Re: Seduction or Lawsuits?

Re: Seduction or Lawsuits?

ManualInsert@DB.com	9/10/2004 2:13:41 PM




Howard Stanton	9/10/2004 3:13:41 PM
Perhaps someone more qualified than I can answer this, but has not this plaintiff, himself, as evidenced in the Google archives, posted links to Google's archived copies of other poster's messages and content? Why would a commercial business use any tool or service of another business, if they they claim that tool or service violates their own rights? HS Takahesi Ogamori wrote: "Byte Me" <no_way@jose.com> wrote in message news:hLm0d.575542$Gx4.89627@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... To be precise, between 1 Jan 2004 and the 13 June 2004, "Ray Gordon"/"LeModernCaveman" posted every 1 hour and 26 minutes (16 times EVERY day!) -------------------------------- Ray wants Google to stop archiving his USENET posts. But he said to me about something I wrote, "The truth is that people get sued pretty harshly for what you've been pulling on me. You also have called yourself a shill, and like it or not, I can quote that with impunity." Can Google also quote his USENET posts with impunity? <snicker>



Alex	9/10/2004 10:39:15 PM
in article 41420AF5.63DC@Intell-transport.com, Howard Stanton at HS3127@Intell-transport.com wrote on 9/10/04 4:13 PM: Perhaps someone more qualified than I can answer this, but has not this plaintiff, himself, as evidenced in the Google archives, posted links to Google's archived copies of other poster's messages and content? Why would a commercial business use any tool or service of another business, if they they claim that tool or service violates their own rights? He's done more than that. He's actually re-posted several of my posts in other newsgroups for comment. HS Takahesi Ogamori wrote:

Report this post for offensive content