misc.legal

> "Jabriol" <jabriol1@excite.com> wrote in message news:9e9431eb.0407101334.3fbaa019@posting.google.com... > > all written by carol witkowski [dec'd 1960]. > > > > all lies. > ================================= This post was traced right to your ISP.

Kent Wills wrote: > I was just walking down the street, when someone handed me a piece of > paper. I thought it was something for a free meal at Popeye's > Chicken. Instead, I found that on Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:11:58 GMT, > Serious Sam <bonecracker

Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > Serious Sam wrote: > >> Kent Wills wrote: >> >>> I was just walking down the street, when someone handed me a piece of >>> paper. I thought it was something for a free meal at Popeye's >>> Chicken. Instead, I found

this poster "anonymous" has been exposed as nothing but another sock-puppet of the woman known as PB, the Probable Baalite. It is suspected that she has also contrived this sock-puppet called Jabriol who claims to be one of Jehovah's Witnesses but does

this poster "starwars" has been exposed as nothing but another sock-puppet of the woman known as PB, the Probable Baalite. It is suspected that she has also contrived this sock-puppet called Jabriol who claims to be one of Jehovah's Witnesses but does

notice that this is the exact same post as Max Musterman's the woman known as PB, the Probable Baalite has created at least half a dozen regular sock-puppets of which "Jabriol" very well could be since this Jabriol persona claims to be one of Jehovah

On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:46:13 -0700 johnam ron <analon1@yahoo.com> whittled these words: > have a friend who recently told me a story about a time he was driving > his truck.... > he had hit a bump and blown a fuse in the tail lamp circuit.... he > st

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:59:55 GMT Steve Macke <stevemacke@comcast.net> whittled these words: > You need to consult a real estate expert - but in most states a quick claim > deed Quitclaim deed, not "quick claim deed" > allows you to take ownershi

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:54:47 -0600, "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote: >John A. Stovall wrote: >> On 20 Sep 2004 14:06:39 -0700, jgrove24@hotmail.com (john >> grove) >> wrote: >> >>> jimbo@sonic.net (Jim Bianchi) wrote in message >>> news:<s

http://abcasiapacific.com/news/stories/asiapacific_stories_1203396.htm Quote A New Zealand lawyer says he has been stopped from releasing documents that would have had a significant impact on a sex-abuse case on Pitcairn Island. The trial of seven P

> "sollipsistic" Yes, but one behaves based on their convictions - determination of fact is up to someone else, hopefully objective and later in the process. > "begging the question" - "...you do not in any way attempt actually to define" Exact

The below was posted in alt.dss.hack and concerns Directv's attempts to collect damages in civil court for alleged satellite piracy: >See <http://www.hackhu.com/Trial%20Summary%209.3.04.pdf> >So what happens to people like "Jeffery Goolsby" of SC

atty.john.farrow@aol.com wrote: > I'm gonna Sue Everyone on this Newsgroup. You are not suing me or Broomleigh. We can control the Judge if need arises. As a charitable organisation, we can fleece you for for every last penny. -- Keith Exfo

Serious Sam wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > >> I was just walking down the street, when someone handed me a piece of >> paper. I thought it was something for a free meal at Popeye's >> Chicken. Instead, I found that on Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:11:48 GMT

Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > Serious Sam wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: >> >>> Serious Sam wrote: >>> >>>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>> Why *SHOULD* I vote for Gay aWol Cokehead, Sam? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That says it all. >>>> >>>>

Kent Wills wrote: > Note that he has stopped trying to push away the topic of his > implication about knowing my address. Implication, insinuation, estimation...take your pick. But by all means, keep on guessing!

Kent Wills wrote: > Care to offer a cite or two, or should everyone just accept this > is another of your lies? Your whole "kenny saved me from Bob" schtick.

Jim wrote: > How can someone be notified of eviction > proceedings when they're not living in > the apartment and their wherabouts are > unknown? You should adopt the new legislation we trialed for two years and are demanding from the British go

http://vaildaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040919/LETTER/109190004&Se archID=73184461205033 Letters to the editor Liza Yambao September 19, 2004 I have read several articles of Dana Easter's comments in the last couple of days and it ma

On 20 Sep 2004 14:06:39 -0700, jgrove24@hotmail.com (john grove) wrote: >jimbo@sonic.net (Jim Bianchi) wrote in message news:<slrnckmqfo.unc.jimbo@bolt.sonic.net>... >> On 17 Sep 2004 13:15:38 -0700, john grove wrote: >> >Automobiles serve a useful

S. O. Damocles wrote: > John A. Stovall wrote: >> On 20 Sep 2004 14:06:39 -0700, jgrove24@hotmail.com (john >> grove) >> wrote: >> The defense of my home involves killing. The killing of >> those who would attack it. Killing had it good points.

