|
|
| |
| |
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:chtnf7$85j@dispatch.concentric.net...
http://www.speakoutvail.com/front1.shtml
And, Speakout! has learned that Bryant may be considering a wrongful arrest
suit against Eagle County, claiming damages that may reach up to $100
million dollars in lost or future endorsements. And, frankly, Speakout!
wouldn't blame him if he did sue Eagle County.
Now THAT I would like to see!
Alex
|
| |
| |
In article <4143089e$0$76513$b83b6cc0@news.wanadoo.nl>,
Alex <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote:
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:chtnf7$85j@dispatch.concentric.net...
Now THAT I would like to see!
Me too. But he won't.
|
| |
| |
"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:<4143089e$0$76513$b83b6cc0@news.wanadoo.nl>...
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:chtnf7$85j@dispatch.concentric.net...
Now THAT I would like to see!
Alex
Fat chance. In such a case, all evidence that the Eagle County
Sheriff had in its possession upon which it based its decision to
arrest would be made very, very public. That includes the infamous
taped confession by Kobe, wherein he said that these kind of
situations are commonplace in the NBA, and he named Shaq by name in
that context, along with other teammates, like Rick Fox. Notice how
both those guys are gone now. No way will Kobe, the Lakers, or the
NBA stand for any of that. Kobe is going to *try* to quit while he's
ahead. The victim won't let him though. he's going to have to spend
*another* $20 million at least before this is all over for him.
|
| |
| |
"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
news:<4143089e$0$76513$b83b6cc0@news.wanadoo.nl>...
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:chtnf7$85j@dispatch.concentric.net...
http://www.speakoutvail.com/front1.shtml
And, Speakout! has learned that Bryant may be considering a wrongful
arrest
suit against Eagle County, claiming damages that may reach up to $100
million dollars in lost or future endorsements. And, frankly,
Speakout!
wouldn't blame him if he did sue Eagle County.
Now THAT I would like to see!
Alex
Fat chance. In such a case, all evidence that the Eagle County
Sheriff had in its possession upon which it based its decision to
arrest would be made very, very public.
Kobe would have a good case, considering the sheriff went around the DA's
back to arrrest Kobe, even after they agreed they would wait. They broke
their word. And the DA filed charges 2 weeks before the DNA results came
back.
Meanwhile, the detectives did a horrible job with the investigation. They
didn't even completely investigate the "crime scene", which would have
either corroborated or contradicted her story. Plus they refused to
interview anyone who disagreed with the accuser's story, like the night
auditor. Plus their search warrant wasn't supposed to take place at night
but they did it anyways. And they took more items of clothing from Kobe,
than they were allowed to take. And they apparently modified the tape.
Not to mention, holding back evidence for half the year. And failing to
reveal what Michael Baden told them.
--
"The Federal Reserve(Banks) are one of the most corrupt institutions the
world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who
does not know that this Nation is run by the International Bankers."
- Congressman Louis McFadden
|
| |
| |
Kobe would have a good case, considering the sheriff went around the DA's
back to arrrest Kobe, even after they agreed they would wait. They broke
their word. And the DA filed charges 2 weeks before the DNA results came
back.
Kobe would have to prove his innocence which is actually a lot harder to do
than be found not guilty. Kobe would lose a lot if he pursued this action.
Meanwhile, the detectives did a horrible job with the investigation. They
didn't even completely investigate the "crime scene", which would have
either corroborated or contradicted her story. Plus they refused to
interview anyone who disagreed with the accuser's story, like the night
auditor. Plus their search warrant wasn't supposed to take place at night
but they did it anyways. And they took more items of clothing from Kobe,
than they were allowed to take. And they apparently modified the tape.
Not to mention, holding back evidence for half the year. And failing to
reveal what Michael Baden told them.
--
"The Federal Reserve(Banks) are one of the most corrupt institutions the
world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who
does not know that this Nation is run by the International Bankers."
