|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>
> I did apply for 90-100 jobs right after I found out Penn's position. I got
> four interviews, no offers, and three letters of high praise for my
> qualifications. I was not allowed to amend the complaint to include that
> p
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
">I haven't talked to Geragos since before the retainer was signed."
You really *should.* Ask him to define "day in Court" for you while you're at
it. I bet he uses Black's.... <g>
>"(I have talked to members of his st
|
|
|
You stated <soldiers need lawyers to get out of the Army> These folks are
volunteer and work for salary, benefits, etc. Few want to get out IMO.
What soldiers need lawyers for is TARGET PRACTICE.
--
Jerry
<jnn7@webtv.net> wrote in message
|
|
|
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:50:34 GMT, "la n." <nilita2004NOSPAM@yahoo.com>
be#@($teth down into alt.war.terrorism :
>Ryan Lankford, Libertarian Warrior wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:07:30 GMT, "la n." <nilita2004NOSPAM@yahoo.com>
>> be#@($teth dow
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>>ienjball wrote:
>> If that were true, they would drop the charges.
">They can't. They're in too deep, and they would never be able stand up to
the publicity if they were to do that. The stakes are too high. They ha
|
|
|
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 03:07:30 GMT, "la n." <nilita2004NOSPAM@yahoo.com>
be#@($teth down into alt.war.terrorism :
>Ryan Lankford, Libertarian Warrior wrote:
>
>>
>> I served during our soire into Somalia and had a lot of friends come
>> home in bo
|
|
|
>Ken Smith wrote
"> And assuming procedural error can be shown, what is the remedy?"
A GAZILLION bucks and a shiny new tinfoil hat.
">After all, Cam was charged on information prior to the indictment, and all
you ought to get is a prelim. More
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
">And you know that that sort of thing isn't easy to come by. Moreover, I
should think (or at least I should HOPE) that you have learned too well from
the School of Hard Knocks what can happen when you go into court long on
|
|
|
>Kent Wills wrote
>"Darn the socks if you *might* have something here. I've discussed this with
Lindsay. She feels that a four year old probably wouldn't go to such a place
on her own. However, she certainly might with someone she trusted, like her
|
|
|
"Barbara Schwarz" <StilllovingMarty@myway.com> wrote in message
news:bf456302.0410161038.7e98f4cd@posting.google.com...
> "Magoo" <magoo44@att.net> wrote in message
> news:<sM1cd.703578$Gx4.121524@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
>> "Faxhor"
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>There's something to be said here, but alas I can't say it right now.
Translation: You'll have to wait for either the book or the movie.
But what *did* you say on the six pm news, Ted ???
-------
have a GREAT day
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>>ienjball wrote:
>> Make no mistake that this case will be decided by a jury.
>Actually, this is FAR from certain.
Wellllllllll..... we'll know more about *that* on Thursday, wont we ??
------
have a GREAT day !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:32:24 -0400, "<0>" <danderous@irony.net>
be#@($teth down into alt.war.terrorism :
>
>It would be hypocrisy for the kind of combat dodgers that pushed war but don't
>have the guts to do it themselves (Limbaugh, Cheney, etc.) to
|
|
|
arnie lerma wrote:
> Just how long would I have to run a small electric current through
> your body, while telling you things that you wanted to hear, before
> you became convinced that I held the secrets of the universe?
I'm afraid I don't quite g
|
|
|
Kurt Knoll wrote:
> There is a complete listing about banned books in Germany out there take
> a look for it
I bet you cannot produce neither the list itself, nor any reference to a
list of books banned in Germany that comprises every book on the
|
|
|
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, LeMod Pol wrote:
> Well I AM prejudiced against German cars and have been since WW II.
