|
|
|
|
| |
| |
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
TdN wrote:
Is the Google Motion to Dismiss on PACER yet? Inquiring minds want to know.
T.
|
| |
| |
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss in
my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
-Shell
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
TdN wrote:
|
| |
| |
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise, and in doing
so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively influence others
into thinking I may not have a case against them.
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when people
do this, and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under a statute
that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
|
| |
| |
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise, and in
doing so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively influence
others into thinking I may not have a case against them.
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when
people do this, and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under
a statute that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
.....nah, too easy. I won't bother. :)
-Shell
|
| |
| |
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
....nah, too easy. I won't bother. :)
I'll take that as your refusal to retract your misguided statements above.
|
| |
| |
Have to call my buddies at Wilson. They have outdone themselves in the
butt whooping dept this time. This is a great laugh. Parker really
screwed up this time. Bet he doesn't even have a clue where he really
blew it. I can see this brief being quoted every time he brings one of
his lawsuits.
Howard Stanton wrote:
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
TdN wrote:
|
| |
| |
Nunya wrote:
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss in
my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
It is a good butt kicking
"...no basis in reality."
Just one of the many gems in this brief. Great reading.
I think that says it all. :)
-Shell
|
| |
| |
In article <zT1bd.4581$wV4.3755@trndny03>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
I'll take that as your refusal to retract your misguided statements above.
And Google, and other non-mentally ill people will take it as further
indication of your illness and frivilous intentions.
In an attempt to eliminate disruption caused by this individual in the
alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, along with spam and misinformation, alt.seduction.fast
now also has a website and discussion forums in which this individual is prevented
from posting. The website forums have proven extremely popular and successful since
off-topic material and bad behavior is prevented there. See the footer in the message
for more information.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
New visitors to alt.seduction.fast are welcomed and directed to the main website
http://www.fastseduction.com
Most seduction discussion has been relocated to the forums on this website, which
can be accessed through your news reader just like this newsgroup, or through a
web interface. The forums were created as an alternative to the large amount of
spamming, misinformation, and offensive behavior by a high-volume poster known to
unfotunately suffer disabling mental illness, in the regular alt.seduction.fast
newsgroup.
Anyone can read forum articles but registration is required (which can be done
through an anonymous email account) in order to post articles. This effectively
prevents disruptive individuals from posting and results in a MUCH more useful and
productive forum.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
|
| |
| |
Howard Stanton <HS3127@Intell-transport.com> wrote in message news:<416C86FB.1F4D@Intell-transport.com>...
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
Howard, is there any notation of when this is dockted for a hearing
before the Judge? If it has been docketed, I would love to have a
front row seat to see the fireworks!
Popcorn, anyone?
Lee Darrow, C.H.
http://www.leedarrow.com
|
| |
| |
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
Howard, is there any notation of when this is dockted for a hearing
before the Judge? If it has been docketed, I would love to have a
front row seat to see the fireworks!
Motions to dismiss are *rarely* granted.
|
| |
| |
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:3j5bd.2195$uN4.885@trndny05:
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
Howard, is there any notation of when this is dockted for a hearing
before the Judge? If it has been docketed, I would love to have a
front row seat to see the fireworks!
Motions to dismiss are *rarely* granted.
Based on your numerous posts to this newsgroup I place absolutely no faith
in anything that you write or have written.
--
KTO
------------------
Everything I post is my opinion. If you don't like my opinions then
killfile me, if you have the balls.
|
| |
| |
Nomen Nescio wrote:
In article <zT1bd.4581$wV4.3755@trndny03>
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
....nah, too easy. I won't bother. :)
And Google, and other non-mentally ill people will take it as further
indication of your illness and frivilous intentions.