- Congressman Louis McFadden
|
| |
| |
In article <2fb0d153.0409111035.4444acc5@posting.google.com>
nastygram@hotmail.com (Zeb Quinn) wrote:
"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:<4143089e$0$76513$b83b6cc0@news.wanadoo.nl>...
Fat chance. In such a case, all evidence that the Eagle County
Sheriff had in its possession upon which it based its decision to
arrest would be made very, very public. That includes the infamous
taped confession by Kobe, wherein he said that these kind of
situations are commonplace in the NBA, and he named Shaq by name in
that context, along with other teammates, like Rick Fox. Notice how
both those guys are gone now. No way will Kobe, the Lakers, or the
NBA stand for any of that. Kobe is going to *try* to quit while he's
ahead. The victim won't let him though. he's going to have to spend
*another* $20 million at least before this is all over for him.
Alleged victim, or the accuser, you ignorant pig.
She was never proven to be a victim since there was no proof that there
was a crime.
You keep missing basic things that a high school teenager wouldn't
despite your lies of being a criminal defense attorney for 30 years.
|
| |
| |
In article <m6OdnfgOhfOIwt7cRVn-rw@comcast.com>
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote:
Kobe would have to prove his innocence which is actually a lot harder to do
than be found not guilty. Kobe would lose a lot if he pursued this action.
Where is that law that states that you cannot file a wrongful arrest
suit, unless you are innocent?
You're an idiot.
|
| |
| |
In article <m6OdnfgOhfOIwt7cRVn-rw@comcast.com>
Where is that law that states that you cannot file a wrongful arrest
suit, unless you are innocent?
You're an idiot.
Listen dumbass, you can file a wrongful arrest suit any time you want. To
WIN, he has to prove it was wrongful which means he has to in essence prove
his innocence. Pay attention #@($head.
|
| |
| |
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:<m6OdnfgOhfOIwt7cRVn-.
...
Kobe would have to prove his innocence which is actually a lot harder to do
than be found not guilty.
...
In this case how could it even be possible to prove innocence?
He admitted being there, what proof could there be other than a
video tape of consent being given or a total recantation by the
alleged victim? The first scenario obviously won't happen. If the
second one occurs would it automatically mean the arrest was wrongful?
From a legal standpoint, I think no,
the DA theoretically could have had just cause acting on what it
believed to be credible evidence.
I'm not a lawyer but I think it would not exactly involve proving his
innocence. It would be showing that he was arrested without cause
which involves things like what evidence was acted on.
,Bob Koca
|
| |
| |
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:<SK2dnWVzJpRhKt7cRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
Listen dumbass, you can file a wrongful arrest suit any time you want. To
WIN, he has to prove it was wrongful which means he has to in essence prove
his innocence. Pay attention #@($head.
|
| |
| |
In article <SK2dnWVzJpRhKt7cRVn-gQ@comcast.com>
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote:
Listen dumbass, you can file a wrongful arrest suit any time you want. To
WIN, he has to prove it was wrongful which means he has to in essence prove
his innocence. Pay attention #@($head.
Wow, I win.
You're so defeated that you had to put my usenet nym in the subject
line.
Thank you for dancing.
Once you grow up, get some education and then some clue, go look up
where he was arrested by the sheriff's office where they had to bypass
the DA office to get a warrant, and where charges were filed 2 weeks
before the DNA evidence came back from testing, and others, then get
back to us to get your sorry ass kicked when he does so.
Although it could be just a rumor, he doesn't need to prove his
innocence to file a wrongful arrest suit.
People can be innocent, but could be still arrested for probably cause,
suspicious activity, ...etc.
But that doesn't mean that the DA can be sued unless they violate
someone's rights or acted on no grounds, which in this case there is a
lot of space for such debate.
Still cannot produce that law saying that you cannot file a wrongful
arrest suit unless you can prove that you are innocent?
Thought so.
