|
http://www.9news.com/newsroom/kobe/mackey-hurlbertletters97804.pdf As you know, within your files and the Eagle County Sheriff's Office's files are records that are highly damaging to the prosecution, that tend to exculpate Mr. Bryant and corroborate his account of the sexual encounter, and that reveal unprofessional, unethical and otherwise unlawful or improper conduct by law enforcement officials, and lawyers and staff members in your office, including the suppression of exculpatory evidence--more than once--by Special Assistant District Attorney Dana Easter, who you are on record as saying in your September 1 press conference was one of the "dedicated, talented and ethical prosecutors" participating in this criminal case. The following is a list of just a few of the records that must be disclosed to allow full and fair public and media scrutiny of your office and law enforcement: The results of the investigation into the hangingman.com t-shirts which differ from your office's original representations in a letter dated November 26,2003. Exculpatory evidence provided to the prosecution by CBI including Agent Wood's conclusions about the veracity of the complaining witness as discussed with Ms. Easter in February 2004. Exculpatory information from Dr. Baden. Information concerning your office's failure to test evidence. Records detailing the District Attorney's office involvement in securing Crime Victim Compensation ("CVC") funds for the complaining witness. The CVC records and representations contained therein by the complaining witness and her attorney in order to secure CVC funds. Detective Winters' July 7, 2003 Supplemental Report in which he summarizes the statement of a witness and the subsequent confrontation of that witness when he concludes, in the words of Detective Winters, that the witness lied to him about the extent of his relationship with the complaining witness. Detective Winters' July 10, 2003 Supplemental Report in which he records what the complaining witness revealed about her psychiatric history, and about her explanations and comments on biological evidence noted by CBI on clothing collected from the complaining witness. The prosecution's investigation into the allegations made by the defense in its three offers of proof submitted pursuant to the Colorado Rape Shield statute concerning the complaining witness' prior and subsequent sexual conduct. Discovery pages 1985-1991 where Gerald Sandberg reported the content of his interviews with several of the witnesses called at the Rape Shield hearing. The notes and chart developed by the prosecution concerning the allegations of specific sexual conduct. Such notes and chart were provided to the defense upon order of the court. Results of DNA analysis of a sample voluntarily provided by one of the witnesses. Telephone records detailing calls between one of the witnesses and the complaining witness. Text messages of one of the witnesses. Affidavit from the suitemate of the complaining witness. Letter from complaining witness dated July 31, 2004 retracting portions of her statements given on July 1 and September 12, 2003. If as you claim there is a compelling need to advance the public interest in scrutinizing your office and law enforcement and this need outweighs even an innocent person's consituional and statutory right to privacy, then all the records in this case need to be disclosed, not just those you believe are harmful to Mr. Bryant. For example, it would be wholly improper-- it would defeat the very public interest you claim you are attempting to advance--to shield the fatal flaws in the prosecution of which your office was aware early on, and to shield your own office from public and media scrutiny while subjecting Mr.Bryant to such scrutiny. Your Response to the seal petition suggests you may want to have it both ways-- you contend that the seal petition should be denied, then decline to "address whether the Media can inspect the criminal justice records until the issues of the [TRO] and the Petition to Seal are addressed." Resp.[2]. Because you claim a compelling "public interest" in public and media scrutiny of the conduct of your office and law enforcement, it is clear that you must allow the public and media access to all the records.
|
| |
| |
s_knight8 wrote:
http://www.9news.com/newsroom/kobe/mackey-hurlbertletters97804.pdf [. . .] The following is a list of just a few of the records that must be disclosed to allow full and fair public and media scrutiny of your office and law enforcement:
(list snipped) I don't understand...I thought everything favoring Kobe has already been leaked by his $20 million spin machine.... Larry Coon University of California The NBA Salary Cap FAQ: http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm
|
| |
| |
Woo hoo! Go Mackey!