In an attempt to eliminate disruption caused by this individual in the
alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, along with spam and misinformation, alt.seduction.fast
now also has a website and discussion forums in which this individual is prevented
from posting. The website forums have proven extremely popular and successful since
off-topic material and bad behavior is prevented there. See the footer in the message
for more information.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
New visitors to alt.seduction.fast are welcomed and directed to the main website
http://www.fastseduction.com
Most seduction discussion has been relocated to the forums on this website, which
can be accessed through your news reader just like this newsgroup, or through a
web interface. The forums were created as an alternative to the large amount of
spamming, misinformation, and offensive behavior by a high-volume poster known to
unfotunately suffer disabling mental illness, in the regular alt.seduction.fast
newsgroup.
Anyone can read forum articles but registration is required (which can be done
through an anonymous email account) in order to post articles. This effectively
prevents disruptive individuals from posting and results in a MUCH more useful and
productive forum.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I am seriously considering doing the same for this GROUP... if I do,
anyone interested?
|
| |
| |
WOW, we just got back from the game in NYC (DAMN YANKEES!)
(although the fans near us were super kind to Red Sox fans)
and we get to read the funny papers. Google explained grp-ie's
failures quite nicely. "...no basis in reality." HAHAHAHAHA
Fuz and I can't stop laughing over it. grp-ie is sunk, he'll
be counter-sued into filing chapter whatever as he has said b4
he would if counter sued. Maybe they will sue his mommie, since
all his crap came from her home. I hope not, she's suffered enough.
Fuz has faxed his lawyer a copy, and now they too can have a
happy day, starting with laughing at a complete loser: grp-ie..
Thanks, Google...
JJT
But hey, let's have a sing song:
(to the tune of Adam Ant's "Goody 2 shoes")
With the Lawsuits happen
So fast he can't hide
You know he's gonna wet'em, wet'em
Better get the Jet-dry, wet-dry..
Blame all the "..@$#*ing judges.."
In all the "..@$#*ing court.." (s)
But it was your "..@$#*ing lawsuit.." (lawsuit)
that sinks yer own boat, own boat..
Grp-ie, bo, Grp-ie ho, grp-ie grp-ie Boo Hoo
Grp-ie, bo, Grp-ie ho, grp-ie grp-ie Boo Hoo
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Threats to minor children follow
You know he needs help, big time.
You pretend to be a woman..
so much you you wanna die..
Cause some jerk off loser loser
beat you on the flip side, flip side..
living 24/7 in the chatrooms
Crying words that you dream
"..if it were legal.." (legal)
".wishes.." that you do mean, do mean..
Grp-ie, bo, Grp-ie ho, grp-ie grp-ie Boo Hoo
Grp-ie, bo, Grp-ie ho, grp-ie grp-ie Boo Hoo
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Subtle innuendos follow
'hellen's' works the east side...
No one's gonna tell him
What's wrong or what's right
not the "..@$#*ing judges.." (judges)
or his dollies he holds tight, each nite..
Look out or they'll tell you
You're a "loonie-toon"
Run away for a good cry, good cry..
come back far too soon, too soon..
Blame all the "..@$#*ing judges.."
In all the "..@$#*ing court.." (s)
But it was your "..@$#*ing lawsuit.." (lawsuit)
that sinks yer own boat, own boat..
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Threats to minor children follow
You know he needs help, big time.
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Subtle innuendos follow
'hellen's' working the west side...
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Subtle innuendos follow
You know he needs help, big time.
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Don't date don't work - what do you do?
Threats to minor children follow
There must be something inside
|
| |
| |
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 03:58:40 GMT, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com>
wrote:
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise,
No, stupid. It's just his opinion.
and in doing
so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively influence others
into thinking I may not have a case against them.
My God, you're absolutely full of yourself, aren't you?
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when people
do this,
No, only when a Pennsylvania attorney does.
and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under a statute
that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
For one to recover attorney's fees, one must have incurred them.
Pro se parties cannot recover attorney's fees in Pennsylvania. See
WESTMORELAND COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and JOHN K.
WHITEFORD v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, et al. 723
A.2d 1084, 1999
For a "paralegal", you really don't know your own state's laws, do
you? Either that, or your "legal research skills" are sorely lacking.
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
Kindly @$#* off, you microcephalic moron.