Can't blame you, there. VWs in particular are Hitler's revenge upon the
world.
|
|
|
It would be hypocrisy for the kind of combat dodgers that pushed war but don't
have the guts to do it themselves (Limbaugh, Cheney, etc.) to gripe about those
Reservists not carrying out a "suicide mission" that was clearly a case of
reckless endange
|
|
|
EditorialStaff <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
news:C1J36ZPI38276.5971875@anonymous:
>> And you reduce it all to a snide remark in your juvenile
>> flame wars.
>
> Oh no, this is a deeply-held opinion. Want to schedule a
>
|
|
|
LOL, if I wasn't in Englewood Florida right now, I might join you. I have a
small little thing tonight, just a few friends over and a little
wine....have a good time. Not much on outdoor sports. I'm an indoor kind
of girl...heheh
BM
"JJT" <jj
|
|
|
"Teresita" <teresita@dataway.com> wrote in message
news:9f11n0duv8a40lorammnagco3ln4offguu@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:28:13 -0500, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Heck, he has me living in Denver. Odd since I told him I was
|
|
|
"Kurt Knoll" <menachem2@monarch.net> wrote in message
news:Gkfcd.734149$M95.355996@pd7tw1no...
> Go and suck Sharon's penis.
The way you sucked Hitler's, moronazi?
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>ienjball wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>ienjball wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>I won't argue the point about the psychologist.
>>>>>
>>>>>There's nothing to argue. I thin
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, I've just been having you on. I've never dropped acid.
>>
>>Either Ted Kaldis is a liar, or Ted Kaldis is a liar.
>
>>Why am I not su
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>>>>None of this is to say that a jury of his peers might not acquit him,
>>>>>
>>>>>If this ever gets to court.
>>>>
>>>>So, Cam has filed a fede
|
|
|
The only thing I can blame you for is to distort the facts. As I said
everyone has to believe all of you holocaust or get Victimized.
Kurt Knoll.
=
"Barbara Schwarz" <StilllovingMarty@myway.com> wrote in message
news:bf456302.0410161022.5b507fe9@po
|
|
|
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, LeMod Pol wrote:
>
> > You don't expect li'l jeffy, the killfile prince, to admit that he is a
> > bigtime loser, or do you?? <G>
>
> Naw. I mean, he got all huffy and flouncy when it was not
|
|
|
Go and suck Sharon's penis.
Kurt Knoll.
=
"Barbara Schwarz" <StilllovingMarty@myway.com> wrote in message
news:bf456302.0410161017.68fb22fc@posting.google.com...
> "Kurt Knoll" <menachem2@monarch.net> wrote in message
news:<Pg%bd.112162$a41.103675
|
|
|
You are a screw up Barbara the correct word for insult is Beleidigung
hop you remember it next time you show your face.
Kurt Knoll..
"Barbara Schwarz" <StilllovingMarty@myway.com> wrote in message
news:bf456302.0410161010.6e7a0992@posting.google.com
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<417166A0.3DB44BA9@worldnet.att.net>...
> ienjball wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> ienjball wrote:
>
> >>> I won't argue the point about the psychologist.
>
> >>
|
|
|
"jitney" <jtnospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b8002be7.0410160054.6b302efd@posting.google.com...
> If I went to the local cemetary and started digging up graves and
> taking away the contents, I would be arrested and prosecuted for grave
> rob
|
|
|
ay Gordon wrote:
>
> I conclude that they are responsible for what goes on on their own domain,
> but if they name a separate publisher, then I sue the publisher. In the
> absence of the name of a publisher, I sue the domain owner. Standard.
It
|
|
|
am totally speechless at the venom displayed on the very day when the rest
of us were in shock at the loss of all the innocent lives. And they were
innocent. Like it or not, your words were inappropriate, wrong and just
mean. I hope they come bac
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> I haven't talked to Geragos since before the retainer was signed.
> You really *should.*
Yeah, well, he spends a lot of his time up in Redwood City these days.