http://www.9news.com/newsroom/kobe/mackey-hurlbertletters97804.pdf As you know, within your files and the Eagle County Sheriff's Office's files are records that are highly damaging to the prosecution, that tend to exculpate Mr. Bryant and corroborate his account of the sexual encounter, and that reveal unprofessional, unethical and otherwise unlawful or improper conduct by law enforcement officials, and lawyers and staff members in your office, including the suppression of exculpatory evidence--more than once--by Special Assistant District Attorney Dana Easter, who you are on record as saying in your September 1 press conference was one of the "dedicated, talented and ethical prosecutors" participating in this criminal case. The following is a list of just a few of the records that must be disclosed to allow full and fair public and media scrutiny of your office and law enforcement: The results of the investigation into the hangingman.com t-shirts which differ from your office's original representations in a letter dated November 26,2003. Exculpatory evidence provided to the prosecution by CBI including Agent Wood's conclusions about the veracity of the complaining witness as discussed with Ms. Easter in February 2004. Exculpatory information from Dr. Baden. Information concerning your office's failure to test evidence. Records detailing the District Attorney's office involvement in securing Crime Victim Compensation ("CVC") funds for the complaining witness. The CVC records and representations contained therein by the complaining witness and her attorney in order to secure CVC funds. Detective Winters' July 7, 2003 Supplemental Report in which he summarizes the statement of a witness and the subsequent confrontation of that witness when he concludes, in the words of Detective Winters, that the witness lied to him about the extent of his relationship with the complaining witness. Detective Winters' July 10, 2003 Supplemental Report in which he records what the complaining witness revealed about her psychiatric history, and about her explanations and comments on biological evidence noted by CBI on clothing collected from the complaining witness. The prosecution's investigation into the allegations made by the defense in its three offers of proof submitted pursuant to the Colorado Rape Shield statute concerning the complaining witness' prior and subsequent sexual conduct. Discovery pages 1985-1991 where Gerald Sandberg reported the content of his interviews with several of the witnesses called at the Rape Shield hearing. The notes and chart developed by the prosecution concerning the allegations of specific sexual conduct. Such notes and chart were provided to the defense upon order of the court. Results of DNA analysis of a sample voluntarily provided by one of the witnesses. Telephone records detailing calls between one of the witnesses and the complaining witness. Text messages of one of the witnesses. Affidavit from the suitemate of the complaining witness. Letter from complaining witness dated July 31, 2004 retracting portions of her statements given on July 1 and September 12, 2003. If as you claim there is a compelling need to advance the public interest in scrutinizing your office and law enforcement and this need outweighs even an innocent person's consituional and statutory right to privacy, then all the records in this case need to be disclosed, not just those you believe are harmful to Mr. Bryant. For example, it would be wholly improper-- it would defeat the very public interest you claim you are attempting to advance--to shield the fatal flaws in the prosecution of which your office was aware early on, and to shield your own office from public and media scrutiny while subjecting Mr.Bryant to such scrutiny. Your Response to the seal petition suggests you may want to have it both ways-- you contend that the seal petition should be denied, then decline to "address whether the Media can inspect the criminal justice records until the issues of the [TRO] and the Petition to Seal are addressed." Resp.[2]. Because you claim a compelling "public interest" in public and media scrutiny of the conduct of your office and law enforcement, it is clear that you must allow the public and media access to all the records.
|
| |
| |
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht news:cjbsti$b4c@dispatch.concentric.net...
http://www.9news.com/newsroom/kobe/mackey-hurlbertletters97804.pdf
Detective Winters' July 7, 2003 Supplemental Report in which he summarizes the statement of a witness and the subsequent confrontation of that witness when he concludes, in the words of Detective Winters, that the witness lied to him about the extent of his relationship with the complaining witness.
Detective Winters' July 10, 2003 Supplemental Report in which he records what the complaining witness revealed about her psychiatric history, and about her explanations and comments on biological evidence noted by CBI on clothing collected from the complaining witness.
This gets to sound more and more like a teenage conspiracy. It would be a shame if this case simply drops by the wayside. I think the Katelyn Faber should be prosecuted, with Matt Herr and Bobby Pietrack. Alex
|
| |
| |
s_knight8 wrote: (list snipped) I don't understand...I thought everything favoring Kobe has already been leaked by his $20 million spin machine....
I'm betting what she retracted was the bathroom story. The fratpack website mentioned this weeks ago. If it's true there's a telephone in the bathroom, she realized she wouldn't be able to explain why she didn't use the phone so she changed the story. -- "The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity; both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and economic opportunists." - Ernest Hemingway
|
| |
| |
|