Falc.
|
| |
| |
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:03:11 GMT, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com>
wrote:
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
Howard, is there any notation of when this is dockted for a hearing
before the Judge? If it has been docketed, I would love to have a
front row seat to see the fireworks!
Motions to dismiss are *rarely* granted.
Because most lawsuits have a factual basis that states a claim.
Unlike yours.
Falc.
|
| |
| |
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise, and in
doing so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively influence
others into thinking I may not have a case against them.
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when
people do this, and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under
a statute that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
While a person can file any frivolous piece of #@($, that does not give it
merit. I believe you are full of #@($, and have no legal basis for the above
claims. I further believe your conduct is motivated by a deeply rooted drive
to feel control over others, interfere with their lives and otherwise cause
them inconvienence and or pain. Kindly cease and desist.
--
Rusty
The preceeding message reflects my beliefs and opinions. Veracity of
statements is left to the common sense of the reader.
|
| |
| |
Your long history as a "vexatious litigant" is noted also. I think you
should file a few more lawsuits, so the courts will finally see you for what
you are and put you in the hospital where I believe you might just get some
help. Obviously you cannot play with others, so perhaps you should go
somewhere that you can be protected from the stress of personal
interactions.
It's for your own good, and the side benefit is that the rest of us would be
rid of you. So file on herpes boy! Make momma proud.....
BM
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise, and in
doing so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively influence
others into thinking I may not have a case against them.
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when
people do this, and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under
a statute that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
|
| |
| |
Only when it's obvious that the case is totall bull#@($. Obvious to the
sane that is. After reading what you have had to say for the last few
months, I would really have to ask that question.
Mr. "Gordon", are you nuts?
BM
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
Howard, is there any notation of when this is dockted for a hearing
before the Judge? If it has been docketed, I would love to have a
front row seat to see the fireworks!
Motions to dismiss are *rarely* granted.
|
| |
| |
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to
dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise, and in
doing
so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively influence others
into thinking I may not have a case against them.
you don't have a case. wake up, fathead. if you'd ever learn anything from
history you'd also be aware that only *you* cause yourself "damage", scabby.
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when
people
do this, and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under a
statute
that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
and they have the right to laugh at you, dummy. no lawyer has or ever will
take your laughable cases. you are nothing more than an empty windbag with
your lame threats of "recovery of attorney fees". if you only had a mere
inkling of just how ignorant and futile you look when you regurgitate your
blowhard threats, lamebrain...
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire to mute my
criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative staff, and how they treat
said staff.
you still thinking that? no wonder you get laughed at all the time, kro-mag
head.
Kindly cease and desist.
kindly shut up, stupid.
how you like them apples, bonehead?
aardvark
|
| |
| |
"Nunya" <yah@right.com> posted <Xu1bd.859$HG3.342@lakeread04> in
alt.seduction.fast on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:42:48 -0400:
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss in
my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
The best part is "Parker's history of vexatious litigation".
Oh...that is just grand.
Almost every case ole Gordo has filed has been dismissed.
Oh..almost forgot.
Where is my defamation lawsuit KOOK?
--
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)
http://www.insurgent.org
Try not to let your mind wander...
It is too small and fragile to be out by itself.
On Tue, 27 May 2003 12:19:08 I was Wollkooked:
This spammer is full of #@($. Get out of my mail or face legal action.
I have no such email addresses listed nor would I remove them if I did. The
spammer in question is a spammer--that's it, he has harassed and defamed me
and my companies for 7 years now and I really don't care what you want.
The ISP sending me this threat is hosting a defamation website that is
being sued and will be removed from the net+ damages. <boink>--I have
already requested at least THREE times that this abuser cease and desist
mailing me, therefore I ask that you take action to kill this offending
account immediately.
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
Ouch! Daa-aaaa-aaamn!! :D I've seen a fair number of motions to dismiss
in my day (as admin, not lawyer)...but...OUCH!
"...no basis in reality."
I think that says it all. :)
I think you just gave an opinion that requires legal expertise,
I think he simply repeated a comment from a legal brief.
and in doing so you are causing me damage by attempting to negatively
influence others into thinking I may not have a case against them.
