|
|
| |
| |
jlruble wrote:
Let me answer that question.
1) I smoke because I enjoy it. I also enjoy the look and
feeling of a good pipe in my hand.
I got a good pipe for you to hold onto.
2) I smoke because it drives inconsiderate (that's not the
right word, but I can't think of anything better at this
time) people out of their minds.
Which is why society has now kicked lowlife scumbag tobacco
addicts like yourself out of PUBLIC places and back to the
filthy gutter where you belong.
I am very opposed to the "nanny" disposition of our
government. I believe that in my 70 years of life I have
earned the right to decide what is right for me.
And you could live to be 170 and you'll still never have
the right to decide what is right for others.
Keep your putrid tobacco smoke to yourself, junkie.
You have every right to walk the other way if you approach
me while I am smoking.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
You have every right not to
frequent an establishment that allows smoking.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
By the same
token, a small businessman should have every right to say
what is allowed in his establishment.
So they should be allowed to decide which Fire Codes to obey,
which Food Safety laws they can ignore, which OSHA regs they
will or won't comply with?
You really are a drug-addled moron, aren't you?
I exclude Houses of
Prostitution and places that promote the use of drugs, but
that should go without saying.
Because it disposes of your pathetic "smoker logic".
If I am conducting a legal business,
NewsFlash numbnuts: It AIN'T legal to allow
tobacco addicts to smoke inside your business.
I should be able to
admit (or exclude) anyone whom I desire.
You can.
What you can't decide is which unlawful PUBLIC behaviors
you will or won't allow.
What's next?
Next is we toss you pig-ignorant lowlife tobacco addicts
out with the rest of the garbage.
A Nazi society?
Godwins Law -- YOU LOSE!
Be careful what you wish for. You may get it.
We already have it, moron. Now suck suck suck your pathetic
tobacco in the ONLY legal place left, inside the privacy of your
own stinky abode.
SCOTTY
|
| |
| |
Said "Sod"Dumbocles:
Keep your tobacco smoke And you could live to be 170
|
| |
| |
jlruble wrote:
I got a good pipe for you to hold onto.
Which is why society has now kicked lowlife scumbag tobacco
addicts like yourself out of PUBLIC places and back to the
filthy gutter where you belong.
And you could live to be 170 and you'll still never have
the right to decide what is right for others.
Keep your putrid tobacco smoke to yourself, junkie.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
So they should be allowed to decide which Fire Codes to obey,
which Food Safety laws they can ignore, which OSHA regs they
will or won't comply with?
You really are a drug-addled moron, aren't you?
Because it disposes of your pathetic "smoker logic".
NewsFlash numbnuts: It AIN'T legal to allow
tobacco addicts to smoke inside your business.
You can.
What you can't decide is which unlawful PUBLIC behaviors
you will or won't allow.
Next is we toss you pig-ignorant lowlife tobacco addicts
out with the rest of the garbage.
Godwins Law -- YOU LOSE!
We already have it, moron. Now suck suck suck your pathetic
tobacco in the ONLY legal place left, inside the privacy of your
own stinky abode.
Anybody think I struck a nerve? When you can't logically debate, be sure to
(try to) insult the other side.
Your lack of intelligence shows through almost as much as your lack of
manners and vocabulary.
SCOTTY
|
| |
| |
jlruble wrote:
Anybody think I struck a nerve? When you can't logically
debate, be sure to (try to) insult the other side.
Anybody notice Scotty evaded all the points.
Your lack of intelligence shows through almost as much as
your lack of manners and vocabulary.
Translation: You lost the argument.
SCOTTY
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:30:24 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
So, why do you smoke?
Let me answer that question.
1) I smoke because I enjoy it. I also enjoy the look and
feeling of a good pipe in my hand.
I got a good pipe for you to hold onto.
Sorry Damocles. If you want someone to give you a hand job, you'd have
better luck doing it yourself.
Which is why society has now kicked lowlife scumbag tobacco
addicts like yourself out of PUBLIC places and back to the
filthy gutter where you belong.
Oddly enough, you are trying to decide what is right for everyone else.
And you could live to be 170 and you'll still never have
the right to decide what is right for others.
Keep your putrid tobacco smoke to yourself, junkie.
I do, asshole.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
Ah, so we see what you really stand for.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
Not here you haven't, loser.
So they should be allowed to decide which Fire Codes to obey,
which Food Safety laws they can ignore, which OSHA regs they
will or won't comply with?
No, because there is no loss of life or even risk to health to
non-smokers who do not frequent places where cigarettes are openly
consumed.
You really are a drug-addled moron, aren't you?
You're just a moron.
Because it disposes of your pathetic "smoker logic".
NewsFlash numbnuts: It AIN'T legal to allow
tobacco addicts to smoke inside your business.
Ah, but it is. I can smoke where I work.
You can.
What you can't decide is which unlawful PUBLIC behaviors
you will or won't allow.
Anti-freedom terrorist.
Next is we toss you pig-ignorant lowlife tobacco addicts
out with the rest of the garbage.
Godwins Law -- YOU LOSE!
No - when you advocate Nazi tactics, you lose. You brought it up first.
Be careful what you wish for. You may get it.
We already have it, moron. Now suck suck suck your pathetic
tobacco in the ONLY legal place left, inside the privacy of your
own stinky abode.
And in the workplace, and at my favorite bar, and at my favorite
restaurant.
You're free not to go any of those places.
--
There's no way to delay that trouble comin' everyday
|
| |
| |
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:27:00 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es>
Anybody think I struck a nerve? When you can't logically
debate, be sure to (try to) insult the other side.
Anybody notice Scotty evaded all the points.
I noticed you didn't make any valid points.
Now stop soliciting people for sex on the internet.
