|
A tenant's utilities were shut off for nonpayment three weeks ago, and the rent hasn't been paid for Sept. Tenant is nowhere to be found and does not answer his cell phone. All of his belongings are still in the apartment. He hasn't picked up his mail either. If landlord is going to evict, isn't a process server supposed to physcially hand him the eviction notice and court date? How can someone be notified of eviction proceedings when they're not living in the apartment and their wherabouts are unknown? Thanks! Jim
|
| |
| |
A tenant's utilities were shut off for nonpayment three weeks ago, and the rent hasn't been paid for Sept. Tenant is nowhere to be found and does not answer his cell phone. All of his belongings are still in the apartment. He hasn't picked up his mail either. If landlord is going to evict, isn't a process
server
supposed to physcially hand him the eviction notice and court date? How can someone be notified of eviction proceedings when they're not living in the apartment and their wherabouts are unknown?
State laws generally require delivery of written notice before filing the eviction action in court. State laws allow various sorts or delivery of that notice other than personal service. Your state might allow delivery of the notice by regular mail accompanied by posting a copy of the notice on the door of the reneted premises. The mailing would be to the premises address. It's up to the tenant to get the mail or arrange to have it forwarded. After notice, and after filing the suit for eviction, service of process concerning the eviction must be accomplished by some method allowed by state law. Personal service won't be the only method permitted. State laws are unlikely to allow turning off a tenant's utilities for nonpayment of rent. That could backfire in a costly way. You could end up owing the tenant money and/or continued possession. You should contact a tenant's rights or landlord's rights organization in your state and learn how to do the eviction. Or better yet, let an attorney handle it. McGyver
|
| |
| |
On 19 Sep 2004, Jim <johnson11012000@yahoo.com> wrote:
A tenant's utilities were shut off for nonpayment three weeks ago . . . .
You don't make suffiently clear whether by "shut off for nonpayment" you mean that an outside utility provider did this pursuant to whatever are its state's laws and its published and otherwise law-prescribed procedures or whether you are suggesting that it is the landlord who was providing the utilities at issue and did the shut off as a matter of self-help, although this can be a signficant distinction if there is a later dispute.
[R]ent hasn't been paid for Sept. Tenant is nowhere to be found and does not answer his cell phone. All of his belongings are still in the apartment. He hasn't picked up his mail either.
For some, apart from narrowly contractual landlord-tenant lease-defined issues, these sorts of factoids (including that it is still the month of Sept.) might raise ethical questions or, anyway, basic human questions whether it is desirable to make more inquiries, e.g., about whether there has been some sort of health emergency requiring hospitalization.
If landlord is going to evict, isn't a process server supposed to physcially hand him the eviction notice and court date?
Not necessarily, depending what the parties may have agreed as stated in their lease and on where the property in question is located.
How can someone be notified of eviction proceedings when they're not living in the apartment and their wherabouts are unknown?
Most state's laws allow a comparatively more lax mode of service of process in a proceeding (even as against a residential tenant) to recover possession of real property than for some other kinds of lawsuits. The most typical, in addition to the option of personal service of process, is what commonly is referred to as "nail and mail" service -- i.e., the law-permissible process server conspicuously affixing a copy of the summons or whatever is the jursdition-specific comparable process to the premises' entry door and same-day mailing of an additional copy to the tenant's last-known address for which the underlying statutory policy is to strike a fair balance between, on the one hand, providing for some practical means of probable actual notice and, on the other hand, not rewarding a deliberately absconding debtor for self-concealment to avoid a just debt; although, also typically, this alternative mode of service is not sufficient in some jursidictions to sustain the grant of a personal money judgment (here: rent arrears) compared with an "in rem" grant of relief as against the "property" at issue itself (here: the grant of a judgment awarding the landlord [re]possession of the leased premises).
Thanks!