> Ask him to define "day in Cou
|
|
|
'Sharon is a butcher'
16/10/2004 14:48 - (SA)
Jabaliya - Palestinians on Saturday surveyed the widespread devastation
inflicted by Israeli troops during an 18-day military operation in the
northern Gaza Strip, after the troops redeployed overnight
|
|
|
roblem Tenant in Condominium Association, Now Problem Association.
I need help with deciphering these city ordinances, please:
A. It is unlawful for any person to emit or cause to be emitted any noise
beyond the boundaries of his/her premises i
|
|
|
"Barbara Schwarz" <StilllovingMarty@myway.com> wrote in message
news:bf456302.0410161010.6e7a0992@posting.google.com...
> "Kurt Knoll" <menachem2@monarch.net> wrote in message
news:<el%bd.112167$a41.95123@pd7tw2no>...
> > Du bist ein riesen ridviech
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>> ienjball wrote:
>>> If that were true, they would drop the charges.
>> They can't. They're in too deep, and they would never be able stand up to
>> the publicity if they were to do that. The sta
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>> And you know that that sort of thing isn't easy to come by. Moreover, I
>> should think (or at least I should HOPE) that you have learned too well
>> from the School of Hard Knocks what can happen w
|
|
|
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:14:30 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin"
Why Dianetics is so Hard to Read AND how Shock Therapy helped Win WWII
Want to know why Dianetics is so well known as being hard to read and
uses so many odd words ?
That's because Hubbard
|
|
|
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:55:54 GMT, "Kurt Knoll" <menachem2@monarch.net>
wrote:
>This all depends what people think about your
Why Dianetics is so Hard to Read AND how Shock Therapy helped Win WWII
Want to know why Dianetics is so well known as be
|
|
|
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:26:35 +0200, me9@privacy.net wrote:
>
>This is simply not true, as can be seen on Amazon. Therefore, the rest
>of your posting is irrelevant. EOT.
Just how long would I have to run a small electric current through
your b
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> ienjball wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>ienjball wrote:
>>
>>>>I won't argue the point about the psychologist.
>>>
>>>There's nothing to argue. I think I was told it's based on case law in
>>>California, but I'm
|
|
|
n Sat, 16 Oct 2004 14:39:21 GMT, "Kurt Knoll" <menachem2@monarch.net>
wrote:
>
><me9@privacy.net> wrote in message
>news:ckqipn$hdg$04$1@news.t-online.com...
>> Kurt Knoll wrote:
>> > Looking into antique book stores is not the normal way to go si
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>>Acid is forever -- and Teddi's admission that he was a user (consuming
>>>>"electric beers" and then defining what he meant by "electric") explains
>>>>a
|
|
|
What is more important contaminated fuel or the life of a 20 year
old.......?
~
The orders are bull#@($ orders ..orders to commit suicide are not orders
~that is the same thing the terrorists are doing...
the motive for all this Iraq crap says th
|
|
|
jtnospam@yahoo.com (jitney) says in
news:b8002be7.0410160054.6b302efd@posting.google.com:
> If I went to the local cemetary and started digging up
> graves and taking away the contents, I would be arrested
> and prosecuted for grave robbery, which
|
|
|
================================================================
CMU PROFESSOR DAVID TOURETZKY - NO EXPERT ON THE 1ST AMENDMENT
================================================================
Carnegie Mellon University Professor David Tourtetzky's
|
|
|
ordon Roy Parker wrote:
>
>> Besides, how can the man who cheered the 9/11 attacks make
>> any comment on the feelings of the Browns?
>
> I didn't cheer on any attacks, I just said the victims weren't
> angels, and they weren't.
We still have AL
|
|
|
Rasta Robert <rr@dds.nl.ReMoVe_ThIs.invalid> wrote in message news:<slrncn1emh.3am.rr@picard.cistron.nl>...
> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.religion.scientology.]
> On 2004-10-15, Faxhor <faxhor@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Phil Scott,
> >
> > I told
|
