|
|
| |
| |
Subject: Re: Legal SUCCESS!!
From: "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:27:35 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.seduction.fast
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.236.58.205
Message-ID: <rkOad.1534$uN4.1221@trndny05>
How amusing that someone claims "failure" over a site I
wound up getting taken down.
Illegally.
You committed a crime, and have here admitted to it.
If you think that this is going to stop us, you had better
think again. What will you whine about when we put the site
back up in a place where you cannot get to it?
You also left out what a FEDERAL JUDGE said about your idea
to have The OFFICIAL Ray Gordon FAQ removed from the Internet:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Plaintiff offers no specific facts to make a clear
showing of immediate, irreparable injury that is so
peculiar that money cannot compensate for it. Nor does
Plaintiff cite to any law to support his legal assertion
that he is entitled to a TRO. Rather, Plaintiff offers
one mere conclusory statement that he is likely to prevail
on the merits of his claim and that the continued
publication of the RayFAQ website will cause irreparable
harm to Plaintiff, not limited to damage to his reputation,
employment and investment prospects. Without more than
mere conclusions, this Court cannot consider and weigh
the factors necessary for the issuance of a TRO.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Injunctive
Relief is DENIED.
-Judge James M. Kelley, November 21, 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------
That means there is NO reason to have the site removed. So, you
have violated the law, by circumventing the decision of a Federal
Judge. Did you think we had forgotten about that?
We also read Google's MTD.
Boy, are you in for a rude awakening.
--
The Editorial Staff
-----
A quote from Gordon Roy Parker, AKA "Ray Gordon":
"(For a dissenting opinion on my character, please visit
the following website: http://members.tripod.com/~rayfaq.html)*
This site contains many lies about me, but as a defender of
free speech I fully support its right to exist."
-Message-ID: <6ertau$76b$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
*The original RayFAQ was removed from the internet as a
result of dozens of complaints from Gordon Roy Parker.
Freedom of Speech is WORTHLESS without Social Responsibility.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
|
| |
| |
Subject: Re: Legal SUCCESS!!
From: "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:27:35 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.seduction.fast
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.236.58.205
Message-ID: <rkOad.1534$uN4.1221@trndny05>
How amusing that someone claims "failure" over a site I
wound up getting taken down.
Illegally.
You committed a crime, and have here admitted to it.
If you think that this is going to stop us, you had better
think again. What will you whine about when we put the site
back up in a place where you cannot get to it?
You also left out what a FEDERAL JUDGE said about your idea
to have The OFFICIAL Ray Gordon FAQ removed from the Internet:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Plaintiff offers no specific facts to make a clear
showing of immediate, irreparable injury that is so
peculiar that money cannot compensate for it. Nor does
Plaintiff cite to any law to support his legal assertion
that he is entitled to a TRO. Rather, Plaintiff offers
one mere conclusory statement that he is likely to prevail
on the merits of his claim and that the continued
publication of the RayFAQ website will cause irreparable
harm to Plaintiff, not limited to damage to his reputation,
employment and investment prospects. Without more than
mere conclusions, this Court cannot consider and weigh
the factors necessary for the issuance of a TRO.
Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Injunctive
Relief is DENIED.
-Judge James M. Kelley, November 21, 2002
-------------------------------------------------------------------
That means there is NO reason to have the site removed. So, you
have violated the law, by circumventing the decision of a Federal
Judge. Did you think we had forgotten about that?
We also read Google's MTD.
Boy, are you in for a rude awakening.
--
The Editorial Staff
-----
A quote from Gordon Roy Parker, AKA "Ray Gordon":
"(For a dissenting opinion on my character, please visit
the following website: http://members.tripod.com/~rayfaq.html)*
This site contains many lies about me, but as a defender of
free speech I fully support its right to exist."
-Message-ID: <6ertau$76b$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
*The original RayFAQ was removed from the internet as a
result of dozens of complaints from Gordon Roy Parker.
Freedom of Speech is WORTHLESS without Social Responsibility.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
|
| |
| |
"EditorialStaff" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
message news:45GPX7T838272.3420949074@anonymous...
We also read Google's MTD.
Boy, are you in for a rude awakening.
EditorialStaff or Form, I am in the UK and I am not an attorney, so I do not
have access to PACER. Would you kindly post it online, or send me a copy
please to trueinternetcockroach@hotmail.com?
Many thanks. I need a laugh.
