|
|
In article <voqmm0t1ep4hjnp80k45or61fj95tspeds@4ax.com>, Mikes
<Smokes@lot.here.com> wrote:
> You're right. No names should be released until a conviction; if
> courts hold any value to justice there is no alternative.
You have it completely backw
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I hear a rumor that on Mon, 11 Oct 2004 04:53:26 GMT, Serious Sam
> <bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>I'm discussing the enticing anger generation.
>>>
>>>
>>> We're discussing whether I
|
|
|
Hello. My name is John Menso.
As a former NYPD detective investigator, it saddens me to be placed in a
position of having to make allegations of criminal and unethical conduct
against specific sworn citizens who once had my implicit trust and
respec
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in
> |-|erc wrote:
> > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in ...
> >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>>Frugal monster wrote:
> >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
> >>>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
|
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in ...
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Frugal monster wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't know what you're crowing about,
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>>Translated, Ted got caught out by a true-blue Aussie,
>>>
>>>"Caught out" my arse! Ken Smith is so predictable. Too lazy to do even
>>>the most
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:40:54 -0700, Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Dionisio wrote:
>
>> Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>
>>> "Moor" *specifically* refers to physical mounting
>
>> Hmm ... Well then, "mooring" seems to be on-topic for this discussion.
>
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in ...
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > Frugal monster wrote:
> >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>>Ken Smith wrote:
> >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>>
>
> >>>>>I don't know what you're crowing about, you blokes do
|
|
|
http://www.fratpack.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=660
We are preparing to release details of testimony from the Rape Shield
Hearings, information that others who testified at the Rape Shield Hearings
have provided, and never before released informatio
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, LeMod Pol wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> > > A moor is akin to an anchor, or stability. Hense a social moor would be
> > > socially anchored or stable.
> > "Moor" *specifically* refers to physical m
|
|
|
In article <cke714$i0o@dispatch.concentric.net>
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=14160
>
>"This has been the strangest quest for anonymity in legal history," said
>Larry Pozner, for
|
|
|
Dionisio wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>> "Moor" *specifically* refers to physical mounting
> Hmm ... Well then, "mooring" seems to be on-topic for this discussion.
> <Nips genteelly around the corner>
What are you poofs on about now? Do
|
|
|
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> > A moor is akin to an anchor, or stability. Hense a social moor would be
> > socially anchored or stable.
>
> "Moor" *specifically* refers to physical mounting and
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> (For those of you in the Aussie boards, Ted is the brother-in-law of
> Cameron John Brown (*NOT* the NZ triathlete). You may have read about how
> he allegedly threw his illegitimate four-year-old daughter Lauren Key off a
> Palo
|
|
|
"Chris" <RRUFIANGE@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message news:<%6wad.4955$yP2.896@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>...
> Lastly, in order for your statement to be viable, you'd have to assume that
> any inmate released in the general population were 100% safe. This is
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> I hear a rumor that on Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:37:59 GMT, Ken Smith
>>> <forget@it.com> wrote:
>> And how, pray, did you "hear" this rumour, given that this is a forum of
>> the
|
|
|
"Chris" <RRUFIANGE@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message news:<8awad.25547$zY6.5759@tornado.tampabay.rr.com>...
> so what do you base your beliefs on?
Read the newspapers. Listen to the radio. Watch TV. *News* but not
*movies*.
You'll find that men/boys
|
|
|
"Russell B Waters" <russell.waters@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:416b2901$0$68238$a82e2bb9@news-out.notoriousnews.com...
>
>
> "Citizen_Cain" <noemailhere@probablynotmebutmystalker.invalid> wrote in
> message news:PqFad.51$gP.47@fe61.usenetserve
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> To give marriage rights to gays would be to treat gays differently, and
> arguably higher, than unmarried hetros.
Um...no.
Right now, straights have marriage rights and gays do not. That is unequal
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> Mores vs moors
>
> It appears that mores is the more correct term. Sorry for my confusion.
Holy crap, he sees a tiny flicker of light...
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> A moor is akin to an anchor, or stability. Hense a social moor would be
> socially anchored or stable.
"Moor" *specifically* refers to physical mounting and stability devices
and their activation.
T
|
|
|
In article <cke93p$rl7@rac1.wam.umd.edu>
tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>In article <aldjm01ef0b6arhjq8kerjsp95rja651mn@4ax.com>,
>Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote:
>>In article <ck2au6$mif@rac1.wam.umd.edu>
>>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
|
|
|
in article 10mlfuvg47059f9@corp.supernews.com, Cliff and Linda Griffith at
grifftex@charter.net wrote on 10/11/04 10:16 AM:
>>>>> "I told Detective (Doug) Winters that on that morning while leaving Grand
>>>>> Junction, I had car troubles. That is no
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message
> news:416719C1.F304B889@igs.net...