--
There's no way to delay that trouble comin' everyday
|
| |
| |
For the sake of band width, I am not reposting everything that this poster
has posted numerous times to support their fallacy.
Anybody think I struck a nerve? When you can't logically
debate, be sure to (try to) insult the other side.
Anybody notice Scotty evaded all the points.
Translation: You lost the argument.
|
| |
| |
jlruble wrote:
For the sake of band width, I am not reposting everything
that this poster has posted numerous times to support their
fallacy.
Anybody think I struck a nerve? When you can't logically
debate, be sure to (try to) insult the other side.
Let me answer that question.
1) I smoke because I enjoy it. I also enjoy the look and
feeling of a good pipe in my hand.
I got a good pipe for you to hold onto.
2) I smoke because it drives inconsiderate (that's not the
right word, but I can't think of anything better at this
time) people out of their minds.
Which is why society has now kicked lowlife scumbag tobacco
addicts like yourself out of PUBLIC places and back to the
filthy gutter where you belong.
I am very opposed to the "nanny" disposition of our
government. I believe that in my 70 years of life I have
earned the right to decide what is right for me.
And you could live to be 170 and you'll still never have
the right to decide what is right for others.
Keep your putrid tobacco smoke to yourself, junkie.
You have every right to walk the other way if you approach
me while I am smoking.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
You have every right not to
frequent an establishment that allows smoking.
No need to, we passed laws that mandate that inconsiderate
lowlife tobacco addicted pukes like you stay out of PUBLIC
places.
By the same
token, a small businessman should have every right to say
what is allowed in his establishment.
So they should be allowed to decide which Fire Codes to obey,
which Food Safety laws they can ignore, which OSHA regs they
will or won't comply with?
You really are a drug-addled moron, aren't you?
I exclude Houses of
Prostitution and places that promote the use of drugs, but
that should go without saying.
Because it disposes of your pathetic "smoker logic".
If I am conducting a legal business,
NewsFlash numbnuts: It AIN'T legal to allow
tobacco addicts to smoke inside your business.
I should be able to
admit (or exclude) anyone whom I desire.
You can.
What you can't decide is which unlawful PUBLIC behaviors
you will or won't allow.
What's next?
Next is we toss you pig-ignorant lowlife tobacco addicts
out with the rest of the garbage.
A Nazi society?
Godwins Law -- YOU LOSE!
Be careful what you wish for. You may get it.
We already have it, moron. Now suck suck suck your pathetic
tobacco in the ONLY legal place left, inside the privacy of your
own stinky abode.
SCOTTY
|
| |
| |
Said "Sod" Dumbocles.
I got a good pipe
Good for you. Smoke it in good health.
|
| |
| |
Well, what can I say. If I was a legend in my own mind, like this poster, I
could declare that I WIN (*&
%%$&*(.
Not only do I refuse to descend to the pitiful level of her response, I
know that it is impossible to have an intelligent discussion with anyone who
cannot speak (type) without profanity.
The only bad thing I can say about her family is that maybe they should
monitor her newsgroup activity a little better.
Since no one really needs, or wants to reread your deranged ravings I am
deleting them. I am sure your addiction to your own words will condemn you
to reposting them.
SCOTTY
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message news:rQk1d.41
|
| |
| |
S.O. Damocles:
Really fed up with you I am.
Emailed to your ISP along with an appropriate complaint and some nice
examples of your postings.
Anyone else to join in into the funny game of hunting these guys
down???
cheers,
Tom
(having some addictive Larsen32 in a Pete)
OrgName: U S WEST Internet Services
OrgID: USW
Address: 950 17th Street
Address: Suite 1900
City: Denver
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80202
Country: US
NetRange: 65.100.0.0 - 65.103.255.255
CIDR: 65.100.0.0/14
NetName: USW-INTERACT99-2BLK
NetHandle: NET-65-100-0-0-1
Parent: NET-65-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.USWEST.NET
NameServer: NS2.DNVR.USWEST.NET
NameServer: NS3.MN.USWEST.NET
Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
RegDate: 2001-01-03
Updated: 2002-08-12
TechHandle: ZU24-ARIN
TechName: U S WEST ISOps
TechPhone: +1-612-664-4689
TechEmail: abuse@uswest.net
|
| |
| |
Thomas Baetge wrote:
S.O. Damocles:
Really fed up with you I am.
So who's forcing you to read my posts?
Emailed to your ISP along with an appropriate complaint and
some nice examples of your postings.
Bwahahahaaaaaa! They'll give it the proper attention it deserves ---
bwhahahahaaaaaaa!
Anyone else to join in into the funny game of hunting these
guys down???
As if a pig-ignorant dip#@($ like you could even acomplish such
a basic task. Wotcha gonna do if you could find me, dip#@($?
cheers,
Tom
(having some addictive Larsen32 in a Pete)
Deutsche Telekom Online Service GmbH (T-DIALIN2-DOM)
Waldstrasse 3
Weiterstadt D-64331
DE
Domain Name: T-DIALIN.NET
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Kaufmann, Daniel (32933385I) hostmaster@t-online.net
T-Online International AG
Waldstrasse 3
Weiterstadt, Hessen 64331
DE
+49 61 51 680 5938 fax: +49 61 51 680 519
Record expires on 10-Feb-2005.
Record created on 10-Feb-1999.
Database last updated on 28-Apr-2004 05:50:13 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
DNS00.SDA.T-ONLINE.DE 195.145.119.62
DNS00.SUL.T-ONLINE.DE 62.153.158.62
DNS01.SUL.T-ONLINE.DE 194.25.134.203
DNS01.SDA.T-ONLINE.DE 195.145.119.189
|
| |
| |
|