Fuck off, jackass.
|
| |
| |
In article <4b8fa98.0409120239.5bd976e3@posting.google.com>
kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com (Huang Gang) wrote:
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:<SK2dnWVzJpRhKt7cRVn-gQ@comcast.com>...
|
| |
| |
Once you grow up, get some education and then some clue, go look up
where he was arrested by the sheriff's office where they had to bypass
the DA office to get a warrant, and where charges were filed 2 weeks
before the DNA evidence came back from testing, and others, then get
back to us to get your sorry ass kicked when he does so.
Although it could be just a rumor, he doesn't need to prove his
innocence to file a wrongful arrest suit.
Of course he can file a wrongful arrest suit anytime he wants. I thought he
might only file if he had a chance to win, which he doesn't. You migh try
some remedial reading classes sometime.
People can be innocent, but could be still arrested for probably cause,
suspicious activity, ...etc.
But that doesn't mean that the DA can be sued unless they violate
someone's rights or acted on no grounds, which in this case there is a
lot of space for such debate.
Still cannot produce that law saying that you cannot file a wrongful
arrest suit unless you can prove that you are innocent?
Reread the thread dumbass. He can't WIN the lawsuit unless he can
essentially prove his innocence. I'm sure you must be a product of public
education.
Thought so.
You have to have a thought to have thought so
|
| |
| |
In article <4b8fa98.0409120239.5bd976e3@posting.google.com>
kongwong_no_sp_am@hotmail.com (Huang Gang) wrote:
|
| |
| |
In article <HYmdnT38L6IpLtncRVn-uw@comcast.com>
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote:
|
| |
| |
In article <3OqdnVXvtPn-LtncRVn-rw@comcast.com>
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote:
Of course he can file a wrongful arrest suit anytime he wants.
Then shut the @$#* up.
I thought
Nobody gives a flying #@($ about what YOU think, the world doesn't
revolve around you, #@($ stain.
he might only file if he had a chance to win, which he doesn't.
According to you, someone confusing innocence with wrongful arrest.
ROFLMAO>
You migh try some remedial reading classes sometime.
Said the moron who has only three words in his limited vocabulary, and
cannot read if his stupid retarded life depended on it.
People can be innocent, but could be still arrested for probably cause,
suspicious activity, ...etc.
But that doesn't mean that the DA can be sued unless they violate
someone's rights or acted on no grounds, which in this case there is a
lot of space for such debate.
Still cannot produce that law saying that you cannot file a wrongful
arrest suit unless you can prove that you are innocent?
Reread the thread dumbass.
Yes, indeed, read the thread, dumbass.
Someone else already told you that you are clueless, funny how you chose
not to argue with him.
He can't WIN the lawsuit unless he can essentially prove his innocence.
All he has to do, if he filed that suit, it to prove that the DA didn't
have enough evidence warranting an arrest, and did something wrong.
That is NOT proving his innocence, @$#*head.
Lots of cases were won, without proving the innocence of the person who
filed the suit.
Go get some education, and grow up, after you manage to see the world
outside that trailer park that you live in.
I'm sure you must be a product of public
education.
At least I am not a product of the inbred trailer trash losers, like
your mom and dad, you are.
Thought so.
You have to have a thought to have thought so
Wow, did your $5 hooker mom teach you that?
At least you're learning, maybe someday you can also grow up.
|
| |
| |
In article <3OqdnVXvtPn-LtncRVn-rw@comcast.com>
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote:
At least I am not a product of the inbred trailer trash losers, like
your mom and dad, you are.
Shut up #@&@
, just admit you were wrong, as always.
|
| |
| |
In article <HYmdnT38L6IpLtncRVn-uw@comcast.com>
"Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com> wrote:
Shut up #@&@
, just admit you were wrong, as always.
|
| |
| |
In article <WbKdncA3QbcyTtncRVn-rg@comcast.com>
"Karl" <Karl@aol.com> wrote:
Shut up
Wow, got me another obsessed fan of mine.
#@&@
,
Stop calling your mom's name.
just admit you were wrong, as always.
I am right, as always, and got someone to sock puppet and change usenet
nyms because he/she/it was too stupid to read properly,
Here are your headers from this post and from the spanked nym "Bill"
<Bill@earthlink.com> .
