|
Of course, he could always tell himself that whatever he is talking
about isn't his fault.
|
| |
| |
| Of course, he could always tell himself that whatever he is talking
| about isn't his fault.
I am sorry to labour this point, but there are some abuses of
the English language that just make me scream !
Bush can "debate WITH himself", but he most certainly
cannot "debate himself" !
And don't tell me its "American", there is no such language.
And the Jewish distortion and abbreviations that have crept
in are somehow obscene.
Similarly the Jewish injunction "Enjoy !" makes me want
to cut out the liver of the offender and shove it down
his throat.
"I hope you enjoy (it)" and "Please enjoy (it)" are both
valid. "Enjoy !" on its own most certainly is not and
is calculated to get your throat torn out.
|
| |
| |
Beloved Citizen wrote:
Of course, he could always tell himself that whatever he is talking
about isn't his fault.
Now THAT is funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
| |
| |
Of course, he could always tell himself that whatever he is talking
about isn't his fault.
On the other hand, if Kerry debated himself... well hey that's a lot easier
to picture.
-http://randomprose.journalspace.com
|
| |
| |
"Wotan" <Wotan@Valhalla.net> wrote in message news:<41590771@212.67.96.135>...
| Of course, he could always tell himself that whatever he is talking
| about isn't his fault.
I am sorry to (be)labour (sic) this point, but there are some abuses of
the English language that just make me scream !
I'm certain it isn't the only thing that makes you scream.
Bush can "debate WITH himself", but he most certainly
cannot "debate himself" !
Sure he can. Just like you can go @$#* yourself.
Why is it so many giddy bigots like to deck out their bull#@($ with
supercilious assumptions of intellectual rank? Is it that they know
that they're hateful lowlife scum, thus the need for the laughably
pompous overcompensation?
And don't tell me its "American", there is no such language.
And the Jewish distortion and abbreviations that have crept
in are somehow obscene.
Similarly the Jewish injunction "Enjoy !" makes me want
to cut out the liver of the offender and shove it down
his throat.
"I hope you enjoy (it)" and "Please enjoy (it)" are both
valid. "Enjoy !" on its own most certainly is not and
is calculated to get your throat torn out.
Bring it on, #@&@
.
|
| |
| |
Salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message news:<Lk96d.1118$Yr.967@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Beloved Citizen wrote:
Now THAT is funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Rumor has it Champagne Georgie will place a mirror on his podium so
that he'll be able to see who it is he's debating.
|
| |
| |
He Pep! wrote:
Salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message news:<Lk96d.1118$Yr.967@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
Rumor has it Champagne Georgie will place a mirror on his podium so
that he'll be able to see who it is he's debating.
Stop IT!!!!! My belly is aching from laughing so hard..
|
| |
| |
He Pep! wrote:
I'm certain it isn't the only thing that makes you scream.
Sure he can. Just like you can go @$#* yourself.
Why is it so many giddy bigots like to deck out their
bull#@($ with supercilious assumptions of intellectual
rank? Is it that they know
that they're hateful lowlife scum, thus the need for the
laughably
pompous overcompensation?
Bring it on, #@&@
.
Don't be hatin'
|
| |
| |
In article <Lk96d.1118$Yr.967@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
Salad <oil@vinegar.com> wrote:
Beloved Citizen wrote:
Now THAT is funny!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sounds more like Kerry, actually. He's been on all sides of just about
any question that might come up...and everything that goes wrong is
someone else's fault, to boot.
His campaign staff, Secret Service personnel, his family owns the SUV...
|
| |
| |
"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message news:<SQp6d.53$xC4.11290@news.uswest.net>...
He Pep! wrote:
Don't be hatin'
Funny how righties always take the side of their own kind, no matter
how reprehensible.
|
| |
| |
Funny how righties always take the side of their own kind, no matter
how reprehensible.
If said people did not support right-wing causes, they wouldn't be
"righties" would they?
-http://randomprose.journalspace.com
|
| |
| |
Kerry, however can always take both sides - well, actually he has on just
about every issue.
If said people did not support right-wing causes, they wouldn't be
"righties" would they?
-
http://randomprose.journalspace.com
|
| |
| |
Le Turd@kerrysuks.com wrote:
Kerry, however can always take both sides - well, actually he has on just
about every issue.
Bush, aussi. Now, tell me exactly why we should vote for him,
especially in light of that EMBARRASSING perfromance.
|
| |
| |
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:21:27 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Le Turd@kerrysuks.com wrote:
Bush, aussi. Now, tell me exactly why we should vote for him,
especially in light of that EMBARRASSING perfromance.
A. Because John Kerry's performance WAS embarrassing - just like you
said and ...
B. John Kerry is @$#*ing traitor who aided and abetted the enemy in
Vietnam and beterayed his own troops and the Nation. He is now aiding
and abetting the terrorists and he is causing the deaths of Americans
fighting in battle once again.
Any questions?
Regards,
|
| |
| |