>>
>>
>> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>>>
>>> "Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES> wrote in message
>>> news:WLn9d.5869
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>SolarChase wrote:
>>>>>Frugal monster wrote:
>>>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bollocks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you talking to Aussies or Poms?
|
|
|
eff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES> wrote in message
> news:oVD9d.7062$UP1.134@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> "Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WH
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> SolarChase wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
[snip -- dealt with elsewhere]
>>/Hum has no ethics
>
> EVERYONE who knows him professionally has told me this -- IN NO UNCERTAIN
> TERMS!
And you have no person
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> SolarChase wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>
>>>No. This didn't have anything anything to do with the law. It seems that
>>>the prosecution wants to try this case in the press.
>
>>Then, in that, the prosecution
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>SolarChase wrote:
[snip -- to focus on the Lauren Key murder trial]
>> 4) What federal rights, if any, can I conf
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>SolarChase wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith wrote
>>>
>
>>>>1) Why is it that I cannot challenge the constitutionality of a statute
>>>> directly and uniquely affecting me in either federal or state court?
>>>
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>SolarChase wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>So, why did the previous team disappear, then ... were they slackers ?
>>>>>
>>>>>No. The
|
|
|
Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES> wrote in message
> news:6pAad.364$gy1.257@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> "LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote
|
|
|
Curly Surmudgeon <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:47:00 +0000, Andrealphus wrote:
>
>> Brigham Young on interracial marriage:
>
>> "Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If
>> the white man who bel
|
|
|
Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "LeMod Pol" <mod_pol@igs.net> wrote in message
> news:416717BB.8BB4BE45@igs.net...
>>
>>
>> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>>>
>>> "Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>> news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>>SolarChase wrote:
>> Why, oh, WHY am i not surprised by this slam ??
">Because you have a puerile imagination and it doesn't take very much to amuse
you."
Lets see here.... we have a man who grew up in Colorado (Gr
|
|
|
I hear a rumor that on Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:37:59 GMT, Ken Smith
<forget@it.com> wrote:
> Whenever I deal with the truly uncouth -- such as yourself! -- I
>speak accordingly. It doesn't bother me overmuch, insofar as I don't
>think of words as s
|
|
|
I hear a rumor that on Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:06:39 GMT, "|-|erc"
<spam@fodder.abc> wrote:
>aussies don't say 'bollocks'. i got the sex pistols album "never mind the bollocks" 15 years
>ago when I was 15 and spent ages finding out what it means. never
|
|
|
asn't Kerry's sister working for the other (losing) side?
j.
Silver Blaze wrote:
> G'day, mates! Australia Says NO to Liberals = Terrorists!
>
> Australia, America's loyal ally in the war on terrorism has spoken; it's
> the votes that count;
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:14:56 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> "Curly Surmudgeon" <curly@curlysurmudgeon.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2004.10.09.18.12.07.527146@curlysurmudgeon.com...
>> > But morality is codefied in many ways, marriage being b
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:54:39 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote:
--------snip----------
> I do not agree. Homosexual couples should face the exact same hurdles and
> remeides as unmarried hetros.
If they are willingly cohabitating as singles you'd be righ
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:49:26 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote:
---------snip------------
>> The point is that the opposite sex couple have the option of marriage to
>> resolve those problems.
>>
>>
> True. But they have to make that decision BEFORE the
|
|
|
"Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10mbpavn6ku3ta6@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Andrealphus" <OHNOLETSGO@NARNIA.WHOCARES> wrote in message
> news:hgZ8d.7738$M05.5857@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > Jeff Strickland <be
|
|
|
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 22:00:28 -0500, someone wrote:
>It is very odd trying to figure out what insurance will cover....
>
Amen brother.
>.... I know several people who bought generators to power
>refrigerators, etc. after the hurricane. Insurance
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I hear a rumor that on Mon, 11 Oct 2004 22:37:59 GMT, Ken Smith
> <forget@it.com> wrote:
And how, pray, did you "hear" this rumour, given that this is a forum of the
WRITTEN word?
>> Whenever I deal with the truly uncouth
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> As I said, I don't think I've ever heard it in Aus, and I've logged as
>>> much time as you have.
>> And I'm surprised, frankly, that you've never heard it, given the nature
|
|
|
I hear a rumor that on 11 Oct 2004 03:11:19 -0700, fvrnite@yahoo.com
(Moe) wrote:
> Do you two realize this is a REALLY STUPID thread posting? Kent, you
>know Sammie is full of crap. His makes claims and has yet to back up
>ANY of them.
>
I kn
|
|
|
I hear a rumor that on Mon, 11 Oct 2004 04:53:26 GMT, Serious Sam
<bonecracker@zorg.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>
>>>I'm discussing the enticing anger generation.
>>
>>
>> We're discussing whether I've angered anyone enough to commit an
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>SolarChase wrote:
>>>Frugal monster wrote
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>>>
>>>>>Bollocks!
>>>>
>>>>Are you talking to Aussies or Poms?
>>>>We don't say "bollocks"
>>>>Try and keep up.
>>>
>>>ROTFL
|
|
