Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
Accuser's apology letter



"s_knight8"
10/12/2004 8:55:14 PM


In addition to the two lies she admitted to, she adds a couple more details.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1012041kobe1.html
 
 
"Blazer Fan Dan"
10/12/2004 5:58:57 PM


s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> scribbled:
In addition to the two lies she admitted to, she adds a couple more
details.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1012041kobe1.html
she has pretty poor penmanship.
--
"if the women don't find you handsome, you haven't bought them enough
beer."
 
 
" bozak"
10/12/2004 9:13:27 PM


"Blazer Fan Dan" <me@server.net> wrote in message news:2t3cubF1qmk3jU1@uni-berlin.de...
s_knight8 <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> scribbled:
she has pretty poor penmanship.
not to mention the #@&@
is insane...
 
 
"Alex"
10/13/2004 5:50:27 PM


"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:ckhudi$sal@dispatch.concentric.net...
In addition to the two lies she admitted to, she adds a couple more details.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1012041kobe1.html
All she's saying is still hearsay.
Who is to know what more she lied about. She calls her lies
"a mix-up", but then she goes on to state she _lied_ because
she didn't think detective Winters believed her.
Hmmm... did she also lie because she didn't think she
could collect if she told the truth?
1) She lied before
2) The dna evidence proves she's lying about a
lot more - like not having sex _after_ she was "raped".
Alex
 
 
"Mr. Misogynist"
10/14/2004 6:23:56 PM


....but not anymore. Should it be a crime? Yeah, I guess, but it is
taken far more seriously than it should be. We live in the era of the
victim, where all forms of victims are glorified.
Rape is seen as the worst of all crimes. "Sex crimes" news stories
flash, oh the humanity. But I have been wondering if they are as big a
deal as they have been made out to be.
For example, if a women were tied up and her arms were slowly pounded
into mush with a hammer, piece by piece, the ends of fingers first then
the rest of the finger... all the way up the arm to the shoulder,
slowly for 8 hours. She would be awarded no special shields at trial,
no special services. No assault crimes organizations for victims of
assault.
But if a man sticks his penis into a women's vagina against her will
and it lasts for only 5 minutes, she is protected by rape shield laws
and is awarded all kinds of protections. It seems as though protection
the vagina is more important than protecting the rest of a person.
Also, I have seen plenty of women doing crazy things with their vaginas
on video. The only difference between those women and rape victims is
one word "consent". So why does consent turn an act some woman would
normally perform into this horrible, terrible, life scarring event?
If I got punched in the face and the attacker ran off, yeah it would
hurt for a few days , yeah I'd be upset, but then I would get over it.
I wouldn't need shield laws to protect my identity from the attacker. I
wouldn't need counseling. Same goes if a group of girls tied me up and
raped me in a heterosexual fashion.
 
 
"Tom"
10/15/2004 1:28:45 AM


There's an old saying:
"People are not hurt so much by what happens to them, but by their OPINION
of what happened to them."
Most women who are "inapropriately" touched are not really that "scarred for
life" by the experience but after everybody in the world TELLS them they
should be scarred for live, they start feeling that way.
 
 
"claire"
10/15/2004 2:11:57 AM




"Mr. Misogynist" <ydalenog@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1097803436.336461.286960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

...but not anymore. Should it be a crime? Yeah, I guess, but it is
taken far more seriously than it should be. We live in the era of the
victim, where all forms of victims are glorified.
Rape is seen as the worst of all crimes. "Sex crimes" news stories
flash, oh the humanity. But I have been wondering if they are as big a
deal as they have been made out to be.
For example, if a women were tied up and her arms were slowly pounded
into mush with a hammer, piece by piece, the ends of fingers first then
the rest of the finger... all the way up the arm to the shoulder,
slowly for 8 hours. She would be awarded no special shields at trial,
no special services. No assault crimes organizations for victims of
assault.
But if a man sticks his penis into a women's vagina against her will
and it lasts for only 5 minutes, she is protected by rape shield laws
and is awarded all kinds of protections. It seems as though protection
the vagina is more important than protecting the rest of a person.
Also, I have seen plenty of women doing crazy things with their vaginas
on video. The only difference between those women and rape victims is
one word "consent". So why does consent turn an act some woman would
normally perform into this horrible, terrible, life scarring event?
If I got punched in the face and the attacker ran off, yeah it would
hurt for a few days , yeah I'd be upset, but then I would get over it.
I wouldn't need shield laws to protect my identity from the attacker. I
wouldn't need counseling. Same goes if a group of girls tied me up and
raped me in a heterosexual fashion.
You are a lonely, lonely man.
 
 
Report this post for offensive content


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004