What mode of service of what sort of process is allowed/required in your jurisdiction, including who may make such service, will be very easy to verify. Also, it should be verified, since, among other things, there may also be a requirement for the pre-suit service (also in a manner prescribed by state-specific law) of a demand for unpaid rent as a predicate to a non-payment eviction proceeding.
|
| |
| |
McGyver, Thanks for your advice on serving notice of eviction. I should have been more clear about the utilities. It's the utility company that shut of the tenant's electricity and water due to non-payment.. This is totally separate from the rent issue. Jim McGyver wrote:
server State laws generally require delivery of written notice before filing the eviction action in court. State laws allow various sorts or delivery of that notice other than personal service. Your state might allow delivery of the notice by regular mail accompanied by posting a copy of the notice on the door of the reneted premises. The mailing would be to the premises address. It's up to the tenant to get the mail or arrange to have it forwarded. After notice, and after filing the suit for eviction, service of process concerning the eviction must be accomplished by some method allowed by state law. Personal service won't be the only method permitted. State laws are unlikely to allow turning off a tenant's utilities for nonpayment of rent. That could backfire in a costly way. You could end up owing the tenant money and/or continued possession. You should contact a tenant's rights or landlord's rights organization in your state and learn how to do the eviction. Or better yet, let an attorney handle it. McGyver
|
| |
| |
nospam, The utility company shut off his utilities for nonpayment to them. The landlord was not involved. Jim nospam@isp.com wrote:
On 19 Sep 2004, Jim <johnson11012000@yahoo.com> wrote: You don't make suffiently clear whether by "shut off for nonpayment" you mean that an outside utility provider did this pursuant to whatever are its state's laws and its published and otherwise law-prescribed procedures or whether you are suggesting that it is the landlord who was providing the utilities at issue and did the shut off as a matter of self-help, although this can be a signficant distinction if there is a later dispute. For some, apart from narrowly contractual landlord-tenant lease-defined issues, these sorts of factoids (including that it is still the month of Sept.) might raise ethical questions or, anyway, basic human questions whether it is desirable to make more inquiries, e.g., about whether there has been some sort of health emergency requiring hospitalization. Not necessarily, depending what the parties may have agreed as stated in their lease and on where the property in question is located. Most state's laws allow a comparatively more lax mode of service of process in a proceeding (even as against a residential tenant) to recover possession of real property than for some other kinds of lawsuits. The most typical, in addition to the option of personal service of process, is what commonly is referred to as "nail and mail" service -- i.e., the law-permissible process server conspicuously affixing a copy of the summons or whatever is the jursdition-specific comparable process to the premises' entry door and same-day mailing of an additional copy to the tenant's last-known address for which the underlying statutory policy is to strike a fair balance between, on the one hand, providing for some practical means of probable actual notice and, on the other hand, not rewarding a deliberately absconding debtor for self-concealment to avoid a just debt; although, also typically, this alternative mode of service is not sufficient in some jursidictions to sustain the grant of a personal money judgment (here: rent arrears) compared with an "in rem" grant of relief as against the "property" at issue itself (here: the grant of a judgment awarding the landlord [re]possession of the leased premises). What mode of service of what sort of process is allowed/required in your jurisdiction, including who may make such service, will be very easy to verify. Also, it should be verified, since, among other things, there may also be a requirement for the pre-suit service (also in a manner prescribed by state-specific law) of a demand for unpaid rent as a predicate to a non-payment eviction proceeding.
|
| |
| |
Jim wrote:
How can someone be notified of eviction proceedings when they're not living in the apartment and their wherabouts are unknown?
You should adopt the new legislation we trialed for two years and are demanding from the British government. If a tenant breaches their tenancy agreement, we evict them without notice. They can sue for damages, but we harass any lawyers who would otherwise represent them. This new scheme works, and places power where it needs to be. -- Keith Exford Chief Executive Broomleigh Housing Association Limited http://www.broomleigh.org/
|
| |
| |
|