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.10.142.171 is the same in all, along with the
timezone, the exact build of Outlook Express, and the ISP.
Now dance again, morph again to another nym, #@&@
.
Path:
internal1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:54:39 -0500
From: "Karl" <Karl@aol.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers,soc.men,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,alt.gossip.celebrities,rec.sport.football.college,rec.sport.basketball.pro,la.general
References: <chtnf7$85j@dispatch.concentric.net>
<4143089e$0$76513$b83b6cc0@news.wanadoo.nl>
<2fb0d153.0409111035.4444acc5@posting.google.com>
<chvhks$85f@dispatch.concentric.net>
<m6OdnfgOhfOIwt7cRVn-rw@comcast.com>
<i507k0djd4hjstil106an2e2irev8rdb2d@4ax.com>
<SK2dnWVzJpRhKt7cRVn-gQ@comcast.com>
<ep89k0hkect5dtrgvfhpul1s9b05vk0tui@4ax.com>
<3OqdnVXvtPn-LtncRVn-rw@comcast.com>
<7di9k01dkb80dci08n12jp19mmm91f8ub5@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Dumbass Sportsfan WAS Re: Kobe considering wrongful arrest
suit against Eagle County
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:54:37 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2741.2600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200
Message-ID: <WbKdncA3QbcyTtncRVn-rg@comcast.com>
Lines: 15
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.10.142.171
X-Trace:
sv3-YOmg9od3Z6thT1jj0busmmWTFFQ57d75lhbxMCEeE+2f+1P3ReC6l/Tdxc8Al5hQYlLscxExV8QsKZX!2NJ4dpl4jtsyHpQJxeeV7gbEwrpeYhF9AFcGFKzPlEYjR0xiG4QiMXWPzHI1Aw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.13
Path:
local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:36:50 -0500
From: "Bill" <Bill@earthlink.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers,soc.men,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,alt.gossip.celebrities,rec.sport.football.college,rec.sport.basketball.pro,la.general
References: <chtnf7$85j@dispatch.concentric.net>
<4143089e$0$76513$b83b6cc0@news.wanadoo.nl>
<2fb0d153.0409111035.4444acc5@posting.google.com>
<chvhks$85f@dispatch.concentric.net>
<m6OdnfgOhfOIwt7cRVn-rw@comcast.com>
<i507k0djd4hjstil106an2e2irev8rdb2d@4ax.com>
<SK2dnWVzJpRhKt7cRVn-gQ@comcast.com>
<ep89k0hkect5dtrgvfhpul1s9b05vk0tui@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Dumbass Sportsfan WAS Re: Kobe considering wrongful arrest
suit against Eagle County
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:36:49 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2741.2600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200
Message-ID: <3OqdnVXvtPn-LtncRVn-rw@comcast.com>
Lines: 43
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.10.142.171
X-Trace:
sv3-H7C7As53Ywq84j9NGB0EfCGCPaSTtFgwt+bClnGYSCXt7stT5imcg/Iv/oQ1ceREoZn4afW70RtfUQI!fd9ifa16zyw+9DcwOvxZtJVUDCIrFR6bvnP3x8SWMeCiCzcISTYR0Ay4L0GVxA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.13
|
| |
| |
In article <cLydnRzQ3_RKTtncRVn-qw@comcast.com>
"Karl" <Karl@aol.com> wrote:
Shut up #@&@
, just admit you were wrong, as always.
The #@&@
is someone who morphs from one nym to another because he got
his/her/its ass kicked and was proven wrong, as usual, don't you agree,
bill@earthlink.net ?
Of course the other #@&@
is your toothless mom.
|
| |
| |
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<chtnf7
And, Speakout! has learned that Bryant may be considering a wrongful arrest
suit against Eagle County, claiming damages that may reach up to $100
million dollars in lost or future endorsements. And, frankly, Speakout!
wouldn't blame him if he did sue Eagle County.
Bull#@($. This ain't gonna happen. Apparently its not just the young
chicks of Colorado that are completely stupid.
I'm sensible
|
| |
| |
|
