnumber intelligent people.
80% of the US population go to church regularly.
90% of the US voters will vote democrat or republican.
Intelligent people wouldn't do either.
|
| |
| |
In article <azR%c.55376$nk.26361@okepread05>,
Todd Benson <tbenson37@cox.net> wrote:
Just as stupid as smoking bans.
An addict would think so.
|
| |
| |
Todd Benson wrote:
Hmm, New York, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Ireland, Norway,
Bhutan,
Singapore... my, there's a lot of stupid people around. Maybe you should
find another planet to live on. Or go and live in a cave.
You're right, there are a lot of stupid people around. No reason to go live
elsewhere, I like diversity.
|
| |
| |
In article <azR%c.55376$nk.26361@okepread05>,
Todd Benson <tbenson37@cox.net> wrote:
An addict would think so.
Playing the same old song there Bruce. You still refuse to see that even
non-smokers see the smoking ban as stupid?
|
| |
| |
Todd Benson wrote:
Bhutan,
You're right, there are a lot of stupid people around. No reason to go
live elsewhere, I like diversity.
Diversity of opinions seems to be a big problem for you, especially with
opinions that differ from yours.
"Icouldcarelesswhatyouchoosetobelieve." - Todd Benson, Sept. 8, 2004
"Wow, what an ego this guy has." - Todd Benson, Sept. 9, 2004
--
Bob Broughton
http://broughton.ca/
Vancouver, BC, Canada
"Watch your mouth, if you ever want to cross the border. Bad things
can happen to Canadians who use foul language in the US."
mailto:stanlee_98@yahoo.com , Nov. 30, 2003
|
| |
| |
Todd Benson wrote:
Diversity of opinions seems to be a big problem for you, especially with
opinions that differ from yours.
I have no problem with diversity, especially with people that disagree with
me. In fact, if the person is reasonable, I enjoy debating with them. Take
a look back at some long and interesting discussions that I have had with
SteveO. I do have a problem with fools and simpletons. Guess which
category I would place you.
"I could care less what you choose to believe." - Todd Benson, Sept. 8,
2004
That is not a problem with diversity. In fact, that is tolerance for
differing opinions. I don't care what you choose to believe. How is that a
problem with diversity?
"Wow, what an ego this guy has." - Todd Benson, Sept. 9, 2004
In response to your comment that I would even care what you believe. Both
comments stand and neither refute my claim to enjoy diversity.
|
| |
| |
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:34:19 -0500, "Sprocket"
<sprocketdrocket@charter.net> wrote:
Dinsdale?
That you, Norman?
|
| |
| |
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:06:48 -0700, "Todd Benson" <tbenson37@cox.net>
wrote:
Just as stupid as smoking bans.
An addict would think so.
Playing the same old song there Bruce. You still refuse to see that even
non-smokers see the smoking ban as stupid?
Intelligent non-smokers know, that the smoking ban is stupid,
but since it serves them, they don't mind.
Stupid anti-smokers on the other hand are still trying to make
the ban look reasonable and necessary.
|
| |
| |
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 17:06:48 -0700, "Todd Benson"
<tbenson37@cox.net> wrote:
Just as stupid as smoking bans.
An addict would think so.
Intelligent non-smokers know, that the smoking ban is stupid,
but since it serves them, they don't mind.
{shrug} We'll take that <bwg>
Stupid anti-smokers on the other hand are still trying to make
the ban look reasonable and necessary.
Just telling it like it is.
|
| |
| |
|