"nancy johnson" <nancyj74@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6d06b72d.0409201048.6d698159@posting.google.com... > This is really a waste of my time, but just in case you really did > miss it the first time I will reply to your post. I didn't miss

"nancy johnson" <nancyj74@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6d06b72d.0409201112.6391c09f@posting.google.com... > > It also wasn't cancelled by Bernie Cosell *except* with regards to mlm. > > Wrong. Bernie blocked it from all the groups. You have

S. O. Damocles wrote: > HawkCW4 wrote: > >>RD (The Sandman) wrote: >> >>>HawkCW4 wrote: >>> >>> >>>>RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>S. O. Damocles wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>>There is MANDATORY liability insurance coverage, though. >>>>>

On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:14:10 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> >Mike Z. Helm wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> That's not even an option. Israel is the only civilised nation in the >>> region. All the rest are pop

Matt wrote: > OK. I'm with it now. there's something going on in another > newsgroup - almost fell for it too. Nice try Tom. :-) The lengths to which some sub humans will go to get their own web site hosted for free by Broomleigh Housing Associ

Dave Cook wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message news:<Udv3d.74$AY2.75874@news.uswest.net>... > >>Scout wrote: >> >>>"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message >>>news:Okn3d.41$AY2.40298@news.uswest.net... >>> >>>>Scout

nancyj74@hotmail.com (nancy johnson) wrote in news:6d06b72d.0409201112.6391c09f@posting.google.com: > "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:<xFH2d.71891$Np2.68135@bignews4.bellsouth.net>... >> "nancy johnson" <nancyj74@hotmai

S. O. Damocles wrote: > Scout wrote: > >>"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message >>news:Jon3d.42$AY2.40634@news.uswest.net... >> >>>sanjian wrote: >>> >>>>S. O. Damocles wrote: >>>> >>>>>sanjian wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>RD (The Sandman)

Ken Smith wrote: > One would suppose that the United Nations would have some sort of mechanism > for enforcing their treaties and agreements. As, for example, one who was asked by the Examiners' Board of the Colorado Bar Association to submit to a

On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, "RKT" <ssanow@bellsouth.net> wrote: > [Is it correct] that the FCC administrates the > private use-for-profit of the 'Public Airwaves' > delivering network television content[?] This will depend on what you think you mean by "

"Larry Coon" <lcnospam@assist.org> schreef in bericht news:414EDFF9.3DE7@assist.org... > tinydancer wrote: > > Nope, the bleeding has been proven by bryants own clothes. > > Don Tiberone already covered most of this. There were > minute traces of

So Arthur L. Rubin sez to me, they sez: > > Time is clearly of no significance to a DMCA notice Neither are facts: http://news.com.com/2100-1025_3-1001095.html -- Hi Everybody But Jade!

Hi, from what I gathered from research on the internet, for a legalling binding contract to exist, a promise must be exchanged for adequate consideration. In the following scenario, does a contract exist? Say, my property was damaged due to a friend

Serious Sam wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >> Serious Sam wrote: >> >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>> >>>> Why *SHOULD* I vote for Gay aWol Cokehead, Sam? >>> >>> >>> >>> That says it all. >>> >>> You have no proof that he's any of these things. >

Serious Sam wrote: > Moe wrote: > >> I don't frigging masturbate while reading Anne Rice > > > Don't be redundant. Sex Pistols "FRIGGIN’ IN THE RIGGIN’" It was on the good ship venus By christ, ya shoulda seen us The figurehead was a w

x-no-archive: yes depends on which country / state you are un, and what mood the cop is in.. drunk or dangerous driving would probably get you stopped / arrested, in any country...

RD (The Sandman) wrote: > sanjian wrote: >>> By and large, laws don't make things "legal", they make things >>> "illegal". >> >> >> Yes, but since the National Firearms Act of 1934 severly restricts >> their ownership, it would require another la

Go ahead and take the last word, I'm not going to continue this. I just want to say that it is my belief that the government should not have the right to force people to do jury duty. THAT is what is wrong with it. I don't go downtown for my own purpos

Serious Sam wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > >> You are quite boring > > > I am *never* boring! > > http://www.mindspring.com/~cramskill/exciting.gif More falsehoods from Speculum Sam.

x-no-archive: yes they may work in vending machines, though not legal tender afaik..

Ken Smith wrote: > > CliffB wrote: > > Kofee thinks the U.N charter trumps the U.S. Constitution. Never! Unless > > Kerry gets in charge perhaps. > > Treaties *ARE* the "law of the land," placed on the same level as the > Constitution itself

Ken Smith wrote: > > Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > soxfan wrote: > > > >> yelling from the rooftops about this illegal and immoral war is the > >>only way to make sure he didn't die in vain. his mom knows that..... and > >>so should we. >

Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > I have no credibility > > > Isn't that the truth!

Moe wrote: > calling you Ken's ass kisser Well he is, you jealous?

Orwellian Prophecy wrote: > "Odd" is benign. Not in your case.

Kent Wills wrote: > At no time have I ever tried to kiss your ass. No, you've been smooching kenny's butt too frequently.

Ken Smith wrote: > Bush has killed more people without cause Drop dead you head case.

Ken Smith wrote: > Serious Sam wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: >> >>> Why *SHOULD* I vote for Gay aWol Cokehead, Sam? >> >> >> That says it all. >> >> You have no proof that he's any of these things. > > > Most laymen don't grasp the d