--------------------------------
At time of writing, Ray Gordon believes that
NLP seduction techniques used successfully
are no different from rape because these
techniques are used covertly. Ray has 4
affiliate links on his 'website' from which he
gains a commission from the sale of NLP
seduction materials. Therefore, by Ray's
standards, he is currently selling 4 books to
assist men directly in what he calls rape.
True Internet Cockroach, the artist formerly
known as, according to Ray, whale/shill/
domestic abuser/employment discriminator/
provider/beta/potential rapist/John/does
this list end(?) Takahesi Ogamori. He must
LOVE me!!! :-x
Ray wants Google to stop archiving his USENET posts.
But he said to me about something I wrote,
"The truth is that people get sued pretty harshly for what you've been
pulling on me. You also have called yourself a shill, and like it or not, I
can quote that with impunity."
Can Google also quote his USENET posts with impunity?
<snicker>
|
| |
| |
True Internet Cockroach" wrote:
Editorial Staff wrote:
Editorial Staff or Form, I am in the UK and I am not an
attorney, so I do not have access to PACER. Would you kindly
post it online, or send me a copy please to
trueinternetcockroach@hotmail.com?
Many thanks. I need a laugh.
PACER access is free, although it costs $0.07 US per page to
download documents. The MTD is 30 pages, and the PDF file is
far too large to send via email. Perhaps we can try to zip
up the file and send it to you, but we cannot guarantee that.
If Gordon Roy Parker had not committed an illegal act by
lying to someone at the upstream provider, or hacking into
our account, or some other illegal subterfuge such as posing
as an attorney or judge, we could have posted it on The
OFFICIAL Ray Gordon FAQ.
If you know of any decent European web space providers who
are able to handle a 6+ Gb site, with several hundred visitors
per day, and who have anonymous login, and blocking capability
by all means, please contact us directly.
--
The Editorial Staff
-----
A quote from Gordon Roy Parker, AKA "Ray Gordon":
"(For a dissenting opinion on my character, please visit
the following website: http://members.tripod.com/~rayfaq.html)*
This site contains many lies about me, but as a defender of
free speech I fully support its right to exist."
-Message-ID: <6ertau$76b$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
*The original RayFAQ was removed from the internet as a
result of dozens of complaints from Gordon Roy Parker.
Freedom of Speech is WORTHLESS without Social Responsibility.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
|
| |
| |
"EditorialStaff" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
message news:O1GGID1738272.3720601852@anonymous...
PACER access is free, although it costs $0.07 US per page to
download documents. The MTD is 30 pages, and the PDF file is
far too large to send via email. Perhaps we can try to zip
up the file and send it to you, but we cannot guarantee that.
Got your email, thanks E.S. Curiosity got the better of me so I figured out
how to log onto PACER to read it for myself, and Ray is humiliated and shown
for the stupid, profiting-from-'rape' #@($bag that he is.
If Gordon Roy Parker had not committed an illegal act by
lying to someone at the upstream provider, or hacking into
our account, or some other illegal subterfuge such as posing
as an attorney or judge, we could have posted it on The
OFFICIAL Ray Gordon FAQ.
If you know of any decent European web space providers who
are able to handle a 6+ Gb site, with several hundred visitors
per day, and who have anonymous login, and blocking capability
by all means, please contact us directly.
There are always ways and means, thanks to the freedoms that the Internet
offer.
I've heard for example that Russian copyright laws are pretty non-existent.
Of course, if someone were to complain about it, it would be difficult for
them to read the complaint, unless of course the complainer was conversant
with the Russian alphabet and the cyrillic alphabet.
Of course, I don't know anything about the internet or the specifics of
copyright law, and I certainly wouldn't condone posting of copyrighted
material SPECIFICALLY banned by a judge.
--------------------------------
At time of writing, Ray Gordon believes that
NLP seduction techniques used successfully
are no different from rape because these
techniques are used covertly. Ray has 4
affiliate links on his 'website' from which he
gains a commission from the sale of NLP
seduction materials. Therefore, by Ray's
standards, he is currently selling 4 books to
assist men directly in what he calls rape.
True Internet Cockroach, the artist formerly
known as, according to Ray, whale/shill/
domestic abuser/employment discriminator/
provider/beta/potential rapist/John/does
this list end(?) Takahesi Ogamori. He must
LOVE me!!! :-x
Ray wants Google to stop archiving his USENET posts.
But he said to me about something I wrote,
"The truth is that people get sued pretty harshly for what you've been
pulling on me. You also have called yourself a shill, and like it or not, I
can quote that with impunity."
Can Google also quote his USENET posts with impunity?
<snicker>
|
| |
| |
|