It's causing you damage to state the truth? Interesting concept.
Besides which, he's quoting someone else's remarks in the context of a
lawsuit, which makes the comments priveleged and nonactionable. I would
think you would know that if you knew anything about law. Oh that's
right, you don't.
This is why I can keep referring to you as a "continued and inexcusable
failure" because that was the term used by the judge in the dismissal of
one of your "vexatious lawsuits". It's a priveleged comment and
nonactionable.
I have the right to file a complaint with the PA Bar Association when people
do this, and can pursue civil remedies for injunctive relief under a statute
that allows for the recovery of attorney fees.
I think you have enough to deal with without getting laughed at over
this. And I suspect you will not find a lawyer willing to take on your
case unless you pay them up front, because they'd know that you have no
case. And a pro-se litigant can't get attorney's fees. Kay v. Ehrler,
499 U.S. 432, 111 S.Ct. 1435, (1991), "The Circuits are in agreement,
however, on the proposition that a pro se litigant who is not a lawyer
is not entitled to attorney's fees." [499 U.S. 436]
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
The site has evidently been updated recently. I believe it can also be
accessed by the domain name ray-gordon.com or ray-gordon.net.
HS
Howard, is there any notation of when this is dockted for a hearing
before the Judge? If it has been docketed, I would love to have a
front row seat to see the fireworks!
Motions to dismiss are *rarely* granted.
In your case(s), "rarely" = 100%.
|
| |
| |
JJT wrote:
WOW, we just got back from the game in NYC (DAMN YANKEES!)
(although the fans near us were super kind to Red Sox fans)
and we get to read the funny papers. Google explained grp-ie's
failures quite nicely. "...no basis in reality." HAHAHAHAHA
Fuz and I can't stop laughing over it. grp-ie is sunk, he'll
be counter-sued into filing chapter whatever as he has said b4
he would if counter sued.
I believe if someone gets punitive damages they are *nondischargeable*
in bankruptcy.
|
| |
| |
I wish to thank Jay for letting me use his account, although he's paid off
for his services well :) . I have re-read Parker's problem with Google, and to
be honest, he's in deep dark smelly doo-doo. Google will handle him and shake
his fantasy land failures at the core. My lawyer read it, and he said that
Google will not lose, that given all of Parker's Usenet posting history, which
Google has complete records of, the day it reaches a judge, it's all over.
I want to be there when it happens, but I think I'll just laugh from the
sidelines. Parker isn't worth my time to laugh at in person. I have met
him, asked him for a light outside his mom's house. I spit on him as he
walked off. I did not miss. And if/when I see him again, it's his face.
Because, Parker, I still have not forgotten the threats you made to Jenny,
and me, and Jay, and others. You will pay for them, this I swear. Be it
in person, in or out of court, or by having the world laugh at you via
the upcoming movie. Maybe all 3. You will never know till it's too late.
Now, Jay and I are off to the track, maybe spend a few 100 or so, then
off to the clubs. Friday we'll be at Fenway Park. Wanna come, Parker?
Too bad, I have offered you many chances for a good time, but no more for you.
Not, as other's have said..shut the @$#* up and eat your apples..
Worms and all..
Fuz 'da Bun
PS: Hi to all of you who remember me, esp Shell. May God Bless and
keep you and your's forever. EVERYBODY!: DO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE !
|
| |
| |
Ray Gordon wrote:
Further, I think your conduct is motivated by your desire
to mute my criticisms of why lawyers hire admininstrative
staff, and how they treat said staff.
Kindly cease and desist.
....nah, too easy. I won't bother. :)
I'll take that as your refusal to retract your misguided
statements above.
I second his misguided statement above.
Are you a nutter?
|
| |
| |
Howard Stanton <HS3127@Intell-transport.com> wrote in message news:<416C86FB.1F4D@Intell-transport.com>...
I believe a copy of the pdf file can be downloaded at
http://www.mycolumbus.net/chewonthis/show_case_doc_8,174532,,,,1.pdf
That made my day.
Oh, my God. I don't think I have laughed so hard in a looooooonnnnng
time. Whoever wrote that motion is a comic genius.
And has an impressive grasp of case law. I had forgotten about the
Tiffany case and Kathleen R. v. The City of Livermore entirely. The
parallels to Mr. Parker's action in both cases are quite
thought-provoking.
I also liked the quotation from the opinion that said that claims
needed to be clearly stated so the court didn't have to "fish for a
gold coin in a bucket of mud" becaue "judges have better things to do
with their time".
Hee!
T.
|
| |
| |
John Michaels <hpnotst@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<mK2bd.12418$nj.1755@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>...
Have to call my buddies at Wilson. They have outdone themselves in the
butt whooping dept this time. This is a great laugh.
I have to agree that this is sheer @$#*ing genius. If I ever meet the
people who wrote this brief, the drinks are on me.
T.
Parker really
screwed up this time. Bet he doesn't even have a clue where he really
blew it. I can see this brief being quoted every time he brings one of
his lawsuits.
Howard Stanton wrote:
|
| |
| |
TdN wrote:
...
I also liked the quotation from the opinion that said that claims
needed to be clearly stated so the court didn't have to "fish for a
gold coin in a bucket of mud" becaue "judges have better things to do
with their time".
I told you it was funny as hell. I was laughing my ass off reading it.
Oooo, wait, now Parker is going to chime in with "Is that your legal opinion,
counseler?"... c'mon, Ray, ask it!
There are so many nuggets of quotable gold in there, someone should to a top 10.
--
Form <formhandle@fastseduction.com>
Fast Seduction 101 - http://www.fastseduction.com/
Class is now in session...
Say goodbye to trolls, newsloons, and spam.
Gain (FREE) access to the moderated ASF newsgroups at:
http://www.fastseduction.com/discussion/
|
| |
| |
*snippys*
Fuz 'da Bun
PS: Hi to all of you who remember me, esp Shell. May God Bless and
keep you and your's forever. EVERYBODY!: DO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE !
Hiya! *waves* :) LTNS! Hope life's treating ya well!
-Shell
|
| |
| |
She snipped this part of his post:
"I want to be there when it happens, but I think I'll just laugh from the
sidelines. Parker isn't worth my time to laugh at in person. I have met
him, asked him for a light outside his mom's house. I spit on him as he
walked off. I did not miss. And if/when I see him again, it's his face."
I guess she has no problem with men who behave that way. Her behavior seems
to make that clear.
|
| |
| |
in article 2lhbd.101$qL1.53@trndny07, Ray Gordon at ray@cybersheet.com wrote
on 10/13/04 5:44 PM:
She snipped this part of his post:
"I want to be there when it happens, but I think I'll just laugh from the
sidelines. Parker isn't worth my time to laugh at in person. I have met
him, asked him for a light outside his mom's house. I spit on him as he
walked off. I did not miss. And if/when I see him again, it's his face."
I guess she has no problem with men who behave that way. Her behavior seems
to make that clear.
Gordon has some odd priorities.
Apparently, it's OK to cheer as people you disagree with are incinerated or
jump to their deaths from a burning tower but it's not OK to spit at someone
who would cheer.
|
| |
| |
I'm really glad you are too cheap to go to bars where the big people hang
out. You would spend a small fortune getting the drinks that were thrown in
your face, out of your clothes....
Twit.....
BM
She snipped this part of his post:
"I want to be there when it happens, but I think I'll just laugh from the
sidelines. Parker isn't worth my time to laugh at in person. I have met
him, asked him for a light outside his mom's house. I spit on him as he
walked off. I did not miss. And if/when I see him again, it's his face."
I guess she has no problem with men who behave that way. Her behavior
seems to make that clear.
|
| |
| |
Gordon has some odd priorities.
Apparently, it's OK to cheer as people you disagree with are incinerated
or
jump to their deaths from a burning tower but it's not OK to spit at
someone
who would cheer.
Cops call spitting on someone assault.
He threatened to do it again.
Toss in all his other conduct for the past year or so and it makes for a
compelling charge.
|
| |
| |
| |
